A driver faces up to $110,000 in fines for speeding on a Swiss street. But he can afford it
Why the eye-popping penalty? Because the speedster, a repeat offender, is one of Switzerland's wealthiest people, and the Vaud canton, or region, serves up fines based on factors like income, fortune or general family financial situation.
The Swiss are not alone. Germany, France, Austria and the Nordic countries all issue punishments based on a person's wealth. The recent fine isn't even a record in Switzerland. In 2010, a millionaire Ferrari driver got a ticket equal to about $290,000 for speeding in the eastern canton of St. Gallen.
Back then, the Swiss safety group Road Cross said rich drivers had been lightly punished until voters approved penal law overhaul three years earlier that let judges hand down fines based on personal income and wealth for misdemeanors like speeding and drunk driving.
Under today's rules, an indigent person might spend a night in jail instead of a fine, while the wealthiest in the rich Alpine country could be on the hook for tens of thousands.
A court in the Swiss canton of Vaud recently ruled that the tycoon must pay 10,000 Swiss francs ($12,300) up front and could be forced to pay the rest — 80,000 more — if he's caught for a similar roadway infraction over the next three years.
Switzerland's '24 Heures' newspaper first reported the case and said the man, who was not identified, was a French citizen listed by Swiss economic weekly Bilan among the 300 richest people in Switzerland — with a fortune in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
The daily reported that an automated police radar photographed the offender driving at 77 kilometers per hour (48 mph) in a 50 kph (31 mph) zone on a Lausanne street. A quick-calculating prosecutor tallied the maximum fine the driver faced under the law, the report said.
Vincent Derouand, a spokesperson for the Vaud public prosecutors office, said the defendant didn't contest the decision, which was handed down in June for the infraction nearly a year ago — in August 2024.
The Vaud criminal code sets a maximum financial penalty based on the 'personal and economic situation of the offender at the time of the ruling' — notably taking into account issues like income, fortune, lifestyle and family financial needs.
The newspaper reported that he had already been caught for a similar speeding infraction eight years ago, and also paid 10,000 Swiss francs in penalty and faced another 60,000 if another infraction had taken place within the following two years.
In Switzerland, penalties for speeding can even catch up with the cops: One officer was fined for racing at nearly twice the speed limit through Geneva streets back in 2016 while chasing thieves who had blown up a bank teller machine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Charlie Munger Says He Ditched Insurance Once He Got Rich And Self-Insured Instead As 'All Intelligent People' Do — 'There's a Lot of Waste'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. For most people, insurance isn't optional—it's a given. Home, auto, medical, liability—you're taught to protect your assets before you even finish building them. And while those monthly premiums sting, they're the price of security, or so the logic goes. But Charlie Munger saw it differently. And when you're worth billions, you get to opt out of the rules the rest of us live by. Just months before his death at 99, the legendary Berkshire Hathaway vice chairman made it clear: when he reached a certain level of wealth, he stopped insuring what he could afford to lose. "Think of what I've saved in my life," Munger said during the 2023 Daily Journal shareholder meeting. "I never carried—never—I think once... but with one exception, I never carried collision insurance on a car. And once I got rich, I stopped carrying fire insurance on houses. I just self-insure." Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — and you can too at just $2.90/share. Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. That remark came in response to a question from CNBC's Becky Quick, who asked Munger about large companies—like Meta—self-insuring against major liabilities. Would the trend pose systemic risk? Munger didn't take the bait. Instead, he turned the focus inward. "In my own life, I'm a big self-insurer, and so is Warren," he said, referring to longtime business partner Warren Buffett. "It's ridiculous for me to carry fire insurance on my house because I could easily rebuild a house if it burned down. So why would I want to bother fooling around with the claims process and all kinds of things?" His message wasn't just personal. It was philosophical. "If insurance—you should insure against things you can't afford to pay for yourself," he said. "But if you can afford to take the bumps... some unusual expense coming along doesn't really hurt you that much... why would you want to fool around with some insurance company?" And then came the line that caught everyone's attention: "All intelligent people do that way. I don't say all... maybe I should say all intelligent people should do it my way." He elaborated further, with his trademark precision: "There should be way more self-insurance in life. There's a lot of waste. You're paying when you buy insurance for the other fellow's frauds—and there's a lot of fraud in life." The statement shocked Becky Quick, who pointed out the irony: "That's a little bit of a surprising take from a guy who is vice chairman at Berkshire, which has so many insurance companies." Munger didn't soften the blow. "That is the right way to do it. I'd rather tell the way it is. I'm not going to tell it differently than I think it really is just because it's better for Berkshire. Even though it's bad for Berkshire, I want to tell you—if you can afford to self-insure, self-insure." But that's a massive "if." Most Americans can't casually replace a car, let alone rebuild a house. When wildfires swept through California last year, some homeowners lost everything—many still waiting on insurance payouts they couldn't afford to skip. Then there's liability: someone gets injured on your property, a guest trips at your holiday party, a contractor falls during construction—those aren't just rare hypotheticals. They're real financial threats. Self-insurance means you're on the hook for all of it. No safety net. And for most, that's not realistic. Still, Munger's argument wasn't about skipping protection altogether—it was about cutting out waste. If you can cover your own risk, why pay into a system bloated with fraud, commissions, and red tape? That's where smarter, more accessible options come in. Arrived is one of them—a platform that lets you buy fractional shares of vetted rental homes with as little as $100. You don't manage tenants. You don't repair roofs. And you don't deal with insurance headaches. Arrived handles all of that while you collect rental income and potential appreciation. You're not self-insuring—but you're not paying for someone else's fire, either. Munger's stance isn't practical for everyone. But his brutal honesty peeled back a truth worth considering: a lot of what we pay for in the name of "protection" is really just covering the inefficiencies of others. For the rare few, skipping insurance is a calculated risk. For the rest of us, choosing investments that minimize exposure—and maximize control—isn't just smart. It's survival. See Next: This HELOC lender lets you borrow, repay, and borrow again —. 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. This article Billionaire Charlie Munger Says He Ditched Insurance Once He Got Rich And Self-Insured Instead As 'All Intelligent People' Do — 'There's a Lot of Waste' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kevin O'Leary Says New Executives Get No Stock Options, No Benefits, And No Full-Time Title Until They Prove Themselves, Just Like The Swiss
Kevin O'Leary says he has completely changed the way he hires executives, and is apparently taking inspiration from Swiss business culture. The investor and television personality explained in a recent post on X, 'No stock options, no benefits, no full-time title... until they prove it. I learned this from the Swiss, and it's revolutionized our operations.' A Six-Month Trial Instead Of A Full-Time Commitment O'Leary described the approach in a video, using the example of hiring a new CEO for a growing venture. Once he narrowed the field to two candidates, he asked one: 'Would you consider becoming a contractor for six months as opposed to a fully empowered employee, and we'll pay you 30% more than your base contract's going to be? No stock options, no benefits for the six-month period. But wouldn't you like to test us first?' Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. The idea, he said, is to give both sides the chance to 'road test' each other, making sure the candidate integrates well with the existing team and the parent company. 'Don't you want that experience?' he recalled asking. In this case, the candidate agreed. O'Leary calls it an "apprentice" model, common in Switzerland and across Europe, where the focus is on confirming a cultural fit before offering a permanent position. 'We don't do [this] in America,' he said. 'And we should do it.' He noted that about two-thirds of candidates complete the trial and move on to full-time roles with stock options and benefits. The remaining third leave on good terms, having gained valuable experience but deciding the position isn't right for them. 'We're not firing anybody,' he said. 'Those Swiss guys got it right.' Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Business Is Binary, Says O'Leary For O'Leary, this hiring method is just one example of his direct approach to business. "Business is binary. There are winners and losers. You either make money or you don't," he posted on X last year. He believes success requires relentless effort, especially for young entrepreneurs. "If you want to succeed in business you have to work 25 hours a day because there's someone across the world who will kick your a*s if you don't." He advises those in their 20s to forget about work-life balance while building a business, stressing that the competition is global and tireless. "You're competing with people in Mumbai or Shanghai who are willing to work 24 hours a day, eight days a week," he said last year.O'Leary adds that the early years are the best time to make sacrifices, because "In your 20s, you can afford the time, the focus and all the stress that comes with building something from the ground up. You should start thinking about taking some time off only after establishing that foundation." For O'Leary, sacrifice, preparation, and persistence are non-negotiable. Whether it's a new hire or a new venture, the standard remains the same: prove yourself. Read Next: 2,000 High Earners Manage $6B With This AI Platform — UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Kevin O'Leary Says New Executives Get No Stock Options, No Benefits, And No Full-Time Title Until They Prove Themselves, Just Like The Swiss originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Charlie Munger Says He Ditched Insurance Once He Got Rich And Self-Insured Instead As 'All Intelligent People' Do —'There's a Lot of Waste'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. For most people, insurance isn't optional—it's a given. Home, auto, medical, liability—you're taught to protect your assets before you even finish building them. And while those monthly premiums sting, they're the price of security, or so the logic goes. But Charlie Munger saw it differently. And when you're worth billions, you get to opt out of the rules the rest of us live by. Just months before his death at 99, the legendary Berkshire Hathaway vice chairman made it clear: when he reached a certain level of wealth, he stopped insuring what he could afford to lose. "Think of what I've saved in my life," Munger said during the 2023 Daily Journal shareholder meeting. "I never carried—never—I think once... but with one exception, I never carried collision insurance on a car. And once I got rich, I stopped carrying fire insurance on houses. I just self-insure." Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — and you can too at just $2.90/share. Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. That remark came in response to a question from CNBC's Becky Quick, who asked Munger about large companies—like Meta—self-insuring against major liabilities. Would the trend pose systemic risk? Munger didn't take the bait. Instead, he turned the focus inward. "In my own life, I'm a big self-insurer, and so is Warren," he said, referring to longtime business partner Warren Buffett. "It's ridiculous for me to carry fire insurance on my house because I could easily rebuild a house if it burned down. So why would I want to bother fooling around with the claims process and all kinds of things?" His message wasn't just personal. It was philosophical. "If insurance—you should insure against things you can't afford to pay for yourself," he said. "But if you can afford to take the bumps... some unusual expense coming along doesn't really hurt you that much... why would you want to fool around with some insurance company?" And then came the line that caught everyone's attention: "All intelligent people do that way. I don't say all... maybe I should say all intelligent people should do it my way." He elaborated further, with his trademark precision: "There should be way more self-insurance in life. There's a lot of waste. You're paying when you buy insurance for the other fellow's frauds—and there's a lot of fraud in life." The statement shocked Becky Quick, who pointed out the irony: "That's a little bit of a surprising take from a guy who is vice chairman at Berkshire, which has so many insurance companies." Munger didn't soften the blow. "That is the right way to do it. I'd rather tell the way it is. I'm not going to tell it differently than I think it really is just because it's better for Berkshire. Even though it's bad for Berkshire, I want to tell you—if you can afford to self-insure, self-insure." But that's a massive "if." Most Americans can't casually replace a car, let alone rebuild a house. When wildfires swept through California last year, some homeowners lost everything—many still waiting on insurance payouts they couldn't afford to skip. Then there's liability: someone gets injured on your property, a guest trips at your holiday party, a contractor falls during construction—those aren't just rare hypotheticals. They're real financial threats. Self-insurance means you're on the hook for all of it. No safety net. And for most, that's not realistic. Still, Munger's argument wasn't about skipping protection altogether—it was about cutting out waste. If you can cover your own risk, why pay into a system bloated with fraud, commissions, and red tape? That's where smarter, more accessible options come in. Arrived is one of them—a platform that lets you buy fractional shares of vetted rental homes with as little as $100. You don't manage tenants. You don't repair roofs. And you don't deal with insurance headaches. Arrived handles all of that while you collect rental income and potential appreciation. You're not self-insuring—but you're not paying for someone else's fire, either. Munger's stance isn't practical for everyone. But his brutal honesty peeled back a truth worth considering: a lot of what we pay for in the name of "protection" is really just covering the inefficiencies of others. For the rare few, skipping insurance is a calculated risk. For the rest of us, choosing investments that minimize exposure—and maximize control—isn't just smart. It's survival. See Next: This HELOC lender lets you borrow, repay, and borrow again —. 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. This article Billionaire Charlie Munger Says He Ditched Insurance Once He Got Rich And Self-Insured Instead As 'All Intelligent People' Do —'There's a Lot of Waste' originally appeared on
