BUDGET: SA Canegrowers welcomes no increase in sugar tax
SA Canegrowers on Wendesday said that it welcomes the decision by Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana not to enact any further increases in the Health Promotion Levy (or sugar tax) in his Budget 3.0.
"Introduced in 2018, the sugar tax cost 16 000 jobs and R2 billion in revenue in the first year of implementation alone, according to independent research by Nedlac. Any increase would risk the livelihoods of growers and increase unemployment in many parts KwaZulu Natal and Mpumalanga, where there are few other job opportunities," SA Canegrowers said.
" The sugar tax has been nothing but destructive for South Africa. While the Nedlac study demonstrated concrete proof of job losses, no evidence has been provided to show the tax has reduced obesity or improved the health of South Africans in any way," it further stated.
The association said it believes that Treasury should scrap the tax, to help ensure that government drives job creation and economic growth, as per its commitments outlined in the Sugarcane Value Chain Master Plan 2030.
"This social compact between industry and government to revitalise the industry also has the potential to create new markets for sugarcane growers and kickstart new industrialisation projects in Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal," Canegrowers said in a statement.
"Agricultural jobs are critically important to the stability of South Africa and to making sure that we reduce rural poverty and hunger. SA Canegrowers will continue to strive for an end to this job-killing tax, calling on the government to prioritise desperately needed economic growth and jobs instead," it further said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
19 minutes ago
- IOL News
Jailed for two decades: How Larrisa Vern stole R2. 8 million from Delmas Primary School
Former Delmas Primary School financial officer, Larrisa Vern, has been sentenced to 25 years behind bars after she was convicted on charges of fraud and money laundering. Image: Hawks The Delmas Regional Court has sentenced 52-year-old former Delmas Primary School financial officer, Larrisa Vern, to 20 years behind bars after she was convicted on charges of fraud and money laundering. 'This came after the Hawks Secunda-based serious commercial crime investigation (unit), priority crime specialised investigation (unit), Hawks asset forfeiture investigation (unit), and National Prosecuting Authority proved criminal activities against Vern,' said Mpumalanga spokesperson for the Hawks, Lieutenant Colonel Magonseni Nkosi. Vern was appointed to her position at the school in December 2021 and assumed her duties in January 2022. 'In less than two years, her criminal activities were exposed after a whistleblower notified the authorities regarding two bonus payments made by her to her bank account,' said Nkosi. The matter was referred to the Hawks for investigation. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. The team of investigators managed to secure a warrant of arrest on 6 February 2024. Vern was arrested three days later, on 9 February 2024. 'Investigation continued, and more dirty linen was uncovered as it was established that Vern caused an actual loss of R2,792,912 to the school,' said Nkosi. Vern paid money to four different bank accounts using different references before transferring the money to her main account. In court, the state successfully proved 94 counts of fraud and 555 counts of money laundering. Vern pleaded guilty on all charges before the Delmas Regional Court on 21 May 2025. 'Vern was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for fraud, of which five years is suspended for five years on the condition that she is not involved in fraudulent activities during the time of suspension. She was further sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for money laundering,' said Nkosi. The court ruled that both sentences will run concurrently. Vern is expected back in court on 5 June 2025 to allow the Asset Forfeiture Unit to present its case. Meanwhile, provincial head of the Hawks in Mpumalanga, Major General Nico Gerber has commended the team of investigators and the prosecution team for the 'excellent manner in which they dealt with the case'. 'The next step is to seize the proceeds she accumulated through her criminal activities. Gone are the days that you can benefit from your criminal deeds,' said Gerber. In 2023, a Limpopo woman was arrested by the Hawks on allegations of stealing R1.5 million from her employer, the Thabazimbi Christian School. At the time, provincial spokesperson of the Hawks in Limpopo, Lieutenant-Colonel Matimba Maluleke said Pretorius was arrested by the Limpopo Hawks serious commercial crime investigation unit for allegedly embezzling R1.5 million from the Thabazimbi Christian School. [email protected] IOL News
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South African GDP grows by a paltry 0.1% in Q1, but agriculture shines
One thing that is as certain as the changing seasons is that as the year progresses, forecasts for South African economic growth in 2025 – which are mostly around 1.2% – will be downgraded, which in turn will blow out of the water many of the revenue and debt projections in Budget 3.0. South Africa's sluggish economy barely grew in the first quarter (Q1) of this year, expanding a pathetic 0.1% from Q4 of 2024, according to data released on Tuesday by Statistics South Africa (Stats SA). This 'growth' – at a pace that a snail could slither past – would have been a contraction of 0.3% were it not for a stellar performance by the agricultural sector, which grew its production by a hefty 15.8% in the first three months of the year. Following gross domestic product (GDP) growth of just 0.4% in Q4 of 2024 – revised down from an initial estimate of 0.6% – the data underscores the woeful state of South Africa's economy, which simply cannot seem to expand at a rate that exceeds population growth and creates jobs. Against this backdrop, it's no surprise that South Africa's unemployment rate rose one percentage point in Q1 to 32.9%. Worryingly, only four of the 10 industries on the production side of the economy posted growth, led by agriculture, a sector that is also extremely volatile. Agriculture biggest growth driver South Africa's descent into deindustrialisation was writ large in the data, with the manufacturing and mining sectors the biggest drags on the read, declining 2.0% and 4.1% respectively. Consumer spending perked up – helped by lower interest rates, slowing inflation and early pension drawdowns under the two-pot reforms – but it hardly shot the lights out. 'Consumer activity was stronger, with trade, catering & accommodation expanding by 0.5%. Retail trade, motor trade, accommodation and food & beverages contributed positively,' Stats SA said. Changes in GDP contributions Gross fixed capital expenditure – a key measure of investment – maintained its downward trajectory, falling 1.7%. And without investment growth, the economy will remain stuck in a rut. 'Consumer demand likely received a small boost from lower rates, higher disposable incomes given still-low inflation and pension reform. But none of this is sufficient to offset the soft outlook still painted by dismal investment. From this data alone, there is no clear indication that it might be reasonable to expect more robust growth going forward,' said Razia Khan, Chief Economist Africa at Standard Chartered Bank in London. Indeed, the outlook for Q2 is already troubling. What this means South Africa cannot attract investment, create jobs and reduce poverty without significantly faster rates of economic growth. Many of the country's crippling social ills, including rampant crime, are at least partly a reflection of this woeful pace of growth. This deprives the government of revenue, forcing it to borrow more, raising its debt-servicing costs – leaving it with less to spend on things such as education, welfare and health – in a vicious cycle that shows no sign of ending soon. The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) fell 1.6 points in May to 43.1 – pointedly, its lowest level since the Covid-19 pandemic. This marked the seventh consecutive month that the PMI was in contractionary territory below the neutral 50 mark and bodes ill for the sector's performance this quarter. The return of the rolling power cuts, popularly known as 'load shedding', after a 310-day pause in Q1 did not help matters, but the economy has been trapped in slow-growth mode for years. There are a range of reasons for this depressing state of affairs, which continues to fuel the terrible trifecta of poverty, unemployment and inequality. Policy uncertainty continues to deter investment, along with mounting concerns about reliable water supplies and a crumbling road, rail and port network. Transnet is showing promising signs of a management turnaround, but it still has a mountain to climb. A high tax burden with little to show for it hardly inspires confidence. Sky-high levels of violent crime and the security costs that go with that are constraints to growth, while South Africa's failing public schools add up to a chronic skills shortage. And amid these domestic challenges and many more, the outlook for the global economy has been souring, not least because of US President Donald Trump's bewildering tariff 'policies' that top the ANC and the GNU in the League of Uncertainty. One thing that is as certain as the changing seasons is that as the year progresses, forecasts for South African economic growth in 2025 – which are mostly around 1.2% – will be further downgraded, which in turn will blow out of the water many of the revenue and debt projections in Budget 3.0.
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Mixed news at the pump: fuel levy rises while prices drop
The Western Cape High Court has dismissed the EFF's urgent bid to block a controversial fuel levy hike—just as fuel prices dip. From midnight, levies rise by 16c (petrol) and 15c (diesel), despite constitutional questions. It's a pump paradox: taxpayers pay more, but pump prices briefly fall. In a ruling handed down yesterday, Judge Nathan Erasmus found that the EFF's application lacked urgency and did not meet the legal threshold for interim relief. The court did not engage with the broader constitutional challenge itself, which the EFF had previously framed in its initial filing as a possible Part B of its legal strategy. A tax fight rooted in Budget 3.0 The levy increase was announced in Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's revised Budget 3.0, tabled in May following the political fallout and eventual withdrawal of VAT hikes in earlier budget versions. Treasury estimates the fuel levy will raise about R4-billion in the 2025/26 fiscal year. The EFF has argued that the use of Section 48(1) of the Customs and Excise Act to implement the fuel levy increase amounts to an unconstitutional bypassing of Parliament. Section 77 of the Constitution requires that all new taxes be passed via a money Bill through the National Assembly. Arguments on constitutional compliance Representing the EFF, Advocate Mfesane Ka-Siboto told the court: 'The fact that this has happened before does not make it lawful. Past practice is not a substitute for constitutional compliance.' He described the move as a case of 'taxation without representation.' The Treasury, represented by Advocate Kameel Premhid, countered that Section 48(1) had long been used lawfully to adjust fuel levy schedules. He argued the measure was an administrative amendment within an existing framework, not the introduction of a new tax requiring legislative approval. What this means for you For consumers, the fuel levy increase translates into higher petrol and diesel prices at the pump, effective immediately. This could lead to broader knock-on effects on transport costs, food prices and inflation, particularly for lower-income households who spend a greater share of their income on fuel-linked expenses. Treasury maintains the hike is necessary to address fiscal gaps left by the abandoned VAT proposal. The fuel levy increase will be offset by a decrease in fuel prices – which also kicks in on Wednesday, 4 June. The Department of Minerals and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) announced the following price decreases yesterday: Petrol 93 (ULP & LRP): ⬇️5cents/litre. Petrol 95 (ULP & LRP): ⬇️5 cents/litre. Diesel (0.05% sulphur): ⬇️ 36.9 cents/litre. Diesel (0.005% sulphur): ⬇️36.9 cents/litre. Commenting on the changes, the DMPR noted that over the last month, there has been a decrease in the average Brent Crude oil price from US$66.40 to US$63.95, largely on the back of continued global trade uncertainty, Parliament distances itself from the damage Parliament, which was cited in the court papers, but not the target of any relief, issued a brief statement after the judgment: 'Although cited in the application, no relief was sought against Parliament. Parliament's position throughout the proceedings was to abide by the outcome of the court process. Accordingly, Parliament will comply with the court's ruling.' Oversight loophole or legal mechanism? In its legal representations, Treasury has argued that Section 48(6) of the Act ensures Parliamentary oversight by requiring the amended tariff to be tabled after the fact. The EFF, however, contends this form of post-implementation tabling falls short of the constitutional threshold for public finance legislation. EFF's Part B remains unclear In a short statement on X after the ruling, the EFF said: 'We are committed to fighting the fuel levy increase in court and in Parliament.' However, the party did not explicitly confirm that it would pursue the Part B constitutional review. Whether the EFF returns to court or not, the broader legal and political debate over fiscal authority, oversight and the democratic control of taxation is likely to persist. DM
