How to watch 2025 Indy 500 Qualifications: Schedule, date, time, TV channel, streaming
The 109th running of the Indianapolis 500 will be broadcast live on FOX, with exciting events throughout the month of May. Keep reading for key details, including qualifications dates, start times, TV channels and streaming options.
The Indy 500 Qualifications schedule runs from Saturday, May 17 to Sunday, May 18. Check out the complete schedule below:
The race will take place at Indianapolis Motor Speedway in Indianapolis, IN. The track is 200 laps, 500 miles, and features straightaways that are 5/8ths of a mile long.
The 2025 Indy 500 Qualifications will be broadcast on FOX, FS1 and FS2.
The 2025 Indy 500 Qualifications will be available to be streamed live on the FOX Sports website and the FOX Sports App.
For those without cable, there are live-streaming services that carry FOX, FS1 and FS2, including YouTube TV, Sling TV, Hulu + Live TV and fuboTV.
If you have an antenna in a good reception area, you can also watch INDYCAR on your local FOX station. Check out the Federal Communications Commission TV reception maps to see which stations are available in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
40 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Republicans are right to blanch at this Elon Musk gravy train
Elon Musk last week slammed President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' for the trillions in new federal debt it is projected to cost — a subject well worth the nation's attention. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), however, pointed to a different possible motive for the tech billionaire's dissatisfaction with the bill: It 'has an effect on his business,' the speaker said. Johnson suggested that Musk began his campaign against the bill after they spoke about an obscure policy the act would roll back — one that has directed billions of dollars to Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle company. Johnson's claims provide a revealing look at the side effects of well-meaning — but not all that well designed — government mandates (in this case, for the automobile industry to reduce emissions in specific ways), and how they can distort both politics and the economy. While the bill has many flaws, Republicans are right to object to the Tesla gravy train. Rather than keep it, as Musk would probably prefer, they should replace it with clean energy policies that promote competition and choice. Tesla heavily depends on selling automotive regulatory credits to traditional automakers. Manufacturers of gas-powered cars are failing to produce as many zero-emissions vehicles as national and state-level mandates from Washington, Sacramento and Brussels require. Consumers' appetite for EVs has grown, but not enough for traditional carmakers to transition off gas as quickly as the mandate-writers would have liked. So those companies must buy credits from EV-makers such as Tesla, which produces only zero-emissions vehicles. In 2024, Tesla made $2.76 billion on emissions deals, a 54 percent increase from the year before. During the first quarter of 2025, Tesla reported earning $595 million in regulatory credits, even as its total net income for the period was only $409 million. A February Post analysis found that Musk and his businesses received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the years, including $11.4 billion through automotive regulatory credits. 'About a third of Tesla's $35 billion in profits since 2014 has come from selling federal and state regulatory credits to other automakers,' The Post tabulated. 'These credits played a crucial role in the company's first profitable quarter in 2013 and its first full year of profitability in 2020. … Without the credits, Tesla would have lost more than $700 million in 2020, marking a seventh-consecutive year with no profits.' If you haven't heard of these regulatory credits, you're not alone. Even for those paying close attention, the EV policy fight that has attracted the most attention has been the One Big Beautiful Bill's proposed phaseout of $7,500 tax credits for electric car-buyers. Musk has expressed openness to eliminating the policy; analysts speculate that doing so could entrench his dominance in the U.S. EV market by making it harder for new entrants to break in. Such are the arcane politics and weird incentives that complex government regulations can promote, as companies compete for the profits that can flow from getting a clause inserted or deleted from the federal code. To be sure, the federal EV mandate's writers were well-intentioned. They wanted to accelerate the needed transition to electric vehicles, as transportation overtook electricity generation as the country's largest source of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions. They used various policy levers available to them — from the Clean Air Act to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards — because Congress failed to enact more efficient clean energy policies. Republicans can change that, eliminating the mandates, tax credits and other subsidies that riddle federal law and replacing them with a robust and rising carbon tax. This policy would empower consumers and companies — each acting according to what makes the most sense for themselves, without government micromanagement — to decide how to green the economy. Maybe consumers would prefer to buy more plug-in gas-electric hybrid cars that eliminate 'range anxiety' before fully moving to EVs, which will be easier when electric car technology is more mature and charging infrastructure more ubiquitous. That's the beauty of a carbon tax: The emission costs from consumers' decisions would be reflected in the sticker prices they pay, maximizing choice and minimizing federal micromanagement — all while reducing the overall expense of a green energy transition. Admittedly, carbon taxes have been less politically successful than other policies that disguise their costs to consumers. (EV mandates boost car prices across the board; renewable electricity requirements increase power bills; etc.) But the politics cannot be as unflattering as the Musk-Trump meltdown the country had to endure last week.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Road Closures: IRONMAN 70.3 travel delays this weekend
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) – The third annual IRONMAN 70.3 Western Massachusetts triathlon is set to take over the region on Sunday, bringing significant road closures and traffic delays throughout Springfield and West Springfield. Ironman triathlon to bring thousands of athletes to Springfield area The Springfield Police Department and Town of West Springfield have announced several road closures in preparation for Sunday's event, expected to host elite athletes and enthusiastic spectators. The triathlon begins with a 1.2-mile downriver swim in the Connecticut River, followed by a 56-mile bike ride starting at Riverfront Park and winding through scenic New England countryside. The final leg is a 13.1-mile run, newly rerouted this year to pass through Springfield's Forest Park, before finishing in downtown. Ironman Traffic MapDownload The Springfield Police Department has announced several road closures for the race: Court Street will be closed from 8 a.m. Saturday, June 7, through 6 p.m. Sunday, June 8. E. Columbus Avenue (northbound) from State Street to Boland Way will also be closed during the same time frame. On Sunday, June 8, W. Columbus Avenue (southbound) from Memorial Bridge to State Street will be closed from 4 a.m. to 6 p.m. The Town of West Springfield is also advising residents to plan, as multiple roads will be impacted by the bike and run routes from approximately 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. on Sunday. The following roads will experience closures or significant delays: Westfield St: From Springfield Rd to Old Westfield Rd Old Westfield Rd: From Westfield St to Dewey St Dewey St: From Old Westfield Rd to Amostown Rd Country View St: From Dewey St to Amostown Rd Amostown Rd: From Country View St to Piper Rd Piper Rd: From Amostown Rd to Kings Hwy North Blvd: From Kings Hwy to Westfield St South Blvd: From Westfield St to Park St Park St: From South Blvd to North End Bridge Main St: From Park St to Park Ave North End Bridge: Eastbound Lanes CLOSED West Springfield officials encourage drivers to allow additional travel time and review detailed course maps online. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woodlake High softball caps dream season with CIF SoCal title, plus Corcoran in action
Woodlake High softball coach Ramon Lara had faith in his team that they could have a magical season. With just one loss all season, the second-seeded Tigers were on a mission to make sure that they would not lose another game. Woodlake capped a dream season Saturday with a 4-3 victory over No. 1 Pioneer Valley in the California Interscholastic Federation Southern California Division IV championship. 'Many years of having a good group of girls that work together, and it all came together,' Woodlake coach Ramon Lara said. 'We've had a good core of girls that have played together since they were about 12 ... seventh graders. They're all junior and senior and they've become kind of a family where they know each other really well.' Woodlake scored one run in the top of the seventh inning, which proved to be a decisive win since Pioneer Valley scored a run in the bottom half of the inning. Audrina Rodriguez finished the season 22-0 after pitching a five hitter. The Tigers (30-1) celebrated their SoCal title with 15 pizzas at Mountain Mike's in Pismo Beach. The Tigers' lone loss this season was to South 10-4 at the Woodlake Tournament. Woodlake won the Central Section Division IV title after an 8-1 victory over Coalinga at Margie Wright Diamond on May 31. No. 1-seed Corcoran trailed 4-0 and rallied, scoring a run in the sixth and two runs in the seventh, but lost 4-3 to No. 3 Pioneer-Whittier in the SoCal Division V championship. The Panthers finished the season 27-5 and a Central Section V title after an 18-6 victory over Shafter.
