
What you should say when your child is struggling – and 4 things you must NEVER utter, from mental health gurus
The way you speak to children can either push them away or build their trust. Here's what not to say. . .
Parenting isn't just what we do, it's what we say, too.
8
Finding the right words when emotions are running high can feel like walking a tightrope, says Jessica Agudelo from Mental Health First Aid England. 'The language we use as parents plays a crucial role in shaping how we are perceived by our children.'
We all want our children to feel safe, supported and understood. But these days, three-quarters of parents are worried about their kids' mental health, according to a recent report by Bright Horizons.
And they have every reason to, with one in 10 kids aged 5-16 years old having a clinically diagnosable mental health illness.*
It's a growing problem – hospital admissions for mental health problems in under-18s in England have risen by 65% in the past decade.**
And while the pandemic has had a profound impact, experts say it's not the sole factor.
Without you realising it, your words could unintentionally hurt your child, rather than lift them up, which can influence whether they seek support from you or others.
'The words we choose in everyday interactions can either support and empower, or come across as judgmental and dismissive,' says Jessica.
'Supportive and constructive language helps develop trust and open communication, creating a safe space for children to express themselves, especially when they are having a hard time.'
There is no handbook on how we should parent, so how do we know the right things to say, especially if we didn't receive this from our own parents when growing up?
We asked four children's mental health experts, who are parents themselves, to share the words they try to use, along with one thing they make sure they never to say to their kids.
Kourtney Kardashian slammed as 'insane' for controversial parenting move & even sister Khloe thinks it's 'crazy'
WHAT TO SAY. . .
'I'm listening'
8
Lisa says: 'When kids are distressed, they don't always know why. When I say: 'I'm listening', I'm letting them know we have time to talk and work out what's going on.
"You don't have to agree with everything they're telling you. Often just feeling heard and listened to really grounds them and helps them regulate their emotions again.
"Kids can balance themselves quickly once they get things out of their system.'
'I'm here with you'
8
Jessica says: 'Simply offering silence and a safe, comforting space for your child to process their feelings is often all they need.
"When my daughter was upset recently, I let her scream because that's what she needed. By acknowledging her pain without rushing to fix it, I was showing her that it was OK to feel whatever she was feeling.
"This allowed her to experience her emotions authentically, which is crucial for emotional growth.'
'You should be proud of yourself'
Paul says: 'Instead of saying: 'I am proud of you', I try to say: 'Well done, you should be proud of yourself'.
"I've worked with young people with incredibly low self-esteem and low self-worth.
"By saying: 'I am proud of you', we can unintentionally give the message that success is based on how they make other people feel.
" Telling a child: 'You should be proud of yourself', is far more impactful for building their self-image.
"I always try to say this to my six-year-old son. The radiant smile on his face when he replies: 'I am, Daddy', shows me he knows he can do things that bring pleasure to himself, without seeking approval from me.'
'Nothing you say could make me stop loving you'
8
Lynn says: 'I always make sure I acknowledge if a conversation is likely to be hard for them.
"Make it clear that you are proud of the strength they are demonstrating in telling you about their problems.
"As a parent or carer, your child might also be reassured if you tell them there's nothing they could say that will make you stop loving them, and reassure them that they don't have to put on a brave face.'
WHAT NOT TO SAY. . .
'I'll just leave and you can be by yourself then'
Lisa says: 'It's easy to say this when your child is angry and shouting: 'I hate you!'
"But deep down, they don't really want you to leave. Removing yourself also the chance to have a conversation with them and sends the message that if they are cross with you, you'll leave them alone.
" This doesn't mean parents can't think about their own needs, too. You could say: 'You sound really cross right now, shall we talk about it?'
"If they keep shouting, say: 'I know you're cross right now, but I don't like being shouted at, so if you keep shouting at me, I'll need to go into another room for a bit.' It's OK to let them know you have feelings, too.'
'Are you OK?'
8
Jessica says: 'It's instinctive to ask: 'Are you OK?' when we sense something might be off.
"But this often doesn't get to the heart of what's going on – it's too easy for kids to brush it off and say: 'I'm fine'.
"Instead, try saying: 'Tell me about your day. What was good about it and what wasn't?' Or: 'I've noticed you seem a bit down today, can we talk about it?'
"These open-ended questions invite a child to share more freely. When they feel heard, they're more likely to open up.'
'Don't cry'
8
Paul says: 'Instead, I try to say: 'I can see you are upset, it's OK to cry'. It's important not to make light of or brush aside how a child is feeling.
"This is important for all children, but for far too long we've told boys that crying is weak. Telling a child to suppress emotions is damaging to their development and wellbeing.
"If we suppress feelings of sadness, it can lead to long-term mental health issues, like anxiety and depression.'
'Why can't you just be happy?'
8
Lynn says: 'I avoid phrases that create a barrier like this, or: 'Why do you always have to be like this?' and: 'What do you have to worry about?'
"Phrases like this put a wedge between you and the young person. Try to understand that feelings of depression, anxiety and self-hatred are all-consuming and cannot simply be pushed aside – and remember, as an adult, you have more coping mechanisms than they do.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Weston Park baton walk symbol of hope for suicide survivors
A charity started by a father who lost his son to suicide has held a Walk of Hope to encourage open conversations around mental McCarthy, a former BBC and Sky News reporter, lost his son Ross to suicide aged Ross left a farewell note asking his family to campaign for better mental health support, Mr McCarthy co-founded the charity Baton of said Saturday's event at Sheffield's Weston Park was about "smashing stigma surrounding suicide and encourage open conversation". He said: "Having witnessed first hand the trauma of losing a wonderful son with so much to give, I realised belatedly just how woeful society is when it comes to mental wellbeing."Together there is so much we can do and that includes bringing to an end the dreadful silence surrounding the subject."The event saw campaigners carry a Baton of Hope, a gold baton designed and crafted by Thomas Lyte, goldsmiths and silversmiths to Queen Elizabeth bearers included people who had lost loved ones to suicide or survived a suicide attempt. Debbi Marlow, who was among those who carried the baton, lost her brother Andrew to suicide three years said: "We've come together in the name of our loved ones and to consider people who struggle with their mental health."Suicide is everyone's business. In some way so many of us will be affected by suicide, whether we lose someone who is very special to us or we're aware of that. We're all connected as humans by suicide in some way."We need to connect and talk about it and the baton allows those conversations."Leah Laycock, who also carried the baton, witnessed her father attempt suicide as a child and is a suicide survivor said: "Once upon a time, I wouldn't talk about it but after coming across the Baton of Hope charity, meeting other people and connecting with them has helped me so much."And it's brought my journey of recovery forward very quickly, which is amazing."Carrying the baton feels like a symbol of survival, strength, and hope – not just for me but for everyone who's ever felt like they couldn't go on." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North


Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Top dermatologist's urgent warning to those with spots - common remedy could leave you scarred for life
Popping an unsightly pimple before a big social event or work presentation may seem like a simple solution. But while this might seem like a good idea at the time, it's a bad habit that can do more than just scar you, a skin expert has warned. According to Dr Conal Perrett, a dermatologist at The Devonshire Clinic on Harley Street, London, popping spots can risk spreading infection or requiring pricey follow-up care, often costing hundreds of pounds, to fully clear. Instead, he suggested targeted treatments and gentle skincare to support natural healing for spots. Acne is one of the most common inflammatory skin conditions in adolescents. More than 80 per cent of teenagers battle with pimples. The condition is caused by hair follicles becoming plugged with oil or dead skin cells, which can be a result of shifts in hormones, or using cosmetic products and certain medications. It can also occur later in life for a number of reasons. Dr Perrett advised: 'Refrain from picking or squeezing any blemishes, as this can worsen inflammation and lead to permanent marks.' The correct way to treat a troublesome spot depends on the type you have, the doctor warned 'For stubborn scarring, advanced treatments such as chemical peels, laser and microneedling can be the best way forward.' 'Using the right skincare ingredients, alongside daily sun protection, can make a significant difference. 'For more persistent or severe acne, seeking professional advice is the best way to protect the skin and support a smooth, healthy complexion in the future.' Dr Perrett also urged people, in particular acne sufferers, to look out for the five main types of spots: blackheads, papules, pustules, nodules and cysts. Dark spots on your face are likely blackheads, Dr Perrett noted, which can be treated and prevented with products containing salicylic acids and gentle retinoids—because they keep pores clear. Such products are available on the high street, often as serums. Small, red inflamed bumps without visible puss-filled heads, meanwhile, are likely papules—which occur when clogged pores trigger deeper inflammation. This redness can be reduced by products containing benzoyl peroxide, niacinamide, topical retinoids, alpha hydroxy acids and azelaic acid. Spots that look similar to papules but have a red base and white or yellow tip, are likely pustules which carry a higher risk of scarring if popped. These troublesome spots can be treated with the same way as papules, but in some cases prescription-strength retinoids and oral antibiotics may be needed. Another, nodules, are large, painful and sit deep within the skin. These have a significant chance of leaving permanent scarring, so they also require prescription-strength retinoids and oral antibiotics. Cysts, meanwhile, have the highest likelihood of scarring and are large, soft, pus-filled lumps that sit deep below the skin's surface. 'It is crucial to never squeeze cysts, as this can dramatically increase scarring and spread infection,' Dr Perrett warned. If patients have painful cysts and nodules, steroid injections such as corticosteroid to quickly reduce swelling, redness and pain. However, he added, if pimples stubbornly persist patients should see a dermatologist. For those with acne scars he said wearing a hydrating SPF can, minimise how visible they are. 'Sun exposure stimulates melanin production, which can make scars appear darker and more pronounced,' he said. 'A broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF 30 or higher should be applied every morning and reapplied throughout the day. 'Pairing sun protection with a good moisturizer enhances skin repair by maintaining hydration, which is crucial for cell turnover and barrier function.' This is especially important for those taking the acne medication Roaccutane, as it makes them more sensitive to ultraviolet radiation from the sun, he warned. Research has suggested diet may also play a role in acne prevention. Experts advise avoiding sugar and focusing on a healthy, well-balanced diet with high amounts of nuts, legumes, fish, red meat, fruits and vegetables. Some studies also suggest there is a higher risk of acne with frequent milk consumption, but more research is needed before dietary recommendations can be made. For this reason, experts recommend keeping a diary to see if any of foods directly aggravate acne and avoid them if this is the case.


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reform the NHS, not our shopping baskets
This week, the NHS will publish its 10 Year Health Plan. The most we can expect from this exercise in Soviet-style planning is tinkering around the edges of an edifice that was erected when Joseph Stalin ruled in Moscow. By 2035, the end date of this 10-year plan, the country will almost certainly be unable to afford the NHS in its present form – if, indeed, it hasn't collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions by then. Unable to address the fundamental problems of the NHS, the dirigistes of Whitehall have come up with a new plan to direct us how to lead our lives – telling us what we should or shouldn't be allowed to choose to put in our shopping baskets. Supermarkets will be expected to cut 100 calories from the average shopping basket by limiting sales of sugary and salty snacks or other 'junk food'. Ever since Napoleon Bonaparte sneered at England as 'a nation of shopkeepers', we have worn his insult as a badge of honour. We are proud to be a people who earn our living by trade and we cherish the liberties that are the glory of a commercial society. Even those of us who are not shopkeepers are at least customers. So little does this Labour Government know the British people that it is about to resort to distinctly Napoleonic measures to punish both retailers and consumers. Yet previous attempts to control consumption have never succeeded in changing enduring patterns of behaviour rooted in human nature. It is outrageous that officials feel empowered to tell us what we can, and cannot, eat. The public is being infantilised and robbed of agency. Centuries have passed since Parliament abandoned sumptuary laws that prohibited the lower orders from imitating the luxurious dress of the aristocracy. But the bureaucratic mind is obdurate in its disdain for popular tastes in food and drink. Combined with Labour's instinct to meddle, along with its insatiable fiscal appetite, it is no surprise that, as we report today, a modern version of the sumptuary laws is about to land on an unsuspecting nation. Obesity is a genuine and growing problem, but, hitherto, all attempts to address it by fiscal means have failed. The latest obesity tax – supermarkets will be fined if they don't reduce the nation's calorie intake, and this will inevitably be passed on to consumers – now emerging from the bowels of the Health Department and the Treasury, claims to be aimed directly at our waistlines. In reality, like all its predecessors, it will target our wallets. There is a certain grim irony in the fact that this policy should have been adopted at the same time as the decision by the NHS to prescribe the weight-loss drug semaglutide (contained in Ozempic and Wegovy). It is fairly obvious that the underlying rationale of the new regulations is less about obesity than about the Government's failure to control spending. No doubt figures will be trotted out about how many lives will be saved by cutting consumption of ultra-processed foods or any other category of comestible that attracts the ire of the health bureaucrats. But the truth is that new rules are being concocted because the Government is running scared of its own MPs, who have effectively imposed a veto on cuts in welfare spending. What would genuinely make a difference to life expectancy and health outcomes would, of course, be a radical reform of the NHS, a more active population, and a reduction in the numbers wasting their lives on benefits. Rachel Reeves has just poured another £29 billion into the health service, without any clear cost-benefit calculation. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is intelligent enough to know that he has inherited an obsolete behemoth that is crying out for root-and-branch reform. But building a new consensus for a new NHS would require the Labour Party to rethink its assumptions about the social contract, as well as the role of insurance and individual responsibility. The original 1946 NHS Act created 'a comprehensive health service designed to secure improvement in the physical and mental health of the people of England and Wales'. Today, the nation's health is not safe in the hands of a dysfunctional Labour Party that would rather do anything – even introducing an assisted-dying service – than take on the overdue task of making the NHS fit for purpose. These new directives are at best a displacement activity, at worst an act of fiscal condescension. A nation of shopkeepers deserves better than to be bossed around by its own government.