Return to office boosts demand for older London buildings, says British Land
London
offices is starting to 'trickle down' to older buildings because of sky-high rents, fewer people working from home and a shortage of new properties, according to one of the capital's biggest landlords.
British Land, which co-owns Broadgate in the City of London, said it had seen a significant uptick in demand for 'good second-hand space in core locations' and a sharp fall in the amount of available space.
Since Covid-19, big office tenants have been narrowly focused on the best-quality space in new or freshly refurbished buildings, as they try to lure employees back to in-person work.
But Simon Carter, British Land chief executive, said the market was now shifting because new space had become so expensive and there was little availability owing to a lack of construction since the pandemic.
READ MORE
'There is definitely the trickle-down effect,' he said. 'The return to the office is much stronger than anyone anticipated. No one [has] built, so the rents are strong.'
A year ago, hedge fund and market maker Citadel pre-leased a large office space in British Land's development at 2 Finsbury Avenue for about £100 per sq ft (€118.70), far ahead of the roughly £70 per sq ft rent similar buildings had commanded just a few years earlier.
Rents for that top-quality space are now pushing £115-£120 per sq ft, with few buildings still on the market to occupy in the next several years – which is forcing businesses to look at other options.
'That demand is just going elsewhere,' said Mr Carter.
Office vacancy levels fell slightly in London's central City and West End districts in the first quarter, according to data provider Costar. Brokers Cushman & Wakefield said the amount of second-hand space sitting on the market in the City had fallen by a fifth since 2023.
Most businesses want to stay in core locations close to large train stations, but Mr Carter noted early signs of a move to office districts farther away from key transport links, such as British Land's development at Canada Water.
He said he was beginning to see a trend that 'if [companies] want a new building and they are more price sensitive, they are looking at some of the emerging locations: Battersea, Stratford, the new buildings at Canary Wharf or Canada Water'.
British Land recently reported an improvement in the value of its properties with its £9.5 billion portfolio of UK offices and retail parks increasing 1.5 per cent in the 12 months to March, according to independent assessments. The portfolio was boosted by higher rents after several years of valuation declines driven by rising interest rates.
The company reported its rents rose 3 per cent on a like-for-like basis, with underlying profit – which strips out the impact of changes in property valuations – rising 4 per cent to £279 million. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
NI community projects fear closure after US and UK funding reportedly pulled from peace organisation
A number of community and peacebuilding projects supported by the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) fear they will close due to the reported loss of vital funding from the US . It also emerged this week that the UK government had pulled a promised £1 million , citing budgetary pressures. However, multiple organisations told The Irish Times their 'bigger concern' was the halting of the US contribution to the peacebuilding and reconciliation body. The IFI said it had received financial support from 'a range of international donors including the US government' and was seeking clarity and support from its US partners. READ MORE The peacebuilding organisation was established by the British and Irish governments in 1986 to promote economic and social development and bring together nationalist, unionist and cross-Border communities. Since then, the IFI has spent €974 million supporting more than 6,000 projects, including efforts to remove peace walls and to prevent young people from being recruited or attacked by paramilitaries. The US government has traditionally been the IFI's largest funder. According to the IFI's accounts, its donations last year came from two sources, €2.5 million from the US and €5.5 million from the Irish Government. USAid, which administers foreign aid for the US government, was closed by president Donald Trump earlier this year. [ Senator George Mitchell: Northern Ireland's peace must evolve. And if it is here to stay it must be shared Opens in new window ] In February, Donald Trump's administration cut USAid jobs. Photographer: Pete Kiehart/Bloomberg via Getty Images It is not yet clear precisely how this will impact the IFI, but groups which deliver its projects in Ireland fear their funding will not be renewed at the end of this financial year. 'Since Donald Trump removed the USAid ... they've been more or less telling us we don't have any funding,' said a representative of one community organisation, who asked to remain anonymous so as not to jeopardise their contract. 'We've been told we should look for other funding if we want to keep the project going.' Conal McFeely, of Creggan Enterprises, which has previously received IFI funding, said: 'We've been told the reason the IFI are now considering withdrawing is because they've been choked of this funding from USAid, and they're out telling groups they're not going to continue their funding'. Emphasising the 'highly significant' role the body had played, he said it was 'instrumental in bedding down the peace here and attempting to contain and settle the conflict. They're a key player'. But he said 'a number of programmes, particularly in the Derry area, including here in Creggan, have been informed it's likely their programmes will not be funded beyond the current term, and they've been told to consider winding the projects down. 'There is a complete lack of alternative funders willing to take a risk ... lots of those initiatives will unfortunately fall by the wayside,' he added. Mr McFeely added it was 'extremely disappointing' the UK government was 'withholding its last [£1 million] phase of funding, and that will have a detrimental impact on the ground here in terms of marginalised communities that are still dealing with the fallout from the conflict. 'If the Irish Government is still prepared to put in money, why is the British government not matching that money? It's scandalous,' he said. In a statement, the IFI said that it 'has received financial support from a range of international donors including the US government, the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. 'We are grateful for the long-standing support from all our partners, including the bipartisan support under various US administrations,' it said. 'We are continuing to engage with our US partners to seek clarity around support from the US government which will play a key role in the delivery of the IFI's programmes into the future.' It said all projects currently funded by the IFI 'remain unaffected and their funding is secure as per their letters of offer'. 'Support from the US and others remains critical in our ability to deliver peace and reconciliation initiatives in Northern Ireland and the southern border counties,' the body said.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
An answer to Ireland's housing crisis is right behind us
When you are in a crisis, the choice is never between good and bad – it's always between bad and worse. Ireland has a housing crisis . We have far too many people and not enough homes for them. We can't seem to build quickly enough in the right areas at the right price. All the while, rising rent and house prices are prompting tens of thousands of young educated Irish people to emigrate . As argued here last month , our immigration policy is giving out too many work visas relative to the economy's ability to house these new migrants. There is too little supply and too much demand. The solution must include a reduction in immigration rates and a simultaneous increase in home building. In the short term, all bottlenecks to building should be removed while the number of people coming into the country needs to be capped, which means identifying a number for sustainable migration and sticking to it for a specific time period. READ MORE Facing a crisis resolutely is often described as the 'Dunkirk strategy', where you achieve your goals however you can, galvanising all your resources. At Dunkirk, rather than waiting for navy frigates to evacuate the stranded British army, the war cabinet commandeered every boat possible – fishing boats, yachts, pleasure boats, the lot. The objective in the crisis was: do whatever necessary. One housing-related idea under discussion is the notion that Irish people should be allowed (or even encouraged) to build small homes in their back gardens for the family to alleviate the pressure on the rental market. As long as the homes are within a specific size and meet some specific guidelines, families should be allowed to do what they want, right? [ We need to confront the reality that the housing shortage can't be solved Opens in new window ] This seems pretty sensible and, while it is hardly a universal solution, as an incremental move it's a start. The back gardens of many homes are potentially an amazing resource. In place of Nimbyism, living in the garden could be the start of a Yimbyism movement: yes in my back yard. Although some have voiced opposition, the international evidence is overwhelmingly positive. Allowing people to build in their back garden creates reasonably priced homes in the right areas. In North America, removing planning barriers in recent years has unleashed huge growth in small garden homes. For example, in three years Seattle tripled its permits to build what they call secondary dwelling units. In California, permits surged by 15,334 per cent. In Vancouver today, roughly 35 per cent of single-family lots host a laneway or secondary suite. These are families taking the housing crisis into their own hands and building in their gardens. Why would you stop them? In the Irish context, how big might this garden housing opportunity be? The Dublin City Council area contains about 3,305 hectares of private gardens. To give you a sense of how big this is, consider 8,262 Croke Parks. Now you get the picture. These are already residential-zoned, serviced plots located in prime, established urban areas. By contrast, empty brownfield sites are scarce in Ireland because even though dereliction is rife, there simply isn't enough derelict land to meet targets. If we want to avoid more sprawl and longer commutes, new greenfield development should be curtailed. Ireland's national policy is already aiming for 40 per cent of new housing to be built in existing urban areas. Gardens are already inside the cities. Ireland has hundreds of thousands of square metres of ready-to-go residential land in gardens. A think tank called Progress Ireland has run some of the numbers to see how many small homes could be built in existing gardens. Obviously gardens without back lanes or side entrances aren't suitable, and they must be big enough to accommodate a basic studio or one-bedroom modular home. On top of these physical constraints, to be viable building in the garden must be cheaper than renting locally. The report concludes that, across the country, about 18 per cent of existing gardens are suitable. That's about 348,000 viable sites. [ Rise in young people's mental health difficulties partly due to housing insecurity, says charity Opens in new window ] In a crisis, surely it is worth green-lighting such an opportunity. At the very least, planning restrictions should be eased so that neighbours can't object on the basis of density or views or whatever Nimby nonsense is invented as grounds for objections. A serious problem for Ireland is that our population isn't dense enough. We have only 73 people per square kilometre, compared with 279 in the UK. Four times the density means that public infrastructure might be as much as four times more effective. The more we build outwards, the worse our infrastructure will be and the more it will cost. Speaking of cost, a basic two-bedroom log cabin for a garden is estimated to run about €30,000–€42,000, making it an attractive solution for intergenerational living or as a 'starter' home for a young person on family land. Contrast this with the cost of a two-bed apartment in Ireland or a similar starter home on a new estate. This sort of microdevelopment needs to be part of an overall housing plan. It can't hurt. I understand many people will regard commandeering back gardens as a gimmick, putting people in a glorified shed or cabin rather than fixing the housing problem permanently. I get it. But anything that reduces pressure on the rental market must be considered for the short term. Having sons and daughters living in their own place beside their parents, or vice versa, might also have dramatic family positives (although it might also have the opposite effect in some cases). The aim is to reduce the acute pressure. Many younger people might love to live, for a while at least, in the place where they grew up, with a modicum of independence and their own front door. Why should the State, which has failed to provide proper housing, object to this stopgap? Last year Ireland built only 33,500 houses, a pathetic number. Even if we were to build 50,000 a year, which would be quite an achievement, we are a long way from bringing supply and demand into alignment. On the demand side, migration must be reduced if we are to have any hope of stabilising prices. On the supply side, a Dunkirk emergency strategy must be accepted, however unpalatable to some.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Apple needs to up its game to impress
What does Apple have to do to impress analysts? A lot more than it is currently doing, it seems. Despite delivering a healthy set of results for its third quarter, investors seem to be unimpressed. The iPhone maker reported revenue that rose almost 10 per cent to $94 billion (€81.4 billion), with strong sales of its smartphones and momentum in China. But that wasn't enough to convince analysts that the company is on the right track. The bump in device sales was being viewed in some quarters as a reaction to potential tariffs, with lingering worries over what Donald Trump's trade war will do to Apple's future prospects. Meanwhile, the tech giant seems to be slipping further and further behind its rivals when it comes to the buzziest technology of them all: artificial intelligence . READ MORE Just over a year after the company unveiled its plans for Apple Intelligence, the speculation that Apple has lost its edge and its innovation is still rife. The tech giant has been slow to roll out new features, adopting a cautious approach to the technology even as Google and Samsung plough ahead. One of the biggest blows was the news that Apple was delaying the AI-powered, smarter version of Siri that it had previously promised. [ Is it time for a new kind of CEO at Apple? Opens in new window ] Apple has a tough line to walk. It has built its reputation on protecting the privacy of its customers, and views any developments in this area through that lens. And that means evaluating the potential impact of every decision on consumer privacy. But on Friday morning the company's shares dipped lower, extending a negative run for Apple that has seen the company's shares lose almost 17 per cent in the year to date. In contrast, one-time rival Microsoft has gained 25 per cent since the start of 2025, and Google parent company Alphabet is largely flat. Apple may have a plan up its sleeve. Chief executive Tim Cook indicated that he was open to the possibility of a deal with AI companies to help advance the technology on its platform. But that may not be enough to keep investors happy.
