logo
PAC's Jaki Seroke: Sobukwe would have supported the GNU

PAC's Jaki Seroke: Sobukwe would have supported the GNU

Mail & Guardian14-07-2025
Former president of the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe.
The spirit of goodness in the heart of the former president of the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC), Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe, continues to manifest nearly 50 years after his death.
According to Jaki Seroke, secretary of the PAC, there was no doubt that if Sobukwe were watching, he would be proud about the relationship his party has forged with the ANC and would be 'urging the PAC to push on until total liberation is attained so that in the end, Azania benefits from fruits of collaboration in the government of national unity [GNU]'.
The spirit of restoration between the two parties continues to manifest itself through the invitation the ANC has extended to the PAC to form part of the Liberation Movement Summit taking place in Johannesburg from 25 to 28 July.
The letter of invitation, signed and delivered by ANC secretary general Fikile Mbalula to his counterpart, Apa Pooe, is a sign of the fraternal embrace the former liberation movements display to each other.
Part of the letter, among other pleasantries displayed, read as follows:
'We are delighted to formally notify you of the forthcoming Liberation Movement Summit which will be convened by the African National Congress in its capacity as the chair of the Liberation Movement. This is an esteemed summit … with the participation of all six Liberation Movement parties, under the distinguished leadership of His Excellency Mr Matamela Cyril Ramaphosa as the chair of the summit.'
The parties referred to include Zanu-PF of Zimbabwe; Frelimo of Mozambique; the MPLA of Angola; Chama Cha Mapinduzi of Tanzania; the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde, a political party that spearheaded the liberation movements in both Guinea-Bissau and Cape Verde.
The PAC, despite holding only one seat in the National Assembly, Ramaphosa gave it a cabinet position above other bigger parties, with its president, Mzwanele Nyhontso, serving as the minister of land reform and rural development.
That possibly explains why the PAC chose, without any strings attached, to work and support the ANC in the unity government.
Seroke expressed disappointment in the behaviour of the Democratic Alliance in the GNU, saying he wished the DA could do better. Rather than being obstructive and turning to the courts, matters could be dealt with through dialogue and constructive engagement.
'The DA in particular is misbehaving in public with their dog whistle politics aimed at polarising rather than uniting South African people.
'The ANC has lost the zeitgeist they had in 1994. It is seemingly easy to attack their leaders.
'It will take a great effort and time to get the internal politics right. That is why the splits of EFF [Economic Freedom Fighters], MKP [uMkhonto weSizwe party], the South African Communist Party and we, as the PAC, see this as opportunistic and harmful to the agenda of unity.
'Nation building cannot go smoothly when its enemies are embedded and ready to sabotage the GNU,' said Seroke.
Seroke said that Sobukwe would have sought 'a meeting of minds' between the two liberation movements to thrash out differences.
This, he said, was despite the differences that caused the separation of 1958, which triggered the formation of the PAC in 1959 to chart its own liberation path in the 'midst and whirlwind' of apartheid violence against the oppressed people in this country.
The Africanist members of the ANC walked out over what they regarded as insufficiently radical policies to bring about liberation.
Seroke said the fact that Sobukwe, with his other Africanists comrades, split with the ANC in the 1950s, should not, in 2025, with new thinking and spirit of cooperation emerging, hinder the PAC from supporting the ANC in projects such as the GNU.
He warned against a destructive strategy that ignores new political realities of cooperation and constitutional democracy.
Seroke said: 'Coalitions wear many different apparels but the essence is the same. Social forces from a range of political perspectives gather on a common cause, at times even to repel a threat that aims at delivering a scorched earth outcome.'
He said now was the time for all South Africans, whatever their political stripes, to strive to help build a better South Africa, and to hold hands towards that end.
'We must try to shy away from political parties that are mostly grouped around cult personalities or driven by a strongman mentality with no discernible principle, but keen on politics of brinkmanship.'
Seroke said that in keeping with the spirit of Sobukwe, 'we must be willing to work towards a common agenda, recognising that if we do not, the politics of throwing stones at each other and destroying goodwill will not take us far'.
He said despite the breakup in 1958, 'the PAC and the ANC have always had a symbiotic relationship that goes as far back as 1943, when the ANC Youth League was formed to propagate the ideals of African nationalism as a guiding philosophy'.
Seroke said the PAC is committed to working and supporting the ANC in the GNU.
'Our aim is not to score political points as we identify mistakes, and reversals of the African revolution gains.'
He said the relationship between the PAC and ANC should be mutually beneficial, 'which is to say that when the ANC grows, the PAC should not be stunted'.
Seroke said the PAC was willing to work with South Africans from all walks of life and from all political perspectives.
'The time of throwing around our toys, and seeking to wish away other people, is gone. We must, as the PAC, reach out to all South Africans.
'Sobukwe was a man of God, a man of prayer, a visionary who understood there is only one race, and that race is a human race.
'The ANC and PAC will work to ensure that the GNU succeeds, contributing to reshaping our society for the better, and it is unfortunate that organisations and those who are taking potshots at the GNU may be failing to read the signs of the time.'
Jo-Mangaliso Mdhlela is an independent journalist, a social justice activist, a former trade unionist, and an Anglican priest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exploring BRICS' role in addressing global challenges and fostering dialogue
Exploring BRICS' role in addressing global challenges and fostering dialogue

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Exploring BRICS' role in addressing global challenges and fostering dialogue

The Valdai Discussion Club in partnership with the South African Institute of International Affairs hosts the 3rd Russian-African Conference in Pretoria titled: 'Realpolitik in a Divided World: Rethinking Russia-South Africa Ties in a Global and African Context'. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers The role of BRICS in the world has been hailed as a positive force driving dialogue and creating strategic conditions for development, rather than opposing any particular nation, including the US. This message was delivered at the Russia-Africa conference, co-hosted by the Valdai Discussion Club and the South African Institute of International Affairs in Pretoria. The conference, titled 'Realpolitik Responses in a Fractured World: Rethinking Russia-South Africa Ties in Global and African Context', brought together top government officials and academics to share their perspectives on 'G20 and BRICS: Assessing Strategic Roles in an Evolving Global Order'. Dmitry Birichevsky, director of the Department of Economic Cooperation at the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, noted that the BRICS leadership cycle in the G20 has coincided with a strengthening of its economic positions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'The mounting influence of BRICS has asserted itself as a centre for growth, innovation and one of the main pillars of a new and more just world order,' he said. He added that BRICS' principles of consensus, equality, and mutual consideration of each other's interests resonate with the growing number of countries in the Global South. Key issues on the BRICS agenda include making economic governance more democratic and bridging the digital and ecological divide between the Global North and the Global South. Birichevsky reiterated Russia's support for the South African presidency, saying it has predictably placed G20 emphasis on the African agenda amid the alarming development in the global economy. Philani Mthembu, executive director of the Institute for Global Dialogue, noted that the recent presidencies of BRICS and G20 have coincided with a rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape, which has heightened the focus on these forums. He stressed that the low level of participation or absence of the US should not be the only thing on their radar. 'The participation of the US will not make or break South Africa's G20 presidency. The US must be seen in a broader context where the US is pursuing what it views as America first,' he said. Mthembu added that BRICS should aim to reform international institutions from within while also applying external pressure. Elena Maslova, associate professor at MGIMO University's Department of Integration Studies, recommended that BRICS delve into issues such as climate change. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers Elena Maslova, associate professor at MGIMO University's Department of Integration Studies, suggested that BRICS should explore topics such as climate change, highlighting the declaration on climate finance as a significant step forward. 'BRICS is gradually becoming a key platform for climate dialogue as well. BRICS should strive to create its single space for climate finance implementation to make it possible to reduce emissions,' she said. Maslova emphasised that BRICS is not a confrontational tool, but rather a valuable platform for tackling global challenges. Nourhan ElSheikh, professor of International Relations at Cairo University, stated that the Global South's influence has surged over the past decade, largely due to BRICS and G20, which are driving forces behind the emerging new world order. 'The Global South matters a lot not only for competition among colonial powers but also as a global player in international politics,' she said. ElSheikh remarked that the Global South has matured to the point where it can identify its own interests, rather than automatically aligning with the US, which is still trying to maintain its global dominance. 'Now we have the Global South saying 'no' and that this is not in our favour or interest and we have the right to choose our way,' she said. Cape Times

Reporting from the West: A return to reason?
Reporting from the West: A return to reason?

Mail & Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Reporting from the West: A return to reason?

The tide is slowly turning on uncritical pro-West reporting on issues such as Russia's war on Ukraine (above) or Israel's genocide in Gaza. Photo: Bulent Kilic/AFP In the aftermath of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, an already shrill pro-Western network in South Africa spanning NGOs, academia, and sections of the media took on a hysterical tone. This became frenzied when South Africa took Israel to the International Court of Justice. Conspiracy theories — such as the claim that Iran bribed the ANC to bring the case — were circulated as fact, and people offering rational and evidence-based critiques of the often propagandistically pro-West network were dismissed as conspiracy theorists, radical economic transformation types or patsies for Russia, China or Hamas. A number of people were slandered in what became a witch-hunt. In this environment, disinformation — a very real issue — was no longer a matter of truth or falsehood: it became a label selectively wielded to discredit critique of the West. Disinformation has never been the exclusive domain of Russia or China. The United States has a long history of covert influence, regime change and strategic propaganda — from Latin America to Africa, the Middle East and beyond. The 'weapons of mass destruction' and ' Yet for some years influential actors in parts of the media, NGO and academic establishment in South Africa echoed Western narratives without scrutiny, treating unevidenced US claims as fact and dismissing dissenting voices as dupes or foreign proxies. On the media front, the Daily Maverick, under Branko Brkic, led the charge. In the NGO world, it was the Brenthurst Foundation under Greg Mills. And in the academy, the leading figure was Herman Wasserman, who, in an article co-authored with Dani Madrid-Morales and Saifuddin Ahmed, declared critical attitudes toward Nato to be the result of 'strategic disinformation narratives' crafted by Russia. Other significant players included BizNews, amaBhungane, the Institute for Race Relations and figures such as RW Johnson, Tony Leon, Franz Cronje and Helen Zille, among others. The effect of this hysteria, triangulated between the media, NGOs and the academy, was to delegitimise critical views and narrow the space for public debate. But the tide is turning. There is now a growing recognition that some of the loudest voices on the South African political and media landscape have, for years, been uncritically echoing the ideological and geopolitical priorities of Western powers. The legitimacy of this behaviour is now being challenged, and with that challenge comes the possibility of a more independent, democratic and principled public debate. The Brenthurst Foundation, once the most aggressive of the think tanks pushing a propagandistically pro-West line, has closed its doors in circumstances that remain opaque. The Daily Maverick, under new editor Jillian Green, no longer maintains the same hard pro-West line. It now includes a broader range of perspectives, including regular critiques of Israel. The publication's credibility took a serious battering in the final years of Brkic's editorship, but it is now in the midst of a clear and welcome restoration. One of the clearest signs of this shift is a recent video commentary published by leading South African journalist Redi Tlhabi in the Daily Maverick itself. Tlhabi delivered a scathing rebuke of how sections of the South African media have treated statements and threats by fringe American politicians as if they were major diplomatic developments. She singled out coverage of two proposed US House Bills targeting South Africa over its stance on Gaza. One had a single sponsor; the other had five — all Republicans — with no bipartisan support, no Senate version and no advancement to committee stage. 'You can't pass a law based on the signatures of five people out of a Congress of 535,' she said. Tlhabi noted that the media manufactured hysteria over 'non-issues' in US-South Africa relations, while failing to scrutinise the political identities, funding sources and actual legislative relevance of the individuals involved. One of those individuals was Representative Ronny Jackson, a far-right Republican from Texas closely aligned with US President Donald Trump. Jackson voted against certifying former president Joe Biden's election, and received more than $125,000 in funding from pro-Israel lobbying interests, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Tlhabi pointed to this as a clear example of how US and Israeli-aligned networks effectively use minor figures in the US and gullible journalists abroad to shift public discourse. 'A lot of money goes back and forth as people try to capture public perception,' she said, naming think tanks such as the Hudson Institute and its relationship with local political actors, as players in a coordinated effort to reshape public debate in South Africa. 'We [the media] must not become players in these political games and machinations,' she warned. 'We must discern and analyse and listen to a plurality of voices.' That this critique appeared in the Daily Maverick is significant. It implicitly marks a rupture with the publication's previous editorial line. It signals a break from a moment in which serious questions about the conduct of Western powers, and about elite alignments in South Africa, were reflexively cast as Russian propaganda, or as a result of machinations by China, Iran or Hamas. It is fascinating to see how a line of critique that until recently was aggressively dismissed as conspiracy theory or 'disinformation' has now been articulated in the mainstream media by one of our most respected journalists. It's often said that Gandhi once remarked, 'First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.' The quote is misattributed. It actually comes from the American labour lawyer Nicholas Klein, who told a room of union members in 1918: 'First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you.' In reality, there isn't always a monument. Sometimes an idea or a position slowly becomes common sense. This is exactly what we are now seeing with the quiet return of reason to South Africa's public sphere. A once-hysterical conversation is giving way — slowly, inconsistently, but discernibly — to a more grounded one. If we are serious about defending truth and democracy, we need to be consistent. We must subject all global powers to the same level of critical scrutiny. That means acknowledging the ideological work done by US-funded think tanks, media partnerships and academic exchanges. It means recognising that disinformation is a global problem — and that when it comes from the West it is often cloaked in the language of freedom, democracy and human rights. A mature public discourse must be able to hold this complexity without collapsing into paranoia or propaganda. It is both possible and necessary to hold multiple critiques at once. One can oppose Russian aggression in Ukraine without parroting Nato or Western talking points. One can denounce Iranian authoritarianism while still rejecting US and Israeli propaganda. This is what a genuinely democratic and independent political culture looks like. Tlhabi and the Daily Maverick are to be commended for taking an important step forward in the restoration of the credibility of our public sphere after the years of uncritical pro-West hysteria. This advance will also be well served by a frank appraisal of the routine recourse to conspiracy theory in BizNews, which continues to poison our public sphere. Dr Imraan Buccus is senior research associate at ASRi and the University of the Free State.

Urgent calls for KZN Cogta MEC to restore order in troubled KwaDukuza municipality
Urgent calls for KZN Cogta MEC to restore order in troubled KwaDukuza municipality

The Herald

time5 hours ago

  • The Herald

Urgent calls for KZN Cogta MEC to restore order in troubled KwaDukuza municipality

Opposition parties in the KwaDukuza municipality have blamed its governance crisis on internal conflicts within the ANC and are calling on KwaZulu-Natal Cogta MEC Thulasizwe Buthelezi to step in. The north coast-based municipality has been plagued by reports of instability and a potential collapse since the ANC removed Lindile Nhaca as mayor in a no-confidence vote in December 2024. Nhaca's removal came after her fallout with the party's then-provincial secretary Bheki Mtolo. She was replaced by Muzi Ngidi, who didn't last long either, before being forced out of the mayoral office by the party earlier this month, along with deputy mayor Njabulo Cele. Ngidi had only been in office for eight months when the ANC's provincial task team (PTT) co-ordinator Mike Mabuyakhulu announced he had also been recalled after a controversial tenure that had included allegations of corruption, misuse of municipal vehicles and excessive security expenses. The PTT announced that the two would also be liable to pay a portion of the money that the municipality spent on Ngidi's vehicle hire during their tenure. The two were retained in their respective positions until the party and its coalition partners elected their replacements to ensure 'continuity'. The DA and ActionSA in the council have since highlighted the impact that those actions and internal disputes in the ANC have had on the municipality. Privi Makhan, DA caucus leader, pointed to Ngidi's continued spell in office -despite his official recall — while his party looks for a replacement as the cause of the leadership uncertainty within the municipality, which has led to last-minute cancellations of portfolio committee and EXCO meetings. That has undermined the legislative functions of the council and is affecting service delivery, he said. 'Caretaker mayor Ngidi however appears exceedingly content to play the role of ceremonial figurehead, attending public events and persevering with his handshaking exercises, while refusing to take political responsibility for the legislative crisis unfolding under his watch. It has become increasingly clear that between him and his cabal, he remains hell-bent on collapsing the municipality, which is reminiscent of his eight-month tenure in office,' said Makhan. 'KwaDukuza is not a pawn in the ANC's internal political games. Communities are being denied basic services, as a result of Ngidi's disdain for a decision made by his own movement. 'This political circus, created and sustained by the ANC, must come to an end. KwaDukuza needs stable, accountable leadership, not more chaos driven by internal ANC dysfunction.' He called on Buthelezi to intervene to ensure stability in the municipality. ActionSA councillor Halalisani Ndlovu expressed similar sentiments. Ndlovu wrote a letter to the department requesting an urgent intervention in the 'ongoing collapse of governance and oversight' in KwaDukuza. She said her main cause for concern was the collapse of the financial and local public administration and human resources (FLPA) committee, which oversees critical functions like expenditure monitoring, procurement and budget implementation as per the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA). 'The committee last met on June 4 . Since then, no meetings have been convened to consider matters for June or July. The July 25 meeting was abruptly postponed with no explanation or alternative date provided. The next scheduled sitting is only on August 20, meaning three consecutive months of oversight will be lost,' she said. 'This is a dereliction of duty that threatens the very integrity of the municipality's governance and financial accountability.' She added that executive directors had also missed committee meetings, often without formal apologies or explanations, which have added to the crisis within the committee. 'This reflects a blatant disregard for institutional responsibilities and the accountability obligations of senior officials. 'As a result, oversight over the municipality's finances has collapsed. Our fiduciary duty as councillors and members of the finance committee to monitor procurement and performance processes has ground to a halt, and the public interest is being severely undermined.' Ndlovu said Ngidi served as a chairperson for the FLPA committee, and the uncertainty around him and the mayoral position was at the centre of this crisis. TimesLIVE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store