Teenage girls' TikTok skincare regimes offer little to no benefit, research shows
The team behind the study say there has been a rise in young girls sharing videos of complex skincare routines with moisturisers, toners, acne treatments and anti-ageing products.
In the first study of its kind, researchers analysed such videos on the plaftorm and found the regimes are not only laborious – some girls wake up as early as 4.30am to fit in their routines – but pricey, unnecessary and potentially harmful.
'The risks associated with using these products, especially in young girls, far outweighs whatever marginal benefit you may get from using the active ingredients,' said Dr Molly Hales, the first author of the research from Northwestern University.
Hales added that while social media can be a place for playfulness and self-expression, young girls do not need such regimes.
'The danger is when girls get the message that this is something that they have to do to take care of their skin and to protect their health,' she said.
'These products don't increase the health of your skin and they probably worsen your skin integrity over time.'
Instead she said a gentle cleanser once or twice a day and the application of sunscreen is sufficient.
Writing in the journal Paediatrics, Hales and colleagues report how they created two TikTok accounts, purportedly for 13-year-olds and, and accumulated a sample of 100 skincare routines videos filmed by young people.
The team found all but one of the 82 creators were girls, and their age ranged from seven to 18 years old.
'Almost all content creators had clear, light skin without visible blemishes,' the researchers write, adding the videos 'made frequent reference to aspirational beauty ideals that may be tied to whiteness'.
The study reveals the skincare regimes involved six products on average, often from the same brands, with a total average cost of $168 (£124). However, some involved more than a dozen products with a total cost of more than $500 (£369).
'Get Ready With Me' videos were the most common, followed by 'Skin Care Routine' and 'After School' skincare routine videos.
The team found many of the ingredients in the featured products, such as citric acid, carry a risk of skin irritation and sun sensitivity – meaning they increase the chance of sunburn and other skin damage. Yet only 26% of the 84 videos showing daytime skincare routines included a sunscreen – something that authors called 'a significant missed opportunity'.
Hales added the use of products with multiple active ingredients, or layering products with the same active ingredients, increases the risk of skin irritation.
The researchers found that among the 25 top-viewed videos, 76% contained at least one potential contact allergen – often fragrance.
Prof Tess McPherson of the British Association of Dermatologists, who was not involved in the work, said the study was important, backing up anecdotal reports of an increase in young people attending clinics with skin irritation.
'We're certainly seeing a huge increase in people wanting something they call perfect or flawless skin, which we know is unachievable [and] unhelpful – it doesn't make people happy,' she said.
McPherson added she is aware of young people asking for birthday money to put towards expensive skincare products, many of which are now being targeted at young girls through appealing packaging.
As well as the risks highlighted by the study, McPherson said the skincare videos contribute to an increase in stigma around conditions such as acne and eczema as well as a fear of ageing, a message she said was reinforced by women embracing Botox and fillers.
'Younger and younger children are seeking skincare products when they don't need them, they're not helpful,' she said. 'This is a very concerning statement on society and how we view how skin should look.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Distracting the public': group of health professionals call for RFK Jr to be removed
A grassroots organization of health professionals have released a report outlining major health challenges in the US and calling for the removal of Robert F Kennedy Jr from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The report from Defend Public Health, a new organization of about 3,000 health professionals and allies, is an attempt to get ahead of misinformation and lack of information from health officials. In an effort to keep making progress in public health, Defend Public Health's report was slated to coincide with that of the anticipated second US report to 'make America healthy again' (Maha). The first Maha report was released in May, and a second report was expected this week – but amid turmoil at the health agencies, it has reportedly been delayed for several weeks. 'The Maha report is essentially a distraction from the real causes of poor health,' said Elizabeth Jacobs, professor emerita at the University of Arizona and a founding member of Defend Public Health. 'This administration does not want to address things like poverty and education and access to healthcare. Instead, they're distracting the public with information on solutions to problems that don't actually exist. When the foundation of your policy is not evidence-based, it will collapse.' The Defend Public Health report diverges from the previous Maha focus on issues such as processed foods and environmental chemicals, but it covers familiar ground in public health. The group highlights the importance of food safety, security and access to food, including through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), and improved opportunities for physical activity. They seek to ensure equitable access to vaccines; expand access to healthcare, including comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare access; and build strategies for clean air. The report also recommends fully funding scientific research and public health systems; combatting scientific misinformation, including from the US government; and strengthening pandemic preparedness. They call for reductions in gun violence, now the number one cause of death for children. And their last recommendation is to remove Robert F Kennedy Jr, secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), from office, calling his removal 'the single most important step toward improving the health of Americans'. The recommendations are exactly what the US needs to address to become healthier, said Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association (APHA). If you 'look at the things that actually kill people, from the 10 leading causes of death, that is indeed the right list'. The US spends twice as much on healthcare as the next industrialized country, despite having poorer health outcomes, Benjamin pointed out. 'The fracturing of our healthcare system undermines the accessibility of healthcare,' Benjamin said before noting that the US also spends less than other countries on the social determinants of health and social supports, and invests less in primary care and prevention. Such gaps are getting worse under the second Trump administration, with huge cuts to Medicaid, affordable housing, and nutrition programs like Snap. 'If they're serious about making America healthy again, I would suggest that we first begin by feeding children,' Jacobs said. 'When, for example, RFK Jr is talking about food dyes, I don't think that that is anywhere near as important as the fact that 13 million children in the United States do not know where their next meal is coming from.' Scientific misinformation is an 'existential threat' to Americans, and the US government is a 'major source' of misinformation and disinformation now, Jacobs said. The first Maha report 'contains misinformation and uses references that don't even exist', she noted. The Defend Public Health report has a tongue-in-cheek note that it was 'created by real human experts relying on real rigorous data'. Jacobs recommended working with social media companies, 'one of the biggest amplifiers of misinformation', to address the spread of harmful information. Educating children on how to evaluate the quality and accuracy of information is also important, she said. But one of the biggest purveyors of health misinformation is Kennedy himself. 'Everything that he is doing is horrifying,' Jacobs said. 'There is a saying in public health, 'saving lives a million at a time', and he is doing the opposite of that.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion She called him a 'genuine threat' who is 'devastating' public health. 'He has no knowledge, training or experience in any type of science. He's never done an experiment, he's never written a paper, he's never gotten a grant to study anything. He has no understanding of the underlying causes of poor health in the United States,' Jacobs said. Defend Public Health launched in November, after Trump's re-election because, as Jacobs said, 'it was very clear to us that public health specifically was going to be under attack.' 'We knew that it was going to be a tough fight. I don't think that any of us knew how bad this was going to get, how quickly. But we are doing everything in our power to support our fellow researchers, public health workers, anybody that we can, and also continue to get accurate information out to the public,' Jacobs said. The group joins other established health organizations as well as other newcomers like the Vaccine Integrity Project to serve as reliable sources of information. There's a long history of groups like these providing outside perspectives on official recommendations, Benjamin said. But the federal government is uniquely positioned to speak to the health of all Americans. 'Pediatricians certainly have the nation's trust around vaccines for kids, but there's a big debate about at what point does a kid become an adolescent, become an adult? At what point do they go into the adult health system?' he said. That creates confusion around which advice a patient should follow. The same may be true of a patient who becomes pregnant, or someone who may fall under the purview of multiple health organizations. It's not always easy to know who belongs in which group. 'We have to be careful that each of these private sector organizations align our recommendations, so that we don't further confuse the public,' Benjamin said. Yet, Benjamin continued, 'as the federal government withdraws in its responsibility to protect the public, groups like ours will become more influential in filling that void until we can get the federal government again to step up into that place as a trusted advisor.' Benjamin and Jacobs – and other experts in these groups – hope that the federal government will once again become a source of reliable information. 'We really wanted to start building a framework so that we're ready when we have the opportunity to start putting some of our policy recommendations in place,' Jacobs said. 'There is just rampant chaos right now around public health and science related to this administration, and we have got to stand firm and keep bringing the conversation back to the actual causes of poor health among Americans. I can't control what the government is going to decide to do. What we can do is continue to provide accurate information to the public.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The dermatologist-approved 'magic' body wash wowing shoppers by clearing back and chest spots FAST: 'This product is incredible'
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more A salicylic acid body wash is proving so effective at reducing breakouts that shoppers have claimed it's 'like magic'. The £26.10 47Skin Treatment Body Wash is helping boost the confidence of shoppers dealing with frustrating bouts of spots on their chest, back and bum. Using the two per cent salicylic acid wash, users have found it helps to unclog pores and smooth rough, bumpy or blemish-prone areas. 47Skin Treatment Body Wash, 150ml Shoppers struggling with spots on their back, chest, and bum are finding impressive results with the 47Skin Treatment Body Wash. Made with salicylic acid and Silver Chitoderm,® which kills 99.9 per cent of blemish-causing bacteria, it helps to reduce spots and blemishes and promote clearer skin. £26.10 Shop Before and after: Ideal for blemish-prone, bumpy skin, the lightly foaming formula helps prevent spots and reduce the appearance of blemish marks and redness If you're self conscious about baring your back or chest due this summer to stubborn spots, then scores have recommended the 47Skin Treatment Body Wash. Dermatologist-approved and clinically tested, the 47Skin Treatment Body Wash doesn't mess about when it comes to its blemish-busting formula. Helping to prevent and clear breakouts in equal measure, the body wash has been formulated with the brand's iconic Silver Chitoderm®, which kills 99.9 per cent of blemish-causing bacteria. The result? 'Obsessed' Boots users, who claim it's a must-have for summer. 'This product has worked so well on my daughter's (12) back and chest,' wrote one thrilled 47Skin Treatment Body Wash shopper. 'It's less spotty, much less red, and the KP bumps have reduced. She is feeling much more confident to go swimming at school.' Helping men and women with all skin types, the intensive yet gentle body wash is designed to smooth, brighten and clear your skin without causing dryness or irritation. If you're suffering from problem areas of bad skin, then this foaming wash could be a worthwhile addition to your shower routine, particularly with summer inviting many of us to bare more skin. This is all thanks to the unique ingredients, including Silver Chitoderm®. This clever ingredient is when silver and chitoderm bond together to create an invisible barrier, killing 99.9 per cent of the bacteria that cause breakouts. Other noteworthy ingredients in the 47Skin Treatment Body Wash include 2 per cent Salicylic Acid (BHA), which gently exfoliates and helps dissolve dirt and oil from pores, while the Papaya Fruit Extract, Liquorice Root and Bearberry Leaf help to brighten the skin too. In short, the foaming treatment wash is ideal for blemish-prone skin, preventing spots, evening out skin tone and reducing the appearance of blemish marks and redness. 'This product is incredible,' raved one thrilled user. 'I've had small spots on my legs & bum for years that just haven't gone no matter what, I'm not joking I used this product 2 or 3 times and they've disappeared.' Another agreed, adding: 'Really pleased with this product. We had 3 weeks before prom to clear small spots on my daughter's back. It did it. Easy to use wash on leave for a few minutes and wash off.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
A moment that changed me: I resolved to reduce my screen time – and it was a big mistake
I unlocked my iPhone screen at the precise moment that my weekly screen time notification appeared – accidentally dismissing it before I could take a screenshot – and promptly erupted into a rage. I had spent an excruciating week resolutely not looking at my phone, part of a month-long effort to whittle my daily screen time down from more than four hours a day to less than an hour, with the hope of improving my mental wellbeing (and possibly carving out a career as an inspirational speaker). But my efforts felt futile without being able to post evidence online about how offline I had become. I frantically Googled how to retrieve notifications (you cannot) and – briefly – considered re-creating my screen time report in Photoshop. Over the past decade or two, my efforts at self-improvement have taken various forms: the year where I read 105 books; the period during which I gave up all forms of sugar including, misguidedly, fruit; and a dalliance with shamanism that, I'm sorry to say, included interpretive dance. Some might suggest I would be better off learning to cook, or drive, or type with more than one finger, but they can't reach me because I no longer look at my phone. 'Project Screen Time' began after I listened to a podcast in which a comedian claimed that you shouldn't look at social media within two hours of waking up, because it messes with your dopamine, or something. This is my favourite kind of advice: uncited, from the mouth of a layperson who can't remember how they acquired it. But I gave up opening Instagram first thing in the morning and … it worked. Miraculously, choosing not to sandblast my brain with pictures of other people's abs before I was fully conscious did improve my mood. Even better, I found that if I didn't look at my socials first thing, I could often resist until after lunch. As is typically the case when I embark on a new regime, this brief moment of clarity quickly became a frenzy. I traded one obsession (looking at my phone) for another (not looking at it). In my second week, I was down to two hours of screen time a day. By my third, it was an hour and a half – and I became determined to get it below 60 minutes. Part of me was impressed that I could appear normal while quietly (nobly?) wielding this superpower. However, I was unable to keep my gift a secret. I soon began boring friends, acquaintances and service workers with tales of my herculean discipline. Before long, my quest was disrupting my day in new ways. I resented having to open Maps on my phone, so I found myself getting lost while cycling to appointments. If I wanted to show someone a picture or a meme, I would ask to Google it on their phone, rather than my own. I refused to order Ubers after nights out (the painstaking process of watching a cab crawl towards my location while the minutes of screen time racked up was torturous) and instead offered to transfer the money (later, on my laptop) to whoever did. I became increasingly frustrated that my screen time wasn't lower. I would get to 2pm having barely glanced at my phone and yet the data would claim I had used it for 36 minutes. I began to think conspiratorially. My screen time was displayed in a graph split into blue (social), turquoise (entertainment) and orange (productivity and finance). But the vast majority of the chart was made up of undelineated grey. What was the grey?! Eventually, screen time was added to the list of subjects (including the music and lore of Taylor Swift and my attraction to Ron DeSantis) that I was forbidden from discussing at home. My lowest point arrived as I was showing a friend my weekly stats, which gives you a breakdown of how long you've spent on each app. He queried why 'Settings' was my third most-used application – and I had to admit it was because that was how I compulsively checked my screen time. My tantrum over being unable to memorialise my lowest-ever screen report (51 minutes a day!) was a wake-up call; reducing my screen time had become its own form of phone addiction. Rather than escaping the need to seek validation from strangers online, I had happened upon a new way to earn their approval. But all was not lost. The realisation nudged me towards acceptance that I will probably never be a moderate person; I can't rely on any form of self-regulation (my latest regime – skincare – revolves around an LED mask that automatically switches off after 10 minutes, otherwise I fear I would be wearing it to the office like a DayGlo Hannibal Lecter). In the end, I stopped trying to recapture my screen-time report, instead screenshotting the less aesthetic chart in my settings to post online. Within minutes, DMs flooded in from people congratulating me on my self-restraint and asking how I had managed to quit my phone. I replied to them all, dopamine flooding my brain's starved reward centre. That day, my screen time was three hours and 36 minutes. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
