Explainer: What's behind the request for Germany to split its power market?
FRANKFURT, April 29 (Reuters) - Germany has been landed with demands to split its 25 year-old single electricity market into up to five price bidding zones by European power grid lobby ENTSO-E, that wants to stop intra-German price differences leaking to neighbouring countries.
Here are facts and considerations around the issue as a six-month consultation period started on Monday.
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
WHY HAS THE TOPIC COME TO THE FORE?
In its Bidding Zone Review, the European network companies' group argues that dividing Germany's huge market area into a number of zones would bring more efficiency and reduce management costs in Germany and outside.
A scenario modelled on 2019 conditions showed a five-way zonal split could save up to 339 million euros of grid management costs a year, reduce bottlenecks, and help more renewable power to be transmitted, it said.
German grid handling costs ran to 2.8 billion euros ($3.19 billion) in 2024, standing in the way of steering producers' and consumers' behaviour.
WHAT ENTSO-E HOPES TO ACHIEVE
High renewable generation in Germany's north, while industry demand is concentrated in the south, distorts prices in a single zone over a large geography, say some organisations, economists, northern federal states, and Germany's EU partners such as Sweden, which operates a connecting cable.
Northern areas cannot benefit from cheap local power as everyone pays too much when the entire national grid bill is spread around all, they say.
Local zones with realistic prices would encourage better participation in battery storage, electric cars and heat pumps.
WHY GERMANY IS OPPOSED
Germany concedes its network expansion is slow but it has clear targets for building north-south transmission highways to overcome the structural problems. It cannot ditch these now to adopt an entirely new system, say the coalition government, southern states and industries, namely energy, cars and chemicals.
Germany's export-geared industries are struggling with recession and, if burdened with even higher costs in the south, might decamp, withdraw employment.
Meanwhile, transmission companies (TSOs), under the watch of the energy regulator, are clearly making progress with big new transport lines.
POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ESCALATION
If the EU Commission, led by German national Ursula von der Leyen, adopted ENTSO-E's stance and pitted itself against Berlin, the row could rattle the bloc's biggest economy and give rise to right-wing and anti-EU sentiments.
Or, if Germany persisted in its opposition to a reconfiguration, it could face retaliation at a time when it needs good relations with its EU trade partners.
If member states do not agree how to proceed within six months, the Commission has a further six months to decide on a course of action.
HOW THE ISSUE COULD BE SILENTLY REMEDIED
Germany can hope to maintain its unified price zone if it adheres to a long-term requirement under an EU internal energy market regulation for 70% of its border interconnection capacity being ready for tradable power flows by year-end.
TSOs are optimistic they can prove their progress on this target, a bid supported by Germany's power bourse, the European Energy Exchange (DB1Gn.DE), opens new tab.
"Then, there would be no reason to break up this large liquidity pool (Germany's status quo)," said EEX chief executive, Peter Reitz, in a call with reporters on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Asset manager Amundi plans to cut 50 jobs in Italy, document says
MILAN, June 9 (Reuters) - The Italian arm of France's Amundi, Europe's biggest asset manager, has set a target of 50 staff cuts to be achieved by the end of the year, a document it sent to unions on Monday showed. The proposed layoffs amount to 13.8% of a total staff in Italy of 363 people, based on the numbers included in the document, of which Reuters reviewed a copy. The figure is at the lower end of the range Amundi SGR, the company's Italian unit, flagged to unions in the country last month, when it first unveiled plans to reduce its headcount and help the group meet its savings goal and shield profit margins as competition in the sector rises. Reuters was first to report on May 15 of the proposed cuts. A representative for Amundi declined to comment, reiterating the target of yearly savings of between 30-40 million euros starting from 2026 set by the group, as it focuses resources on growth drivers comprising Exchange Traded Funds, technology, Asian markets and third-party distribution accords. Italy is the biggest foreign market for both Amundi and its parent company Credit Agricole ( opens new tab. In 2017 Amundi paid 3.545 billion euros ($4.04 billion) to buy the fund business of UniCredit and struck a 10-year distribution contract which runs out in 2027. ($1 = 0.8769 euros)
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia's Afterpay says some BNPL users told to close accounts, then sold credit cards
SYDNEY, June 10 (Reuters) - Some customers of Australia's Afterpay have been asked to close buy-now-pay-later accounts to qualify for a mortgage and offered a credit card upon qualification, the BNPL provider said on Tuesday, underscoring fierce competition in the consumer finance sub-sectors. BNPL loans, on-the-spot interest-free short-term loans with minimal credit checks, exploded as an alternative for younger shoppers after the COVID-19 lockdowns and stimulus payments spurred an online shopping frenzy. Customers are incentivised to pay on time by the promise of maintaining or increasing their borrowing limit. In a survey of 1,000 of its customers, Afterpay said more than 10% reported being offered a credit card by the same bank or mortgage broker that told them to close their BNPL account to qualify for a loan, without specifying which banks or brokers. Owned by U.S. tech billionaire Jack Dorsey's Block (XYZ.N), opens new tab, Afterpay leads Australia's BNPL market with more than 3.5 million active monthly users, half the country's total BNPL accounts, according to government figures. Lenders are required by law to make reasonable inquiries about an applicant's finances but may not give financial advice. Spokespeople for Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the biggest lender, and No.3 lender National Australia Bank ( opens new tab told Reuters that they did not tell applicants to close their BNPL accounts. A spokesperson for No.4 lender ANZ ( opens new tab said the bank assessed BNPL liabilities alongside a person's other finances and "depending on the customer's overall financial position, goals, and objectives, they may choose to restructure or close certain debts – such as BNPL accounts – to support their application". Afterpay claimed banks were capitalising on a perception of BNPL users as riskier than traditional borrowers to protect a declining lending category. Australian interest-accruing credit card debt is down 30% in half a decade as borrowers seek cheaper options. The company added that its survey found BNPL users had credit scores and on-time repayment records broadly in line with credit card users. The BNPL model has avoided regulation under Australian consumer credit laws so far as it doesn't involve interest. However, "if it looks and acts like credit, then it should be regulated as such," the Australian government had said last year. New legislation requiring BNPL firms to run credit checks on borrowers kicks in on Tuesday, which, Afterpay's Head of Public Policy Michael Saadat hopes, would improve transparency around user creditworthiness. The main reason Afterpay customers close their accounts is because their lender or broker told them to, and "this should not be something that is driven by misperception of the regulatory requirements," Saadat told Reuters in an interview. According to mortgage broker AFG, ( opens new tab one in 10 Australian mortgages are arranged by brokers. Mark Hewitt, general manager of industry and partnerships at AFG, said the company does not distribute credit cards but responsible lending rules require it to "ensure adequate enquiry is made around an applicant's ability to meet their financial commitments".
ITV News
32 minutes ago
- ITV News
Nato chief to call on UK to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence
Life comes at you fast in Downing Street. It's only a week since the Prime Minister was dodging questions about when he would increase defence spending to 3% of GDP. Today the Nato Secretary General is in town to tell Keir Starmer that actually Britain ought to spend 3.5% by 2035. Its expected the PM will agree with the target. And we are talking big sums here. That extra 0.5% is worth north of £17bn. Put a different way our defence budget of around £60bn would have to rise to more like £100bn to meet the 3.5% which is the new Nato target. Thats an NHS scale amount of money. And it inevitably means spending cuts elsewhere or tax rises or both. There are two reasons for this. The first is Vladimir Putin, the second is Donald Trump. Putin has shown he is ready and willing to attack his European neighbours. Trump has suggested he is less willing to come to the rescue. Today it is Ukraine, tomorrow it could be Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania. That's where we come in. Those three Baltic states are all Nato members. If they are attacked we would be obliged to defend them, we would be at war with Russia; that's the Nato deal. Mark Rutte wants Nato to be big enough, tough enough and determined enough to deter Putin, to make it not worth his while to test the alliance. But Nato's 2035 target is, of course, ten years away. Many defence analysts think that it will only take Putin a couple of years after ending the Ukraine war to reconstitute his armed forces. So here's the key question; are we in a Cold War moment when the threat in Europe will not materialise, or a pre-1939 moment when it will?
