German court overturns ban on far-right magazine
The Federal Administrative Court's ruling, opens new tab dealt a blow to attempts to contain the nativist Alternative for Germany party, the second-largest in parliament after February's election, and its range of online and print outriders.
Former Interior Minister Nancy Faeser banned the magazine, which had a circulation of 40,000 and a deep social media footprint, last July, labelling it a "mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene".
In his ruling, however, Ingo Kraft said that although Compact contained many extreme statements, including voicing support for expelling German citizens of migrant background, they did not amount to proof that the organisation behind the magazine was "intrinsically" unconstitutional.
"The Basic Law allows even its enemies freedom of opinion and of the press," Kraft wrote.
The magazine's chief editor Juergen Elsaesser, who has said Compact wants to overthrow Germany's "regime" and describes himself as a supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin, retweeted a picture of himself captioned with the single word: "Sieg!", or "Victory".
For the AfD, which has long pursued a strategy of peppering the state with complicated lawsuits and parliamentary questions that slow its working and discredit them, the ruling is a morale boost after it underperformed polls in the election.
Bjoern Hoecke, leader of the party's most radical wing, cast his party and the magazine as defenders of democratic norms against the previous Social Democrat interior minister's authoritarian instincts.
"Instead of prosecuting Islamists, she hunted down harmless critics of the government," he wrote on social media. "She caused great harm to democracy."
The Interior Ministry, now led by the conservative Alexander Dobrindt, did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Don't cave to Putin, Europe urges Trump
Sir Keir Starmer and other European leaders will urge Donald Trump not to submit to Vladimir Putin's demands for more Ukrainian concessions. In a show of unity in the wake of Russia's success at last week's Alaska summit, the group will fly to Washington on Monday and attempt to stiffen US resolve in the peace talks. Alongside Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, Sir Keir will seek to minimise the risk of Volodymyr Zelensky being humiliated in the Oval Office again – as happened when he last visited in February. The European delegation – which includes Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister; Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president; and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general – will also push back on Putin's demand for Mr Zelensky to surrender the whole of the Donbas region, which is made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in eastern Ukraine. But the Trump administration said a discussion about the future of the mineral-rich region was needed and insisted 'both sides' will need to make concessions. On Sunday, Mr Macron said the delegation's will was to ' present a united front between Europeans and Ukrainians ', warning Mr Trump: 'There is only one state that proposes a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.' He added: 'If we are weak with Moscow, we are preparing for tomorrow's conflicts.' European leaders have not explicitly called for all of Donetsk to remain Ukrainian, instead saying it was up for Mr Zelensky to decide what to agree to on territory. Mr Zelensky pushed back on suggestions that he should be made to give up the entirety of the Donbas region, including land that Ukraine still holds. However, he opened the door to negotiations with Putin directly, saying any territorial changes should be discussed in a three-way meeting with the US. 'We need real negotiations which means they can start where the frontline is now,' Mr Zelensky said. 'The contact line is the best line for talking and the Europeans support this.' The Ukrainian president noted that the Russians were 'still unsuccessful' in Donetsk, where Ukraine holds 30 per cent of the land, and had failed to take the area in the 12 years that Putin had tried to seize control. The request for face-to-face talks with Putin, which Moscow has consistently rejected , appears to be part of a wider European strategy to show Russia as the obstacle to peace. In a joint press conference in Brussels on Sunday, Mr Zelensky and Ms Von der Leyen said Russia must stop attacking Ukraine before proper negotiations can progress, whether that is called a ceasefire or not. The message represented an attempt to counter Mr Trump's public declaration that all sides should end the focus on a temporary ceasefire and move straight to establishing a permanent peace deal. European leaders are wary of this position because it would allow Putin's forces to seize more Ukrainian land while talks were ongoing. However, senior figures in the Trump administration reinforced the president's desire for talks over territory on Sunday. Steve Witkoff, the US peace envoy who joined Mr Trump and Putin for talks in Alaska, told CNN: 'There is an important discussion to be had with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there.' Marco Rubio, who was also in Anchorage, told CBS News: 'To reach the end of this conflict, both sides are going to have to make concessions. That's just a fact.' The US secretary of state also backed away from previous US threats to sanction Putin if he failed to agree to a ceasefire, suggesting such a move would not keep him at the negotiating table. European leaders praised the Trump administration after the president promised security guarantees to a Western-backed peacekeeping force in Ukraine once the fighting has ended. Sir Keir and Mr Macron are leading a group of 30 nations dubbed the ' Coalition of the Willing ' offering to help protect Ukrainian freedom if a peace deal is struck. Under the plans, British military trainers and engineers would be sent into Ukraine alongside contributions from other nations after a ceasefire to rebuild the Ukrainian armed forces. European planes, including Royal Air Force fighter jets, would also police the skies to deter any invasion. Leaders have argued for months that the US would have to provide some form of security 'backstop' to make sure that in reality Russia would be deterred from attacking again. Some went public over the weekend thanking Mr Trump for supposedly offering 'Nato Article 5-like' guarantees in a call briefing them on the Putin summit. Article 5 is a clause that agrees an attack on one Nato member is considered an attack on all. Downing Street wants the White House to clarify what security guarantees it is offering, while Mr Macron said he would ask the US 'to what extent' it is ready to contribute. However, Sir Keir did not issue personal comments on Sunday, reflecting Downing Street's strategy of trying to influence Mr Trump behind closed doors rather than via megaphone diplomacy. Senior figures in Downing Street have expressed regret over what they consider to have been their failure to help Mr Zelensky prepare for February's ill-fated meeting with Mr Trump in Washington. Mr Zelensky arrived at the White House hoping to announce Ukraine had reached a minerals deal with the US. But his Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump descended into a shouting match after JD Vance, the vice-president, demanded that he show more gratitude after years of American support.
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Don't make Zelensky the Beneš of 2025
The ghost of Edvard Beneš may well be haunting Washington when Donald Trump meets Volodymyr Zelensky to hear the terms for peace in Ukraine. In 1938 Beneš had to accept the annexation of part of Czechoslovakia by Germany, agreed at the notorious Munich summit by Britain and France. Beneš was forced to resign and, after the entire country was occupied by the Germans, went into exile in the UK. What does fate have in store for Ukraine's president? The circumstances may be different but the dynamics are similar: an aggressor is demanding part of his country as the price for peace and a foreign power is brokering the outcome. If, as is now expected, Mr Trump insists that Ukraine give up much of Donetsk in exchange for a cessation of hostilities on other fronts, Mr Zelensky simply cannot accept it. The sacrifices his people have made in three and a half years of conflict since the Russian invasion make such a capitulation impossible. Even with US-backed security guarantees it is not an outcome Mr Zelensky can possibly go along with, not least because past promises of Ukraine's territorial integrity, dating back to 1994, have not been fulfilled. Nonetheless, like Beneš, he may have no choice but to agree and then step aside to let someone else manage the aftermath. If the American president is intent on giving Vladimir Putin the spoils of his war, he is presumably prepared to withdraw support to Ukraine if Kyiv continues the fight. European leaders, despite a great show of diplomatic support for President Zelensky – including accompanying him to Washington to prevent the browbeating he received before – are not committed enough to go it alone without US backing. This, then, is the prospect facing the Ukrainian leader as he prepares to meet an American president who is seemingly unable to hold to a consistent position on how peace can be achieved. For a while it appeared that he favoured tougher action against Moscow and its allies to demonstrate the price to be paid for its continued onslaught. But that prospect disappeared with the summit in Alaska when the Russian leader received the red-carpet treatment and took his place back on the world stage. Perhaps Mr Trump will change his mind again and be persuaded that a tighter squeeze needs to be applied to Russia. But, judging by the briefings in Washington, that is unlikely. Mr Zelensky faces being cast as the Edvard Beneš of today. Everyone knows what happened next.
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain to help restart civilian flights into Ukraine after ceasefire
Britain will help restart international air travel into Ukraine after a peace deal is agreed to boost the country's economy and rebuild its independence. The Coalition of the Willing, a group of more than 30 nations supportive of Ukraine, wants to establish 'normal' flying conditions in the event of a ceasefire. Royal Air Force fighter jets are due to join planes from other European nations in policing the skies to make sure that Russia does not launch a second full-scale invasion. But a secondary aim will be to once again reinstate international travel in and out of Ukrainian cities. A similar effort will be made to reopen Ukraine's ports by accelerating ongoing efforts to clear the Black Sea of mines. The ambitions show an additional feature of the West's hopes of rebuilding Ukraine into not just a secure and strong nation after the fighting ends, but an economically thriving one. There would also be upsides for European travellers, who for more than three years have experienced longer journeys as planes divert around the Ukrainian border. In the sky over Europe, from Portugal to Ukraine, the flight radar shows a striking contrast. Busy air routes full of passenger planes gradually give way to an empty horizon. — (@ukraine_ua) August 14, 2025 Planning for how Europe can do more to protect Ukraine's independence if there is a deal with Russia has been going on intensively for months. Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, the French president, have been taking the lead on the drive, with a joint headquarters being set up in Paris. The coalition has put an emphasis that nations reluctant to take part in peace-keeping efforts should not hold back others more ready to act. The coalition will also consider how to ensure Russia will not restock its military after a ceasefire is declared, which could enable a second full-scale invasion in the future. The Prime Minister committed to the consideration of putting British 'boots on the ground and planes in the air', though the idea of a mass UK deployment to man any new border has faded. Instead, hundreds of British military trainers and engineers will be sent into Ukraine to help rebuild its armed forces. The first deployments are expected to take place within a week of a ceasefire, with the UK presence ramping up in the weeks after that. Allies would fly planes over Ukraine to patrol the skies and deter a second Russian invasion, under the plans. The UK is willing to provide Eurofighter Typhoons and F-35s. This would also allow commercial air travel to resume. In July, the UK Government said planes from the coalition would provide 'air policing, reassuring the Ukrainian population and establishing the conditions for normal international air travel to re-commence'. Alongside this will be an effort to create 'safer seas' around Ukraine. The Black Sea Task Force, which was set up by Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria, would be bolstered with specialist staff to more quickly clear mines in the water. The UK Government said this drive would 'ensure safe and secure maritime access for all vessels transiting to and from Ukraine ports'. The resumption of more normal air travel and port activity would provide a boost to the Ukrainian economy at a time when Kyiv wants to rebuild its military. Other companies and travellers in Europe could benefit too. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) noted in its 2025 annual report: 'The ongoing war in Ukraine also has affected air transport in various ways. 'Twenty per cent of European airspace has been closed and Russian airspace overflight rights withdrawn for most Western airlines, requiring the re-routing of long-haul flights to Asia.' How quickly private airline companies would be willing to fly once again both over and into Ukraine, even with the coalition patrols, remains to be seen.
