
Employers engaging over 10 employees directed to establish ICC to protect women at work
This Act mandates constitution of Internal Complaints Committee by the employers of all the establishments employing 10 or more workers, to conduct inquiry related to the complaints on sexual harassment at the workplace received from their women employees.
Any non-compliance on the part of employers with respect to the provisions of the Act will entail penalty of upto ₹50,000. Hence all the factories and establishments carrying out building and other construction works in Madurai, Sivagangai and Ramanathapuram districts shall constitute the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) in their workplace immediately and comply with the regulations stipulated under the said Act.
The members of the ICC and the grievance redressal mechanism of the factory shall be displayed in conspicuous locations on the premises and the construction sites and shall be kept visible to all the employees. The standard operating procedures for the establishments to deal with issues on sexual harassment have been framed by the Government in its G.O. 64 Social Welfare and Women Empowerment Departments and all the employers are instructed to strictly adhere to the guidelines stipulated therein, said A Velmurugan, Joint Director (Industrial Safety and Health) in a press release on Monday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Cooperative dept role key in implementation
Rajamahendravaram: The Cooperative Department has a crucial role to play in effectively implementing the Right to Information (RTI) Act, said East Godavari District Cooperative Officer M Venkataramana. Addressing a district-level awareness programme on the RTI Act, organised at the Aryapuram Urban Cooperative Bank's conference hall, he noted the significance of cooperative societies as grassroots institutions that work closely with the public. Venkataramana urged Public Information Officers (PIOs) to be fully aware of key provisions such as Section 7, which mandates timely responses to RTI applications, and Section 19, which deals with the appeal process. He warned that delays or denial of information could lead to penalties and disciplinary action under Section 20. District Cooperative Audit Officer M Jagannatha Reddy stressed the importance of a transparent and timely information system and said staff should be well-versed with the Act to serve the public more efficiently. Divisional Cooperative Officer M Kanakadurgareddy explained the exemptions under Section 8 of the RTI Act, which prohibit the disclosure of information related to national security, strategic interests, trade secrets, or personal privacy. Ramadas Cooperative Training College Principal Srinivas explained that as per Section 20, officials could be fined ₹250 per day for delays in providing information, with a maximum penalty of ₹25,000. He also underlined the mandatory disclosure of information related to corruption and human rights violations. The awareness session was attended by PIOs, appellate officers, and supporting staff from various cooperative institutions across the district.


United News of India
5 hours ago
- United News of India
No plan for IREL, HCL, NALCO merger into NCMC: Centre
New Delhi, July 24 (UNI) The Central government is yet to chalk out a plan for the merger of Indian Rare Earth Limited (IREL), Hindustan Copper Limited (HCL) and National Aluminum Company Limited (NALCO) into a 'National Critical Minerals Corporation', Union Minister for Coal and Mines Kishan Reddy told the Lok Sabha. The union minister replying to a query said the Central Government through a notification on November 22, 2010 appointed a Commission of Inquiry under the Chairmanship of Justice M. B. Shah for the purpose of making inquiry of illegal mining of iron ore and manganese ore in contravention of the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or other rules or licenses or guidelines issued there under referred to as illegal mining. The Justice M.B. Shah Commission submitted the report to the Ministry of Mines, which was subsequently laid in the Parliament, the minister said. The Section 23C of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Act, 1957 empowers the State Government to frame rules to prevent illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and for purposes connected therewith. Therefore, the control of illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and purposes connected therewith is primarily the responsibility of the State Government, added the minister. The Central Government supports and augments these efforts through policy initiatives from time to time. Some of the steps taken by the Central Government for the prevention and control of the frauds like fake transportation permits, under invoiced exports etc. are as under the MMDR Act, 1957 was amended through the MMDR (Amendment) Act, 2015, wherein Section 30B and 30C read with Section 21 and 23C, inter-alia, provide stringent punitive provisions for illegal mining, transportation and storage, added the minister. Altogether, 21 State Governments including Odisha have framed rules under section 23C of MMDR Act,1957 to curb illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals. Further 22 State Governments including Odisha have set up Task Forces, specially constituted to control illegal mining and review the action taken by member departments for checking the illegal mining, transportation and storage activities, added the minister. The Ministry of Mines launched the Mining Surveillance System (MSS) in October 2016 through IBM. The MSS system detects likely incidences of illegal mining using space technology. The Ministry of Mines also issued guidelines on 3 October 2023 to major mineral rich States for prevention of misclassification of grades of iron ore and other minerals by using technology, added the minister. UNI XC SSP


The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Parliament security breach case: Delhi HC seeks police reply on bail plea of two accused
The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked Delhi Police to respond to a bail plea of two accused in the December 2023 Parliament security breach case. During the hearing, the counsel for the accused – Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D – told a Division Bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Shalinder Kaur that the act of opening smoke canisters inside Parliament while sloganeering 'did not amount to terrorist act' as the smoke was not obnoxious and the intention of the accused was to only 'highlight unemployment and not create terror'. The Bench, however, remarked, 'The best way to create terror in India is to disrupt Parliament. You disrupted Parliament.' It asked the Delhi Police to file a status report on Mr. Sharma's bail plea and posted the hearing for October 8, when it would also take up Mr. Manoranjan D's petition, for which it had issued a notice earlier. The duo had challenged a trial court's order denying them bail. Mr. Sharma contended that he was entitled to be released on bail on the grounds of parity with the other two accused who were already on bail. Mr. Manoranjan D called the allegations against him 'vague' and alleged that Delhi Police had 'wrongly attributed' the charge under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against him. The Bench said there was no parity since those granted bail had protested outside Parliament, whereas the present accused were inside it. In a major security breach on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack on December 13, 2023, accused Mr. Sharma and Mr. Manoranjan D allegedly jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery during Zero Hour, opened canisters filled with yellow gas, and sloganeered before some MPs overpowered them. Around the same time, the other two accused – Amol Shinde and Neelam Azad – allegedly opened coloured gas canisters outside the Parliament premises and raised slogans. The High Court granted bail to Ms. Azad and another accused, Mahesh Kumawat, in July.