Wall Street Analysts Think PulteGroup (PHM) Is a Good Investment: Is It?
Investors often turn to recommendations made by Wall Street analysts before making a Buy, Sell, or Hold decision about a stock. While media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm employed (or sell-side) analysts often affect a stock's price, do they really matter?
Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about PulteGroup (PHM).
PulteGroup currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.81, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 16 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.81 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.
Of the 16 recommendations that derive the current ABR, nine are Strong Buy and one is Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 56.3% and 6.3% of all recommendations.
Check price target & stock forecast for PulteGroup here>>>While the ABR calls for buying PulteGroup, it may not be wise to make an investment decision solely based on this information. Several studies have shown limited to no success of brokerage recommendations in guiding investors to pick stocks with the best price increase potential.
Do you wonder why? As a result of the vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover, their analysts tend to rate it with a strong positive bias. According to our research, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations for every "Strong Sell" recommendation.
This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.
With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, which classifies stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), is a reliable indicator of a stock's near -term price performance. So, validating the Zacks Rank with ABR could go a long way in making a profitable investment decision.
In spite of the fact that Zacks Rank and ABR both appear on a scale from 1 to 5, they are two completely different measures.
The ABR is calculated solely based on brokerage recommendations and is typically displayed with decimals (example: 1.28). In contrast, the Zacks Rank is a quantitative model allowing investors to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.
It has been and continues to be the case that analysts employed by brokerage firms are overly optimistic with their recommendations. Because of their employers' vested interests, these analysts issue more favorable ratings than their research would support, misguiding investors far more often than helping them.
In contrast, the Zacks Rank is driven by earnings estimate revisions. And near-term stock price movements are strongly correlated with trends in earnings estimate revisions, according to empirical research.
In addition, the different Zacks Rank grades are applied proportionately to all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide current-year earnings estimates. In other words, this tool always maintains a balance among its five ranks.
Another key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank is freshness. The ABR is not necessarily up-to-date when you look at it. But, since brokerage analysts keep revising their earnings estimates to account for a company's changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in indicating future price movements.
Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for PulteGroup, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has declined 2.8% over the past month to $11.48.
Analysts' growing pessimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates lower, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to plunge in the near term.
The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for PulteGroup. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>
Therefore, it could be wise to take the Buy-equivalent ABR for PulteGroup with a grain of salt.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
24 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump's coal frenzy clashes with market realities
President Donald Trump's mad dash to unleash more mining and burning of 'beautiful clean coal' across the U.S. is running face-first into unfavorable market realities. The president has vowed to reverse Biden-era policies, rev up U.S. mining, and keep aging coal-fired power plants alive. But hundreds of miners have been laid off in states like West Virginia in recent weeks, prices remain low and a growing number of small, metallurgical coal producers across the U.S. continue to declare bankruptcy. Last week, Core Natural Resources laid off 200 miners in West Virginia at a metallurgical coal mine. The announcement arrived after Coronado Global Resources laid off workers at its coal mine in the state. Miners were also laid off at Alpha Metallurgical Resources' mine in Boone County last year. At the same time, companies like Corsa Coal Corp. and Coking Coal, LLC, have declared bankruptcy, and some say the industry will continue to face turbulence. Advertisement 'I wouldn't be surprised if we see several other producers either go out of the market or … you'll see substantial cutbacks, layoffs,' Randall Atkins, founder of Kentucky-based Ramaco Resources, which mines both coal and rare earths, told POLITICO's E&E News. 'There are plenty of others that are not in good shape. There are more companies out there that are teetering.'
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin
Eric Trump signaled that the tension between the competing factions of Donald Trump's crypto empire has cooled and the family's World Liberty Financial will buy a 'substantial' amount of the memecoin at the center of the dispute. The president's son said in a post on X on Friday that the company responsible for the Trump memecoin isn't moving forward with a digital-wallet offering that has caused a fissure with World Liberty Financial, the crypto company owned in part by the Trump family.
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
May Jobs Report: On The Surface, It Seems Good. It's Not.
SUNRISE, FLORIDA - JUNE 26: Job seekers attends the South Florida Job Fair held at ... More the Amerant Bank Arena on June 26, 2024 in Sunrise, Florida. More than 50 companies set up booths to recruit people from entry-level to management. Open jobs include police officers, food service, security, sales reps, technicians, customer service, IT, teacher assistants, insurance agents, and account executives. (Photo by) The American job market added 139,000 jobs in May, slightly exceeding expectations of 126,000, and the unemployment rate remained at 4.2%. Good, right? No. That would be like your doctor taking a brief glance at you and declaring you're OK without checking your blood pressure, listening to your heart and lungs, or drawing blood. That's how deceptive this all is. With May now in the books, 2025 is on pace to create 1.49 million jobs, the lowest number since 2010, when we were climbing out of the Great Recession. That's barely what is needed to keep with population growth, the labor force participation rate, and the employment-population ratio. Furthermore, April's numbers have been revised downward by 30,000 to 147,000, and March and April actually created 95,000 fewer jobs than originally reported. The job market is much weaker than it initially appears. For instance, health care added 62,000 jobs in May, while leisure and hospitality created 48,000 jobs. Together, the two sectors accounted for 79% of all jobs created in May. Add the 16,000 jobs created in social assistance and we come to 90% of all jobs created in May. That kind of disproportionate growth is worrisome. A harmonious job market as a driver of a healthy economy tends to create jobs across the board, a hallmark of the job market during the previous four years, the best four-year stretch in history. Completing the picture, employment showed little change over the month in all other major industries. Federal government employment continued to decline in May by 22,000 and is down by 59,000 in 2025. Note the rising rate in May; none of us knows the real extent of this, of course, as many of the firings that DOGE perpetrated are still in flux. But so far in 2025, three out of eight job losses in the government employment sector took place in May. We can expect more job losses in this sector. All in all, not only did the civilian labor force shrink by 625,000, the ranks of the employed shrank by 696,000, and the ranks of the unemployed grew by 71,000. That's clearly an exodus; a significant number of people leaving the job market altogether. They just quit looking for work, and this amounts to overall job market shrinkage, a different measurement than job loss or creation. If the total population and the civilian non-institutional population grow, so should the labor force, or we'll face a growing inability to provide goods and services for both our domestic and international markets. That drop in the supply side capacity could fuel inflation. If it's any consolation, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 0.4%, or by 3.9%, over the past 12 months. Not only are May's numbers not what we'd like to see, the trend lines are all negative. It's not yet time to batten down the hatches, but it is time to make sure our ship is seaworthy.
