logo
Kevin Cullinane: Ireland once planned boldly. At another crossroads, State must do so again

Kevin Cullinane: Ireland once planned boldly. At another crossroads, State must do so again

Irish Examiner06-08-2025
'A prosperous society is one which plans for the future, not one which lives only for today.'
There was a time when Ireland dared to dream big and, more importantly, to plan big. From the moment the fledgling State emerged from the shadow of empire, it understood that survival and success would depend not just on grit but on vision.
Strategic thinking wasn't a luxury, it was a necessity.
Take the Ardnacrusha hydroelectric power station. In the 1920s, this engineering marvel on the River Shannon was nothing short of audacious.
The State took roughly 20% of the national budget and spent it on the hydroelectric scheme in Co Clare.
Built in partnership with Siemens, it provided 80% of the country's electricity at a time when most rural homes still relied on candles. It was a statement of intent: Ireland would not be left behind.
Then came the ESB, a national utility that brought light to the land and symbolised the State's commitment to modernity.
Under the stewardship of leaders such as Seán Lemass, Ireland began to think in decades — not election cycles.
Lemass understood that infrastructure was destiny.
Under the stewardship of leaders such as Seán Lemass, Ireland began to think in decades — not election cycles.
He championed industrialisation, education reform, and the creation of semi-state companies that would lay the foundations for future prosperity.
Our airports and ports followed suit. Dublin, Cork, and Shannon under Aer Rianta, the jewel in the crown of semi-state companies, became gateways to the world, not just for people but for ideas, trade, and opportunity. The foresight in the 1960s and '70s to preserve land at Dublin Airport for a future parallel runway, delivered on time and within budget in 2022, was a textbook example of strategic master-planning.
So too was the reconstruction of Cork Airport's main runway during the pandemic. At a time when others might have paused, we pressed ahead with investment in critical strategic infrastructure, with the long-term dividend for Ireland in mind. This is what strategic thinking looks like.
It's not always headline-chasing. It's not always universally popular. But it delivers.
The next 50 to 100 years will demand the same pioneering spirit that built Ardnacrusha, the same resolve that laid runways in peacetime and pandemic alike.
With the announcement of the National Development Plan, Ireland stands at another crossroads. We know what is possible when the State thinks long-term. The Government has committed €3.5bn to EirGrid for the development of Ireland's electricity grid infrastructure, an essential step in delivering Ireland's renewable energy targets and preparing for a decarbonised, electrified future. Uisce Éireann will receive €4.5bn between now and 2030, in an effort to build out projects supporting the Government's target of 300,000 new homes and large-scale water infrastructure.
There is €2bn put aside to progress the construction of Dublin's MetroLink.
DAA also has ambitious plans to continue investing in infrastructure and sustainability projects at Dublin and Cork airports, without State funding, once planning permissions are granted.
We must fund Ireland's future. We must plan it. Above all, we must have the courage to make decisions and accelerate delivery. As Ireland's population grows by nearly a third in 20 years, the urgency of infrastructure planning becomes even more critical. Planning must move faster. Infrastructure must be future-proofed. Ambition must return to the heart of our national conversation.
If we don't think strategically, we will fall behind. But if we do, if we channel the spirit of Lemass, the vision of Ardnacrusha, and the competence of our people, we can build an Ireland that is not just ready for the future but is leading it. The ambition is clear; delivery will be the test.
Kevin Cullinane is deputy director of communications at DAA
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents of Harvey say Simon Harris is reponsible for failed promises, but not their son's death
Parents of Harvey say Simon Harris is reponsible for failed promises, but not their son's death

The Journal

timean hour ago

  • The Journal

Parents of Harvey say Simon Harris is reponsible for failed promises, but not their son's death

THE PARENTS OF Harvey Morrison Sherratt, a nine-year-old boy who died on 29 July who had waited years for scoliosis surgery, have said that they do not hold Tánaiste Simon Harris 'directly responsible' for their child's death. In a statement issued last night on social media, Gillian Sherratt and Stephan Morrison said that they hold Harris accountable for his failure to keep the promise he made when he was Health Minister in 2017 that no child would wait more than four years for scoliosis surgery and for his failure to meet them to discuss Harvey's case while their child was alive. Harris is planning to meet the parents soon, and has requested an inter-disciplinary report into Harvey's care to be put together via the Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill. In their statement, Harvey's parents said that anyone who is holding Harris directly responsible for their child's death is doing so 'against our own wishes'. 'Our issue with him is purely political and not personal. For anyone commenting on his posts or Government posts and calling for #JusticeForHarvey, we ask that if you are using Harvey's name that you do so in a respectful way,' they said. People up and down the country have been vocal in their support for the parents of Harvey Morrison Sherrat following his death after the familiy faced years of struggle to access care. Gillian Sherrat Gillian Sherrat Harvey's parents have called for Harris to resign for his failure to keep promises he made in relation to the care of children with scoliosis, and that call has been taken up by Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín. Tóibín has also said that the presidential election will now be a 'referendum on Simon Harris', and said that his party will seek to table a motion of no confidence in the Fine Gael leader. Advertisement A protest will be held in Dublin city this Saturday to 'call on Government to make it so no child or family will ever have to suffer through what [Harvey's parents] and Harvey have suffered through'. On X and other social media platforms, attacks on Harris have become highly personal, with multiple accounts branding the politician a 'child killer'. Harris faced immense backlash for attending an Oasis concert during the weekend as well. Yesterday evening, Harvey's parents said that they want the march on Saturday to be 'peaceful'. 'This is a march to call out systematic failures within Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and to call for change within paediatric healthcare,' they said. The parents have also called for people not to bring signage and flags along to the march in support of other causes, as they do not want their call for urgent paediatric healthcare reform to be diluted. Harvey Morrison Sherratt was born with both spina bifida and scoliosis. His parents have said that not only was his surgery delayed for months, he was also at one point removed from the waiting list unbeknownst to them. More widely, CHI, the HSE and the Government have been widely criticised by advocacy groups and the opposition for their handling of a series of crises involving children's healthcare in Ireland over the last two years. Not only have many children faced delays for surgery with CHI, unnecessary hip surgeries have also been performed on children who didn't need them, a report has found. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Around 200 attend public meeting over drone delivery hub
Around 200 attend public meeting over drone delivery hub

RTÉ News​

time3 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Around 200 attend public meeting over drone delivery hub

Around 200 hundred people have attended a public meeting in Dundrum this evening to address local concerns surrounding a planning application for a mobile drone delivery hub in the Dublin suburb. The planning application, from drone-delivery company Manna, attracted around 200 objections. The main concerns raised in the objections were about noise, safety, privacy, and environmental impact. Manna already operates in Dublin 15, where it says it has made deliveries to 42,000 households over the past 18 months. A decision on the application for a new hub in Dundrum was due on 4 August, however, an Coimisiún Pleanála has sought further information from Manna on the planned centre. This opens up a six-month window during which the company will have to provide follow-up information to planners. Local Fianna Fáil TD Shay Brennan hosted the meeting, with Manna Chief Executive Bobby Healy making a presentation to the audience. During a Q&A session afterwards, locals from the Dundrum area - as well as some residents from Dublin 15 (where Manna flies around 100 drone deliveries daily) raised their concerns around noise, privacy, and general disruption and how they might be addressed. The meeting follows the publication earlier of the Government's official guidance for the operation and management of drones in Irish airspace. Fines to be introduced for drone regulation infringements Fines are also set to be introduced for drone regulation infringements around privacy, safety and noise. The Government has published official guidance for the operation and management of drones in Irish airspace. As part of the National Policy Framework for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), a working group on drone geographical zones will be established. This group will look at the safe integration of drones into our airspace as well as their impact on society and the environment, which includes fines. Gardaí and the Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) are responsible for enforcing current EU drone regulations. These two bodies, together with the Data Protection Commission, will continue to work on enhancing investigations of offences related to drone use. Meanwhile, the framework will see a U-space steering group being set up. U-space refers to specific services and procedures to ensure safe and efficient access to airspace for a high volume of drones. Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien said the policy framework, which was included in the Programme for Government, "recognises the importance of collaboration and engagement of a wide range of stakeholders." "It aims to facilitate consideration of how matters such as planning and environmental issues will be addressed by the appropriate authorities, including in the context of the expansion of commercial drone delivery services," he added. The minister also said the "implementation of the policy framework relies on cross-government structures and the continuation of engagement and support from various departments, agencies, the UAS sector and the public. "Given the rapid pace of evolution of the UAS sector internationally, the Policy Framework will be a living document that will have to continue to evolve to keep pace with these developments," he added. Drones are used as daily tools in areas such as inspections (pipeline, rail, wind turbine maintenance), agriculture, mapping, architecture, construction, real estate, energy, environment, meteorological applications, and public safety. In Ireland they are being rolled out across services including emergency response (eg Dublin Fire Brigade for assessing risks and managing responses to risks), dangerous building and site inspections by local authorities (eg, Dublin City Council), environmental monitoring (Environmental Protection Agency) and goods and medical delivery. However, they are also being increasingly used for food delivery in some areas of Dublin. Mr Healy welcomed the Government's National Policy Framework for UAS. He said it is "a pivotal moment by establishing a clear, forward-looking regulatory foundation, the Government has laid the groundwork for a safe, innovative, and globally competitive drone economy. "At Manna, we've long believed that right policy enables real progress. Going forward, this policy signals that Ireland is ready to lead in UAV innovation, attract investment, and foster high-tech job creation - powered by responsible regulation and collective ambition," he added. Drone flight paths to be examined Meanwhile, Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien has said the management of flight paths for drones in Irish airspace will be looked at. "That is not to stifle the sector but it's to look at very specific measures around geographical zones, how they can be managed, how we look at our regulatory framework about how this sector can grow in a sustainable way," he said. The minister said that a national working group on geographical zones will be established, following on from the policy document published today. "We have had 50 submissions to this policy document, many of which from operators, residents and others. It is actually trying to bring all that together to look at how we licence drone usage, which is being done already through the IAA," he said. He said it will be looked at how flight paths for drones can be "managed effectively" and how that can permeate down to local authorities. "There are areas where there is a concentration of drone usage that some welcome, that some don't. This is a sector that is going to be with us well into the future. "We are one of the first European countries to come forward with this comprehensive framework around system usage," he said. Mr O'Brien said there will be penalties and enabling enforcement under the legislation. He said Fixed Charged Offences will be introduced for infringement of the regulations, which is being worked on, with gardaí, the IAA and the Data Protection Commission "continuing to publicise conviction and enforcement actions relating to infringement". "There are certain powers in place already, we have got to look to see how they have been strengthened further without stifling the growth in what is a very important sector that can really help people and business in relation to their normal lives," he said.

Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules
Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules

RTÉ News​

time4 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules

A US judge has denied the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," Judge Berman wrote. "The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct," the judge said. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. President Trump had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. However, in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Mr Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On 11 August, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Mr Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Mr Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store