
Liberals were just 611 votes from a majority government. Here's how
Article content
With the dust mostly settled on the 2025 federal election, the Liberals won 169 seats in the House of Commons for a minority government, but how close were they to nabbing three ridings that would have secured a majority?
Article content
Article content
A mere 611 votes across two Ontario ridings and Nunavut.
Article content
That's according to the fact-checking and quick math by Dan Arnold, chief strategy officer at Ottawa-based Pollara Strategic Insights and a former pollster for prime minister Justin Trudeau, who posted his findings to X on Tuesday.
Article content
Article content
The Liberals finish just 611 votes away from a majority.
— Dan Arnold (@calgarygrit) April 29, 2025
Article content
It might be cliche, but Arnold said the results serve as a reminder that every vote really does count.
Article content
Article content
'This is an election where that's the case, because there is a real difference between a majority and a minority in terms of the long-term life of a government,' he said.
Article content
Arnold zeroed in on the three closest races that could have tipped the Liberals into a majority had they won them. National Post examined Elections Canada data for the ridings to confirm Arnold's findings.
Article content
In Milton East–Halton Hills South, Conservative Parm Gill — a Stephen Harper-era MP — edged Liberal Kristina Tesser Derksen by 298 votes (32,186 to 31,888). Further south in Windsor–Tecumseh–Lakeshore, Tory Kathy Borrelli finished 233 ballots ahead of Liberal incumbent Irek Kusmierczyk (31,901 to 31,668).
Article content
Article content
Meanwhile, in Nunavut, where turnout was lowest anywhere in Canada at barely over 36 per cent, NDP MP Lori Idlout had 77 more supporters to retain her seat against Liberal challenger Kilikvak Kabloona (2,945 to 2,868).
Article content
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Ottawa Citizen
32 minutes ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Today's letters: Ontario is being simplistic about hospital parking fees
Article content Article content The reasons Dr. Nili Kaplan-Myrth have given for her resignation as a trustee from the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board reinforce the growing knowledge that board employees will not be protected from extremist intimidation and threats (depending on who is making the threat and who the target of the threat is), nor from years of administrative abuse of power. Article content Kaplan-Myrth's story is another example of a public school system that has run amok due to years of not having to be accountable to its taxpayers. Its financial mismanagement is just the tip of the iceberg. Article content We truly need the Ontario government to ensure our children and youth are being properly educated for the 21st century and to demand that the school boards committed and hard-working employees get the support and protection they need in the face of administrative indifference and the multifaceted extremist ideologies that infuse our culture and threaten our children's future. Article content Article content I was struck by news coverage of homes destroyed by wildfires and tornadoes and by how vulnerable wooden homes are. That, plus the rise of homelessness and the recent tariffs on Canadian steel, makes me think that now is the time for Canada to develop its own modular, pre-fabricated steel homes. Article content This would create a local demand for Canadian steel and aluminum products, while providing easily deployable, strong, durable structures resistant to the natural disasters. They could be transported by truck or rail, then dropped on site as needed to address emergency/temporary and long-term housing needs. The walls themselves could then be reinforced and insulated locally with poured concrete. Article content


Toronto Sun
4 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Letters to the Editor, June 9, 2025
Monday letters Photo by Illustration / Toronto Sun CARNEY IS THE SAME OLD LIB While I was deeply disappointed that Pierre Poilievre wasn't successful in the past election, I had hope that, although the team was the same, Mark Carney would turn out to be someone different than his predecessor. Turns out he is the same. Watching question period over the past week the Liberals continue using the same talking points and refuse to answer a question, Carney included. I guess honesty and transparency are not Liberal attributes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Jane Gilbert Ajax (Evasion is the language the Liberals understand. It's too bad we have to endure for another term) AFFORDABLE AT WHAT COST? Could someone please explain the term 'affordable housing.' I keep hearing this term from every politician wanting to get elected. Is there a price on these houses? Are they mortgage free? How about affordable housing for seniors? Mayor Olivia Chow has raised property taxes more than 20% over her short term of office. My fixed income, based on the amount I was entitled to some 10 years ago, has no inflation clause to keep up with present-day costs. I guess Chow's idea of creating new housing is to squeeze pensioners out of their homes when they cannot afford to pay the taxes! I have never heard this socialist elite mayor ever say the words 'cut back' on anything. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Tony Di Stasi Etobicoke (None of them ever define what is affordable housing, it's just a term that sounds good but is meaningless in reality) JUST OPEN IT I read that the Eglinton Crosstown should be up and running by September ('Eglinton Crosstown rolling soon: Ford,' Jane Stevenson, June 4). Please inform all the politicians to not waste time and money on a grand opening ceremony. There's nothing to celebrate. Just open it. How anything that's long overdue and way overbudget can be celebrated for finally being in service is beyond me. Ha, that could be Metrolinx mantra: 'If it's not overdue and overbudget, it's not Metrolinx.' Todd Keller (That has a sad and expensive ring to it) World Canada Sports Crime Editorials


Calgary Herald
13 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Chris Selley: Earth to Liberals — First Nations are not an anti-development monolith
Article content Sean Fraser — the federal Liberals' supposed master communicator who did a bad job as immigration minister, and then a bad job as housing minister, and then said he wasn't running again to spend time with his family, and then opportunistically changed his mind and was rewarded with the justice and attorney general portfolio — laid his first dog's egg of the Mark Carney era this week. Article content Article content Fraser said Indigenous groups don't have a 'complete veto' over natural-resource projects or any other government decisions — but that wasn't the turd in question, because it was absolutely true. Article content Article content The turd came later, apparently after getting his ears boxed by Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse: Fraser disavowed his entirely truthful statement. Article content 'I think even accepting the premise of the question that was put to me (about a 'veto') really made people feel like there may be an attempt by the government to work unilaterally, not in partnership (with First Nations),' Fraser told reporters in a public apology. Article content 'Despite innocent intentions, I think my comments actually caused hurt and potentially eroded a very precarious trust that has been built up over many years to respect the rights of Indigenous people in this country,' he said. Article content Article content Coming up on 500 years since Jacques Cartier first set foot here and named it Canada, and 150-plus years after the Crown concluded the first treaties with First Nations, and with President Donald Trump suddenly bringing our crippling dependence on the United States into very sharp focus, if we can't even speak the plain truth to each other in plain language, we might be in even bigger trouble than we realized. Article content Article content But I think we can speak the plain truth to each other in plain language, so long as we rightly marginalize fringe and unreasonable voices. While apologizing for speaking the truth, Fraser also accurately pointed to 'a frankly dangerous trope that paints a false picture of Indigenous peoples as being anti-development.' Article content The 2021 Census recorded 1.8 million Indigenous Canadians — five per cent of the Canadian population, give or take. No one would ascribe monolithic opinions like 'supports/doesn't support resource development' to any other ethnic five per cent of the Canadian population. Yet most Canadian media reliably frame these issues as 'First Nations versus the colonialist menace.'