A deadly steel accident brings Pennsylvania rivals together
CLAIRTON, Pa. — At 10:47 a.m. Monday, every worker in every U.S. Steel facility across the country — from the headquarters in downtown Pittsburgh to the plants in Gary, Indiana, and Fairless Hills in Bucks County — stopped what they were doing to observe a moment of silence. It had been one week since an explosion at the largest coking operation in North America took the lives of two men, Timothy Quinn and Steven Menefee, and injured 10 others.
At the Irvin Plant in West Mifflin, a siren blew, then it blew again. In the three minutes in between, the people present stood with their heads bowed in prayer with quiet tears. At the coke works in Clairton, it was even harder: The pain was fresh, personal, gutting. Only the processes that could not safely be stopped weren't silenced.
Unless you have worked in a steel mill — or another job for which you walk into danger every day, such as firefighter, police officer or soldier — it is difficult to adequately convey the love these workers have for one another and the aspiration their craft requires of them.
But their unity in grief comes after months of strife that divided not just the workforce but the entire state, including the business leaders and elected officials now tasked with helping pick up the pieces.
The explosion occurred just two months after President Donald Trump approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15 billion deal with Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. The agreement has lifted hopes for steel communities, but the negotiations were divisive and ran headlong into the presidential election. The proposed sale split local union officials and rank-and-file members, who supported it, from their international president in Cleveland, who led the opposition. It also surfaced long-simmering tensions between company management and state elected officials.
No two men butted heads more than Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Montgomery County Democrat, and U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt.
Their differences came to a head on Nov. 19, exactly two weeks after the election. Shapiro, who months earlier had said he could not support a deal between Nippon and U.S. Steel, gathered several of his top staffers, as well as key players from both companies, at his office in the Capitol in Harrisburg to discuss the future of U.S. Steel.
It didn't go well.
In fact, it went so badly that Shapiro unceremoniously ejected Burritt from the room less than 10 minutes after the meeting began, both men told me.
Burritt smiles about the moment now; at the time, though, he admits he was not amused. He recalls that the meeting began with Nippon executive Takahiro Mori giving the group an assessment of the virtues of the deal between Nippon and U.S. Steel. Burritt was then slated to follow with a discussion of what would happen if the deal did not go through.
Burritt's presentation was not as smooth as he would have liked. He wanted to show how the Nippon investment was in the best interest of the community. But his remarks veered into complaints, he says, about how 'it's been difficult for us to do business in Pennsylvania' because of state and local regulations, including a high-profile fight over permitting in Allegheny County. It was partly for these reasons that U.S. Steel had already announced its next-generation plant would be built in Arkansas.
The governor took offense and, Burritt recalls, said something to the effect of: 'You've disrespected the workers, you've disrespected me, and, if you continue like this, you're going to have to leave.' The CEO says he answered back a little too bluntly — he is a very blunt man — and Shapiro told him to get out. So he did.
Shapiro is known to be prickly sometimes, but he says Burritt is the only person he has ever thrown out of his office. Still, in his gut, he knew someday the two could work together.
'I never, ever, ever close the door on dialogue with anyone,' Shapiro says, then deadpans: 'Well, literally, the door did close on him when he left my office.'
But, he adds, 'I think in this business, my job is to find ways to bring people together.'
That someday did not arrive when the deal was finalized between the U.S. Steel and Nippon: It happened last week when Burritt called Shapiro to brief him on Clairton.
Within moments of the news of the explosion, both men were working together to face the tragedy. Burritt was on the scene immediately, going directly to the heads of safety and manufacturing. His calls back and forth with the governor were earnest.
Both men were at the plant the next day to address the loss of life. Both tell me their goal is to get to the bottom of what happened so it does not happen again. Shapiro says he will hold Burritt to that pledge, and Burritt says he holds himself to it.
So often, the intersection of business and politics is presented in terms of malign influence one way or the other: campaign donations, election endorsements, overregulation, political opposition to industry and its practices. But, more often, business and politics intersect at the level of personality, with individuals building relationships over time to try to find policy that works for both sides. We rarely read about that. It's often boring. But the tragedy in Clairton last week highlights how strong personalities in the private and public sectors can bring comfort, move things forward and even give people hope.
In Pennsylvania, it's also what's expected.
Darrin Kelly, the head of the Allegheny/Fayette Central Labor Council, was on the scene within an hour and praised how the two men found a way to come together.
'They both showed up the next day, they committed to making sure they got to the bottom of whatever happened, and they behaved like adults when that was something that the men and women here needed,' says Kelly, whose local AFL-CIO affiliate includes more than 100,000 workers across several western Pennsylvania counties, including members of the local United Steelworkers union.
It's the Pennsylvania way, says Kelly.
He's not wrong. Our politics has created what outsiders see as strange bedfellows, but those who live and work here see it as normal. Sen. John Fetterman, a Braddock Democrat, established a relationship with Trump that perplexes the D.C. press. Fetterman and his wife, Gisele, met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago ahead of the inauguration, with Trump telling me he found Fetterman impressive. Shapiro was considered for the Democratic ticket that ran against Trump in 2024, but he called the Nippon and U.S. Steel deal a 'BFD,' and credited the president for his negotiating skills and willingness to engage with the governor's office. Shapiro and Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pennsylvania) are set to do yet another AI-energy event together in Pittsburgh next month.
Shapiro says his meeting with Burritt ahead of the news conference, and their subsequent conversations, showed no traces of any lingering animosity. However, he stresses that as governor, he has a duty to get to the bottom of what happened. The company's early explanation is that a valve failed as it was being flushed for planned maintenance, but a U.S. Steel spokesperson added in a statement that 'this investigation is in its early stages.'
'I think it's important that we work together,' Shapiro says. 'I will hold him accountable for the commitments he made to me and the community to provide a full accounting for what happened or why it happened — and to fix whatever the situation is so that when those steelworkers go back into the plant, they can be assured that they are safe.'
He adds he expects Burritt will do just that: 'He gave me his word, and I take him at his word.'
Burritt, for his part, was pleased with the governor last week, praising 'his comportment, his [reaching] out, and his compassion and his focus … in search of truth.'
The CEO struggles to keep his emotions in check when talking about the men and women who work in the plants at U.S. Steel. On Saturday, he attended the memorial service for Quinn; on Tuesday, for Menefee.
'These men and women work in difficult situations together for an extended period of time; they are rugged, tough and reliable, and every day they go into the plant not knowing what will happen,' he says. 'Unless you've actually worked with these people and seen what they go through every day — they earn their pay, they earn their benefits. They are worth every bit.'
As for speculation that the fatal explosion raised questions about the plant's future, Burritt dismisses it out of hand. 'That plant will be around for a very, very long time,' he tells me.
In managing the aftermath of the explosion alongside Shapiro, Burritt says he will honor the code of conduct that started with the Gary Principles, named after Judge Elbert Gary, the first chairman of U.S. Steel, who created a corporate code of ethics for the then-new company more than 100 years ago.
'We were the first company that we know of that had an explicit code of conduct,' Burritt says. 'It is safety first, trust and respect, environmental stewardship, excellence and accountability, and then lawful and ethical conduct.'
Plus, it's easy to remember: It spells out 'steel.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Cox defends Utah Senate president
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox stood by state Senate President Stuart Adams on Thursday, defending the top lawmaker's decision not to disclose his personal connection to a law inspired by the criminal case of his granddaughter. During a tense exchange with reporters, Cox said there is no need for an investigation into Adams' behavior because he and Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, R-Draper, have openly stated the extent of their involvement in the law's passage. 'There's nothing to investigate,' Cox said. 'The facts of this are very, very clear.' What is the new law? The provision, which passed in 2024 as part of SB213, allows 18-year-old high school students to be charged as 17-year-olds if they engage in noncoercive sexual activity with teenagers who are 13. In a stated effort to keep the process fair, Adams did not tell legislators, except for Cullimore — the bill's primary sponsor — that his granddaughter was currently the defendant in a Davis County criminal case falling into that category. Cullimore has said that after Adams told him about his granddaughter's situation in 2023 he contacted her defense attorney, Cara Tangaro, to identify statutory changes to prevent high school students from being charged with child rape when no force was involved. The change was discussed in committee hearings and floor debates before passing as part of the 49-page criminal justice omnibus bill. The law did not apply retroactively to Adams' granddaughter, but it was referenced at her sentencing. Court observers disagree on the extent to which the law may have shaped the eventual plea bargain that let the granddaughter avoid a prison sentence and sex offender designation. 'I don't think there are any facts in dispute,' Cox said. 'He talked to the Senate majority leader. The Senate majority leader took that information and he proposed a piece of legislation.' Calls for Adam to resign State Sen. Nate Blouin, D-Salt Lake City, Utah Democratic Party Chair Brian King, and activist groups across the political spectrum have called on Adams to resign, alleging that he abused his power. But Cox said these criticisms are unfounded. This is the process taken by many pieces of legislation, the governor said, and by not disclosing his personal situation, including to Cox, Adams allowed lawmakers to focus on the policy's merits. 'Every single legislator has experiences in their life where they see something that they feel may be unjust, and that influences the way they bring legislation to the table,' Cox said. Cox pushed back against some legislators who have said the provision was snuck into the bill late in the process. It was part of the initial draft and was debated by stakeholders, Cox said, adding that those who say they didn't know about the provision are 'lying to you, or they're a terrible legislator.' Review will happen Cox repeatedly said he was 'grateful' that Adams had not told him 'this was impacting someone in his family' because it may have changed how he 'reacted to the bill.' But Cox said he and others now have a chance to revisit the legislation if needed. On Friday, Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz announced the creation of a working group of policy experts to 'review' SB213 and analyze state laws related to unlawful sexual activity among high school students. In an interview with Deseret News and last week, Adams said he had no participation in the drafting of the provision, or its placement in SB213, and said the way the bill became law 'was done ethically and morally perfect.' Cox said on Thursday that Adams made the right call by staying out of the legislative process as much as he could as it related to the provision — even if it was initiated by his concerns tied to a family connection. 'I think it was appropriate for the top person in the Senate not to weigh in on this bill, which is exactly what happened,' Cox told reporters. 'He did not weigh in on this bill — I can only imagine what you would have written if he had.' Play Farm Merge Valley
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration not eyeing equity in companies that are increasing US investment, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -The Trump administration is considering taking equity stakes in companies receiving funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act but has no plans to seek shares in bigger semiconductor firms that are increasing their U.S. investments, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing a government official. The development follows comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who on Tuesday said the government is continuing to work on the possibility of taking a 10% stake in troubled chipmaker Intel. However, the administration does not intend to take equity stakes in companies like TSMC, which are ramping up investment, the official told the Journal. Businesses not increasing their commitments may need to offer equity to the government in exchange for subsidies. "The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron," the official told WSJ. TSMC executives have already had discussions about giving back their subsidies if the administration asks to become a shareholder, according to the report. The White House and TSMC did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. TSMC, which counts Nvidia and Apple as key clients, announced plans for a $100 billion investment in the United States during an event with President Donald Trump at the White House in March. This investment is in addition to $65 billion committed for three manufacturing facilities in the state of Arizona. The U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act, late last year finalized subsidies of $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the United States. Besides Intel, Micron, TSMC and Samsung were among the biggest recipients of CHIPS Act funding. In the past, the U.S. government has taken stakes in companies during periods of economic uncertainty to provide financial support and restore confidence. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'It's alarming': Education Department revokes guidance on English learning services
The U.S. Education Department has rescinded critical guidance to schools regarding how they provide English language learning services for roughly 5 million students in U.S. schools. The Education Department on Tuesday rescinded a 2015 Dear Colleague letter on its website, which served as a guide for school districts that are serving English learners to ensure they're providing adequate resources to their students under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In a statement to ABC News, the Education Department said the document was "overly prescriptive" and that it micro-managed states. MORE: Immigrant families fear Trump's deportations as children return to school "States have vastly different needs for this important population of students and are best equipped to determine how best to educate these students while following all applicable federal laws," the department said in the statement. The document is still available online for "historical purposes only," according to a notice. The Washington Post was the first to report the guidance had been rescinded. Advocates worry the decision removes federal oversight and accountability, which could lead to school districts opting to discriminate against English learners. Despite those concerns, removing the guidance does not strip resources from schools nor does it alter state curriculums, which are handled by state and local agencies. Roxanne Garza, director of higher education policy at the Education Trust, suggested the move could further the fears of immigrant students wary of returning to school amid the Trump administration's measures to curb illegal migration. "I think it could add to the overall feeling of fear -- like making these people, these families, feel like they don't belong in their communities." MORE: Education leaders split on how Department of Education cuts will affect families Montserrat Garibay, former assistant deputy secretary and director of the Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA) during the Biden administration, equated the now-rescinded English-learners document to the Bible for English language instructors. During her tenure, she said the letter was instrumental to her office in providing resources to the students who needed it most. Garibay, who said nearly three quarters of students in English Language Acquisition programming are U.S. citizens, argued the move could have a lasting impact if it results in scaled-back resources. "These are children who eventually are going to be paying our Medicare and Medicaid, right? Our Social Security, because they are U.S. citizens. And it's outrageous that we are not providing them with the resources that they need to be successful in the 21st century." Garibay also said lifting the long-standing guidance appears to fly in the face of an executive order Trump signed earlier this year designating English as the official language of the United States. Education advocates decried the agency's decision. MORE: Trump admin live updates: US, European Union announce 'Framework Agreement' on trade ImmSchools Co-Founder Viridiana Carrizales told ABC News "It's alarming because, you know, it feels like this administration is stripping away every right, every protection, funding, access to resources etc. that are so critical for those 5 million students in the country who are learning English." Carrizales, whose organization partners with school districts to create more welcoming and safe schools for K-12 immigrant students, said the recent move is a significant shift for classroom educators because immigrant protections, overall, are "diminishing." "We're hearing a lot more concerns from educators themselves, who're trying to figure out how they can meet and support this population when their resources and protections are being taken away," she said. Anne Kelsey, senior policy analyst for disability rights at the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, argued the decision will harm immigrant children and families. "Language access is a fundamental right that builds safer, smarter, and more connected communities, and ensures children can receive a full and fair education while keeping their parents actively involved," Kelsey wrote in a statement to ABC News, adding "These programs welcome parents and families fully into the school community and we know it leads to stronger educational outcomes for students." The effort to return education responsibilities and decisions to the states is arguably President Donald Trump's top K-12 education priority. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon kicked off her 50-state "Returning Education to the States" tour last week.