7 money changes that will affect your bills in the next month
The New Year has ushered in a raft of financial changes that could hit your pocket. Energy bills have risen for millions of households as have broadband and mobile phone bills. Meanwhile council tax increases are being rubber stamped in every part of the country.
In April things will change again as we usher in the new financial year. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will increase universal credit, PIP and attendance allowance for millions at the end of March. You can read the full list of payments affected here.
But before then there are seven other financial changes to come before the end of this financial year. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here
READ MORE: Martin Lewis reveals exact date you should check for the cheapest car insurance renewal quote
READ MORE: DWP to increase universal credit, PIP and attendance allowance for millions in matter of weeks - full list
Warm Homes Discount deadline - February 28
The Warm Homes Discount deadline will pass on February 28. The gives those who qualify an extra £150 off their energy bills. It is available to those on most energy firms in the UK, such as British Gas, EON, EDF, Scottish Power, Scottish Gas, Utilita, Octopus and more.
Eligible individuals should have received a letter by the end of January, but you need to contact the Warm Home Discount Scheme helpline if you haven't had one yet.
February 25 - Ofgem price cap announced and energy bills rise
On February 25, energy regulator Ofgem will announce the latest price cap. Based on Cornwall Insight predictions there will likely be another increase, with money expert Martin Lewis advising that bills are likely to increase again by roughly another 3%, or £47 a year. It will be the third time in a row that Ofgem has chosen to increase prices. It would set the new rate at £1,791 a year for a typical use average household.
Free wills month
Each year in March and October, Free Wills Month allows people over the age of 55 to get a simple will written or updated for free. Many charities and hundreds of solicitors across the UK take part.
Rail fares to rise - March 2
Rail fares will increase from March 5. In Wales, the Welsh Government agreed to an increase in regulated rail fares of 4.6%, with the rise to take place on March 2. This is in line with the increase already announced for fares controlled by the UK Government.
However, Transport for Wales will be applying different increases to each regulated product. Anytime Day Single fares will increase by 3%, 7-Day Season ticket fares will increase by 3.5% and Anytime Day Return fares and Off Peak Return fares will both increase by 6%.
Economic and Fiscal Forecast - March 26
According to recent government announcements, the next "Economic and Fiscal Forecast" is scheduled to be published on March 26. This is a report that predicts future economic conditions and will be produced by the Office for Budget Responsibility.
More stamp duty to pay - March 31
At the end of March, there will be a change to stamp duty rates. In September 2022 the threshold at which this tax had to be paid was increased to £250,000 from £125,000.
The threshold for first-time buyers was also raised from £300,000 to £425,000 and the maximum amount a property is worth to benefit from the relief was increased to £625,000 from £500,000. But from March 31, all of these measures will be scrapped.
Household support fund to end - March 31
The Household Support Fund was introduced during the cost of living crisis to help low-income families. It is set to be scrapped on March 31. It gave councils extra money to help vulnerable households with everyday living costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
How much damage could Donald Trump do to Elon Musk?
Tesla stock soared in the months after the November presidential election because investors were convinced Donald Trump was about to do massive favors for his largest financial backer, Tesla CEO Elon Musk. But Trump can also do great damage to Musk's many business interests. The risk of that damage is one reason that Tesla shares (TSLA) tumbled 14% in trading Thursday following the very nasty and public spat between Trump and Musk. But it's not just Tesla that could be at risk. SpaceX depends on government contracts for a significant share of its revenue. And Tesla, SpaceX and Musk's other companies, including social media platform X, artificial intelligence company xAI and brain-computer interface company Neuralink all face regulation from the federal government. In addition, Musk faces possible investigations of his own activities from agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is looking into whether he violated rules when purchased his initial stake in X, then called Twitter, ahead of launching his takeover bid for the company. Trump appeared to threaten that he would take such action against Musk, as he posted on his Truth social media platform Thursday that, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' To which Musk replied on his social media platform X: 'This just gets better and better,' followed by two laughing face emojis, along with 'Go ahead, make my day.' Tesla has relatively few government contracts. But there are numerous federal policies that directly affect its finances, including a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle buyers that allows Tesla and other automakers to raise prices. That was likely worth billions to Tesla last year alone. In addition, Tesla reported more than $8 billion in sales over six years of regulatory credits to other automakers to help them comply with federal and state emission standards. Trump is in favor of rolling back those standards and stripping states of the power to set their own emissions rules, which would destroy the market for those credit sales. A note from JPMorgan to clients Thursday estimates the loss of the EV tax credit could cost Tesla $1.2 billion a year and the loss of regulatory credit sales another $2 billion. Musk has also pegged the future of the growth of Tesla on operating a self-driving taxi service without any driver on board. Tesla's current 'full self driving' offering (FSD) requires a driver to be present to take control of the car. The service is due to debut in Austin, Texas, later this month. He admits his ambitious growth plans could be constrained by regulations. In addition, the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has also already announced investigations into accidents involving existing Tesla cars operating with FSD. Many Tesla fans assumed those investigations would be dropped under a Tesla-friendly Trump administration. SpaceX has received $15.2 billion in contracts from NASA, as well as $5.8 billion from the Department of Defense, along with a few million more from other agencies, according to Replacing SpaceX on those contracts, however, is not realistic. That's because there is no other company available to replace it. For example, Boeing, the only other company able transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS), had problems on its only crewed flight last year. That required its Starliner spacecraft to return to Earth without two astronauts, who were stranded at the ISS for nine months instead of the planned trip of a handful of days. But SpaceX also is subject to the oversight of both NASA and the FAA. Its Starlink satellite internet communication service is also seeking approval from the FCC to expand its service.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Hungary's Retail Sales Rebound Counters Industry Output Decline
Hungary's retail sales surged at the start of the second quarter, making shoppers Prime Minister Viktor Orban's bet to avoid another recession less than a year before elections. Store receipts rose an annual workday-adjusted 5% in April, the most since May 2022, according to data published by the Budapest-based statistics office on Friday. Industrial output meantime dropped for a 14th consecutive month, falling a workday-adjusted annual 2.3% in April after a 5.4% drop in March.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who would be a Chancellor? Rachel Reeves faces some horrible decisions next week
The Chancellor will have some tough decisions to make when dishing out the cash in next week's Spending Review. But handing out money is usually easier than raising it. And raising money later in the year will be the bigger challenge and will probably result in the Chancellor announcing some tax hikes. When the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announces the details of her Spending Review next Wednesday, it will sound as though she's increasing the amount of money the government is spending on public services and future investment projects. But the total amount of government spending was already set in the Chancellor's Spring Statement in March. Back then, she decided the government would spend £1.4 trillion on average in each of the next five years. That's equivalent to 44% of GDP, is higher than the average of 40% of GDP in the five years before the pandemic and is unlikely to be increased in the Spending Review. Incidentally, these numbers are bigger than the average tax receipts of £1.3 trillion, or 41.5% of GDP, anticipated over the next five years. That explains why the government is expecting to borrow an average of £90bn each year, or 2.8% of GDP, to fill the gap. Instead of altering the total amount of money the government will spend, the Spending Review will determine what the money is spent on. This means the Chancellor has to make some tricky decisions on how much to spend on the NHS, defence, welfare and all the other public services. Given the sheer size of the NHS budget and the growing importance of defence, increases in those areas will result in meagre increases elsewhere. The Spending Review won't, however, address the bigger issue, which is that the Chancellor will probably have to find more money later in the year. The pressure to increase total amount of government spending has grown since it was set in March. The recent public sector pay deals, the plans to restore some winter fuel payments and soften other benefit cuts, and the clamour to scrap the two-child benefit cap could mean that government spending needs to be £8bn higher than currently planned in five years' time. And the government's new migration policy (which may mean fewer people are paying taxes than previously expected) and the recent rise in the government's borrowing costs may result in the gap between government spending and tax receipts being an extra £10bn bigger in five years' time. That's an additional £18bn that may need to be found from somewhere. That would rise to £36bn if the government needed to meet its 'ambition' to raise defence spending from 2.5% of GDP to 3.0% of GDP before 2030. And it could rise to £46bn should the Office for Budget Responsibility judge that the UK's rate of productivity growth will be a bit lower than it currently believes. That would mean the economy doesn't grow as fast as expected and, as a result, tax receipts would be lower than projected and government spending would be higher. In other words, to avoid breaking her own fiscal rules and to maintain the current buffer against those rules, in the Budget this autumn the Chancellor may need to raise an extra £18bn to £46bn. She can do this in three equally unappealing ways. First, she could cut other forms of government spending, although this will jar with the government's aims to improve the provision of public services. Second, she could bend her fiscal rules to allow her to borrow more, but this may just increase government spending if it results in the financial markets charging the government a higher interest rate. Third, she could raise taxes, but to fill a hole as large as £18bn to £46bn the Chancellor may need to break her pre-election pledge to not raise income tax, VAT and National Insurance for employees. To limit the fallout, the Chancellor may opt for a bit of all three. It's unclear what this would mean for the economy as it would depend on the mix of the changes in spending, taxes and borrowing. But it is clear that the hardest decisions for the Chancellor lie further down the line and may involve raising taxes for households. Paul Dales is Chief UK Economist of research consultancy Capital Economics.
