Maa Twitter Review: Kajol wins hearts in ‘gripping' horror drama, fans call it a must-watch
Kajol's latest release, Maa, a mythological horror film that hit theatres on June 27, is drawing praise online for its emotional depth, chilling atmosphere, and standout performances, particularly by the actress herself. Social media, especially on X, has been flooded with reactions hailing the film as 'gripping,' 'unexpected,' and 'visually stunning.'
Directed by Vishal Furia, Maa blends themes of motherhood, ancient legends, and supernatural horror into a story that has struck a chord with audiences. Kajol, who plays a mother fighting dark forces to save her daughter, is being singled out as the film's emotional and narrative backbone.
One user wrote, 'Maa is gritty, scary and a valuable franchise to horror films. Amazing vfx provides you with an end that you are not expecting. You will feel the vibe of strangers things at some point. Kajol carries the film on her shoulders. @itsKajolD is shining bright and is tough to take your eyes off her.' while another called Maa 'gritty, scary and a valuable addition to Indian horror.'
The visual effects, inspired in parts by Western horror elements, were also praised, with comparisons made to Stranger Things.
Film reviewer Siddharth R Kannan called Maa 'a genre-bending tale that blends emotion, mythology & horror seamlessly.' He described Kajol's performance as 'one of her boldest, most vulnerable' and also praised Ronit Roy for a 'layered, powerful' role. The direction, VFX, and music were highlighted as key strengths.
Another viewer warned fans not to miss the post-credit scene, calling it 'a surprise worth staying for.'
While Maa is still playing in theatres, its digital debut is not far off. The film is set to stream on Netflix, which has bagged its digital rights.
Though the platform hasn't confirmed a date yet, sources indicate the OTT release will likely take place between mid-August and mid-September 2025, in line with standard Bollywood release windows.
Set in the same cinematic universe as Shaitaan, Maa follows a mother-daughter road trip that takes a terrifying turn after they enter a cursed village haunted by ancient evil. What follows is a tense battle between maternal instinct and supernatural horror, as Kajol's character faces demonic forces head-on. Kajol Ronit Roy Indraneil Sengupta Kherin Sharma Jitin Gulati Surjyasikha Das
With strong word-of-mouth, growing buzz on social media, and a Netflix release on the horizon, Maa is fast becoming one of the most talked-about Indian horror films of the year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Louis Vuitton's runway has found India — it must now lead the show
Pharrell Williams's Louis Vuitton menswear spectacle in Paris on June 25 may be remembered less for its celebrities than for its compass. The collection — titled 'Paris to India' — scattered cricket stripes across silk suits, dangled elephant-trunk bags from models' hands and sent them striding over a snakes-and-ladders set conceived by architect Bijoy Jain. A Punjabi soundtrack co-produced by A R Rahman pulsed through the Louvre courtyard. In 30 brisk minutes, a French mega-brand declared that the world's most sumptuous fashion conversation now needs India in every sentence. For decades, India has been the textile world's quiet workroom: An exporter of labour, motifs and moral mystique, rarely an equal partner. The Louis Vuitton show signals something subtler than simple 'inspiration'. Jain's name sat proudly beside Williams's on the show notes; Rahman's beats shared billing with hip-hop icons. A similar dignity surfaced last year when Dior embroidered its pre-fall collection with the Chanakya School of Craft in Mumbai, crediting 300 artisans by name. In both cases, Indian creativity occupied the marquee, not the margins. That shift is the real headline. Why now? The luxury industry is scrambling for authenticity in a climate-anxious, post-pandemic marketplace. Carbon budgets, digital passports, circular business models and Gen Z's sceptical gaze are pushing brands to swap generic glamour for grounded storytelling. India offers a reservoir of stories written in plant dyes, zero-waste weaves and 4,000-year-old techniques that emit less carbon than the average polyester tracksuit. As the world's most diverse living craft laboratory — housing 11 million artisans across 3,000 clusters — India can supply both narrative depth and sustainability data. In short, global fashion's search for purpose runs straight through Kutch, Varanasi and the looms of Assam. The timing is auspicious at home too. The government's Rs 13,000-crore PM Vishwakarma scheme is rebuilding the artisan economy with credit, tools and market linkages; the Ministry of Textiles is fast-tracking Geographical Indication tags that protect regional identities; and the foreign office increasingly treats handloom gifts as soft-power artefacts. Louis Vuitton's Paris shout-out merely amplifies that trajectory. Yet, opportunity and outcome are not synonymous. Most Indian craftworkers still earn less than three pounds a day. More than half remain outside formal supply chains, which means no pensions, no insurance, no intellectual-property protection. If the global luxury pivot stops at aesthetic applause, the wealth gap widens; but if it matures into equitable contracting, credit sharing and co-branding, both sides profit. Dior's Chanakya partnership paid fair wages and logged 35,000 artisan hours; the house later released a documentary naming every embroiderer. That template — transparency plus traceability — shows how homage can become joint ownership. Louis Vuitton, which already embraces digital product passports for leather goods, could extend the system to heritage textiles, listing cluster names, wage rates and environmental savings. Customers would pay a premium for that honesty; artisans would secure predictable orders and global visibility. Indian designers and institutions must be ready to negotiate from strength. Design schools need incubation labs where students prototype with master karigars, proving that craft can be both couture and climate solution. State tourism boards could host 'Made With India' residencies, inviting foreign labels to spend a season in Kanchipuram or Bhuj, working shoulder-to-shoulder with local cooperatives. The private sector can sweeten the deal: Impact investors are already funding start-ups that marry blockchain provenance with natural-dye supply chains, rewarding clusters that meet biodiversity goals. A new lexicon is required as well. For years, culture writers spoke of 'inspiration' and 'appropriation'— binary terms that trap debates in outrage. The more useful phrase today is 'co-creation.' It presumes dialogue, contracts, revenue share and continuous credit. Co-creation resists both tokenism and hollow celebration. When a luxury house commissions a Banarasi brocade lining and prints the weaver's QR-coded signature inside the jacket, the customer's admiration translates into artisan equity. That is collaboration at the speed of modern commerce. Williams's show may not have reached that destination yet, but its direction is unmistakable. The fact that a monogram giant felt the need to celebrate Indian culture on global livestreams, accurately crediting Indian creative elites, marks the moment India's soft-power curve bent upward. The next bend — aligning that spotlight with the millions who keep the looms humming — is within reach if brands, policymakers and educators act in concert. India's craft legacy has always been ready for its close-up; technology, policy and consumer mood have finally switched on the klieg lights. The runway has found India. It is time for India — loom by loom, dye vat by dye vat — to lead the runway. The writer is assistant professor of design, IILM, Gurgaon
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Why has JSK – Janaki Vs State of Kerala not been issued censor certificate, HC asks censor board
Stating that films bearing similar names had been released earlier, the Kerala High Court asked the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) why censor certificate has not been issued for the Malayalam feature film JSK – Janaki vs State of Kerala. The producer firm of the film that stars, among others, Union Minister of State Suresh Gopi had approached the High Court, citing delay on the part of the CBFC in issuing the certificate. The CBFC's counsel informed the court that its objection was to the name of the film's central character, Janaki, which is another name for the Hindu goddess Sita. Also, explicit language was used while referring to women. Certificate for teaser Wondering why the name of the character – a commonly used name — has to be changed, the court observed that many Indian films having names of gods, goddesses and religious figures in the title had been granted censor certificates in the past. There were movies like Sita aur Gita. No one had any complaints then. The film's producer firm said that the CBFC had issued a censor certificate for the same film's teaser trailer. The revising committee of the CBFC had on Thursday asked the makers of the film to change the title of the film as well as the name of the protagonist. It had been reported that the Thiruvananthapuram regional office of the CBFC had cleared the censoring of the film on June 18 with a U/A certificate. However, when the regional office forwarded the same to the CBFC headquarters in Mumbai, the officials there demanded a change in the title as well as the name of the titular character of Janaki. It was also conveyed to the makers through unofficial channels that the victim of a sexual assault cannot be named after a goddess. The revising committee met after the makers of the film approached the Kerala High Court, alleging delay.
News18
22 minutes ago
- News18
Sunil Gavaskar Slams 'Sports Websites', 'Individual Accounts' For Spreading Fake News
Last Updated: Sunil Gavaskar has urged people to verify quotes attributed to him, highlighting the spread of fake news. Former India cricketer Sunil Gavaskar has said that certain websites and individual accounts have attributed comments and quotes to him that he never made, urging people to cross-check and verify such information before believing it to be true. Gavaskar still plays an active role in cricket as a broadcaster and expert and is in England covering the Indian team's five-match series. Multiple other former cricketers, including Anil Kumble and Ravichandran Ashwin, have spoken against certain accounts attributing fake quotes and posting on social media. Gavaskar, in his video, opened up about his observations regarding fake news and quotes attributed to his name in the last few months. 'Over the last few months, it's come to my notice that a lot of sports websites and individual accounts have been attributing comments and quotes to me which I have never made," Gavaskar said in a video posted on his Instagram account. Gavaskar isn't one to mince his words and shy away from reality. Unfortunately, certain individual accounts fabricate fake quotes to increase their online engagement in an unethical manner, for most celebrities. With the advent of fake news all around, Gavaskar's popularity has often been misused by the media houses. Gavaskar complained against a website during the Border-Gavaskar Trophy when they published a fake article in his name. Recently, Gavaskar's celebration when Rishabh Pant scored a hundred in the second innings of the first Test at Headingley, Leeds, won the hearts of cricket fans. Gavaskar wanted to see Pant pulling off his trademark somersault celebration. Pant, who scored a hundred in the first innings as well, finished on the losing team as England chased down a 371-run target with five wickets to spare.
