logo
Sask. author's anti-racism book is among 596 banned by U.S. Department of Defense for use in its schools

Sask. author's anti-racism book is among 596 banned by U.S. Department of Defense for use in its schools

Yahoo6 days ago
A Saskatoon author is still reeling after finding out his first non-fiction book has been banned by the U.S. Department of Defense for use in its schools.
Khodi Dill's Stay Up racism, resistance, and reclaiming Black freedom is a book aimed at young adults to act as a primer on anti-racism theory.
It first hit the shelves in the fall of 2023, and uses Dill's experience growing up a Black kid on the Prairies to shed light on how white supremacy functions in North America and to help readers understand how racism impacts their lives.
"A couple of days ago, one of my editors, Kari at Annick Press, reached out to me and told me that he hated to be the bearer of bad news," Dill said.
He was informed students at 161 schools run by the U.S. Department of Defense, would not have access to his book.
Dill's book is one of 596 that are banned on the department's list, which was made public earlier this month by a federal judge hearing the case of E.K. v. the Department of Defense.
Twelve students currently attending Department of Defense operated schools, are suing the department for "scrubbing references to race and gender from its libraries and lessons," according to an April court document.
The students are in grades ranging from pre-kindergarten to high school, within the United States and around the world, according to the document.
"If you were to look at the list of banned books, which is now publicly available, you'll see that a lot of the book titles revolve around things like racism, gender, things like, you know, trying to achieve equity within our society for different groups," Dill said.
"I have a feeling that those are the sorts of ideas that are a little bit more threatening to this administration that's in the U.S. right now."
Dill said a number of Saskatoon teachers have used his book as a tool in the classroom.
However, he has noticed further east, there tends to be a stricter "vetting process" when it comes to the books used for teaching — especially where the N-word is concerned — like in his book.
"Because it examines my experiences as a Black person and examines anti-Black racism in general, it does feature the use of the N-word, " Dill said, adding that when it is used, it's in a critical way or it's documenting its use against Black people.
Many schools have now implemented policies that have completely banned the use of the N-word for study, he said.
"How do you authentically represent that time period and those atrocities without addressing the language that was used?"
These types of policies contribute to the erasure of Black experiences, he said.
"Yeah, some censorship that might be well-intentioned, but that has some pretty dire consequences in terms of reckoning with the truth and the reality of what has happened and what continues to happen to Black people here in North America."
'Those are red flags': Rutgers professor of sociology
Arlene Stein, a professor of sociology from Rutgers University in New Jersey, said she has had a number of her books flagged for a potential ban by the local government.
Stein has written many research books on subjects relating to gender and sexuality — including one on a campaign in the U.S. against LGBTQ+ rights organized by a Christian organization.
"And in the course of that publication history … local government tried to ban my book," Stein said.
Years later, she was in the process of publishing her book Unbound, which told the story of a transgender man.
"The book was challenged by local library and school board in Galveston, Texas," she said.
Many of the people who make the decisions about these books are doing so in a "very ill-informed way.
"Often they don't even read the books," she said. "They look at titles, if race is in the title, if gender is in the title, if sexuality is in the title … those are red flags."
Stein again pointed to her book Unbound — which she said was not read before it was challenged. "They didn't read it and they ended up deciding not to ban it because they didn't want to take the time to read it," she said.
Stein said having access to knowledge is important and that includes the critical knowledge about race — including books like Dill's Stand Up.
'A chilling effect': PEN America
Kasey Meehan, the program director for Freedom to Read at PEN America, said the organization has been tracking instances of book bans since 2021.
She said books that have been overwhelmingly targeted include those about race, racism, or include characters of colour, LGBTQ+ characters or talk about sexuality and gender or sexual experience.
This stems from "pressure put on school boards or state legislatures that are driving these initiatives down to the schools."
And more recently the federal government is getting involved, Meehan said.
"So it's exactly right that this list of nearly 600 books that have been removed from the Department of Defence schools comes in response to two executive orders that were passed by the Trump administration that restrict discussions of diversity, equity and inclusion."
The impacts have started to trickle down into the literature community, Meehan said.
"It certainly casts a chilling effect across the book industry and across writers and authors."
Public libraries and schools have become more nervous about buying books that may end up on these lists.
It also impacts the authors on these lists, she said. They begin to work under a soft censorship, thinking of how to adapt their work to fit into this atmosphere.
"We should be talking about our history, we should be celebrating all sorts of different identities in our pluralistic society," Meehan said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further
‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further

"And worse than that, it's just not right," the MSNBC host says Texas Republicans are trying to gerrymander the state even further in their favor, and on Tuesday morning, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough could do nothing but scoff at how 'idiotic' their plan is, on top of being anti-democratic. During their discussion, the 'Morning Joe' hosts zeroed in on the fact that Texas Democrats deliberately left the state this week, to avoid Republicans forcing through a vote to redraw the districts and grab another five house seats. More than that, the MSNBC hosts scoffed at the response of Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, who angrily said that the politicians 'abandoned their posts and turned their backs on the constituents they swore to represent.' More from TheWrap 'Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at 'Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further | Video Jimmy Fallon Jokes Trump Fired the Weatherman So Now the East Coast Heat Wave Doesn't Exist | Video Roku Debuts Ad-Free Subscription Service Howdy in Partnership With Lionsgate, WBD, FilmRise Seth Meyers Leaves Jenna Ortega Speechless With Suggestion for Combatting Her 'Resting Bitch Face' | Video 'Oh, my goodness, it's almost like Lincoln talking to Congress at the beginning of the Civil War. The stakes are so high. Oh wait, no they're not Willie!' Scarborough mocked. 'To do what's right for the people of Texas? To take the vote away from anybody in Texas who's basically a Democrat by gerrymandering the districts?' Scarborough then explained how the redistricting would be 'so out of whack' that, even if state legislative races came down to a 50/50 split by voters, Republicans would still win handily. 'That guy, and the rest of the Texas legislature, and Greg Abbott want to rig the system,' Scarborough said. 'They want to make sure that Republicans are over-represented on election day. They want to rig the process. And so they're acting so indignant about it!' The MSNBC host then called out the 'short-sightedness' of the Republicans' plan, arguing that it would open the door for blue states to do the exact same thing. 'If Texas achieves what they want to achieve, then California will go back! And then they will draw up even more rigged lines that will help Democrats,' Scarborough said. 'And New York State will do it, and who knows? Maybe then Florida decides to — I mean, it really is, it's an idiotic thing to do.' 'They used to do it every 10 years, and now, I don't know if the President told them to do this or somebody else told them to do it, but it's just stupid,' he continued. 'And worse than that, it's just not right.' You can watch the full discussion from 'Morning Joe' in the video above. The post 'Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at 'Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

Mamdani preaches from pulpit of radical pastor pushing reparations, abolishing police: 'Brother and friend'
Mamdani preaches from pulpit of radical pastor pushing reparations, abolishing police: 'Brother and friend'

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Mamdani preaches from pulpit of radical pastor pushing reparations, abolishing police: 'Brother and friend'

FIRST ON FOX: New York City socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani appeared at a church over the weekend led by a pastor with a history of controversial statements on race, anti-Israel ties, and who has issued support for reparations. "My profound thanks to Rev. Stephen A. Green and the Greater Allen AME for the honor of addressing their beautiful congregation in Jamaica, Queens this morning," Mamdani posted on X late Sunday. Mamdani spoke at the church for over 10 minutes and delivered a politically charged sermon that weaved in scripture in an attempt to justify his campaign platform. Near the end of his sermon, Mamdani said New York City and the United States are facing a "dark moment." He then called the Trump administration an "authoritarian government" and slammed ICE for "abduct[ing]" immigrants. "That is not justice. It is cruelty and it is criminal. These are our neighbors. These are people who are guilty of only wanting a field of their own to harvest," he continued. He went on to target the issue of affordability in New York City, an issue that has resonated with his supporters, and asked, "What good is New York City being the greatest city in the world if New Yorkers cannot afford to live here?" Green, who called Mamdani his "brother and friend," repeatedly said, "Amen" after the sermon and thanked him for attending. Like Mamdani, who has espoused several controversial political views, Green is no stranger to pushing his radical views on social media. In 2021, he called for a "new U.S. Constitution" on social media, saying that the country needs a document that "guarantees the right to vote, abolishes the electoral college, provides reparations for slavery, guarantees annual income, and so much more." In a 2022 Facebook post, Green, who calls himself a "global thought leader at the intersection of faith and social justice" and an "activist," called on President Biden to establish a commission on reparations because the "impact of slavery and its vestiges are felt in every aspect of life for Black people." "I was proud to be arrested at the DC Airport with my comrades to protect voting rights, DC Statehood, and reparations," Green said in a 2021 Facebook post that included a video of him being arrested. "We must continue to escalate our actions across the nation in order to protect voting rights. This is our revolutionary summer. Hold on, we must keep our eyes on the prize." "Trump's executive order is still entrenched in White Supremacist nationalism," Green posted on Facebook in June 2018. "We can not ease up on our pressure to abolish ICE and open our borders." In another Facebook post that year, Green insisted on "abolish[ing] the system of policing in this nation" and amplified a separate post accusing the system of policing in the United States as being anti-Black. One month after the October 7th Hamas attack on Israel, Green participated in a rally calling for a ceasefire. Pastor Jamal Bryant, who Fox News Digital previously reported has a long history of praising notorious antisemite Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, was one of the leaders at the rally. Bryant is the leading voice behind the recent boycott of Target where liberal activists urged the public not to shop at the retailer in response to the company's rollback of DEI guidelines. Green also led another rally the following February that was promoted as a "peace pilgrammage" for Gaza, saying, "We walked 150 miles to push the Biden administration to demand a ceasefire to protect the lives of all precious Palestinians and to pursue the beloved community." "The Black prophetic tradition calls me to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God as we speak out against genocide, occupation and war," he continued, appearing to take a shot against Israel. In recent weeks, Mamdani has faced an onslaught of attacks amid old interviews and past social media posts being unearthed, including several posts from 2020 and 2021 calling for defunding police. "We need a socialist city council to defund the police," Mamdani posted on X in July 2020. "Queer liberation means defund the police," Mamdani posted on X in November 2020. "Nature is healing," Mandani posted on X in response to a user mocking and laughing at seeing a police officer "crying inside his car." However, last week, in the wake of a Midtown Manhattan shooting that left a NYPD officer dead, Mamdani said his calls to defund the police were made out of "frustration" over George Floyd's death and appeared to distance himself from his past rhetoric. His comments left several in the community unconvinced that he had genuinely turned the page from antagonizing the police and with the belief that the walkback was politically driven as the city reels from the worst mass shooting in half a century. Fox News Digital reached out to the Mamdani campaign and Green for comment.

Iran Gives Update on Conditions for Nuclear Talks With US
Iran Gives Update on Conditions for Nuclear Talks With US

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iran Gives Update on Conditions for Nuclear Talks With US

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran said it won't base its economic strategy on any resumption of nuclear talks with the U.S. and warned it has ways to overcome sanctions if Washington rejects its conditions. "We are currently under sanctions, but we are still carrying out our economic and commercial activities and selling our oil," Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told Iranian Labor News Agency (ILNA). Newsweek has contacted the U.S. State Department for comment. Why It Matters While Iran has not demanded sanctions relief as a precondition for talks, it views lifting sanctions as a key objective of negotiations. Nearly seven months into President Donald Trump's second term—which began with public overtures toward Iran and promises of a new Middle East peace framework—diplomatic progress remains stalled after strikes by Israel and the U.S. deepened mistrust, with Tehran signalling it won't submit to Washington's demand for zero uranium enrichment. With a fragile ceasefire in place, there is the potential for renewed military action to erupt at any moment and develop into a broader confrontation. A man holds an Iranian flag at the start of an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli protest after Friday prayers in Tehran, Iran on July 25, 2025. A man holds an Iranian flag at the start of an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli protest after Friday prayers in Tehran, Iran on July 25, 2025. Vahid Salemi/AP Photo What To Know Gharibabadi, a member of the Iranian negotiating team that held talks with the U.S. prior to strikes on its nuclear facilities, said Tehran remains able to carry out economic and trade activities—including continuing oil exports—even under sweeping sanctions. "They wanted to reduce our oil sales to zero, but they couldn't. Because there are different capacities. We should not tie all the country's destinies to negotiations," he said in an interview with the Iranian Labor News Agency (ILNA). The U.S. issued a new round of sanctions targeting over a hundred individuals, entities and vessels linked to Iran's oil and petrochemical sectors, a measure Iran said was an "assault on the Iranian people." Gharibabadi suggested Iran is awaiting a possible response to the preconditions it has set for resuming nuclear talks, including financial compensation and guarantees against military attack. The U.S. has rejected Iran's call for financial compensation, calling the request "ridiculous." What People Are Saying Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister of Legal and International Affairs Kazem Gharibabadi told ILNA: "If we were able to lift the sanctions through negotiations, that would be great, and this is not a bad step, and we should do it. But if they want to take advantage of the negotiation platform, we should naturally not tie everything to negotiations." U.S. State Department Tammy Bruce told reporters on July 31: "What I can say is that any demands for financial compensation from the United States to the Iranian regime are ridiculous. If the Iranian regime really wanted to save money or alleviate some of the sanctions policy, they would stop taking destabilizing actions." What Happens Next Iran is risking further international sanctions if it fails to reach a nuclear agreement with European countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store