'Grave national security concern': Ramaphosa calls for restraint amid tensions in SAPS
Mkhwanazi made damning allegations against police minister Senzo Mchunu. He accused the minister of interfering with police investigations and also being an associate of people with questionable characters.
Mchunu has denied all the allegations made against him.
'This is a matter of grave national security concern that is receiving the highest-priority attention. It is vital that the integrity of the country's security services is safeguarded and that the rule of law is affirmed,' Ramaphosa said
'All parties to this matter are called upon to exercise discipline and restraint. The trading of accusations and counter-accusations threatens to undermine public confidence and sow confusion. Furthermore, these actions damage the unity and focus of the police.'
The Presidency said Ramaphosa will outline the actions to be taken on this matter on his return from the Brics Leaders' Summit currently under way in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
30 minutes ago
- The South African
Donald Trump slams 'TRAIN WRECK' Elon Musk: 'He's gone off the rails!'
US President Donald Trump on Sunday slammed former ally Elon Musk's launching of a new political party as 'ridiculous,' deepening the Republican's feud with the man who was once his biggest backer. Trump also branded the SpaceX and Tesla tycoon a 'TRAIN WRECK' who had gone 'off the rails' after Musk said he wanted to challenge the current US political system. The world's richest man was almost inseparable from Trump as he headed the cost-cutting 'Department of Government Efficiency,' but they fell out hard over the president's 'big beautiful' tax and spending mega-bill. 'I think it's ridiculous to start a third party,' Donald Trump told reporters before he boarded Air Force One on his way back to Washington from his New Jersey golf club. 'It's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. Third parties have never worked. So he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous,' he said. South Africa-born Musk announced on Saturday that he would create the so-called 'America Party' to challenge what he called the United States' 'one-party system.' Musk says the president's massive domestic spending plan would explode the US debt, and has vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it. The former DOGE boss, who led a huge drive to slash federal spending and cut jobs, equated Trump's Republicans with rival Democrats when it came to domestic spending. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk posted on X, the social media platform that he owns. Musk gave few details of his plan and it was not clear whether he had registered the party with US electoral authorities, but it could cause Republicans headaches in the 2026 midterm elections – and beyond. In a sign of how sensitive the issue could be for Trump, he took to his Truth Social network while still on Air Force One to double down on his assault on Musk. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Trump posted. 'The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats.' In a lengthy diatribe, Trump repeated his earlier assertion that Musk's ownership of electric vehicle company Tesla had made him turn on the president due to the spending bill cutting subsidies for such automobiles. Musk has insisted that his opposition is primarily due to the bill increasing the US fiscal deficit and sovereign debt. Earlier on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also threw shade at Musk's attempts to enter the political fray, telling him to stick to running his companies. When asked by CNN if Musk's plan bothered the Trump administration, Bessent offered thinly veiled criticism. 'I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone,' Bessent said. 'So I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities.' Musk left DOGE in May to focus full-time on his corporate responsibilities, with Tesla's sales and image especially suffering from his brief venture into Trump's inner circle. Trump gave him a grand send-off in the Oval Office, during a bizarre ceremony during which Musk appeared with a black eye and received a golden key to the White House from the president. But just days later the two were exchanging bitter insults on social media after Musk criticised Trump's flagship spending bill. Trump would not comment on Sunday when asked if he would be asking Musk to return the golden key. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
BREAKING: Donald Trump hits South Africa with 30% tariffs
South Africa is set to face a significant trade setback as US President Donald Trump has confirmed that 30% tariffs will be imposed on all South African goods starting 1 August 2025. The announcement was made in a letter from Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa. The tariffs are a result of the Donald Trump administration's stance on global trade imbalances, claiming that South Africa sells more to the US than it buys, a disparity that the US says justifies the imposition of a hefty tariff. This move is part of Donald Trump's broader 'reciprocal tariff' policy, which has sparked debate worldwide. Critics argue that the policy is based on flawed economic reasoning, with concerns over its long-term impact on international trade relations. 'South Africa's trade imbalance with the US has reached a point where it can no longer go unaddressed,' Donald Trump's letter stated. 'These tariffs are necessary to ensure fairer trade practices.' With just three weeks until the tariff implementation, South African exporters are bracing for the economic fallout. Key industries, including mining, agriculture, and manufacturing, are likely to be hit hard by the new tariff regime. Experts warn that the increased cost of doing business with the US could lead to reduced exports, putting pressure on local businesses already struggling with the global economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. South African officials have expressed concern over the sudden move and its potential to harm their economy, urging Trump's administration to reconsider the punitive tariffs. Economic analysts and trade experts have widely criticised the tariffs, arguing that the trade imbalance with South Africa is not due to unfair practices, but rather structural and historical economic factors. They claim that the imposition of tariffs could lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, further exacerbating global trade tensions. 'The reciprocal tariff policy fails to account for the complexities of international trade,' said Dr. Thabo Mbeki, former South African president and economist. 'It's a short-sighted approach that risks worsening trade relations and harming economies on both sides.' With the August 1 deadline looming, South African officials are seeking diplomatic channels to resolve the issue before the tariffs take effect. However, with the Donald Trump administration's firm stance, it remains uncertain whether a last-minute resolution can be reached. The upcoming trade blow is a pivotal moment in South Africa's relationship with the US, and exporters will be watching closely to see how this affects their ability to access the lucrative American market. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
BRICS leaders condemn Ukrainian attacks on Russian infrastructure
The declaration made no mention of Russia's constant missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities, which have intensified in recent weeks and caused greater death and destruction The leaders of BRICS — including President Cyril Ramaphosa — have strongly condemned Ukraine for recent attacks on Russian railway infrastructure, but remained silent on Russia's constant bombardment of Ukraine, which has killed many civilians. The BRICS nations, meeting in Rio de Janeiro for their annual summit on Sunday and Monday, 6 and 7 July, issued a 126-point declaration covering a wide range of political, economic and security issues. It included the following: 'We condemn in the strongest possible terms the attacks on bridges and railway infrastructure deliberately targeting civilians in the Bryansk, Kursk and Voronezh regions of the Russian Federation on May 31, and June 1 and 5, 2025, which resulted in the deaths of several civilians, including children.' The declaration made no mention of Russia's constant missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities, which have intensified in recent weeks and caused greater death and destruction, in part because of US President Donald Trump's reduction of US military support, leaving Ukraine without sufficient anti-missile defences. Ukraine has occasionally struck back at military targets inside Russia, though its attacks have been far fewer than Russia's attacks on Ukraine. The Bryansk, Kursk and Voronezh provinces which were mentioned in the BRICS declaration 'are all located near Ukraine's northeastern border and have played a central role in Russia's war effort, serving as key logistical hubs and launch sites for missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities — often targeting civilian infrastructure and causing casualties', according to the Kyiv Independent. The BRICS declaration otherwise mentioned Ukraine only briefly and did not present a united position on the war, probably because of the different positions of member countries. Instead, the declaration allowed members to maintain their varying positions by stating: 'We recall our national positions concerning the conflict in Ukraine as expressed in the appropriate fora, including the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly. 'We note with appreciation relevant proposals of mediation and good offices, including the creation of the African Peace Initiative and the Group of Friends for Peace, aimed at peaceful resolution of the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy. We expect that current efforts will lead to a sustainable peace settlement.' Russia is one of the original BRICS members, along with Brazil, India and China. South Africa was admitted in 2010, and since then, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates have also been admitted, as well as 10 partner countries that enjoy partial membership benefits. Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the summit in person, presumably because of the International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant for his arrest, which Brazil would have felt obliged to execute as it is an ICC member. Putin participated by video link and sent his foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, to represent him in person. Chinese President Xi Jinping did not attend either, apparently because of a clash of schedules. Strikes on Iran The presence of Iran — which has supplied drones to Russia to attack Ukraine — was felt in a condemnation of the recent US and Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and express grave concern over the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East. 'We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under full safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the IAEA. 'Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm. In this context, we reiterate our support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at addressing regional challenges. We call upon the United Nations Security Council to be seized of this matter.' Though the declaration characterised Iran's nuclear facilities as 'peaceful', they have not been unequivocally confirmed as such by the IAEA. Gustavo de Carvalho, a BRICS expert at the SA Institute of International Affairs in Johannesburg, said the Rio de Janeiro declaration was more or less what he had expected. As a consensus-based body, it was difficult for BRICS to engage with divisive language. He welcomed what he said was the first endorsement by China and Russia — the two BRICS permanent members of the UN Security Council — of the aspirations to permanent Security Council membership of Brazil, India and two African countries (still to be identified by Africa). He noted that the summit had advanced the ongoing process of strengthening links between the BRICS members on issues such as artificial intelligence, health and education. He saw progress in the BRICS initiative to increase trade among member countries in their own currencies, rather than the US dollar and interbank payments. He said that every year there was an expectation that BRICS would take a strong anti-Western position in its summit declarations. 'But we never really see it, partially because most of its members don't consider themselves to be anti-Western, but rather as non-Western, with different layers of interaction and integration with Western countries.' De Carvalho said that while the BRICS countries acknowledged the threats to multilateralism posed by the Trump administration, they had chosen to take a positive, longer-term stance by emphasising the roles they could play in strengthening international bodies like the UN, the World Trade Organization and the World Health Organization — 'rather than just pointing a finger at the US, which would create a much stronger war of words but not really resolve the issues'. DM
