
Sabah may stay poor due to GLCs
Published on: Sunday, June 08, 2025
Published on: Sun, Jun 08, 2025
By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: Badly managed GLCs is one of the worst economic problems of Sabah. The GLCs have become a bottomless pit. No matter how much extra revenue the GRS Government can generate or how much more funding it can get from the Federal Government or how much more investments it can attract, Sabahans will remain poor. All these money cannot cover this ever-expanding hole by badly managed GLCs.
Advertisement Singapore's GLCs [e.g. SIA, DBS, Capital Land] are big economic boosters, making profits in billions. Sabah's GLCs are big liabilities, losing billions over the years. Sabah's GLCs make outsiders rich, impoverish Sabahans. They practice 'Sabah for NON-Sabhans', NOT 'Sabah for Sabahans'. GRS Government has started the GLC Transformation. The GRS Government has started the GLC transformation because it has realized this bottomless GLC problem. It must be plugged or else Sabah will remain poor always.
Advertisement Well known fact that Sabah's GLCs have: [1] Proliferated in number since the mid-1980s. [2] The increase in number has little economic logic or strategy. more for expediencies and political accommodation. Chairman appointments of big GLCs are special reserves for warlords. Senior management jobs for relatives and macai. [3] The number of GLCs has grown to more than 250. The Assistant Minister of Finance has confirmed this number in the press. [4] Big majority of GLCs have in total lost billions over the years, some are still heavily debt ridden, poorly managed and lack governance. [5] The GLCs have incurred huge liabilities for the many past lopsided agreements signed by GLCs and Malayan companies. [6] The GLCs have produced most failed and/or delayed JV projects with Malayan companies. There are 7 or 8 in KK alone as testimonies of the GLCs' failures. One GLC has failed to launch a major tourism project for more than 10 years. Sabah GLCs love Malayan companies, sideline Sabah companies. No love for 'Sabah for Sabahans.' They love 'Sabah for Malayans'. [7] Return on capital and assets are poor, mostly negative! [8]. The non-performing GLCs have not helped to build up Sabah's economy. Instead, they are destroying it. The GRS government, for the first time in Sabah's history, has initiated transformation after many public warnings by Hajiji and Masidi on the unsatisfactory and sad situation in the GLC. Already announced are these big moves. First, AG Brenndon and MOF Assistant Minister have confirmed the formation of the Oversight Committee. This is an important first step. Second, AG Brenndon has confirmed that all agreements to be signed by GLCs must be referred to and vetted by his Chambers before submission to the Cabinet. Knowing Brenndon, he would not tolerate any lopsided agreement at Sabah's expense. Many Sabahans are extremely concerned about the poor performance of GLCs. This is common talk among folks in Sabah. Not in complimentary tone. Reflective of this sentiment, more than 70, 000 viewers have visited the podcast by SABAR on GLCs in the Kopitiam Council's YouTube platform. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs2LTSK5Kiw&t=723s It is very positive that Hajiji and Masidi have started to solve Sabah's GLC-massive-headache. Likewise, other leaders should consider offering their ideas/solution in the run up of the 2025 election. Better still, include their plan to transform the GLCs in their manifestos. The GLC problems, no doubt very tough, must be resolved because they are bleeding Sabah dry. GLCs dominate every important economic sector in Sabah. Simple logic. GLCs' combined failure to perform in these sectors has inflicted Sabah's overall economy like CANCEROUS CELLS. All Sabahans, especially the vulnerable B40 suffer. The GLCs are depriving future generations of their economic opportunities. Followings are some token samples: [1] GLCs are in control of Sabah's Financial Institutions [SDB, SCC]. [2] GLCs are in effective control of many natural resources: mining/minerals [SMM], timber and FMUs [Innoprise, SOFODA]. [3] GLCs hold many monopolistic rights: Cement [Sabah Cement Industries], Ports [Suria, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD], Water [Jetama]. Fishing landing rights [SAFMA]. [4] GLCs have been granted practically free and extremely prime land, most of them at RM1,000 premium. [Innoprise, SUDC of SEDCO, Suria, SICC, Sabah Energy, TAED.]. [5] GLCs have been granted vast acreage of valuable agriculture land for free or at nominal premium. [Sawit Kinabalu, KPD, Sabah Softwood.] [6] GLCs have been granted cheap and valuable land for industrial park [KKIP, SOGIP, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD, ASEAN Supply Base in Labuan] [7] GLCs have been granted concession rights in oil and gas, river and sea sand [Sabah Energy, Sabah Gas, SMJ Energy, SEDCO]. [8] GLCs are in hotels, resorts and jungle resorts [Innoprise, SEDCO and Sabah Air] [9] GLCs have been granted exclusive JV preference mostly with Malayan companies. Summary: you name it, GLCs are in it. GLCs control it. GLCs are the preferred choice for almost every economic activity in Sabah. GLCs are given priority in any new business, depriving opportunities for Sabahan businessmen. Despite of all the huge advantages, most of them are doing very badly. The GLCs are in competition Sabah's private sector in the most unfair manners. They are killing our Sabahan investors, entrepreneurs, and even small SMEs. Chairmen, Directors, Senior Management would have been sacked in the Private Sector. All business conglomerates would NOT have tolerated the bad governance/management of the board of directors, senior management of Sabah's GLCs. They would have been sacked long time ago. The shareholders would not tolerate such persistent non-performance and abuses. The GLCs can afford to continue with their perennial state of abuses, bad-performances, losses and giving perks away is because Sabahans, you and me, our future generations are paying for their perpetual good lives. Does Sabah need 250 GLCs? How may officers and staff needed by GLCs Pertinent questions. I would not venture to guess. However, one thing is certain, a great number of them are existing to give jobs, perks and political accommodation or favours. Will not surprise if majority of them would not be able to justify their existence in a proper revamp exercise. As can be seen in the list above, badly managed monopolies, special concessions granted by the government, land given for free, duplication, competition against each other are common features among these GLCs. Pertinent question 2. After years and years of losses, the iron rice bowl mentality is as strong as ever. Petronas has reduced 10% of its work force because petroleum prices are dropping. No iron rice bowl in Petronas. A thorough revamp, transformation and rationalization is long overdue. Let the leaders in this election answer this question. Good leaders will give you the right and logical answer. Solve the GLCs Problems, 50% economic Sabah's problems are Solved. Why is this? Because the GLCs are burdening down, big liabilities in almost all the sectors of Sabah's economy. If the GLCs can be transformed to perform, all the sectors that they are in will create an economic boom in Sabah. Imagine: [1] If each GLC, on average, can create 100 jobs, 25,000 Sabahans will have employment. Sabah's unemployed graduates will be over. [2] If each GLC, on average can make RM10m, total will be RM2.5b, RM20m, it will be RM5b. Given all the freebies like land, monopolies, concessions and no capital cost, such profits can be within easy reach. SMJ Energy's profit is already RM250m in 3rd year of existence. KPJ Hospital [Johor SEDCO] makes RM350m a year. [3] Sabah GLCs should emulate KPJ Hospital, expand beyond Sabah or go international. This is possible when there is a proper Board of Directors and good senior management. Hajiji and Masidi have appointed the right people in some GLCs already. Vast improvements in their performance. 3 myths that must be dispelled. First: Sabah does not have the right people to manage the GLCs properly. Not true. Remove the useless ones, good Sabahans can be found. Second: GLCs cannot be turned around. Appointing right chairmen, directors and senior management, the turn-arounds will be possible. Examples: [1] SDB is being revamped. Lim Haw Kuang, former Executive Chairman of Shell in China and Director BNM has been appointed as Executive Chairman. The Board of Directors are credible people. No political interference. RAM has just given SDB top rating! [2] SMJ Energy is performing exceptional well with a highly regarded Board of Directors and well qualified senior management team. Its profit in 2024 is RM250m. [3] Sabah Energy Corporation, Sabah Credit Corporation are being managed professionally. They are doing very well. SEC may become the biggest gas aggregator in Malaysia! SCC has proven that it can do some social financing and be profitable! [4] Hajiji has appointed James Wong as GGM to revamp SEDCO. [5] POIC LD has been turned around with Yong Teck Lee as Chairman and Fredian Gan CEO. It is now undertaking a major expansion that will make POIC LD a marine hub for Sabah. POIC LD is showing the way that it can monetize its landed assets, FZ approval from Federal MOF and its deepest ports in this region. [6] Innoprise has been transformed, vastly improved by forward looking executive chairman Jasnih and a professional team. Thirdly, GLCs can make sizeable profit [in hundreds of millions of RM]. E.g. SMJ Energy. GLCs in plantations, GLCs with monopolies and GLCs give free land have potential to make a lot more. Let's pray Leaders of all Parties will Focus on GLC Transformation. Yes, Sabahans better pray hard that Sabah leaders will focus on transformation of GLCs. Successful GLC transformation will mean prosperity. Failure? Continue poverty. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Express
4 hours ago
- Daily Express
Sabah may stay poor due to GLCs
Published on: Sunday, June 08, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 08, 2025 By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: Badly managed GLCs is one of the worst economic problems of Sabah. The GLCs have become a bottomless pit. No matter how much extra revenue the GRS Government can generate or how much more funding it can get from the Federal Government or how much more investments it can attract, Sabahans will remain poor. All these money cannot cover this ever-expanding hole by badly managed GLCs. Advertisement Singapore's GLCs [e.g. SIA, DBS, Capital Land] are big economic boosters, making profits in billions. Sabah's GLCs are big liabilities, losing billions over the years. Sabah's GLCs make outsiders rich, impoverish Sabahans. They practice 'Sabah for NON-Sabhans', NOT 'Sabah for Sabahans'. GRS Government has started the GLC Transformation. The GRS Government has started the GLC transformation because it has realized this bottomless GLC problem. It must be plugged or else Sabah will remain poor always. Advertisement Well known fact that Sabah's GLCs have: [1] Proliferated in number since the mid-1980s. [2] The increase in number has little economic logic or strategy. more for expediencies and political accommodation. Chairman appointments of big GLCs are special reserves for warlords. Senior management jobs for relatives and macai. [3] The number of GLCs has grown to more than 250. The Assistant Minister of Finance has confirmed this number in the press. [4] Big majority of GLCs have in total lost billions over the years, some are still heavily debt ridden, poorly managed and lack governance. [5] The GLCs have incurred huge liabilities for the many past lopsided agreements signed by GLCs and Malayan companies. [6] The GLCs have produced most failed and/or delayed JV projects with Malayan companies. There are 7 or 8 in KK alone as testimonies of the GLCs' failures. One GLC has failed to launch a major tourism project for more than 10 years. Sabah GLCs love Malayan companies, sideline Sabah companies. No love for 'Sabah for Sabahans.' They love 'Sabah for Malayans'. [7] Return on capital and assets are poor, mostly negative! [8]. The non-performing GLCs have not helped to build up Sabah's economy. Instead, they are destroying it. The GRS government, for the first time in Sabah's history, has initiated transformation after many public warnings by Hajiji and Masidi on the unsatisfactory and sad situation in the GLC. Already announced are these big moves. First, AG Brenndon and MOF Assistant Minister have confirmed the formation of the Oversight Committee. This is an important first step. Second, AG Brenndon has confirmed that all agreements to be signed by GLCs must be referred to and vetted by his Chambers before submission to the Cabinet. Knowing Brenndon, he would not tolerate any lopsided agreement at Sabah's expense. Many Sabahans are extremely concerned about the poor performance of GLCs. This is common talk among folks in Sabah. Not in complimentary tone. Reflective of this sentiment, more than 70, 000 viewers have visited the podcast by SABAR on GLCs in the Kopitiam Council's YouTube platform. It is very positive that Hajiji and Masidi have started to solve Sabah's GLC-massive-headache. Likewise, other leaders should consider offering their ideas/solution in the run up of the 2025 election. Better still, include their plan to transform the GLCs in their manifestos. The GLC problems, no doubt very tough, must be resolved because they are bleeding Sabah dry. GLCs dominate every important economic sector in Sabah. Simple logic. GLCs' combined failure to perform in these sectors has inflicted Sabah's overall economy like CANCEROUS CELLS. All Sabahans, especially the vulnerable B40 suffer. The GLCs are depriving future generations of their economic opportunities. Followings are some token samples: [1] GLCs are in control of Sabah's Financial Institutions [SDB, SCC]. [2] GLCs are in effective control of many natural resources: mining/minerals [SMM], timber and FMUs [Innoprise, SOFODA]. [3] GLCs hold many monopolistic rights: Cement [Sabah Cement Industries], Ports [Suria, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD], Water [Jetama]. Fishing landing rights [SAFMA]. [4] GLCs have been granted practically free and extremely prime land, most of them at RM1,000 premium. [Innoprise, SUDC of SEDCO, Suria, SICC, Sabah Energy, TAED.]. [5] GLCs have been granted vast acreage of valuable agriculture land for free or at nominal premium. [Sawit Kinabalu, KPD, Sabah Softwood.] [6] GLCs have been granted cheap and valuable land for industrial park [KKIP, SOGIP, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD, ASEAN Supply Base in Labuan] [7] GLCs have been granted concession rights in oil and gas, river and sea sand [Sabah Energy, Sabah Gas, SMJ Energy, SEDCO]. [8] GLCs are in hotels, resorts and jungle resorts [Innoprise, SEDCO and Sabah Air] [9] GLCs have been granted exclusive JV preference mostly with Malayan companies. Summary: you name it, GLCs are in it. GLCs control it. GLCs are the preferred choice for almost every economic activity in Sabah. GLCs are given priority in any new business, depriving opportunities for Sabahan businessmen. Despite of all the huge advantages, most of them are doing very badly. The GLCs are in competition Sabah's private sector in the most unfair manners. They are killing our Sabahan investors, entrepreneurs, and even small SMEs. Chairmen, Directors, Senior Management would have been sacked in the Private Sector. All business conglomerates would NOT have tolerated the bad governance/management of the board of directors, senior management of Sabah's GLCs. They would have been sacked long time ago. The shareholders would not tolerate such persistent non-performance and abuses. The GLCs can afford to continue with their perennial state of abuses, bad-performances, losses and giving perks away is because Sabahans, you and me, our future generations are paying for their perpetual good lives. Does Sabah need 250 GLCs? How may officers and staff needed by GLCs Pertinent questions. I would not venture to guess. However, one thing is certain, a great number of them are existing to give jobs, perks and political accommodation or favours. Will not surprise if majority of them would not be able to justify their existence in a proper revamp exercise. As can be seen in the list above, badly managed monopolies, special concessions granted by the government, land given for free, duplication, competition against each other are common features among these GLCs. Pertinent question 2. After years and years of losses, the iron rice bowl mentality is as strong as ever. Petronas has reduced 10% of its work force because petroleum prices are dropping. No iron rice bowl in Petronas. A thorough revamp, transformation and rationalization is long overdue. Let the leaders in this election answer this question. Good leaders will give you the right and logical answer. Solve the GLCs Problems, 50% economic Sabah's problems are Solved. Why is this? Because the GLCs are burdening down, big liabilities in almost all the sectors of Sabah's economy. If the GLCs can be transformed to perform, all the sectors that they are in will create an economic boom in Sabah. Imagine: [1] If each GLC, on average, can create 100 jobs, 25,000 Sabahans will have employment. Sabah's unemployed graduates will be over. [2] If each GLC, on average can make RM10m, total will be RM2.5b, RM20m, it will be RM5b. Given all the freebies like land, monopolies, concessions and no capital cost, such profits can be within easy reach. SMJ Energy's profit is already RM250m in 3rd year of existence. KPJ Hospital [Johor SEDCO] makes RM350m a year. [3] Sabah GLCs should emulate KPJ Hospital, expand beyond Sabah or go international. This is possible when there is a proper Board of Directors and good senior management. Hajiji and Masidi have appointed the right people in some GLCs already. Vast improvements in their performance. 3 myths that must be dispelled. First: Sabah does not have the right people to manage the GLCs properly. Not true. Remove the useless ones, good Sabahans can be found. Second: GLCs cannot be turned around. Appointing right chairmen, directors and senior management, the turn-arounds will be possible. Examples: [1] SDB is being revamped. Lim Haw Kuang, former Executive Chairman of Shell in China and Director BNM has been appointed as Executive Chairman. The Board of Directors are credible people. No political interference. RAM has just given SDB top rating! [2] SMJ Energy is performing exceptional well with a highly regarded Board of Directors and well qualified senior management team. Its profit in 2024 is RM250m. [3] Sabah Energy Corporation, Sabah Credit Corporation are being managed professionally. They are doing very well. SEC may become the biggest gas aggregator in Malaysia! SCC has proven that it can do some social financing and be profitable! [4] Hajiji has appointed James Wong as GGM to revamp SEDCO. [5] POIC LD has been turned around with Yong Teck Lee as Chairman and Fredian Gan CEO. It is now undertaking a major expansion that will make POIC LD a marine hub for Sabah. POIC LD is showing the way that it can monetize its landed assets, FZ approval from Federal MOF and its deepest ports in this region. [6] Innoprise has been transformed, vastly improved by forward looking executive chairman Jasnih and a professional team. Thirdly, GLCs can make sizeable profit [in hundreds of millions of RM]. E.g. SMJ Energy. GLCs in plantations, GLCs with monopolies and GLCs give free land have potential to make a lot more. Let's pray Leaders of all Parties will Focus on GLC Transformation. Yes, Sabahans better pray hard that Sabah leaders will focus on transformation of GLCs. Successful GLC transformation will mean prosperity. Failure? Continue poverty. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]


Daily Express
a day ago
- Daily Express
Sabah GLCs mostly ‘blackholes'
Published on: Saturday, June 07, 2025 Published on: Sat, Jun 07, 2025 By: David Thien Text Size: From left – Adi, Roger Chin, Lo and Haffisz. Kota Kinabalu: A majority of the 250-odd Sabah GLCs (Government-linked companies) are like 'blackholes' sucking away financial resources from Sabah. But there are a few bright stars. 'These statutory bodies and GLCs produced only RM143m dividends to the Sabah Government, of which RM50m was from SMJ Energy. Only a small number can generate dividends for the government. The performance of the rest is pathetic,' said Datuk John Lo, a former banker and now in the Sabah Economic Action Council (SEAC). Advertisement The other profitable GLCs include Sabah Foundation's subsidiary Innoprise, Sabah Energy Corporation, Sogip, Sogdc, POIC Lahad Datu, Suria Capital, Sabah Credit Corporation and Sawit Kinabalu. Lo was a guest panel speaker at the NGO Sabar – Kopi Tiam Council podcast on 'Oversight & Reform of government-Linked Companies (GLCs) Transparency, accountability & Corruption Prevention session, recently. 'Most are either non-performing or underperforming,' Lo said and pointed out that GLCs hold many monopolistic rights for example, cement [Sabah Cement Industries], ports [Suria, POIC Sandakan and POIC Lahad Datu], water [Jetama] and fishing landing rights [Safma]. They have been granted very cheap but extremely prime land, most of them at RM1,000 premium. [Innoprise, SUDC, subsidiary of Sedco, Suria, SICC, Sabah Energy, TAED.]. Advertisement Others have been vast acreage of valuable agricultural land for free or at nominal premium. [Sawit Kinabalu, KPD, Sabah Softwood.] Then there are those who have been granted cheap and valuable land for industrial park [KKIP, Sogip, POIC Sandakan and POIC Lahad Datu, Asian Supply Base in Labuan] or granted concession rights in oil and gas, river and sea sand [Sabah Energy, Sabah Gas, SMJ Energy, Sedco]. GLCs are also into hotels, resorts and jungle resorts [Innoprise, Sedco and Sabah Air] or granted exclusive JV preference with Sabahan and non-Sabahan companies. 'Most significantly, many GLCs have become a huge liability and drag on Sabah's economic growth. Allowing GLCs to continue without proper governance will result in serious economic consequences. Sabah can never catch up,' he said. In most cases the political appointments of chairmen, board of directors and senior management have been inappropriate. 'GLCs are still bleeding losses year in year out. Sabahans are subsiding these losses that have easily run into billions the last 35 years. The accumulated losses are staggering,' he said. What is worse is that some of these GLCs have sold or entered into JVs in many valuable assets like prime commercial and agriculture land, buildings, monopolies and concessions, most of which are lopsided against Sabah. These GLCs have taken huge loans from the government and banks [especially SDB] that they cannot service or repay, often forcing Sabah taxpayers to bail them out. 'They enter into many lopsided JV agreements against the interests of Sabah. They have the greatest number of failed JV projects that need rescue by 'white knights'. 'These billions of dividends can be tax free and can transform Sabah's economic ownership back to Sabahans. The greatest impact is job creation. If each GLC, on average, can create an additional 100 jobs, there will be additional 25,000 jobs!' said Lo. 'This money could have been used for the hard-core poor, repair or investment in infrastructures, health, scholarships or to build two or three universities. 'The GLCs have many JV projects that are suspended or non-start for years.' 'SDB's revamp is showing encouraging results. Keep an eye on Sabah Energy as it will be the new performing star.' Lo was pleased that Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor has appointed suitable Sabahans to head some boards and management e.g. SDB, SMJ Energy, Sabah Energy, Sogip, Sogdc and the latest, a new Group GM for Sedco. Hajiji has appointed advisors on the economy, oil and gas, energy, tourism and international affairs. Notably, he said state Finance Minister Datuk Seri Masidi Manjun has appointed a task force on GLCs. Masidi has also appointed an oversight committee for GLCs. 'Hopefully, the revamp of GLCs will lead some of them to be listed on Bursa. Bursa will impose demanding and stringent governance requirements on these GLCs. 'GLCs that have independent board of directors and professional management appointed by Hajiji and Masidi are turning around with noticeable improvements. 'It is imperative that future Sabah governments continue to revamp, rationalise the GLCs. 'Focusing on and sorting out the mess in Sabah's GLCs is a critical economic issue for every Sabahan, especially for the present young generation and their children. These GLCs are eroding away their future. 'I hope all Sabahans, every man, every woman, every voter, after listening to Sabar's podcast, will support the reformation, transformation and rationalization of Sabah's GLCs. 'It is in every Sabahan's interest to see to it that all GLCs succeed,' Lo stressed. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia


New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: When commuting is a walk in the park
UNLESS people live off the grid, they would want homes near basic conveniences. With access to government services, supermarkets, schools and clinics, people also prefer living near bus or taxi terminals or commuter train stations for easy travel to the city. Residential areas near such transportation hubs have been fortunate to have infrastructure built around them. In the future, the plan is to reverse this: the National Transport Policy 2019–2030 (NTP) states that new housing projects will be developed on or near public transport stations. This concept, exemplified by the Kota Madani housing project, offers residences for low-income groups seeking a sustainable and organised urban lifestyle. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, in introducing the concept, said it might require changes to existing regulations, as such housing projects promote broader use of the public transport system. Anwar's announcement is timely, as public transport usage stands at only 20 per cent nationwide, significantly below the 40 per cent target set in the NTP. The challenge, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke, is ensuring that the NTP achieves its goals. Anwar's initiative marks a significant step toward addressing low public transport usage. Building homes near transit stations could help resolve this issue. Still, as Loke said, the challenges are entrenched. Low public transport usage stems from inconvenient routes, unreliable service, frequent delays, poor last-mile connectivity, and the social perception of car ownership as a status symbol. Since the mid-1980s, Malaysia's push into industrialisation spurred domestic car production, making private vehicle ownership easy, affordable and widespread. The obsession with cars is exemplified by the six million vehicles entering Kuala Lumpur daily, 2.2 million during peak hours. For public transport to succeed — like Hong Kong's MTR or Singapore's MRT — the government must make tough policy decisions to reduce driving and incentivise bus and train usage. One approach would be to impose a congestion charge for city entry to encourage greater use of buses and trains. Other than limited parking, the measure most hated by motorists is paying to enter the city. Inconsistent schedules, Delays and overcrowding — though frustrating — are issues of management and efficiency, not infrastructure failure. The same applies to poor last-mile connectivity, inadequate waiting areas, and substandard bus infrastructure. In short, there must be a competent system — or artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions — to manage scheduling and operations. As for those living off-grid or in remote areas, an AI-enabled e-hailing service could offer a practical mobility solution. Balancing these complex factors — improving public transport while managing urban traffic congestion — remains the ultimate challenge.