logo
Pressure grows on Yvette Cooper to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action

Pressure grows on Yvette Cooper to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action

The Guardian17 hours ago
The home secretary is coming under increasing pressure to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action, as UN experts and hundreds of lawyers warned that proscribing the group would conflate protest and terrorism.
In two separate letters to Yvette Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers said that proscribing the group would set a dangerous precedent.
Additionally, several UN special rapporteurs, including those for protecting human rights while countering terrorism and for promoting freedom of expression, said they had contacted the UK government to say that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'.
On Tuesday two people were arrested after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters.
Avon and Somerset police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking on to a person, object or land to cause serious disruption.
Earlier, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'.
The Netpol lawyers' group letter, shared exclusively with the Guardian, was signed by 266 solicitors, barristers and legal academics, including 11 KCs and 11 law professors. 'Proscription of a direct-action protest group is an unprecedented and extremely regressive step for civil liberties,' they write. 'The conflation of protest and terrorism is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes. Our government has stated that it is committed to respecting the rule of law: this must include the right to protest.
'To use the Terrorism Act to ban Palestine Action from direct action would be an abuse of this legislation and an interference with the right to protest. Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.'
Signatories of the Haldane Society letter, which will be handed to Cooper before MPs vote on Wednesday, include Michael Mansfield KC and Imran Khan KC – who represented the family of Stephen Lawrence and victims of the Grenfell Tower fire – and the Labour peer John Hendy KC.
It has been signed by thousands of people including the politicians Caroline Lucas, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, the actors Adeel Akhtar and Juliet Stevenson, teachers and vicars.
The letter says: 'It [a ban] would leave many ordinary members of the public vulnerable – for example, simply wearing a T-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action' would be seen as violating the proscription and action would need to be taken.
'There are many dangers to proscribing peaceful direct action groups, even if their objectives are those some of us may disagree with. Current and future governments may misuse this precedent to attack other interest groups in future, offering no avenues for peacefully venting dissent.'
The prime minister, Keir Starmer, was a member of the Haldane Society but left when he became director of public prosecutions in 2008.
The UN experts said: 'Mere property damage, without endangering life, is not sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism … Protest actions that are not genuinely 'terrorist', but which involve alleged property damage, should be properly investigated as ordinary crimes or other security offences.'
The Home Office referred the Guardian to Cooper's statement last week announcing the proposed ban, and comments in a press release issued on Monday in which she said that Palestine Action's acts 'do not represent legitimate acts of protest and the level of seriousness of Palestine Action's activity has met the test for proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fears over £160bn blow to London's stock market as AstraZeneca considers listing move to US
Fears over £160bn blow to London's stock market as AstraZeneca considers listing move to US

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Fears over £160bn blow to London's stock market as AstraZeneca considers listing move to US

The boss of AstraZeneca, the biggest company on the London Stock Exchange, has discussed shifting the pharmaceutical firm's stock market listing to the US. Such a move would be the biggest hit to the stock market yet, following some huge departures such as £10bn financials firm Wise and £40bn mining business Glencore, among others. The pharmaceutical firm however is far bigger by market capitalisation, currently worth just over £161bn – more than BP, National Grid and Lloyds Bank combined. Pascal Soriot is the chief executive who has held private conversations over moving the listing, first reported the Times, citing frustrations with restrictions around new medicines and pricing structures. The Independent understands the company acknowledges the CEO's concerns as being longstanding, especially regarding new products, while conversations are ongoing with the UK government over support for the wider pharmaceutical industry, particularly when it comes to supporting the commercial environment to become a global superpower in the sector. While the stock market listing would naturally be a huge blow for the UK markets, Mr Soriot could seek to re-domicile the company in the US too. That would bring political pressure too amid a potential huge blow for the government as they both chase economic growth and also get ready to back life sciences as one of the pillars mentioned in the recent industrial strategy. Earlier this year, AstraZeneca ditched plans for a £450m vaccine hub near Liverpool, with 'timing' cited as a reason at the time, while a £12m funding gap was also apparent. While the Conservatives had initially agreed the deal including a £90m pledge, Labour found no record of it after taking power and eventually only committed to £78m. 'Reports that AstraZeneca wants to move its stock listing to the US looks to be driven by business needs rather than chasing a higher valuation,' commented Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell. 'America is important to its growth strategy and it could become an even bigger cog in the wheel. 'The CEO seems frustrated at the lack of financial support to open new laboratories and manufacturing facilities in Europe and might see a full US stock listing as a stepping stone to receiving better treatment Stateside. 'It won't be an easy move to pull off as unlike many other UK market 'defectors' with a dominant US shareholder base like CRH and Flutter, AstraZeneca has a more geographically diverse pool of investors.' Meanwhile, one key focus of President Trump's tariff plans have been to encourage - or demand - more pharmaceutical companies ply their trade in the US. The EU are trying to arrange in a trade deal for pharmaceuticals to be one of the industries which get a lower than 10 per cent base tariff for exports. A total of 40.4 per cent of AstraZeneca's total $54bn (£39bn) revenue for 2024 came from the US alone: $21.8bn (£159bn), compared to $11.7bn from Europe and $12.6bn from Asia, Africa and Australasia combined. AstraZeneca does already have American depositary receipts trading in the US, which allows investors to locally trade in their shares. At the close of Monday's market, their share price on the LSE had risen more than 2 per cent to above £104, before falling back 0.5 per cent lower in Tuesday morning trading. When contacted, the company did not directly comment on any listing speculation. Board approval would be required to move the shares overseas. Mr Soriot earned £16.85m in 2023 as the highest-paid CEO among any FTSE 100 firm.

Lucy Letby alleged to have murdered and harmed more babies
Lucy Letby alleged to have murdered and harmed more babies

The Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Lucy Letby alleged to have murdered and harmed more babies

Detectives investigating the former nurse Lucy Letby have passed evidence to prosecutors alleging she murdered and harmed more babies. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed on Wednesday that it was considering further charges against Letby over alleged crimes at the Countess of Chester hospital and Liverpool Women's hospital. It is understood that evidence relating to more than six cases has been passed to prosecutors by Cheshire constabulary. It follows the arrest this week of three former Countess of Chester hospital bosses on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. Letby, 35, is serving 15 whole-life prison terms after being convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others in the year to June 2016. The former neonatal nurse is seeking to overturn her convictions at the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), having lost two legal challenges at the court of appeal. Police have faced mounting questions about Letby's convictions after an international panel of experts announced in February that they had found no evidence of criminality against her after reviewing medical records and other documents. However, Cheshire Constabulary is continuing three criminal investigations into the nurse, hospital bosses and into alleged corporate manslaughter by the Countess of Chester hospital NHS foundation trust. The three former hospital managers arrested on Monday on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter have not been named and have declined to comment. They have all been released on police bail. The CPS said on Wednesday it had 'received a full file of evidence from Cheshire Constabulary asking us to consider further allegations in relation to deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the Countess of Chester hospital and Liverpool Women's hospital.' A spokesperson said it would 'carefully consider the evidence to determine whether any further criminal charges should be brought', adding: 'As always, we will make that decision independently, based on the evidence and in line with our legal test.' Any further charges against Letby are likely to be highly controversial given the ongoing concerns about her convictions. A further prosecution against the former nurse would have to be approved by Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions, and potentially by the government's most senior law officer, Richard Hermer. As the criminal investigations continue, the CCRC is at the early stages of reviewing two large dossiers of expert medical evidence casting doubt on her convictions, which followed two trials at Manchester crown court. Mark McDonald, Letby's new barrister, has described the new material as 'overwhelming evidence' that she should be released from prison, where she has been held since November 2020. The senior Conservative MP Sir David Davis earlier this year said the nurse was the victim of 'one of the major injustices of modern times'. However, lawyers for the babies who died and were harmed in Letby's care have dismissed the expert evidence as 'old and full of analytical flaws'. Peter Skelton KC, for the families of seven of the babies, told the Thirlwall inquiry in March that the doubts were based on 'fragile towers of speculation'. Richard Baker KC, representing the families of 12 of the babies, said there was 'nothing remarkable or new' about the material passed to the CCRC, adding that the bereaved parents had become a 'sideshow within a ghoulish media circus'.

EXCLUSIVE Lotus could axe up to 30% of jobs at Norfolk factory after labour costs hike
EXCLUSIVE Lotus could axe up to 30% of jobs at Norfolk factory after labour costs hike

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Lotus could axe up to 30% of jobs at Norfolk factory after labour costs hike

Nearly 400 jobs are at risk at Lotus as the car maker becomes the latest household name to look at slashing its workforce. The Mail understands the sports car specialist could cut 'up to 30 per cent' of jobs at its factory in Hethel in Norfolk in a bid to save money. That amounts to as many as 390 of its 1,300 staff with a decision expected to be made within the next three months. The prospect of job losses at Lotus comes just days after it emerged that Nissan is planning to lay off 250 workers at Britain's biggest car plant in Sunderland. And accounts for shoe retailer Clarks this week revealed that it shed more than 1,200 jobs last year amid 'very cautious' consumer spending as sales fell by more than £90million. The wave of job losses will raise fresh questions over Rachel Reeves's handling of the economy as business and household confidence collapses in the wake of her tax-raising Budget. Labour's capitulation on welfare reform has blown another £5billion hole in her Budget numbers – making further tax hikes this autumn ever more likely. Donald Trump's erratic trade policies – and the imposition of punitive tariffs on British cars and steel entering the US – are also taking their toll. Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey this week sounded the alarm over job losses across Britain. He said the labour market was 'weakening' and the uncertainty was taking its toll on UK investment and business growth. 'That increase in uncertainty and predictability is definitely coming through in terms of activity and growth,' Bailey said in an interview with broadcaster CNBC from a summit in Portugal. 'When I go around the country talking to businesses, which I do a lot, what they tell me is that they are putting off investment decisions. 'I do see some underlying weakening, particularly in the labour market.' Lotus, which is majority owned by Chinese carmaker Geely, has denied recent reports that it was planning to shutter its factory in Hethel and move production to the US. The reports sparked a frantic intervention by the government to prevent the factory being earmarked for closure. Executives at the company held a meeting with business secretary Jonathan Reynolds on Sunday to discuss possible support measures. But despite hopes the factory will stay open, sources told the Mail job losses remain on the cards. A source familiar with the matter also said the trade deal signed between the US and the UK - which came into effect on Monday and reduces American tariffs on British cars to from 27.5 to 10 per cent - would not stave off the planned job cuts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store