Assassin Milorad Ulemek's chilling nickname and disturbing link to TV star's murder
Eleven days before Jill Dando was shot dead, Milorad Ulemek made himself available for a "special operation" after being asked to carry out an assissination.
The ruthless soldier claimed he was fighting in Kosovo on April 15 1999 when he called his spymaster Radomir Markovic to offer his services. Ulemek, 57, later told a Belgrade court that Makovic had previously asked him to "remove one person who is currently seriously threatening the security of the state". Markovic and Ulemek are serving 40 years in jail for plotting two assassinations for brutal dictator Slobodan Milosevic, who died in 2006 while on trial for war crimes.
In 2016, Serbian Ulemek, 56, gave evidence at the trial of four former intelligence officers charged with the murder of newspaper owner Slavko Curuvija. Mr Curuvija was shot dead outside his Belgrade home on April 11, 1999. Jill was killed on April 26.
Mr Curuvija had upset Milosevic and the president's powerful wife Mira, a former friend. Like Jill, he was going home when he was ambushed from behind, forced to the ground and shot at close range in the head. Ulemek said he declined the request because he was needed in Kosovo before calling Markovic twenty days into the bombing to say he was available.
Nicknamed the Legionnaire, after serving in the French Foreign Legion, Ulemek has played a leading role in some of Serbia's most violent acts. He is reported to have made millions running one of Serbia's top crime gangs and was kingmaker for the first democratic leader, only to plot his murder.
Ulemek shot up two nightclubs and was suspected of contact with Norwegian mass killer Anders Breivik, who was inspired by "Serb nationalists". Ulemek was born in Belgrade on March 15, 1968, to father Milan, an officer in Josip Tito's Yugoslav People's Army, and Croatian mother Natalija.
The school dropout, who hung out with young criminals, reportedly fled Serbia in the 1980s while on the run for a raid on a sports shop in Belgrade. He is said to have lived in London learning English, and then France.
Reportedly cleared of murder in Paris after accidentally killing a man in a fight, and under threat of deportation, he joined France's Foreign Legion in 1986. He is believed to have served in Chad and the Middle East. Ulemek was said to have been based in Corsica, and was a sergeant specialising in sniper combat and sabotage.
He "deserted" around 1991 to join the Serbian Volunteer Guard, or Tigers, who were fighting in the Yugoslav wars. The paramilitary outfit was set up by warlord Zeljko Raznatovic Arkan. Ulemek is said to have become close to the alleged war criminal who was killed in 2000 - even acting as his best man when he wed pop singer Ceca in 1995. Milosevic's trial at the International Criminal Tribunal heard Ulemek trained volunteers at a base in Croatia.
In 1994 he briefly married and took his wife's name of Lukovic. Like Arkan, Ulemek mixed business with war and in the mid-90s he took over Belgrade's Zombi club. But he was said to have infuriated Arkan in 1996 when he became deputy chief of the Jedinica za specijalne operacije (JSO) - a 500-man unit of the Serbian Intelligence Service which acted as Milosevic's guard.
A witness described murders carried out by his JSO squad chief in Kosovo in 1999, claiming he killed two unarmed young Albanians in civilian clothes and saw four prisoners forced into a house before it was blown up with grenades. He also said he saw Ulemek in Kosovo twice. McMafia author and Balkans expert Misha Glenny called the JSO a "critical node" where the state partnered organised crime.
Ulemek teamed up with mafia boss Dusan Spasojevic who led the Zemun Clan, a major player in the heroin trade. The Legionnaire is said to have earned £8.6million from kidnappings the Clan carried out. By 1999 Ulemek was under the command of head of Serbian security services Radomir Markovic and had become the JSO's de facto commander.
He was later convicted of the attempted murder of Vuk Draskovic, injured when a truck smashed into his motorcade in 1999, killing four officials. And in 2000, he plotted the murder of Ivan Stambolic, the ex-Yugoslav president who helped Milosevic rise up the ranks of Tito's communist party.
But the dictator turned on his ex-mentor, ordering his murder when Stambolic revealed he planned to run against him. Stambolic was found in a shallow grave in 2003 - shot in the back of the neck. As Serbia rose up against Milosevic after the disappearance of his rival in 2000, Ulemek and the Zemun Clan switched sides to join opposition leader Zoran Djindjic .
Ulemek vowed to back Milosevic's democratic opponent in exchange for keeping his job. But the relationship with Djindjic, who sent Milosevic to The Hague, soured a year later when he tried to free Serbia from organised crime.
Ulemek was suspended in 2001 for torching a disco and opening up with automatic gunfire. A month later he opened fire in a nightclub. Djindjic was killed by a sniper as he got out of his car in 2003. Ulemek surrendered in 2004 at a Belgrade house shared with his second wife, Aleksandra Ivanovic, mum of three of his four daughters, after apparently hiding in the former Yugoslavia and Canada.
In 2007 he and ex-deputy, Zvezdan Jovanovic, were convicted of conspiring with 10 others, most Zemun members, to kill Djindjic. Both got 40 years. It was reported that Ulemek has had three escape bids foiled at Zabela high-security jail and he can request early release in 2030.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Justin Trudeau takes major step in Katy Perry ‘romance' with concert date
In a pairing no one saw coming but everyone is now watching, former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been spotted attending Katy Perry's Montreal concert. The gig comes just days after the two were filmed dining together at a high-end local restaurant. The sighting has reignited speculation about the nature of their relationship, turning a political retirement into something far splashier. Social media erupted late Tuesday night as concertgoers at Perry's July 30 show shared footage of Trudeau, 53, in the audience at the Bell Centre. He wasn't alone, as his 16-year-old daughter Ella-Grace was at his side, beaming as the pop star powered through her chart-topping setlist. But it wasn't just a father-daughter night out that got people talking. Eyewitness videos appear to show Trudeau visibly enjoying Perry's performance, mouthing lyrics to Dark Horse and watching her acrobatic stage routine with wide-eyed admiration. One clip shows him momentarily frozen as Perry strikes a pose mid-song, a soft grin possibly betraying more than casual appreciation. The concert appearance follows closely on the heels of the much buzzed-about dinner between Trudeau and Perry at Le Violon, an upscale French restaurant in downtown Montreal. The two were filmed together on July 28 in a moment that has since gone viral, fueling wild speculation and a flurry of memes. Adding fuel to the fire is the fact that both Trudeau and Perry are recently single. Trudeau announced his separation from Sophie Grégoire in 2023, while Perry reportedly split from longtime partner Orlando Bloom earlier this summer. Though there has been no official comment from either camp, the timing and visibility of their outings have left fans and media alike leaning in with curiosity. More Trending While some observers are dismissing the events as coincidental or simply a high-profile friendship, others have been quick to project something more. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Critics, however, have pointed to the spectacle as a calculated rebranding effort for both parties – Perry, 40, shifting her public image post-Orlando, and Trudeau stepping further into post-political life with a dose of celebrity glamour. But if that's the case, it's working. The internet hasn't stopped talking since the sightings emerged. For now, it remains to be seen whether this is a flirtation, a friendship, or just a fascinating coincidence. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Foo Fighters' new drummer revealed after band member's firing and death of Taylor Hawkins MORE: Hollywood superstar looks completely unrecognisable after shaving for first time in 6 years MORE: Jess Glynne blasts White House over 'sick' deportation video using Jet2 Holidays viral song
Scotsman
7 hours ago
- Scotsman
Love & Other Poisons by Lesley McDowell review: 'enthralling'
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It was the most scandalous case in Victorian Scotland. Madeleine Smith, daughter of a successful Glasgow merchant – one with a country house too – was charged with murdering her lover, Emile L'Angelier, a French exile, ten years older than her and working as a clerk in a Glasgow office. There was no doubt that they were or had been lovers. Madeline, however, had been engaged to a young man approved of by her father. Emile had threatened to send Madeleine's love letters to her father, so there was clear evidence of motive. Lesley McDowell Moreover, Madeline had bought arsenic for medicinal purposes and her lover was killed by arsenic poisoning. But there was no evidence of how Madeline could have fed Emile the poison. The inability to prove this saved her. The Jury found the case 'not proven', that distinctive verdict open to Scots juries which in effect often means 'we're pretty sure you did it, but it hasn't been proved' or simply 'go away and don't do it again.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lesley McDowell, in this fine novel, comes up with a plausible explanation of how the arsenic might have been introduced into Emile's body. She has no doubt that Madeline was guilty, yet feels for her. Madeleine is indeed the heroine here. In fact, the Glasgow scenes are only part of the story, and McDowell even denies herself the dramatic opportunities offered by the trial, restricting this to a few things said by the lawyers. She is at least as interested in what happened next, and indeed much later, for the novel opens with a brash young American forcing himself onto a nonagenarian Mrs Sheehy, claiming to be a friend of her granddaughter. The American, Harry, has come from Hollywood, where the silent movies are about to become talkies. He has identified the old woman as the infamous Madeleine – which she denies, not wishing her granddaughter and other younger members of her family to know her dark secret. Indeed, Madeleine has come a long way from Glasgow. For some years she moved successfully in London society, but in America her life has been more modest. Her past is to be forgotten, and she is now a respectable old lady. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The American bullies her nastily, however, and she is also disturbed by a murder trial in New York in which she sees an accused woman as a victim. It is part of McDowell's skill and understanding of human nature to make the very old Madeleine seem a sympathetic heroine, even though there is little doubt that a lifetime ago she murdered her French lover. It's an enthralling novel, a beautifully organised tale in which McDowell shifts the perspective with great skill. She has been living with this story for a long time, revealing that ten years ago she was planning to collaborate with that finely imaginative novelist Emma Tennant in a version of Madeleine's story. Tennant's death made this impossible, but the finished article is a book that Tennant would surely have admired. It is certainly thoroughly enjoyable – a remarkably intelligent and at times very moving fictionalisation of an extraordinary life.
New Statesman
10 hours ago
- New Statesman
Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters
Photo byThe French prime minister François Bayrou said it was a 'dark day' for Europe. Under the trade deal that Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced in Scotland on 26 July, the US would impose a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports, but the European Union would not increase tariffs on American imports in return. According to Bayrou, 'an alliance of free peoples' had 'resolved to submission'. It was definitely a climbdown for the EU. Ever since Trump was re-elected last year and threatened new tariffs on imports to the US, the European Commission had threatened counter-measures – just as it did during the first Trump administration, when it responded to US tariffs on European aluminium and steel with its own tariffs on American products like bourbon. In the end, though, the EU simply accepted the new US tariffs this time – and on top of that, promised to increase purchases of American liquified natural gas and weapons. To be clear, what was agreed in Scotland is a political or 'framework' deal and a lot of the important details have yet to be worked out. In particular, it is not yet clear whether pharmaceuticals – a hugely important sector for the EU and especially Germany – will be included or how much steel will be exempt from tariffs. Moreover, the promises that von der Leyen made to increase investment in the US have already turned out to be empty – there is no way the EU can buy $750bn of American oil and gas in the next few years and it cannot direct companies to invest in the United States. Nevertheless, in the few days since the deal was announced, it has widely been seen as a humiliating European capitulation to Trump. Many critics of deal – especially EU boosters who fantasise about the idea of 'strategic autonomy' or a 'geopolitical Europe' – seem to imagine that the EU could have followed an alternative approach and stood up to Trump. In reality, though, there was little alternative to what Bayrou called 'submission'. Critics of the deal think EU member states undermined von der Leyen and forced her to negotiate from a position of weakness. It is true that some member states, especially Germany and Italy, ultimately backed off from threats of retaliatory measures because they feared that a full-on transatlantic trade war would ultimately hit important sectors of their economies harder than they are now being hit by the new US tariffs. But the idea that the EU had leverage over the US that it had but did not use – and that if it had used it, it could have struck a much better deal – is wishful thinking. As the world's largest trading bloc, the EU has long thought of itself as an economic superpower and prided itself on its ability to negotiate trade deals – that, of course, was one of main arguments why the UK should remain within in the EU. This deal has somewhat undermined that self-image. After all, in May, the UK was able to negotiate a slightly better deal with the Trump administration, with a baseline tariff of 10 per cent. But what really makes the EU weak relative to the US is its vulnerability in security terms. The idea that the EU had leverage over the US that it did not use only makes sense if you think that economics and security are completely separate realms and that security issues are irrelevant to trade negotiations and cannot be linked. But deep down, despite all the tough talk and the threats of retaliation to Trump's tariffs, European politicians knew that taking such a confrontational approach could have consequences for US support for Ukraine – or even for Nato and the US security guarantee to Europe itself. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It's striking that this trade deal was being negotiated just as Trump seemed to be becoming increasingly frustrated with Vladimir Putin and more supportive of Ukraine. Earlier in July, Trump had reinstated supplies of US weapons to Ukraine – albeit paid for by Europeans – and threatened new economic sanctions against Russia if Putin did not make progress in negotiations within 50 days. (The day after the EU-US trade deal was announced, Trump said he was now giving Putin even less time.) As tentative as European leaders know Trump's shift on Ukraine is, they do not want to jeopardise it. EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič, who apparently spent hundreds of hours in frustrating negotiations with Trump administration officials, hinted at this in a briefing the morning after the announcement of the deal. He said he could not go into the details of everything that was discussed with Trump in Scotland, but 'it was not just about trade'. In the end, what has made the EU so dependent on the US, and made the EU's 'submission' inevitable, is the war in Ukraine – or, to be more precise, the way that, for the last two and half years since the Russian invasion in 2022, European leaders have insisted that their own security depends on a Ukrainian victory. Related
