
No, Rachel Reeves crying during Prime Minister's Questions isn't the political win you think it is
Thankfully, the times I have bawled until my face was a red-streaked and swollen mess have not been caught on camera for the world to see (I am a particularly ugly and colourful crier). So I genuinely felt for Rachel Reeves, who today was spotted puffy-eyed with a single tear rolling down her cheek, while sat behind Prime Minister Keir Starmer during today's Prime Minister's Questions, the day after the controversial welfare system reforms vote.
Reeves, the country's first female Chancellor, has recently been on the receiving end of criticism from colleagues, opposition parties and the public over a proposal to cut benefits and Personal Independence Payments (PIP) which help disabled people live a more independent life, as part of a much-needed benefits system overhaul. Elements of said plan is something the government has since been forced to u-turn on following backlash and the threat of a Labour rebellion.
Much furore has been made of Reeves's clear upset when Starmer sidestepped a question about her future during PMQs – and it's something the financial markets have apparently picked up on, too. At around midday (when PMQ's are broadcast) the value of the pound declined sharply against the dollar (though whether that's entirely down to Reeves's tears, or more linked to the suggestion that unpopular tax rises or a new Chancellor with a whole new economical plan could be waiting in the wings, is unclear).
What is clear, however, is the whiff of misogyny accompanying a lot of the commentary about Reeves online right now. There's a lot I find indefensible about this current Labour government – remember the halcyon days of last July when we actually thought change was afoot and things were going to get better? – but a politician showing emotion is not one.
It's a tired and well-worn (not to mention chauvinistic) trope that women are often 'too emotional' in the workplace, and that showing any sign of upset is to be considered weak and feeble. It's a reductive take – and we don't know with certainty what has upset her (a spokesperson for the Chancellor said it was 'a personal matter' and that Reeves will be 'working out of Downing Street this afternoon', implying she has not been ousted or used as a scapegoat). Frankly, a few tears are far less embarrassing than some of the frequent, angry outbursts we see from other politicians.
Donald Trump, for instance, regularly takes to his own social media platform, Truth Social, to get involved in spats with whoever has irked him that day, using language akin to an angry eight-year-old who has been told he's had enough screentime for the day, labelling former colleagues as 'losers' or any vaguely unflattering (and oftentimes honest) commentary about himself as 'fake news'.
Or take his Vice President, JD Vance, and his petulant outburst against Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the White House earlier this year, during which he berated a man whose country is at war for his lack of wearing a suit. These are treated as popcorn-worthy entertainment, meme-ified and held up as the embodiment of 'power' and strongman politics – when really, it's just a tantrum for all to see. Somehow, though, I reckon Reeves will be judged more harshly.
I'm not saying crying at work is necessarily a good thing – if you find yourself dissolving into tears frequently and publicly, maybe it's time to accept that perhaps the job isn't for you. But what I am saying is, sure, there's plenty to attack Reeves over politically (seriously, those welfare reform plans and the threat to remove PIP payments were a mess) – but visibly showing emotion should not be one of them. If the markets are affected by a woman crying, then it's the markets that need to get a grip, not Rachel Reeves.
Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reverse non-dom crackdown to get Britain building, Reeves urged
Rachel Reeves has been urged to scrap her controversial non-dom tax crackdown to lure foreign billionaires back to invest in Britain's much-needed building projects. Leo Quinn, the chief executive of construction giant Balfour Beatty, said the Chancellor's abolition of the non-dom regime had driven away crucial investment from the nation's infrastructure. Mr Quinn said: 'London's the best city on the planet and what we should be doing is attracting all these billionaires and wealthy families here ... because what they bring with them and the investments they make is phenomenal. 'I'm hoping that one [minister] will see the light and say, 'Maybe we've gone a little bit too far in what we've done around non-doms ... and we'll look to mitigate some of those rules.'' The Chancellor scrapped the non-dom status in April, a move widely blamed for chasing some of Britain's wealthiest people out of the country. High-profile exits that followed the tax changes include Richard Gnodde, a Goldman Sachs banker, Aston Villa co-owner Nassef Sawiris and John Fredriksen, a Norwegian shipping magnate. Mr Quinn, 68, said Britain was missing out on opportunities to attract wealthy businesspeople to invest in projects where they could 'take a long view' of the possible profits. 'The Government could do more to increase investment here, and there's huge opportunities to bring investment into the infrastructure market,' said Mr Quinn, who is stepping down after a decade at the company. His comments come as figures show foreign investment into Britain plummeted to a record low last year, despite ministers' efforts to drum up cash from overseas. The number of inbound foreign direct investment projects dropped by 12pc to 1,375, its lowest point since records began in 2008, according to data from the Department for Business and Trade. In a trading update, Balfour Beatty said the Government's efforts to speed up infrastructure developments had buoyed half-year profits, which rose 18pc to £132m. The company's projects include the £833m Net Zero Teesside carbon capture project and the Sizewell C nuclear plant, for which Balfour Beatty will deliver a third of the main civil engineering works. A Treasury spokesman said it was attracting 'record investment to our shores' and providing investors with 'direction and clarity on our priorities for major projects'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Data centre developers hand cash to Labour in ‘Yimby' charm offensive
The developer behind one of Europe's biggest data centres has donated tens of thousands of pounds to Labour amid a race to get more properties built across Britain. DC01, a property developer that is seeking to build a £3.75bn data centre in Hertfordshire, gave £20,000 to the Labour Growth Group, which includes dozens of Labour MPs, in May, according to Electoral Commission records. The property company sponsored a reception at the De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms in Covent Garden for Labour MPs in June that was attended by senior ministers, including Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary. At the dinner, Mr Kyle spoke of the 'essential role data infrastructure will play in delivering the UK's technology ambitions', DC01 said in a LinkedIn post. Another property company owned by London-listed developer Tritax Big Box gave £25,000 to a Labour pressure group called Labour Yimby – or 'yes in my back yard' – in June. Labour Yimby calls itself a 'grassroots pro-housing, pro-growth movement' largely made up of Labour councillors. Tritax Big Box manages billions of pounds in properties for logistics and warehousing, but has increasingly pitched its facilities as 'compelling data centre opportunities'. New planning applications The donations come amid deepening ties between Labour, developers and the technology sector as the Government seeks to boost investment in Britain, at a time when interest in artificial intelligence (AI) is booming. Labour ministers have sought to smooth over planning rules to make it easier for data centres to be built on the green belt in so-called 'grey belt' areas. Multiple new data centre applications have been waved through, despite concerns from residents and in some cases objections from local councils. It follows concerns that a glut of new data centres could ramp up the UK's emissions. Data centres for AI require racks of thousands of powerful and power-hungry computer processors. In September, the Government tweaked planning rules to classify data centres as projects critical to national security, which can help bypass planning roadblocks. Announcing the measures, Mr Kyle also hailed DC01's data centre plans as a 'vote of confidence' in Labour's approach. DC01 received outline planning permission from Hertfordshire County Council in January for its 2m sq ft facility near South Mimms. It still requires full planning permission for the project. It is not clear who funds DC01 or who its ultimate customer will be. If the project goes ahead, it could secure a deal with a technology giant such as Amazon or Microsoft. DC01 has said its project will create 200 permanent jobs and 500 construction roles. Marc Harris, the co-chairman of Labour Yimby, said: 'We make no apology of supporting the industry to build the homes and infrastructure so desperately needed. 'Britain's finances and services cannot afford to side with blockers over builders. We support the Government's pledge to build 1.5 million homes, and unlock our data centre potential, but bold planning reforms are needed to make it happen.' Labour Growth Group declined to comment. Tritax Big Box declined to comment. DC01 was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jobs figures to help RBA understand labour conditions
Australia's jobless rate could edge lower for July after a surprise jump a month earlier wrong-footed economists. Market expectations are for the unemployment rate to fall back to 4.2 per cent, when the Australian Bureau of Statistics releases its latest labour force survey. After the unexpected June figures economists noted the higher-than-anticipated rise was partly because of a sub-sample with a higher than average unemployment rate being rotated into the survey. So a modest reversal in Thursday's print should not be over interpreted as a sign the labour market is becoming tighter. Indeed, Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock noted various indicators suggest conditions in the labour market had eased in recent months. "There's some sense in which the labour market is easing. There are some indicators that we think suggest that things are still a little bit on the tight side," she told reporters after the central bank cut interest rates by 25 basis points on Tuesday. "If we can maintain where we are I don't think that's a bad thing." Governor Michele Bullock explains the Monetary Policy Board's decision to lower the cash rate to 3.60 per cent You can read the full statement here: — Reserve Bank of Australia (@RBAInfo) August 12, 2025 Still, the RBA will be watching closely and a substantial deterioration in the jobs market could boost the argument for a follow-up cut in September. Deloitte Access Economics partner David Rumbens expects employment growth to ease through 2025 before stabilising, as public spending decelerates and overseas migration trends downward. Despite the resilience of the labour market since the pandemic, it was being undermined by poor productivity growth, he said in Deloitte's quarterly employment forecasts report. The fall in productivity since March 2022 had cost Australia about $150 billion in forgone economic activity per year, he estimated. Mr Rumbens urged the government to target high-impact, long-term reforms in its upcoming economic roundtable, including an overhaul of the tax system and reduced regulation, to help get productivity moving again. One regulatory change identified by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission on Wednesday could mean $8.7 billion in extra investment and an additional 35,000 homes built by institutional investors over the next five years. The Property Council backed ASIC's review of RG 97 - a regulation that required investors like super funds to disclose stamp duty when reporting fees involved in housing investments. It results in housing investments appearing more expensive than they really are, which penalises super funds for backing long-term housing supply projects, said Property Council chief executive Mike Zorbas. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said it had the potential to be a really important change. "It's a good example of where working together, we can identify regulation which is not serving its intended purpose, we can work with the regulators to act on some of that regulation where it's appropriate to do so, and we can get a good outcome," he said.