Apple needs to up its game to impress
Apple
have to do to impress analysts? A lot more than it is currently doing, it seems. Despite delivering a healthy set of results for its third quarter, investors seem to be unimpressed.
The iPhone maker reported revenue that rose almost 10 per cent to $94 billion (€81.4 billion), with strong sales of its smartphones and momentum in China.
But that wasn't enough to convince analysts that the company is on the right track. The bump in device sales was being viewed in some quarters as a reaction to potential tariffs, with lingering worries over what Donald Trump's trade war will do to Apple's future prospects.
Meanwhile, the tech giant seems to be slipping further and further behind its rivals when it comes to the buzziest technology of them all:
artificial intelligence
.
READ MORE
Just over a year after the company unveiled its plans for Apple Intelligence, the speculation that Apple has lost its edge and its innovation is still rife. The tech giant has been slow to roll out new features, adopting a cautious approach to the technology even as Google and Samsung plough ahead.
One of the biggest blows was the news that Apple was delaying the AI-powered, smarter version of Siri that it had previously promised.
[
Is it time for a new kind of CEO at Apple?
Opens in new window
]
Apple has a tough line to walk. It has built its reputation on protecting the privacy of its customers, and views any developments in this area through that lens. And that means evaluating the potential impact of every decision on consumer privacy.
But on Friday morning the company's shares dipped lower, extending a negative run for Apple that has seen the company's shares lose almost 17 per cent in the year to date. In contrast, one-time rival Microsoft has gained 25 per cent since the start of 2025, and Google parent company Alphabet is largely flat.
Apple may have a plan up its sleeve. Chief executive
Tim Cook
indicated that he was open to the possibility of a deal with AI companies to help advance the technology on its platform. But that may not be enough to keep investors happy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
20 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Fine Gael significantly outspent Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin on elections last year
Fine Gael spent significantly more than either Fianna Fáil or Sinn Féin on elections last year, according to party accounts provided to the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo). Fine Gael was the biggest spender overall on elections in 2024 and also the highest spender on the general election, according to the consolidated accounts of the parties. The accounts, published by Sipo, show Sinn Féin is the richest of the three big parties, with more income, stronger cash balances and an unmatched reserve of €8.7 million at the end of 2024. Sinn Féin, like the other parties, ran a significant deficit last year, in its case amounting to €1.6 million. However, it still finished the year with €4.6 million in cash, down from €5.3 million at the beginning of the year. READ MORE By contrast, Fianna Fáil had just €470,000 in cash at the end of the year. Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil appear to have funded some of their election expenditure through loans, which the two parties will pay back over the coming years as they prepare for the next election, though Fine Gael is in a significantly better financial position than Fianna Fáil. The days when Fianna Fáil outspent everyone at election time are long gone, the figures suggest. This time, the consolidated spending shows Fine Gael spent €3.22 million on elections last year, substantially ahead of Sinn Féin on €1.7 million and Fianna Fáil on €1.69 million. Fine Gael spent more than €2 million on the general election, more than twice as much as Fianna Fáil, which spent less than €950,000, according to the consolidated accounts of both parties. Despite being outspent, Fianna Fáil won 10 more seats than Fine Gael in the general election. Sinn Féin also beat Fine Gael by one seat. [ Three constituencies that show why Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin outperformed Fine Gael Opens in new window ] [ Expect the unexpected: What the 2024 local and European elections have taught us Opens in new window ] Sinn Féin and Fine Gael each spent about €600,000 on the European elections, according to the accounts, with Fianna Fáil's figure much lower at about €320,000. Fine Gael also outspent its rivals at the local elections, with the accounts showing expenditure of €512,000. Fianna Fáil reported spending of €289,000, while Sinn Féin's accounts show it spent just €77,000 on the local elections. All three parties received more than €5 million in State funding last year, while the accounts of all three parties show they are also reliant on fundraising among their members. Sinn Féin has the highest income from donations, with €182,000 raised from individual donations and €52,000 from corporate donations. The party's organisation in Northern Ireland is not governed by the strict rules on political donations that are in place in the South. [ Who is the American who left €535,000 to Sinn Féin's US fundraising group in her trust? Opens in new window ] But it is Sinn Féin's cash pile – likely linked to a mysterious bequest from a reclusive Englishman, William Hampton, who left more than €4 million to the party in 2019 – that sets it apart from its rivals. Along with a substantial property portfolio, it means the party can record 'reserves' of some €8.7 million in its accounts. This is the first year Sipo rules have required the parties to produce consolidated accounts that show the financial dealings of all units of the organisations above a certain size. In a statement, Fine Gael cautioned against comparing the election spend of the different parties in the accounts. [ William Hampton: The life and extraordinary times of Sinn Féin's million-euro donor Opens in new window ] 'It would be inaccurate to use the published annual accounts of political parties without context to compare election expenditure by political parties,' the party said in a statement. It said there 'appears to be significant divergence in the approach to Electoral Act compliance by different political parties ... The extent to which election expenditure is funded by the Party HQ, by party subsidiaries that are required to be reported under the Electoral Act, or by party subsidiaries that are not required to be reported under the Electoral Act, varies for each party and candidate. This also has a bearing on the figures reported.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
AI's inbuilt biases threaten to undermine women in the workplace
The age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is here whether we want it or not. And although it is already proving a useful tool for some tasks – both mundane and incredibly complex – its all-too-human biases are reinforcing discrimination against women, undermining them in the workplace and possibly increasing their risk of unemployment. From information gathering and report writing to hiring decisions and promotional opportunities, current generative AI systems can amplify inequalities because they use flawed data, such as user-generated content from the internet. We all know from personal experience and news reports how unreliable and inaccurate that information can be when left unchecked. Many GenAI systems train on large language models where they learn to understand and interpret information and perform tasks using existing public data which is steeped in stereotypes that favour western white men. This bias has immediate economic and social consequences in the real world. 'Despite AI's potential to enhance sectors like healthcare, education and business, it often mirrors reality and its societal prejudices and can manifest itself through unequal treatment in hiring decisions, academic recommendations or healthcare diagnostics, systematically disadvantaging women,' according to Jerlyn Ho and other Singapore-based academics writing in the scholarly journal Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans . READ MORE Their paper explores how AI systems and chatbots, notably ChatGPT , can perpetuate gender biases due to inherent flaws in training data, algorithms and user feedback loops. Despite its proven bias, GenAI is being used widely to decide who gets hired, fired and promoted. Research has shown that GenAI discriminates against women by spewing pseudoscientific 'facts' and stereotypes of women as being less professionally ambitious or intelligent than men. 'For instance, in gendered word association tasks, recent models still associate woman names with traditional roles like 'home' and 'family', while linking male names with 'business' and 'career'. Moreover, in text generation tasks, these models produce sexist and misogynistic content approximately 20 per cent of the time,' according to the European Commission 's (EC) Generative AI Outlook Report 2025 . 'The growing integration of AI across various sectors has heightened concerns about biases in large language models, including those related to gender, religion, race, profession, nationality, age, physical appearance and socio-economic status,' it continues. [ Women more exposed to jobs impact of AI, Government research finds Opens in new window ] 'While AI holds the promise of enhancing efficiency and decision making in areas like healthcare, education and business, its widespread use and the high level of public trust it enjoys could also amplify societal prejudices, leading to systematic disadvantages, particularly for women.' Occupational bias When gender and racial bias are baked into the technology we use every day, moving it from a possible to a structural barrier, it's far harder to break through professionally. GenAI is used extensively in the hiring process, from CV scanners and gamified tests to body language analysis and vocal assessments. Job applicants are facing machines before they see humans and it is increasingly AI that decides whether or not they are a good match or if the application gets sent to the recycling bin. If technologies like this are biased against someone like you then you're unlikely to be shortlisted for a role, get a foot in the door of your chosen profession or get a seat at the top table. Despite decades of work trying to ensure greater diversity and inclusion in the workplace – which has been proven to improve decision making, risk taking and profitability – AI bias is threatening to take us backwards by reinforcing negative stereotypes instead of judging everyone on a level playing field. At work, your professional image and public profile are often important factors in promotion. Yet the European Commission report found that in occupational portraits generated by three popular text-to-image AI generators: 'Women and black individuals were notably underrepresented, especially in roles requiring high levels of preparation. Women were often portrayed as younger and with submissive gestures, while men appeared older and more authoritative. [ Women are lagging behind on AI but they can catch up Opens in new window ] 'Alarmingly, these biases surpassed real-world disparities, indicating that the issues extend beyond merely biased training data.' Internationally, women are increasingly at risk of being pushed out of the workforce and into the home as conservative governments in places such as the United States, Hungary and, more extremely, Afghanistan promote a return to traditional gender roles. AI-driven technology and many social media platforms are aggressively reinforcing these gender messages and influencing the next generation. If GenAI is disadvantaging women and minorities in hiring and promotion, and they're largely excluded from AI's development and testing processes, why is it being blindly adopted as a workplace tool? Research in Ireland and elsewhere shows many young men are more conservative than their grandfathers and far less progressive than their woman colleagues. In recruitment, some AI algorithms are supporting this move by favouring male candidates over equally qualified woman candidates. The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights found a violation of Dutch and EU anti-discrimination legislation in Meta 's job vacancy advertising algorithm. 'In violation of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination, in 2023, the algorithm in the Netherlands displayed vacancies for receptionist positions to woman users in 97 per cent of cases. Similarly, it showed vacancies for mechanics to male users 96 per cent of the time.' In education, AI may also unfairly predict higher dropout rates for woman students, particularly in male-dominated fields like science, technology, engineering and mathematics (Stem), limiting their access to advanced education programmes and jobs in higher-paid professions. Fill in the blanks Many GenAI models cannot distinguish between fact and fiction, believing that video game content and fictional novels are real, for example. And some even make stuff up to fill in the blanks if they don't have enough information. OpenAI's website says of ChatGPT: 'But like any language model, it can produce incorrect or misleading outputs. Sometimes, it might sound confident – even when it's wrong. This phenomenon is often referred to as a hallucination: when the model produces responses that are not factually accurate, such as incorrect definitions, dates or facts.' [ AI has its strong points. Intelligence isn't one of them Opens in new window ] Facts are important, especially when lives and livelihoods depend on them. Access to employment matters hugely as jobs are the gateway to opportunity and economic stability for all. If GenAI is disadvantaging women and minorities in hiring and promotion, and they're largely excluded from AI's development and testing processes, why is it being blindly adopted as a workplace tool? Leaders need to be more intentional before they bring AI into the workplace: They need to ask themselves: What is my intention here? What am I trying to achieve? How is AI linked to our strategy? Or am I just bringing it in to save money and reduce headcount? For many companies, the short-term promise of productivity seems to be overcoming the hard reality of long-term bias and exclusion. 'The painful truth is that, if women aren't co-pilots of the current AI revolution, they may be left in the dust, faced with technology that presents a whole series of new barriers for them to overcome,' according to research from global consultancy Mercer . Mercer says the potential of AI and automation will only be fully realised if productivity gains are equitably distributed and AI is responsibly managed with data used to nudge leaders towards fair opportunity and pay decisions. [ Action needs to be taken to reverse recent decline in women securing leadership roles in Irish business Opens in new window ] As AI continues to reshape the workforce and transform society, businesses must actively root out bias and keep their eye on opportunities beyond productivity. We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to redesign work for humanity's advancement and wellbeing alongside greater profitability and innovation. Instead of copper-fastening the things that limit and disconnect us – prejudices, stereotypes and bias – let's create a world of work that connects us and fully develops our shared human potential. Margaret E Ward is chief executive of Clear Eye, a leadership consultancy. margaret@
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails additional $100bn Apple investment in US
US President Donald Trump will announce an additional $100 million investment by tech giant Apple in its US manufacturing network, White House officials said on Wednesday. It comes as Apple tries to avoid US tariffs on imports that will impact the cost of iPhones and other products in the US. The announcement will be seen by the Trump administration as a big victory is his crusade to restore domestic manufacturing. But the scale of the investment will raise concerns in Irish Government circles about what it might mean for the company's commitment to its Irish manufacturing base, which employs more than 6,000 staff. The US president is hoping his threat of tariffs on imports will pressure companies to increase manufacturing inside the US, the stated aim of his America First agenda. READ MORE 'President Trump's America First economic agenda has secured trillions of dollars in investments that support American jobs and bolster American businesses,' White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' he said. In February, Apple said it planned to hire an additional 20,000 staff in the US over the next four years, as part of a $500 billion investment in the country during Trump's second term in office, a figure that is now expected to increase to $600 billion. The company made similar, smaller pledges during the Biden administration and Trump's first term, though it has not yet followed through on some of those promises. While Apple supports more than 450,000 jobs with thousands of suppliers and partners across 50 states, the president has been concerned at the company's plan to expand its manufacturing footprint in India. In May, Trump threatened Apple and other phone manufacturers with a 25% tariff on products made outside the United States. Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Anurag Rana and Andrew Girard said the latest Apple pledge of investment may 'soften the White House's ire' over Apple's heavy reliance on India for iPhone assembly. 'We anticipate Apple will focus on higher-end products, artificial intelligence labs and semiconductor engineering in the US, rather than mass-produced lower-end phones and accessories.' Mr Trump's announcement, which was reported earlier by Bloomberg, will include the creation of what the White House is calling the 'American Manufacturing Programme', which will focus on bringing more of Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing to the United States. The US president is hoping his threat of tariffs on imports will pressure companies to increase manufacturing inside the US, the stated aim of his America First agenda. The Apple announcement comes on the day that Mr Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India which, he said, was due to New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. The order said the 25 per cent levies would be added to existing duties imposed on Indian imports in a move that will raise tensions with prime minister Narendra Modi's government. India has failed to reach a trade deal with Washington and was already facing 25 per cent tariffs on its exports to the US before Mr Trump's announcement. A 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports to the US is scheduled to come into force on Thursday. Both the European Commission and the While House had confirmed previously that the 15 per cent rate would include pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. However, comments by the US president on Tuesday when he warned of tariffs on pharmaceuticals of up to 250 per cent over coming years, naming Ireland as a target alongside China, will cause concern in Dublin. – Additional reporting Bloomberg, New York Times, Financial Times limited
