logo
Children facing new school year uprooted from only home they've known

Children facing new school year uprooted from only home they've known

Irish Examiner3 days ago
In a few weeks' time, children across Ireland will return to school after the summer break. It's a time of excitement and nervousness, but marked by the familiarity of friends, teachers, and routines.
However, for dozens of children in the international protection system, this school year will begin in turmoil.
Over the summer, families who have spent years rebuilding their lives in direct provision centres around the country have been told to pack up and leave — some with just a few days' notice. They are being relocated to emergency accommodation far from the communities where their children have grown up, gone to school, formed friendships, and made home.
These forced moves are tearing families apart and destabilising the very children who most need security and consistency.
This is a chaotic response to the housing needs of asylum seekers. Government policy is not considering the human cost and fallout on young lives in particular.
These are young lives that have already faced so much. Conflict, trauma, and persecution drive hundreds of thousands of people to flee their homes to seek safety every year.
The decision to leave is rarely voluntary. It is about survival, often fraught with pain and danger and made at great personal risk. The impact on children is immense
Those who seek asylum do so under international law, and they have rights: The right to protection, the right not to be returned to danger, and the right for their children to grow up in safety and dignity.
The options for those being told to leave the direct provision centres, where they have found some measure of stability, are limited: Either move into emergency accommodation, which is often lacking the required safeguards for children and miles away from schools, communities, and vital support networks they have spent years building; or rent on the private market, an almost impossible option where they will face not just the financial barriers and accommodation shortages faced by the wider population, but racism and socio-economic discrimination.
ActionAid Ireland is supporting several of these families whose lives have been turned upside down. They include two sisters from West Africa who are living in international protection accommodation services (IPAS) accommodation in the south-east of the country, and who have been told they must now leave.
Each sister has a five-year-old son. One has been offered emergency accommodation at the other end of the country, in Donegal, and the other in Mayo. Their lives, and that of their children, are being pulled in opposite directions.
Lost friends
Neither mother has slept properly since hearing the news. One spoke of her son, the first up every morning in his direct provision centre, eager to go to school. Having started junior infants this year, he cannot understand why all his new friends will soon be lost or why he will no longer live near his cousin — the only family he has known in Ireland.
The prospect of leaving their communities is not just distressing for these children, it is destabilising.
The Ombudsman for Children has warned repeatedly that this practice is harmful. He has also stated that in the first-place emergency accommodation is not appropriate for children.
A recent Health Information and Equality Authority review revealed serious cracks in governance and safeguarding in these centres, raising concerns about the safety and wellbeing of the most vulnerable residents. Yet the relocations continue.
Of the nearly 33,000 people currently living in IPAS accommodation, about 5,300 have been granted legal status to remain in Ireland and must leave IPAS accommodation.
In theory, they are 'free' to access the full range of housing supports available to Irish residents
In reality, they are being pushed out of relative stability into a housing market in deep crisis where people all over Ireland are finding it impossible to get affordable rentals.
Challenges for those forced to leave direct provision are magnified by racism, which frequently meets them at the doors of rental viewings. It is completely unrealistic to expect these families to succeed in securing private housing without significant support.
Risk of homelessness
The policy to move people from direct provision risks funnelling children and families straight into homelessness.
These children are real people; they are not statistics. They are losing teachers who know their needs, coaches who welcomed them to local sports teams, and neighbours and friends who made them feel part of a community.
The Government has a choice here: It can continue to pursue a policy that uproots families and undermines their stability, or it can listen to the voices of children's rights advocates, NGOs, and affected families calling for a child-first and human rights approach.
Such an approach would prioritise keeping children in their schools and communities. It would strengthen and empower local councils to better support integration efforts, and ensure appropriate safeguarding measures in any accommodation provided. Above all, it would recognise that the needs of children must take precedence.
The Constitution pledges to 'cherish all the children of the nation equally'. Article 42A specifically affirms children's natural and imprescriptible rights and the State's duty to uphold these rights.
Children have the right for their best interests to be of paramount consideration where the State seeks to intervene to protect their safety and welfare
In the Dáil recently, the Taoiseach stated: 'My fundamental motivation right through my political life has been that you do not leave the child that's furthest behind, behind.'
The reality is children in this country who are furthest behind are being left behind.
They include the two five-year-old cousins who are amongst the families that ActionAid Ireland is supporting. Because their families have been granted legal status to remain in this country, they have to leave their direct provision accommodation and will be uprooted from the only home they have known.
The Government must respond with compassion and urgency, with human rights to the fore.
This is the way we can ensure, truly, no child is left behind. This is how we make back to school what it should be — a nervous but smooth transition to the school term, not a disruptive move across the country.
Cillian Quinn is the policy and programmes co-ordinator with ActionAid Ireland
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Children facing new school year uprooted from only home they've known
Children facing new school year uprooted from only home they've known

Irish Examiner

time3 days ago

  • Irish Examiner

Children facing new school year uprooted from only home they've known

In a few weeks' time, children across Ireland will return to school after the summer break. It's a time of excitement and nervousness, but marked by the familiarity of friends, teachers, and routines. However, for dozens of children in the international protection system, this school year will begin in turmoil. Over the summer, families who have spent years rebuilding their lives in direct provision centres around the country have been told to pack up and leave — some with just a few days' notice. They are being relocated to emergency accommodation far from the communities where their children have grown up, gone to school, formed friendships, and made home. These forced moves are tearing families apart and destabilising the very children who most need security and consistency. This is a chaotic response to the housing needs of asylum seekers. Government policy is not considering the human cost and fallout on young lives in particular. These are young lives that have already faced so much. Conflict, trauma, and persecution drive hundreds of thousands of people to flee their homes to seek safety every year. The decision to leave is rarely voluntary. It is about survival, often fraught with pain and danger and made at great personal risk. The impact on children is immense Those who seek asylum do so under international law, and they have rights: The right to protection, the right not to be returned to danger, and the right for their children to grow up in safety and dignity. The options for those being told to leave the direct provision centres, where they have found some measure of stability, are limited: Either move into emergency accommodation, which is often lacking the required safeguards for children and miles away from schools, communities, and vital support networks they have spent years building; or rent on the private market, an almost impossible option where they will face not just the financial barriers and accommodation shortages faced by the wider population, but racism and socio-economic discrimination. ActionAid Ireland is supporting several of these families whose lives have been turned upside down. They include two sisters from West Africa who are living in international protection accommodation services (IPAS) accommodation in the south-east of the country, and who have been told they must now leave. Each sister has a five-year-old son. One has been offered emergency accommodation at the other end of the country, in Donegal, and the other in Mayo. Their lives, and that of their children, are being pulled in opposite directions. Lost friends Neither mother has slept properly since hearing the news. One spoke of her son, the first up every morning in his direct provision centre, eager to go to school. Having started junior infants this year, he cannot understand why all his new friends will soon be lost or why he will no longer live near his cousin — the only family he has known in Ireland. The prospect of leaving their communities is not just distressing for these children, it is destabilising. The Ombudsman for Children has warned repeatedly that this practice is harmful. He has also stated that in the first-place emergency accommodation is not appropriate for children. A recent Health Information and Equality Authority review revealed serious cracks in governance and safeguarding in these centres, raising concerns about the safety and wellbeing of the most vulnerable residents. Yet the relocations continue. Of the nearly 33,000 people currently living in IPAS accommodation, about 5,300 have been granted legal status to remain in Ireland and must leave IPAS accommodation. In theory, they are 'free' to access the full range of housing supports available to Irish residents In reality, they are being pushed out of relative stability into a housing market in deep crisis where people all over Ireland are finding it impossible to get affordable rentals. Challenges for those forced to leave direct provision are magnified by racism, which frequently meets them at the doors of rental viewings. It is completely unrealistic to expect these families to succeed in securing private housing without significant support. Risk of homelessness The policy to move people from direct provision risks funnelling children and families straight into homelessness. These children are real people; they are not statistics. They are losing teachers who know their needs, coaches who welcomed them to local sports teams, and neighbours and friends who made them feel part of a community. The Government has a choice here: It can continue to pursue a policy that uproots families and undermines their stability, or it can listen to the voices of children's rights advocates, NGOs, and affected families calling for a child-first and human rights approach. Such an approach would prioritise keeping children in their schools and communities. It would strengthen and empower local councils to better support integration efforts, and ensure appropriate safeguarding measures in any accommodation provided. Above all, it would recognise that the needs of children must take precedence. The Constitution pledges to 'cherish all the children of the nation equally'. Article 42A specifically affirms children's natural and imprescriptible rights and the State's duty to uphold these rights. Children have the right for their best interests to be of paramount consideration where the State seeks to intervene to protect their safety and welfare In the Dáil recently, the Taoiseach stated: 'My fundamental motivation right through my political life has been that you do not leave the child that's furthest behind, behind.' The reality is children in this country who are furthest behind are being left behind. They include the two five-year-old cousins who are amongst the families that ActionAid Ireland is supporting. Because their families have been granted legal status to remain in this country, they have to leave their direct provision accommodation and will be uprooted from the only home they have known. The Government must respond with compassion and urgency, with human rights to the fore. This is the way we can ensure, truly, no child is left behind. This is how we make back to school what it should be — a nervous but smooth transition to the school term, not a disruptive move across the country. Cillian Quinn is the policy and programmes co-ordinator with ActionAid Ireland

Letters to the Editor: We cannot allow hate to become the norm
Letters to the Editor: We cannot allow hate to become the norm

Irish Examiner

time3 days ago

  • Irish Examiner

Letters to the Editor: We cannot allow hate to become the norm

What kind of society do we want if we allow violence, hate crimes, and assaults to become the norm? The increasing violence we see and hear of on a daily basis is not helped by online misinformation that promotes a culture of hate, violence, misogyny, and indifference, to our fellow human beings. Looking at the paper headlines of — 26,000 assaults on HSE staff, aggressive behaviour, assaults and abuse of staff in IPAS centres, and attacks on South Asian individuals — does not give a good impression of an Éire of a thousand welcomes. What we are seeing is Ireland becoming a country driven by extremes. Extremes of different cultures, and religions. We are no longer dominated by one or two religions or a single culture, which was predominately white and Catholic, but with differing cultures and religions from all over the globe. We are seeing a dramatic shift to a multicultural, as opposed to a monocultural, society where many varying and differing views have now been exposed but where some have not been accepted. What we have seen as part of this transformation is a shift away from the norms and values that we set in the earlier part of the 19th and 20th centuries, most of which led to inquiries of abuse and corruption at all levels of society, replaced by a more liberal open-minded society where borders are no longer a bar to entry and citizenship. But this, too, has led to a level of intolerance and increasing violence, taken advantage of by the extremists, which has divided differing societies and cultures, within our towns and cities. Our prisons and youth detention centres are at capacity, our frontline emergency workers are tackling an almost daily deluge of violence with some state agencies unable to cope with the relentless assaults on their staff. We need the rule of law to be fully implemented and where punishment fits the crime and a zero tolerance approach to those who attempt or promote intolerance and division. Can we do it? Yes we can, but we must remove the straightjacket that has been imposed on those on the frontline, where direct and decisive action is treated as an abhorrence, where disciplinary action is a constant, but where a softly, softly, approach of turning the other cheek is lauded as a virtue. How long before we adopt, as a collective society, a level of intolerance against those who promote division and violence? No amount of imposed or enforced legislation to stem this level of intolerance, violence, and hate has succeeded. This is because of the lack of will by successive governments to invest in programmes or services, and the constant barriers created by certain agencies and NGOs which constantly promote and defend the rights of those who agitate, while berating and undermining the services that protect us. Christy Galligan, Letterkenny, Donegal Female teachers 1850-1950 We are writing a book on the experiences of Irish female national school teachers, 1890-1950. We are interested in any material, such as diaries, letters, photographs, or other artefacts that your readers might share with us. If you have any information you would like to share, please email Judith Harford and Maria Luddy What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Dead Zoo reminds us of wildlife threat While I admire the concept of the Dead Zoo and welcome its reopening at a new location in Collins Barracks, Dublin, while the Natural History Museum is refurbished, I can't help regretting the demise of creatures that once trod the earth and are now just professionally stuffed sensations. When the collection was housed at the Natural History Museum, you could view tigers, lions, baboons, and water buffalo…among other mammals. They appeared to pose for the visitor — the bullet holes still visible in some of them. They looked noble and aesthetically pleasing in their glass and mahogany display cases, but I'd so much prefer to see them grazing, at rest, or running free in their own domain. The Dead Zoo came to mind recently when I listened to a talk on the threats to our wildlife. White-tailed eagles lovingly returned to our shores have been shot or poisoned. Despite the education campaigns, trigger-happy rural dwellers can't resist an opportunity to rid this island of an already rare species that adds so much to our eco-system and the natural balance in the countryside. Our supposedly protected badger is still under attack due to the perceived link between it and the spread of bovine TB. Our native hare, a sub-species unique to this island, has suffered a 50% decline over the past half century. Yet the State grants a licence permitting the capture of thousands for coursing. As with the white-tailed eagle and the badger, our law protects the Irish hare, but the same legal system exempts coursing from prohibition even while we're in the midst of a biodiversity crisis. So, while I'd recommend a visit to the Dead Zoo, I'd hate to think that the mighty white-tailed eagle, the long-suffering badger, or our beloved Irish hare would ever end up in what a Victorian writer called 'a cabinet of curiosities'. John Fitzgerald, Callan, Co Kilkenny Ireland's rise in opioid addiction I want to applaud the Irish Examiner's Niamh Griffin for her article on pain killers ('Painkiller addiction warning as opioid prescriptions rise by 25% in eight years', August 18). This lead story warns of the addiction risks presented by the rise in the use of painkillers in Ireland. Ms Griffin highlights a study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology using research by UCC among others where we find that there has been a 25% rise in the use of opioids and a 5O% increase in the use of medication containing oxycodone. The study points out that ocycodone is one of the drugs prescribed when other painkillers are not working. The study found a relative 389% rise in the use of Tepentadol which is another drug prescribed for chronic pain. I note that the authors of this research have said the long waiting lists for orthopaedic care such as knee operations can leave people with severe chronic pain, potentially waiting years for surgery. As a clinician, I believe that a multifaceted approach is crucial, focusing on non-pharmacological interventions along with addressing the underlying causes of pain. This includes exploring psychological therapies, physical therapies, and lifestyle changes as well as considering alternative pain management techniques. It's also vital for people to understand the potential risks with long-term painkiller use and this is why it's always important to prioritise patient education and support. I commend Niamh Griffin for her well researched article. John O'Brien, Clinical psychotherapist, Clonmel, Co Tipperary What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Suspects deserve benefit of doubt There has been a lot of discussion lately about the naming of suspects. Personally, I have always felt that it is fundamentally unfair on persons merely accused of having committed a crime to be named in the media prior to any trial or conviction. No matter the eventual outcome their good name and presumption of innocence will inevitably take a hit. Even if acquitted of the crime of which they are accused and told by the judge they are 'free to leave the court a free person', their naming in the media will inevitably haunt them as there will always be prejudiced and merciless people who will nod 'knowingly' and say 'there's no smoke without a fire' and assume the mere fact of being arrested and appearing in court is enough to prove a person's guilt. The argument that 'revealing the person's name could help other victims come forward' does not hold any weight with me. The accused ought be freed or convicted on the strength of the evidence for the specific crime for which they are on trial, not the weight of putative accusations for which they are not on trial. The media could choose voluntarily not to name anyone merely accused of committing a crime and it would not take a 'gag order' from the courts to do this — it would simply take an ounce of humanity on the part of journalists and their editors who report on court cases. It would simply take recalling the famous dictum 'do unto others…' I would like to see a change in the Law in this regard, but until then, the media (and social media) could lead the way by doing the right thing and have a shred of humanity and not name or identify any suspect unless or until they have been found guilty of the crime with which they were charged. Nick Folley, Carrigaline, Co Cork Read More Letters to the Editor: Croke Park 2026 calendar should be nailed down now

Government to review how IPAS applicants are managed in Wicklow
Government to review how IPAS applicants are managed in Wicklow

Irish Independent

time7 days ago

  • Irish Independent

Government to review how IPAS applicants are managed in Wicklow

The move comes after concerns were raised about the high concentration of IPAS accommodation centres in west Wicklow in comparison to other areas of the county. Recent figures provided to a meeting of Wicklow County Council's Strategic Housing Policy Committee highlighted the geographical spread across the county, with 673 based solely within the Baltinglass Municipal District. Following a parliamentary question from Wicklow Sinn Féin TD John Brady, Migration Minister Jim O'Callaghan said it has not been possible for the State to apply specific policies in relation to the distribution of accommodation centres. 'IPAS was accommodating approximately 7,000 people at the end of 2021, and at the end of 2024, the total had grown to over 32,000 residents. 'As we respond to changing trends, and work toward a more stable and sustainable accommodation system in this sector, accommodation is being developed and delivered through a range of channels, with a focus on developing more State-owned accommodation.' Minister O'Callaghan said Ireland is now working to implement the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum in mid-2026. 'Reforming and speeding up processing of applications should also serve over time to reduce the scale of the demand for international protection accommodation.' 'The Department is also working to increase the amount of State-owned international protection accommodation and creating a more stable and sustainable accommodation system.' It is hoped a core supply of State-owned accommodation, of both emergency and permanent options will help to manage different accommodation types, locations and dispersal patterns nationwide. Separately no decision has been made in relation to the future of a proposed IPAS centre at The Avon Hotel in Blessington. 95 Ukrainians are being moved out the facility this week as the need for this type of accommodation has reduced over the last year. ADVERTISEMENT All offers of accommodation are reviewed by the Department under a standardised appraisal procedure which reviews the site suitability, the value for money it offers, planning matters and any works required to meet the required standards. Consideration is also given to the location in relation to access to services, resident welfare, health and wellbeing, and the current level of need in the sector. Local elected representatives and communities will be contacted by the Community Engagement Team about this property with any update. Meanwhile Kippure Holiday Village is currently contracted by the Department to provide accommodation service for people seeking international protection. The Department has acknowledged there is ongoing engagement between the provider and Wicklow County Council in relation to planning matters at the property. Kippure Holiday Village will continue to accommodate people seeking international protection until this engagement is concluded. The Department will then consider any potential impact on the contract that is in place between the service provider and the Department. Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store