Canada joins new NATO Defence Investment Pledge
THE HAGUE, the Netherlands, June 25, 2025 /CNW/ - The world is increasingly dangerous and divided, with the rules-based international system under unprecedented pressure and global conflict becoming more frequent and volatile. To meet this moment, Canada and its Allies are building their defence capabilities to strengthen our collective security.
Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, announced that Canada and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allies have agreed to a new Defence Investment Pledge of investing 5 per cent of annual GDP by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective security. The commitment aligns with Canada's own strategic defence and security goals.
As part of this 5 per cent pledge, Canada will invest 3.5 per cent of GDP for core military capabilities, expanding on our recent investments. That means further investments in our Canadian Armed Forces, modernizing our military equipment and technology, building up Canada's defence industries, and diversifying our defence partnerships. An additional 1.5 per cent of GDP will be dedicated to investments in critical defence and security-related expenditure, such as new airports, ports, telecommunication, emergency preparedness systems, and other dual-use investments which serve defence as well as civilian readiness. Importantly, the progress of this pledge will be reviewed in 2029 to ensure Allies' expenditures align with the global security landscape.
At the Summit, Canada and its Allies reaffirmed their support for Ukraine and the leaders agreed on the imperative for a just and lasting peace. Canada's contributions to Ukraine's defence and its defence industries, including Canada's $2 billion in military assistance announced last week at the 2025 G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, are included in our NATO contributions, as the security of Ukraine is critical to our collective security.
Quotes
'The world is increasingly dangerous and divided. Canada must strengthen our defence to better protect our sovereignty, our interests, and our Allies. These investments won't just build our military capacity – they will build our industries and create good, high-paying jobs at home. If we want a more secure world, we need a stronger Canada.'
— The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
'Canada is a proud founding member of the Alliance. In an increasingly unstable and unpredictable world, we are making the critical investments needed to keep Canadians safe, support our Armed Forces, and strengthen our role in Europe and on the world stage. The renewed Defence Investment Pledge to invest 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 reaffirms Canada's strong commitment to our security, to our sovereignty, and to NATO.'
— The Hon. David J. McGuinty, Minister of National Defence
Related Product
Associated Link
This document is also available at https://pm.gc.ca
SOURCE Prime Minister's Office
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trading Day: Whirlwind fades, calm returns
By Jamie McGeever ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist After two days of strong gains in world stocks amid the widespread relief over cooling Middle East tensions, relative stability was the hallmark of trading on Wednesday, with major asset classes moving in much narrower ranges. In my column today I look at U.S. foreign direct investment - was the sharp decline in the first quarter an anomaly, or a warning of what's to come in the brave new tariff world? More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. 1. Fed's Powell cautions against ending Fed power to payinterest on reserves 2. U.S. current account gap clocks pre-2008 crashmilestone: Mike Dolan 3. Israel-Iran war highlights Mideast's declining influenceon oil prices: Bousso 4. NATO commits to spending hike sought by Trump, and tomutual defence 5. U.S. exchanges, SEC in talks to ease public companyregulations Today's Key Market Moves * World stocks and the Nasdaq 100 hit new peaks for a secondday in a row. The S&P 500 slips, but is still very close to itsrecord high. * Some big moves in U.S. tech, with Super Micro Computer+8.8%, Nvidia +4.3% to a record high, AMD +3.6%, and Tesla-3.8%. Real estate is the biggest declining sector, -2.5%. * Oil stops the rot, kind of, gaining nearly 1% on inventory drawdown and signs of strong U.S. gasolinedemand. * The dollar slips to fresh multi-year lows against the euroand sterling. * Platinum up another 2.5% to new 11-year high above$1,350/oz. Now up 28% in June, on for its best month since 1986. Whirlwind fades, calm returns The MSCI All Country index and Nasdaq 100 touched new record highs for a second session, and Asian and emerging market stocks posted solid gains earlier in the day. But the Dow, U.S. small caps and benchmark European indexes all fell. The euro's march higher is taking its toll, and European stocks have underperformed since the brief Israel-Iran war broke out on June 13. The euro on Wednesday rose for a fifth straight day to $1.1665, its highest since October 2021. Sterling hit its highest since February 2022 at $1.3670, and Britain's FTSE 100 slipped to its lowest this month. Bank of England policymakers may be secretly cheering the pound's rally, however, if it helps tame inflation pressures. The latest Citi/YouGov survey of UK consumers' inflation expectations on Wednesday showed that long-term inflation expectations among the British public rose to the highest since September 2022. One sector faring better in Europe on Wednesday, though, was defense, after NATO leaders agreed big increases in defense spending, especially from Europe. U.S. defense stocks have moved in the other direction this week following the Iran-Israel ceasefire. On the policy and macro front, Fed Chair Jerome Powell's second day of congressional testimony passed off without fireworks, although there were sparks in his exchanges with some lawmakers. He reiterated his view that the central bank is right to wait and see what the impact is from tariffs before considering further rate cuts. U.S. foreign investment slump - anomaly or warning? Much of the 'de-dollarization' debate has focused on foreign exposure to U.S. securities like stocks and bonds. But investors shouldn't ignore foreign direct investment flows, the traditionally sticky capital that may also be sending out warning signals. Foreign direct investment typically involves an overseas entity acquiring the assets of a company in another country or increasing its holdings, often via the purchase of machinery, plants or a controlling stake. FDI is therefore considered a longer-term investment compared to portfolio flows, which can be more volatile. U.S. President Donald Trump says he has attracted record foreign investment into the country. Indeed, the White House has a page on its website with a "non-comprehensive running list of new U.S.-based investments" since Trump's second term began. The running total is in the trillions of dollars and includes pledges from several foreign countries. Included are more than $4 trillion in U.S.-bound investments pledged by the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Japan and Saudi Arabia. During Trump's trip to the Middle East last month, he said the U.S. is on track to receive $12-$13 trillion of investments from countries around the globe, which includes "projects mostly announced ... and some to be announced very shortly." These flows may emerge in full, in time. But official figures on Tuesday showed that FDI in the first quarter actually fell to $52.8 billion, the lowest total since the fourth quarter of 2022. That's well below the quarterly averages of the past 10 and 20 years. The Commerce Department figures also showed that the U.S. current account deficit widened to a record $450.2 billion in the quarter, or 6% of U.S. GDP, meaning FDI inflows barely covered 10% of that shortfall. Should the Trump administration be worried? TARIFF DISTORTIONS The short answer is probably not, at least not yet. FDI flows are typically far smaller than portfolio flows into equity and fixed income securities, so from the perspective of funding the current account deficit, the drop in FDI is not as pressing a concern. On the other hand, if foreign investors are also buying fewer U.S. securities, capital from elsewhere will be needed to fund that deficit. Additionally, America's balance of payments data in the first quarter was hugely distorted by domestic consumers and businesses front-running Trump's tariffs, loading up on imports before the duties kick in later this year. Trump's bet is that the deficit will shrink this year and beyond as his 'America First' policies spur more "onshoring" from domestic firms as they bring production back home and the weakening dollar helps U.S. manufacturing by making exports more competitive. The subsequent boom will attract investment from companies and governments overseas. In theory. However, these dynamics work both ways. For example, the European Union is by far the largest provider of U.S. FDI, accounting for 45% of the total in 2023, according to Citi. The combination of the continent's German-led fiscal splurge, U.S. tariffs and 'de-dollarization' concerns could easily crimp that flow, perhaps significantly. Another potential risk to U.S.-bound FDI is 'Section 899' - the possible tax of up to 20% on foreigners' U.S. income that could be part of Trump's budget plans. A Tax Foundation report in May found that Section 899 would "hit inbound investment from countries that make up more than 80 percent of the U.S. inbound FDI stock." Industry pushback may water down Section 899, but it remains a cloud on the U.S. investment horizon. The U.S. is the world's biggest recipient of FDI, with a 25% share of global volumes in 2023, up from around 15% before the pandemic, according to Citi. Its economy is the largest in the world, a thriving hub of innovation, pioneering technology, artificial intelligence and money-making potential. That will always attract FDI. Whether it attracts as much in this new environment remains to be seen. What could move markets tomorrow? * Germany GfK consumer confidence (July) * European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, VicePresident Luis de Guindos and board member Isabel Schnabel speak(at different events) * Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Deputy GovernorSarah Breeden speak (at different events) * U.S. weekly jobless claims * U.S. durable goods (May) * U.S. trade (May) * U.S. GDP (Q1, final estimate) * U.S. 7-year note auction * Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin, Cleveland FedPresident Beth Hammack and Fed Governor Michael Barr speak (atdifferent events) Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (By Jamie McGeever; Editing by Nia Williams) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
UPI
39 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump says U.S., Iran to meet next week
As President Donald Trump was leaving the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Wednesday, he said U.S. and Iranian officials will meet next week. Photo by Martijn Beekman/NATO | License Photo June 25 (UPI) -- U.S. and Iranian officials will meet next week to discuss current events but won't necessarily negotiate any agreements, President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday. The president didn't say when or where the talks would occur, who would participate or their purpose as he was leaving the NATO summit in The Hague. "We may sign an agreement," he told media. "I don't think it's that necessary." Trump said Iran won't continue trying to create a nuclear arsenal after the U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday morning local time. "They had a war they fought, [and] now they're going back to their world," Trump added. "I don't care if we have an agreement or not." He said the attacks by the United States and others by Israel have "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities and buried its enriched uranium, USA Today reported. Reports conflict regarding the extent of damage to the nuclear facilities in Iran and the aerial attacks' impact on the Middle East nation's nuclear weapons program. A Pentagon report suggests aerial attacks only have delayed Iran's nuclear weapons aspirations by a few months. It also says about 400 kilograms of enriched uranium might have been moved hours before the attacks. An Israeli report, though, says Iran's Fordow nuclear facility that housed thousands of centrifuges some 300 feet underground is buried by granite, steel and concrete after being struck by several 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. "We hit them so hard and so fast they didn't get to move," Trump told reporters. "It's very, very heavy and very hard to move," he said of enriched uranium. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the aerial attacks caused far greater damage than Iranian officials thought was possible. The impact on their nuclear weapons program was so significant that it caused them to agree to a cease-fire with Israel, Hegseth added. Trump said Israeli and Iranian forces are "both tired, exhausted," but he acknowledged hostilities between the two might start again soon.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Reason For Not Ending Ukraine War In 24 Hours Brutally Mocked
President Donald Trump had to admit his failure to fulfill one of his most popular ― and ludicrous ― campaign promises on Wednesday. During the 2024 campaign, Trump repeatedly claimed he could end the war between Russia and Ukraine in 24 hours and even told Fox News' Sean Hannity he was '100% sure' he could keep that promise. However, despite Trump's subsequent election and inauguration in January, the war between Russia and Ukraine has continued with no real end in sight. Trump didn't have a decent answer on Wednesday when Austrian reporter Johannes Petrov noted, 'You once said that you would end the Ukraine war in 24 hours. You later said you said that sarcastically.' 'Of course I said that sarcastically,' Trump replied, which prompted Petrov to ask, 'But you've been in office for five months and five days, why have you not been able to end the Ukraine war?' At first, Trump admitted that ending geopolitical conflicts between rival countries is 'more difficult than people would have any idea.' He also played the blame game. 'Vladimir Putin has been more difficult,' he said about the Russian president. 'Frankly, I had some problems with [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy, you may have read about them. And it's been more difficult than other wars,' Trump said, before listing the various wars he's had an easier time 'ending.' Here's a clip of the exchange. Of course, people on social media had thoughts about Trump's inability to end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. And, yes, there was snark. Lots and lots of snark. Putin Is Still Attacking Ukraine, But NATO's Bigger Problem Is Mollifying Trump NATO Chief Says Alliance Still Strongly Backing Ukraine ― Even As Trump Backs Away How The Israel-Iran Conflict Could Impact The Ukraine War Trump Says It May Be Better To Let Ukraine, Russia 'Fight For A While'
