Senators forgo Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds in spending bill
'One thing this bill does not do, unfortunately, is fund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. As everyone knows, Republicans rescinded bipartisan funding we provided for CPB in the first ever partisan rescissions package,' Murray said.
'It is a shameful reality and now communities across the country will suffer the consequences as over 1,500 stations lose critical funding.'
Murray made the remarks as the Senate Appropriations Committee began consideration of the annual bill funding the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education – which has traditionally included funding for CPB since it was established nearly six decades ago.
Earlier this month, Republicans greenlit a bill clawing back already allocated foreign aid and public broadcasting funds, including more than $1 billion in cuts to CPB, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS.
Many Republicans say the cuts are long overdue, singling out NPR and PBS for what they perceive as political bias. But Republicans in both chambers have expressed concerns about how the cuts would impact the smaller stations they say their constituents depend on.
Some Republicans have also been hopeful of Congress approving some funding for local media ahead of a looming Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government for fiscal 2026.
Opponents of the cuts have already sounded alarm about the fiscal 'cliff' that some stations will face as a result of the latest legislation come October.
'It is a cliff,' Rep. Rosa Delauro (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, told The Hill earlier this month.
'They're already speaking about it, frightened to death, particularly in rural communities that they're not going to have access to important information or alerts about weather situations, information that they need to know, education for their kids, because they're not in communities where there are multiple sources of information.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Fed up with Beacon Hill, those seeking to change the Legislature turn to 2026 voters for reforms
Kaufman is now leading the charge on two petitions that target stipends lawmakers earn for holding leadership positions. One would eliminate stipends altogether; the other would limit stipends to a certain percentage of a legislative leader's base salary, among other restrictions. The effort emerged after a Such issues 'should have been dealt with in a deliberative process in the Legislature,' said Kaufman, who filed bills to address the stipends only to have legislators ignore them. 'We feel like we have to take democracy back. The Legislature failed us and continues to fail us.' Advertisement Another petition submitted Wednesday would overhaul the election system by allowing open primaries that candidates from all different parties would compete in, an effort to increase competition to incumbents who are often unchallenged. Yet another would extend the state's public records law to the Legislature and governor, which would put Massachusetts in line with most other states. Both petitions are pushed by the Advertisement The petitions, if they make it to the 2026 ballot, build off momentum from the The success of that audit campaign, combined with a changing public perception of Beacon Hill, has fueled new efforts 'to try and pry open information from the Legislature,' said Horowitz, who studies the impact of ballot questions. 'People are recognizing that there is a real opportunity in the ballot question,' he said. Legislator pay has been a recurring topic on ballots nationwide. Peverill Squire, a professor at the University of Missouri who's studied Conversely, among the most common — and unpopular — measures that lawmakers themselves have put before voters are ones to increase their own pay. Squire said there have been nearly 250 such measures over the past 100 years, but the median 'yes' vote sits around 43 percent. Advertisement 'It's a problem that lawmakers are always hoping to tackle,' Squire said during a panel Wednesday at the National Conference of State Legislatures Legislative Summit in Boston. In Massachusetts, lawmakers' pay is automatically adjusted every two years through a complicated process involving two separate mechanisms: one guaranteed by the state Constitution, the other baked into a The constitutionally mandated adjustment is determined by the governor, who every two years must decide whether to raise the annual base salary for legislators. In December, Governor Maura Healey said lawmakers would get an The extra pay lawmakers can earn on top of their salaries also jumped by Some legislative leaders defended the extra pay. House Speaker Ron Mariano said stipends reward those who take on more work and responsibility and helps to 'keep people thinking about this job as a potential career.' He also said legislative leaders are best positioned to determine who receives them. 'Who better to know who shows leadership and puts in effort than the leaders who are trying to move the agenda?' Advertisement The Quincy Democrat did not say whether he'd support subjecting lawmakers to the public records law, arguing it depends on the details of 'what you're opening up' to the public. 'There are some things that are better left to negotiate in private,' he said, 'and I would prefer it that way.' There is a relatively low bar for starting the petition process: submitting just 10 signatures from registered voters and the full text of the law or amendment they wish to have enacted. That signed petition must be filed with Campbell's office, accompanied by certificates of voter registration for each signatory. After that, Campbell's office will review the language and, if deemed acceptable, will certify it and create a summary of the proposed law or amendment that will be printed on the petition forms. Once Campbell announces which petitions are certified for the ballot, typically in early September, campaigns can begin gathering the tens of thousands of signatures necessary to get it on the ballot. Initiative petitions for laws require two separate rounds of signature gathering and submission, and the number of signatures required for each round depends on the number of votes cast for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election. For the 2026 election, campaigns will have to collect a total of at least 87,003 signatures over the two rounds, and no more than one-quarter of the signatures can come from any one county. Other petitions filed Wednesday would allow Committee for Public Counsel Services employees to unionize, reduce the state's personal income tax to 4 percent from 5 percent, overhaul a Advertisement Another initiative that was certified last year and will be on the 2026 ballot would Mariano has been vocal about lawmakers' frustration with the ballot initiative process, saying citizen-written laws can create unintended consequences. Massachusetts lawmakers have also regularly rewritten voter-approved laws, such as slowing the implementation of a reduction in The House just this spring passed a He said he doesn't see the proposals as a rebuke of the Legislature, but rather a demonstration of the 'ease' of getting a measure before voters. 'I see a lot more of these well-financed special interest groups taking advantage of a procedure that I think is way too easy to get a question on the ballot,' he said. 'No one's talking to the voters. They're just getting signatures. It becomes an organizational chore more than anything. And when you see ballot initiatives become law, you see the holes in them.' Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
NBC News
26 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump threatens to take over D.C. police and says he might deploy the National Guard
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he's considering a federal takeover of the local police force in Washington, D.C., and that he might bring in the National Guard to help handle crime in the city. The president's remarks went further than his threat Tuesday to take federal control of the nation's capital after a well-known Department of Government Efficiency staffer was assaulted over the weekend. Asked by a reporter at a White House event Wednesday if taking over the Metropolitan Police Department is an 'an option on the table,' Trump said it was. 'We're considering it. Yeah, because the crime is — is ridiculous,' Trump said before referencing the DOGE employee, Edward Coristine, without naming him. 'We have a capital that's very unsafe, you know, we just almost lost a young man, beautiful, handsome guy that got the hell knocked out of him the night before last," Trump said. Trump then threatened to bring in the National Guard. 'What a shame, rate of crime, the rate of muggings, killings and everything else, we're not going to let it, and that includes bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly too,' he said. A spokesperson for D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, declined to comment on Trump's remarks. It wouldn't be the first time a Trump administration has deployed the National Guard in Washington. Following protests in the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020, some of which turned violent, National Guard troops were brought in, despite opposition from Bowser. Two months ago, Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles in a legally contested move amid protests related to the administration's immigration enforcement. Violent crime in Washington is down 26% year to date, according to preliminary data from the Metropolitan Police Department. Trump has long expressed a desire to assume control of the D.C. government. Washington has a limited ability to self-govern in which its laws and budget are subject to congressional oversight. Taking over parts of the district involves a mix of congressional and unilateral actions. For example, Trump could unilaterally assume control of the police, but experts told NBC Washington earlier this year that it would require some 'justifying emergency' and would likely be challenged in court. A full federal takeover of the district would require an act of Congress, in which both the House and Senate would need to vote to repeal the 1973 Home Rule Act that grants D.C. residents the right to elect their own city government. Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for D.C., said in an interview with Fox News Wednesday night that she "totally" supports Trump if he decides to seek a federal takeover of the district. "It's up to the president," Pirro said. "If that's what we need to do to get it done, that's what he should do. And I support the president."
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep. Mocks Party's Hypocrisy Over Texas Gerrymandering Chaos
In a brutal tweet post on Wednesday, one Republican member of Congress has called out his own party's hypocrisy in blasting Texas Democrats for leaving their state. Dozens of Democrats left Texason Monday to deny Texas Republicans a quorum to vote on a newly gerrymandered map that would add five Republican-leaning seats to the House of Representatives. But where a lot of Republicans saw opportunity, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) saw hypocrisy — especially since House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) suddenly canceled House votes last month and sent lawmakers home early for five weeks to avoid a vote on releasing files connected to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a former friend of President Donald Trump. Despite Johnson's very public efforts to sweep the scandal under the rug, Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) have introduced a bipartisan resolution calling for the release of the files. After Republicans criticized Texas Democrats who left their state to prevent the passage of a gerrymandered map, Massie apparently wondered why they were OK with lawmakers ditching Washington, D.C., to avoid a vote on a topic Trump has tried to downplay. Massie made his thoughts known on social media with a tweet that compared 'Democrats leaving Texas to protect their district' to 'Republicans leaving D.C. to protect the Epstein files,' with Johnson's head superimposed over the image of a driver in a car meant to represent Republicans. Some people saw Massie's post as a sign that he was just a D-D-Democrat in Republican clothes. But Massie pointed out just how conservative he is in his response. Related... Texas Democrats Evacuate After Bomb Threat At Chicago Hotel Mike Johnson Shuts Down House Early To Block Vote On Jeffrey Epstein Files Rising Dem Star Talks Texas Gerrymandering Chaos: 'You Don't Beat A Bully By Playing Dead' Obama Slams Texas GOP's Gerrymandering Plot As 'Power Grab'
