logo
A miscalculation by Iran led to Israeli strikes' extensive toll, officials say

A miscalculation by Iran led to Israeli strikes' extensive toll, officials say

Straits Times2 days ago

Rescuers working at the site of a damaged building, in the aftermath of Israeli strikes in Tehran, on June 13. PHOTO: REUTERS
Iran's senior leaders had been planning for more than a week for an Israeli attack should nuclear talks with the United States fail. But they made one enormous miscalculation.
They never expected Israel to strike before another round of talks that had been scheduled for June 15 in Oman, officials close to Iran's leadership said on June 13. They dismissed reports that an attack was imminent as Israeli propaganda meant to pressure Iran to make concessions on its nuclear programme in those talks.
Perhaps because of that complacency, precautions that had been planned were ignored, the officials said.
This account of how Iranian officials were preparing before Israel conducted widespread attacks across their country on June 13, and how they reacted in the aftermath, is based on interviews with half a dozen senior Iranian officials and two members of the Revolutionary Guard. They all asked not to be named to discuss sensitive information.
Officials said that the night of Israel's attack, senior military commanders did not shelter in safe houses and instead stayed in their own homes, a fateful decision. General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Revolutionary Guard's aerospace unit, and his senior staff ignored a directive against congregating in one location. They held an emergency war meeting at a military base in Tehran and were killed when Israel struck the base.
By the evening of June 13, the government was just beginning to grasp the extent of damage from Israel's military campaign that began in the early hours of the day and struck at least 15 locations across Iran, including in Isfahan, Tabriz, Ilam, Lorestan, Borujerd, Qom, Arak, Urmia, Ghasre Shirin, Kermanshah, Hamedan and Shiraz, four Iranian officials said.
Israel had taken out much of Iran's defence capability, destroying radars and air defences; crippled its access to its arsenal of ballistic missiles; and wiped out senior figures in the military chain of command. In addition, the aboveground part of a major nuclear enrichment plant at Natanz was severely damaged.
In private text messages shared with The New York Times, some officials were angrily asking one another, 'Where is our air defence?' and 'How can Israel come and attack anything it wants, kill our top commanders, and we are incapable of stopping it?' They also questioned the major intelligence and defence failures that had led to Iran's inability to see the attacks coming, and the resulting damage.
'Israel's attack completely caught the leadership by surprise, especially the killing of the top military figures and nuclear scientists. It also exposed our lack of proper air defence and their ability to bombard our critical sites and military bases with no resistance,' Mr Hamid Hosseini, a member of the country's Chamber of Commerce's energy committee, said in a telephone interview from Tehran.
Mr Hosseini, who is close to the government, said Israel's apparent infiltration of Iran's security and military apparatus had also shocked officials. Israel has conducted covert operations in Iran against military and nuclear targets and carried out targeted assassinations against nuclear scientists for decades as part of its shadow war with Iran, but the June 13 attack was multi-pronged and complex, involving fighter jets and covert operatives who had smuggled missile parts and drones into the country suggested a new level of access and capability.
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has been moved to an undisclosed safe location where he remained in contact with remaining top military officials, said in a televised speech that Israel had, with its attacks, declared war on Iran. As he spoke, vowing revenge and punishment, Iran launched several waves of missile attacks on Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.
'They should not think they attacked and it is over,' Mr Khamenei said. 'No, they started it. They started the war. We will not allow them to escape from this crime unharmed.'
Earlier on the morning of June 13, Iran's Supreme National Security Council, a 23-person council responsible for national security decisions, held an emergency meeting to discuss how the country should respond. In the meeting, Mr Khamenei said he wanted revenge but did not want to act hastily, according to two officials familiar with the discussions.
Divisions emerged on when and how Iran should respond, and whether it could sustain a prolonged war with Israel that could also drag in the United States, given how badly its defence and missile capabilities were damaged. One official said in the meeting that if Israel responded by attacking Iran's infrastructure or water and energy plants, it could lead to protests or riots.
A member of the Revolutionary Guard briefed on the meeting said that officials understood that Mr Khamenei faced a pivotal moment in his nearly 40 years in power: He had to decide between acting, and risking an all-out war that could end his rule, or retreating, which would be interpreted domestically and internationally as defeat.
'Khamanei faces no good options,' said Mr Ali Vaez, the Iran project director of the International Crisis Group. 'If he escalates, he risks inviting a more devastating Israeli attack that the US could join. If he doesn't, he risks hollowing out his regime or losing power.'
Ultimately, Mr Khamenei ordered Iran's military to fire on Israel. Initially, the plan was to launch up to 1,000 ballistic missiles on Israel to overwhelm its air defence and ensure maximum damage, according to two members of the Guard. But Israel's strikes on missile bases had made it impossible to move missiles quickly from storage and place them on launchpads, they added.
In the end, Iran could only muster about 100 missiles in its first waves of attacks. At least seven sites were struck around Tel Aviv, killing one person and injuring at least 20 more, and damaging residential buildings.
On June 13, after Israeli attacks had somewhat subsided for part of the day, Iran's military hurried to repair some of its damaged air defences and install new ones, according to officials. Iran's airspace remained closed with flights grounded and airports closed.
Some residents of Tehran spent June 13, a holiday, waiting in gas station lines to fill up their vehicles' tanks and flocking to grocery stores to stock up on essentials like bread, canned food and bottled water. Many families gathered in parks late into the night, spreading blankets and picnics on the grass, and said in telephone interviews they feared remaining indoors after Israel had struck residential buildings in various neighbourhoods targeting scientists and military and government officials.
Mr Mehrdad, 35, who did not want his last name used because of fears for his safety, shared a video of his kitchen wall and windows destroyed when an Israeli missile struck the high-rise next door in his upscale neighbourhood in northern Tehran. He said that he had been lucky to have been in the bedroom when the attack occurred, but some civilians in the neighbourhood, including children, had been injured.
In the early hours of June 14, Israel resumed its attacks on Tehran. Some residents, including Ms Fatemeh Hassani, who lives in the Mirdamad neighbourhood, said they heard drones buzzing overhead and non-stop explosion sounds followed by the rat-tat-tat of air defences firing in eastern and central Tehran.
Ms Mahsa, a 42-year-old computer engineer who lives in the capital's north and similarly did not want to give her last name out of fear of her safety, said she and her family were unable to sleep. They not only could hear the booms but also could see traces of fire and smoke from their window.
'We are in the middle of a war, this much is clear to all of us, and we don't know where it will go or how it will end,' she said. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved, sources say
China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved, sources say

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved, sources say

President Donald Trump said that the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a 'great deal". PHOTO: BLOOMBERG BEIJING/SINGAPORE - The renewed US-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks told Reuters. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialised rare-earth magnets that US military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications. At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding US curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, US officials also signalled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke to Reuters about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House, State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on June 11 that the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a 'great deal,' adding, 'we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too.' And US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no 'quid pro quo' on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from non-military US manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a 'green channel' for expediting license approvals from trusted US companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on June 11 that it had obtained export licences that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some 'compliant applications' for export licences. But China has not budged on specialised rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Mr Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Mr Trump said US tariffs would be set at 55 per cent for China, while China had agreed to 10 per cent from the United States. Mr Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the US. Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. 'Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this timeframe, and possibly during Mr Trump's remaining term,' said Mr Liu Weidong, a US-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Mr Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in US court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Mr Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. 'It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognise that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities,' Mr Hass said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump says he hopes Israel and Iran can strike deal
Trump says he hopes Israel and Iran can strike deal

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says he hopes Israel and Iran can strike deal

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth talks to U.S. President Donald Trump during the U.S. Army's 250th Birthday parade, on the same day of U.S. President Donald Trump 79th birthday, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said on Sunday that he hopes Israel and Iran can broker a deal but said sometimes countries have to fight it out first. Talking to reporters as he left for the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said the U.S. will continue to support the defense of Israel but declined to say if he asked the U.S. ally to pause strikes on Iran. "I hope there's going to be a deal. I think it's time for a deal and we'll see what happens. Sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're gonna see what happens," Trump said. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on Sunday, killing and wounding civilians and raising concerns of a broader regional conflict, with both militaries urging civilians on the opposing side to take precautions against further strikes. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

World entering new era as nuclear powers build up arsenals, Stockholm think tank says
World entering new era as nuclear powers build up arsenals, Stockholm think tank says

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

World entering new era as nuclear powers build up arsenals, Stockholm think tank says

World entering new era as nuclear powers build up arsenals, Stockholm think tank says STOCKHOLM - The world's nuclear-armed states are beefing up their atomic arsenals and walking out of arms control pacts, creating a new era of threat that has brought an end to decades of reductions in stockpiles since the Cold War, a think tank said on June 16. Of the total global inventory of an estimated 12,241 warheads in January 2025, about 9,614 were in military stockpiles for potential use, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) said in its yearbook, an annual inventory of the world's most dangerous weapons. Around 2,100 of the deployed warheads were kept in a state of high operational alert on ballistic missiles, nearly all belonging to either the US or Russia. Sipri said global tensions had seen the nine nuclear states - the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel - plan to increase their stockpiles. 'The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which had lasted since the end of the Cold War, is coming to an end,' Sipri said. 'Instead, we see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements.' It said Russia and the US, which together possess around 90 per cent of all nuclear weapons, had kept the sizes of their respective useable warheads relatively stable in 2024. But both were implementing extensive modernisation programmes that could increase the size of their arsenals in the future. The fastest-growing arsenal is China's, with Beijing adding about 100 new warheads a year since 2023. China could potentially have at least as many intercontinental ballistic missiles as either Russia or the US by the turn of the decade. According to the estimates, Russia and the US held around 5,459 and 5,177 nuclear warheads respectively, while China had around 600. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store