logo
Why making an all-American product is so hard

Why making an all-American product is so hard

Mint28-04-2025

From the start, the Idaho-based company Decked has aspired to be an All-American manufacturer. It makes slide-out organizers for pickup trucks, and 95% of its spending on materials goes to U.S. suppliers.
Moving that last 5% stateside has been a challenge. Chief Executive Bill Banta said the company searched for a domestic source for the ball bearings it buys from China, only to hit a dead end.
'We've struggled to find components that are competitive in terms of price and lead time," he said.
Companies have long highlighted 'Made in the U.S.A." products even after much of the nation's industrial base migrated overseas. Some manufacturing returned in the wake of the Covid-19 supply-chain disruptions, and President Trump has said his tariffs are meant to bring back much more.
Manufacturers that already make products in the U.S. said it is tough to create an entirely domestic supply chain. Parts or materials vital to their products are no longer made here, they said, or are available only in quantities that are too low or prices that are too high.
Ricky Cousido is co-owner of Brooklyn-based Rapid Plastics, a six-person company that makes high-end coat hangers for department stores and other retailers. He said the domestic suppliers that furnished the metal hooks for his company's hangers closed or went overseas more than two decades ago.
He now gets the hooks and other metal components from China, and the U.S. tariffs on imports from the country are rapidly boosting his expenses. The bar of a skirt hanger, which cost 40 cents before the duties were imposed, now costs 80 cents, he said.
Cousido said government policy should make exceptions for manufacturers unable to find U.S.-made components.
'I can't beg some company, 'open up, make this item for us,'" he said.
Haas Automation, a California-based builder of factory machinery, makes a similar argument. It imports cast iron from China to make the frames for its products. Peter Zierhut, vice president of outside operations for Haas, said the U.S. has no foundries capable of generating the more than 100 million pounds the company consumes each year, and he sees little chance any will return.
Building a new foundry would require hundreds of millions of dollars in investment to turn out a commodity that is worth just a few dollars per pound, he said. Finding workers would be tough as well, he said.
'It just doesn't seem realistic that cast iron—a super low-tech industry—is going to build their operations in the United States," Zierhut said.
The tariffs the company is paying on iron and other parts from China could raise the price of its machines by about 20%, he said. Meanwhile, competitors based in South Korea, Taiwan and Japan are sending their products to the U.S. at just a 10% to 14% tariff.
Haas said it has already cut production and eliminated overtime at its plant in Oxnard, Calif. The company is building a $500 million factory in Nevada to serve what it had expected to be increased demand for its machines, but Zierhut said that without tariff relief the plant's opening might be delayed.
Some manufacturers said they are making progress at Americanizing their supply chains. Two years ago, CorVent Medical, which makes ventilators at a factory in North Dakota, got up to 70% of its parts from China.
Today, CorVent gets up to 70% of its parts from U.S. suppliers and aims to boost that to 100% within the next few years.
Components made of sheet metal and plastic have been relatively easy to repatriate, said Richard Walsh, CorVent's CEO. Others have been far more difficult. The transistors, motors and power boards used in its ventilators are available only in Taiwan, he said.
However, the company has been able to bring a key part of its supply chain back to the U.S. by contracting with a Minnesota company called Versa Electronics, which makes circuit boards. Walsh said while some of the boards' components come from overseas, the bulk of the cost comes from assembly.
Versa CEO Kevin Johnsrud said his company uses automated machines to place resistors, capacitors and integrated circuits onto circuit cards, though workers sometimes solder components by hand. Versa can compete with overseas suppliers because it specializes in low-volume runs, Johnsrud said.
'We don't do millions of cellphones or other devices," he said.
Even as the trade war begins, fewer consumer packaged goods and grocery items are being marketed as 'Made in the U.S.A.," data from NielsenIQ shows. About 100,000 separate products carried that designation over the 12 months that ended April 12, the firm said, down from 102,000 over the prior 12 months.
Some attorneys have said companies could face extra scrutiny from the Federal Trade Commission over the provenance of their goods. The agency has strict rules that govern whether a product can be advertised as American-made, saying 'all or virtually all" of its components must come from within the country.
Manufacturers sometimes add qualifiers to their marketing, but Pennsylvania-based tool maker Channellock calls its domestically produced pliers, tool bags and drivers '100% Made in USA." Ryan DeArment, the company's executive vice president of sales and marketing, said every bit of their content, including the metal, fabric and cardboard packaging, has a domestic source.
Even so, the tariffs have him concerned. DeArment said the mills that make the steel for Channellock pliers could prioritize automakers and other big customers if import duties boost demand for American metal.
'It might not impact us in 2025, but when we go back to the table in 2026, we could see a change," he said. 'There are so many moving parts."
Write to John Keilman at
john.keilman@wsj.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel's strikes set back Iran's nuclear program, but fail to dismantle it completely
Israel's strikes set back Iran's nuclear program, but fail to dismantle it completely

Hans India

time19 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Israel's strikes set back Iran's nuclear program, but fail to dismantle it completely

Israel's recent wave of airstrikes inflicted significant damage on Iran's nuclear infrastructure but failed to fully dismantle the program, according to global nuclear experts. This outcome leaves both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the U.S. administration facing a critical decision on how to proceed. Preliminary reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicate that while Israel targeted surface-level structures at the Natanz nuclear facility, the heavily fortified underground halls—where uranium enrichment occurs—remain intact. Natanz is central to Iran's nuclear ambitions, and the inability to penetrate its core enrichment areas suggests the operation, while serious, was incomplete. Strikes on other key sites, including Isfahan and Fordow, will also factor heavily into Israel's strategic calculus. The Isfahan facility is Iran's only uranium conversion site—an essential part of the nuclear fuel cycle. Disabling it could temporarily freeze Iran's capacity to enrich additional uranium, though experts note the country still holds considerable stockpiles of enriched material. 'If you interrupt that piece of the flow-sheet, the fuel cycle doesn't work anymore,' said Robert Kelley, a former IAEA weapons inspector. 'The front end of their program dies.' The air campaign reportedly killed nine senior nuclear scientists, which could severely set back Iran's technical capabilities. Still, the bigger challenge may be what happens next. Analysts warn that further escalation could push Iran to deepen its nuclear activities underground, cut off access to international inspectors, and abandon remaining diplomatic efforts. In retaliation, Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones toward Israeli cities, signaling that tensions could sharply intensify. UN officials, including IAEA chief Rafael Grossi, have expressed concern that the strikes could limit future monitoring of Iran's nuclear program. The potential for Iran to divert enriched uranium to undisclosed locations, or exit the Non-Proliferation Treaty altogether, has heightened global anxiety. 'Iran's 400 kilograms of highly-enriched uranium could be easily concealed in a few cylinders,' Kelley added, warning that any move toward weaponization would be difficult to detect without full inspection access. Fordow, another critical enrichment site buried deep within a mountain, remains virtually untouched. Experts say only the U.S. military has the capability to destroy such a fortified facility with bunker-busting munitions. 'Israel cannot destroy Fordow without U.S. support,' said Kelsey Davenport of the Arms Control Association. This raises a difficult question for the Trump administration. While President Trump has repeatedly voiced preference for diplomacy over military intervention, pressure is mounting for the U.S. to act if Iran's program shows signs of recovery. The Center for Strategic and International Studies noted, 'While the administration may not want to launch strikes, allowing Iran to rebuild its nuclear infrastructure may be seen as a greater risk.' Even Israeli leadership concedes that airstrikes alone are not a permanent solution. 'It is impossible to destroy the nuclear program with force alone,' said Israel's National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi. 'The goal is to make the Iranians understand that they will have to stop the nuclear program.' With diplomatic negotiations on uncertain footing and regional tensions rising, the path forward for both Israel and the United States remains fraught with complexity and risk.

FIR Against Supertech, Its Promoter For Defrauding IDBI Bank Of Rs 126.07 Crore
FIR Against Supertech, Its Promoter For Defrauding IDBI Bank Of Rs 126.07 Crore

NDTV

time25 minutes ago

  • NDTV

FIR Against Supertech, Its Promoter For Defrauding IDBI Bank Of Rs 126.07 Crore

New Delhi: The CBI has registered an FIR against Noida-based construction firm Supertech Limited and its promoter R K Arora among others for allegedly defrauding IDBI Bank of Rs 126.07 crore, officials said Saturday. Arora has been named in the FIR alongside whole-time directors Sangita Arora, Mohit Arora, Parul Arora, Vikas Kansal, Pradeep Kumar, Anil Kumar Sharma, and Anil Kumar Jain, in addition to the Noida-based company, they said. On Saturday, the CBI conducted coordinated search operations at five locations linked to the accused," including official and residential premises in Noida and Ghaziabad," in connection with the case. During the raids, agency officials seized cash amounting to Rs 28.5 lakh, CBI's spokesperson said in a statement. The case was initiated following a complaint from IDBI Bank, which alleged that the accused had conspired to misappropriate sanctioned loan funds through fraudulent means. According to the FIR, the bank alleged that the company and its directors submitted forged documents to secure credit facilities under false pretences. The loan account was subsequently declared a wilful default and categorised as fraudulent, allegedly resulting in wrongful losses totalling Rs 126.07 crore to IDBI Bank Ltd., the CBI said.

CBI books Supertech, promoter RK Arora over ₹126 crore worth IDBI Bank fraud
CBI books Supertech, promoter RK Arora over ₹126 crore worth IDBI Bank fraud

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

CBI books Supertech, promoter RK Arora over ₹126 crore worth IDBI Bank fraud

The Central Bureau of Investigation registered a case against Noida-based construction firm Supertech Limited and its promoter, RK Arora, for allegedly defrauding IDBI Bank to the tune of ₹126.07 crore, officials said. The FIR names the firm and Arora, along with the firm's full-time directors Sangita Arora, Mohit Arora, Parul Arora, Vikas Kansal, Pradeep Kumar, Anil Kumar Sharma, and Anil Kumar Jain. The central agency on Saturday carried out search operations at five locations linked to the accused, including official and residential premises in Noida and Ghaziabad, news agency PTI reported. The agency's spokesperson said in a statement that during these raids, CBI officials seized cash worth ₹28.5 lakh. The CBI case stems from a complaint registered by the IDBI bank, wherein it was alleged that the accused conspired to commit fraud and misappropriate sanctioned loan money. The central probe agency said the loan account was subsequently termed a wilful default and categorised as fraudulent. The fraud allegedly resulted in wrongful losses of ₹126.07 crore to the IDBI Bank Ltd. However, Supertech has not released any statement in this regard. Earlier in April, the Supreme Court had directed the CBI to register seven preliminary enquiries to probe the nexus between builders and banks under subvention schemes. The agency was told to probe several Supertech projects and the roles of banks which provided loans for their housing projects in the national capital region (NCR) and other states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store