logo
Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' clears final hurdle before House floor vote

Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' clears final hurdle before House floor vote

New York Post22-05-2025
Bleary-eyed House Republicans advanced the One Big Beautiful Bill Act past the Rules Committee after a marathon hearing Wednesday, overcoming the final hurdle needed to bring it up for a floor vote.
In an 8-4 vote shortly before 11 p.m., the colossal legislation cleared the GOP-led committee along party lines.
The panel convened at 1 a.m. Wednesday to consider the measure due to requirements that Democrats get two days to file minority views.
A 'Manager's Amendment' making last-minute tweaks to the mammoth bill — including a provision cementing a deal to increase the State and Local Tax (SALT) deductions cap by 400% — was unveiled to the committee after more than 20 hours of debate.
3 Republicans have very little breathing room in their bid to get the One Big Beautiful Bill Act through Congress.
Nathan Posner/Shutterstock
More than 500 amendments introduced by Democrats were rejected over the course of the punishingly drawn-out hearing.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has been hoping to push the megabill through the House by Memorial Day before the lower chamber breaks for a one-week recess next week, but is still grappling with multiple holdouts and a razor-thin margin.
The Rules Committee's approval means that the legislative bundle only needs a simple majority to clear the House, rather than a two-thirds majority if leadership were forced to bypass the gatekeeping committee.
Still, Republicans can only afford to lose three votes at most if there's full attendance, given their 220 to 213 majority.
To get to President Trump's desk, the measure will also have to clear the Senate and has been specifically designed to take advantage of the upper chamber's reconciliation process, enabling it to bypass a Democratic filibuster, which requires 60 votes to overcome.
3 Fiscal hawks such as Rep. Chip Roy repeatedly pressed for more spending cuts.
AP
Several senators, such as Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), have voiced opposition to the measure in its current form. Republicans have a 53 to 47-seat majority in the Senate.
Trump met with House Republicans at the Capitol on Tuesday in a bid to pressure them to get the monster bill over the finish line and commended Johnson for his efforts to build consensus around it.
'It's not a question of holdouts, we have a tremendously unified party,' Trump told reporters about the chances of getting the votes. 'I don't think we've ever had a party like this. There are some people that want a couple of things that maybe I don't like or they're not going to get.'
3 Several senators, such as Sen. Josh Hawley, have voiced skepticism over the bill.
Getty Images
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is intended to be Trump's signature legislative achievement of the year and possibly his second term in office, serving as an 'everything bill' of sorts for conservative wishlist policy items.
It features an extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime pay, a barrage of spending cuts, beefed-up border security, bolstered defense spending and energy policy reforms.
Here are the highlights of what's inside the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act:'
Permanent extension of the individual income tax cuts in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, with some adjustments.
Temporary elimination of taxes on qualified tips, overtime pay and car loan interest payments.
An additional deduction for senior Americans in lieu of no taxes on Social Security (there are procedural reasons why Republicans can't do no taxes on Social Security, namely the Byrd Rule).
SALT cap increase to $40,000 for households with adjusted gross incomes below $500,000.
Hikes debt ceiling by $4 trillion, which is forecasted to become a problem sometime after July or August if Congress fails to act.
$175 billion for border security, including $46.5 billion for the construction of a wall along the US-Mexico border specifically.
$150 billion in additional funding for defense, including $25 billion for Trump's space-based Golden Dome missile defense system, $34 billion to expand the Navy's capacity and shipbuilding, $21 billion to replenish America's ammunition stockpile and $5 billion for border security.
A mandated 80-hour-per-month work requirement on able-bodied adults ages 19-64 enrolled in Medicaid. Volunteer work and school would count toward the requirement.
States that provide Affordable Care Act expansion of Medicaid coverage for illegal immigrants will see their reimbursement rates drop.
States with error rates on SNAP benefits would be required to pay a percentage of the program (historically, the feds paid for all of it).
Set up a fast-track system for permitting natural gas if applicants pay either 1% of a project's costs or $10 million, whichever amount is less.
Ends the Biden-era electric vehicle mandate for two-thirds of new car sales to be EVS by 2032.
Able-bodied adults without children would also see work requirements for SNAP, which currently last until the age of 54, jump to the age of 64.
New 'Trump' savings accounts for parents and guardians where the feds will pay $1,000 for children born between Jan. 1, 2024, and Dec. 31, 2028.
Restrictions on large abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood from getting Medicaid funding.
Restrictions on Medicaid funding for transgender surgeries.
Eliminate the $200 tax on gun silencers.
Tax of up to 21% on certain university endowments.
Consolidate student loan payments into two options: 1.) standard program, encompassing monthly payments over a 10 to 25 year period 2.) 'repayment assistance' program that is more lenient.
Roll back key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act.
Air Traffic Control modernization.
Modifications in the 42-page Manager's Amendment renamed 'MAGA' savings accounts for children to 'Trump' accounts; removed silencers from the National Firearms Act of 1934; eliminated language that would sell public lands in Nevada and Utah; moved to implement Medicaid work requirements from Jan. 1, 2029 to 'no later than December 31, 2026' or earlier; and set up a $12 billion program to reimburse states for assisting with border security since January 2021, among other changes.
Throughout the drafting of the bill, there have been five major hang-ups for Republicans: the SALT cap, the timeline for implementing the Medicaid work requirements, adjustments to Medicaid's reimbursements for states and the megabill's impact on the deficit.
Fiscal hawks and blue-state, moderate Republicans have been at loggerheads over some of those issues for months.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shareholders in Metis Energy (SGX:L02) are in the red if they invested three years ago
Shareholders in Metis Energy (SGX:L02) are in the red if they invested three years ago

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Shareholders in Metis Energy (SGX:L02) are in the red if they invested three years ago

Metis Energy Limited (SGX:L02) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 23% in the last month. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last three years have been less than pleasing. In fact, the share price is down 44% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Because Metis Energy made a loss in the last twelve months, we think the market is probably more focussed on revenue and revenue growth, at least for now. Shareholders of unprofitable companies usually desire strong revenue growth. That's because fast revenue growth can be easily extrapolated to forecast profits, often of considerable size. Over the last three years, Metis Energy's revenue dropped 33% per year. That means its revenue trend is very weak compared to other loss making companies. On the face of it we'd posit the share price fall of 13% compound, over three years is well justified by the fundamental deterioration. It would probably be worth asking whether the company can fund itself to profitability. The company will need to return to revenue growth as quickly as possible, if it wants to see some enthusiasm from investors. The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail). You can see how its balance sheet has strengthened (or weakened) over time in this free interactive graphic. A Different Perspective Investors in Metis Energy had a tough year, with a total loss of 23%, against a market gain of about 27%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 1.6% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Metis Energy is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are a bit unpleasant... But note: Metis Energy may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

NY awarded more than $600M to ‘sanctuary' groups helping defy Trump, federal immigration law
NY awarded more than $600M to ‘sanctuary' groups helping defy Trump, federal immigration law

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NY awarded more than $600M to ‘sanctuary' groups helping defy Trump, federal immigration law

Legal and migrant advocacy groups fighting to block New York from helping the Trump administration enforce US immigration laws have been awarded more than $600 million in taxpayer dollars from the city and state governments, a Post review of contracts revealed. The Bronx Defenders alone has received more than $500 million in city contracts since fiscal year 2018 to provide a host of legal services to poor criminal and civil defendants, including migrants, according to a review of contracts from 2009 to the present. 7 The Bronx Defenders alone has received more than $500 million in city contracts. The Bronx Defenders/ Facebook And the legal aid group raked in another $32 million from the state over the years, records kept by the state comptroller's office show. Other groups were also funneled big bucks as they worked to undermine federal immigration policy, including Make the Road NY — which received $56 million to provide legal, health and other services mostly to immigrants, state and city contract records. The group helped organize a rally at the state Capitol last month urging passage of a sanctuary bill as rally goers chanted, 'No hate, no fear. Immigrants are welcome here.' 7 The legal aid group raked in another $32 million from the state over the years. X / @thenyic The New York Immigration Coalition received $46 million. 'New York City should not be in the business of carrying out Donald Trump's mass disappearance agenda, which is in fact illegal under our local laws,' said Murad Awadeh, executive director of the NYICC, on his X handle @HeyItsMurad. Awadeh also reposted an interview he did with New York Public News Network on May 30. 'Sanctuary policies are public safety measures,' he said. 'They encourage people to participate within our society so that they're able and comfortable enough to report things that are happening and without them, a lot of people won't do that, because they are fearful, and rightfully fearful, especially in the world that we're living in today, that they may end up entrapped in this ICE enforcement that's happening.' 7 Portrait of Murad Awawdeh, CEO of the New York Immigration Coalition. X / @HeyItsMurad Additionally, New Yorker Lawyers for the Public Interest received $19 million, including about $5 million from 2022 to present, city and state records show. The Bronx Defenders have been part of a wider push for a statewide sanctuary bill — the New York for All Act — that would bar state and local law enforcement from cooperating with US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents. That would include assisting in providing information, turning over or deporting illegal immigrants. Another bill with a push from activists called the Dignity not Detention Act would ban local jails from renting space to ICE to increase their detention capacity for suspected illegal migrants. 7 The New York Immigration Coalition received $46 million. Robert Mecea 'State leaders are not powerless against the federal administration's mass deportation agenda,' the Bronx Defenders said in a June 11 statement on X. 'We have a couple ideas: pass New York For All and Dignity Not Detention now, before it's too late.' The state Senate adjourned for the summer without passing either of the bills. Passage could become a political liability for Democrats who control the state government and US House of Representatives members who are running for office next year, including Gov. Kathy Hochul. 7 New Yorker Lawyers for the Public Interest received $19 million, including about $5 million from 2022 to present. X / @MaketheRoadNY Meanwhile, New York City is slated to spend $75 million on immigration legal services in its new budget, under a spending agreement approved by Mayor Eric Adams and the City Council. That spending plan includes $41.9 million in free legal assistance for migrants facing deportation But politicians who back President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration fumed that groups helping break federal immigration law are receiving massive taxpayer funding. 'Non-governmental organizations that help shield criminals from deportation should not receive a single penny,' said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn). 7 New York City is slated to spend $75 million on immigration legal services in its new budget. Robert Mecea 'While I don't have much faith in Governor [Kathy] Hochul and New York Democrats to stop funding left wing groups who work against law enforcement and the interests of citizens, we're taking decisive action on the federal level to end the Biden-Schumer gravy train of years past and put that money towards border security and enforcement to get foreign gangs and criminals out.' Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella said, 'Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent to undermine public safety and our immigration laws. They are fighting to protect those who are dangerous criminals. 'It's a poke in the eye to hard working taxpayers. Is the money well spent?. The answer is no.' 7 Politicians who back Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration fumed that groups helping break federal immigration law are receiving massive taxpayer funding. X / @MaketheRoadNY State Conservative Party chairman Gerard Kassar: 'There is no excuse for New York authorities not to cooperate with federal authorities. New Yorkers should not be spending hundreds of millions of dollars on groups fighting to keep illegal aliens in the United States.' The staggering tally comes after an off-duty US Customs and Border Protection agent was shot in the face in New York City during a robbery — with the shooter allegedly an illegal migrant. President Trump also ripped Democrats for flooding 'our Nation with Criminal Invaders.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store