logo
Look away, Mike McGuire!

Look away, Mike McGuire!

Politico28-02-2025

Presented by
THE BUZZ: PUSH IT TO THE LIMIT — If you're the leader of the California Senate, please avert your eyes.
Playbook was chatting with state Sen. Tom Umberg about the Legislature's new bill limit, and he had some thoughts, but he really, really didn't want Mike McGuire to read them.
Because, after McGuire and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas in December capped legislators at 35 bills a piece over the two-year session, Umberg has already introduced 33 — and it's only week 12 of year one.
That gives Umberg the ignominious — or, for fans of the Santa Ana Democrat — glorious distinction of carrying the most bills of any legislator after last week's introduction deadline.
How productive is Umberg, really? For starters, he's been so busy introducing new bills that he only recently became aware of his vaunted status.
'My staff does a good job of reminding me that we can't do all things at all times, notwithstanding that I can't say no to stuff,' said Umberg, who did manage to sneak away for a few minutes of chit-chat.
Even then, he was clearly in on the joke. Umberg pleaded with your Playbook author to 'talk fast' because he 'knew the subject' of this edition.
Umberg's patient staffer who joined us on the line didn't seem as amused, though we're confident her boss will be so pleased with how he's portrayed here that he'll give her a big raise.
But it wasn't all in jest. After all, the man means business.
The Judiciary Committee chair said the complex challenges of implementing tough-on-crime Proposition 36, the CARE Court program and other judicial issues have led him to a 'vigorous' streak of legislating during his final session in office.
'I think the combination of all those things' got him to the high-water mark, Umberg said, before returning to his usual candid self, 'and then, attention-deficit disorder.'
Umberg isn't the only one bumping up against the lower cap in year one of the two-year session. Already, 16 other senators and 22 assemblymembers have burned through 20 or more bills of their reduced allowance, by the count of veteran lobbyist Chris Micheli.
The overall flow of legislation hasn't gotten much lighter since the Assembly and Senate dropped their ceilings from 50 and 40 bills, respectively. The 2,350 introduced this year is up more than 250 from last year, according to Micheli, a noted fan of the limits.
However, members typically introduce more proposals in the first year of the session — mostly to avoid drawing out controversial debates in election years in which there is a shorter calendar and higher electoral stakes. This year's bill load is the smallest in year one of a session since 2015, when the Assembly's bill limit was 30.
The real effect of the new restrictions will be seen and felt next year.
'While we didn't see it really impact the 2025 introductions because they were about the same as previously, we will see the impact in the second year of the two-year session,' Micheli said, adding the new limits will dictate that around 500 fewer bills will emerge next year.
That's assuming rules committees don't waive the limit for anyone, though Micheli predicted leadership will be reluctant to give people a pass after they touted the reductions at the beginning of the legislative year.
Rivas' stated aim was to draw more focus to affordability issues after an election in which Democrats suffered setbacks on the heels of a rough inflationary stretch.
He and McGuire are still piecing together their policy agendas on that issue, and time will tell how much they're able to accomplish in reining in the state's stubbornly high cost of living.
OK, Honorable Senate President Pro Tempore, you can start reading again!
GOOD MORNING. Happy Friday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook.
You can text us at ‪916-562-0685‬‪ — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@politico.com and bjones@politico.com, or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej.
WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced.
THE SCOOP
WORKING THE PHONES — Assemblymember Mia Bonta is calling Democratic Party insiders and asking for their support to run for state superintendent of public instruction in 2026, three people familiar with her outreach said.
Bonta's campaign did not respond to requests for comment.
If Bonta does enter the race, she would appear on the statewide ballot in the same election cycle as her husband, state Attorney General Rob Bonta, who's running for reelection in 2026.
Rumblings about Mia Bonta's interest in the gig have amplified in recent weeks, shortly after Rob Bonta opted not to run for governor in 2026 and seek another term as AG.
That's likely no accident. Having two Bontas vying for new statewide offices on the same ballot could have been a difficult lift, as well as a strain for their donors and labor allies. But Rob is likely to cruise to reelection, freeing up resources for Mia to take a bigger swing.
The assemblywoman's interest in California's top education post harkens to her background. Prior to being elected to the Assembly, Mia Bonta was president of the Alameda School Board and ran a nonprofit that supports low-income students.
HOMELESSNESS CRISIS
LOCALS BUCK BACK — Gov. Gavin Newsom has repeatedly put counties and local governments across California on blast in recent months over their handling of the homelessness crisis. Now, those locals are increasingly venting their frustration with his 'finger pointing.'
The tension comes after Newsom unveiled an online accountability tool earlier this week that tracks how quickly counties move homeless people into shelters or addiction treatment and build new housing. After the state has invested billions in housing projects over the last six years, Newsom's office argues that 'Californians deserve results from their local governments.'
But the governor's pressure tactic drew terse replies from the major associations representing local governments. California State Association of Counties CEO Graham Knaus said Newsom's announcement was 'just spin' without substance; and League of California Cities lobbyist Caroline Grinder said the approach 'ignores real solutions.'
That clapback foreshadows what's likely to be a central dynamic of budget negotiations this session as the governor navigates a tight fiscal outlook: Newsom wants results on what the state has already spent to combat homelessness, but counties and cities say it's not enough. They don't just want one-time funding; they want a dedicated, ongoing stream of money to expand shelters and build affordable housing.
The organizations followed up with a letter to Newsom and legislative leaders, demanding the state continue to provide at least $1 billion per year in homeless/housing assistance for local governments. The letter states that 'ongoing funding provides a critical accountability tool for all levels of government' — a not-so-subtle retort to the premise behind Newsom's new website.
'We're playing roulette on who is responsible for solving homelessness in California,' Knaus told Playbook. 'And that is absolutely the wrong way to make progress.'
Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, said the governor isn't backing down from the tracking website. She noted that counties and cities have received $3.3 billion to address homelessness, including $760 million coming later this year.'The governor is done with excuses,' she said. 'Their numbers are their numbers — we just made it easier for their constituents to see.'
IN THE COURTS
FIRE AWAY — San Francisco-based federal Judge William Alsup ruled Thursday that the Office of Personnel Management broke the law when it ordered other federal agencies to terminate thousands of 'probationary' employees.
But his ruling does not appear to immediately help any of the federal workers who have already lost their jobs, report POLITICO's resident legal eagles Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney.
Alsup also stopped short of ordering the agencies to reinstate the fired workers or to halt looming firings, saying he doesn't currently have the authority to do that.
Still, the ruling is 'a setback for the Trump administration's ongoing effort to dramatically shrink the federal workforce,' Josh and Kyle write. Alsup ordered OPM to rescind any directives it has issued requiring the mass terminations and said OPM must inform several agencies that it has no power to dictate firings across the federal bureaucracy.
CLIMATE AND ENERGY
CALIFORNIA UNPLUGGED — Federal EV charger grants are just a drop in the bucket for California's overall funding pool. Read last night's California Climate to find out why Trump's attempt to claw dollars back could still have a major impact.
TOP TALKERS
HE'S JUST KEN — California Republican Rep. Ken Calvert has become Newsom's ally in trying to secure almost $40 billion for wildfire aid, Bloomberg reports.
'He certainly believes that California and these Los Angeles residents deserve the same federal aid that anyone else in the country deserves,' said Jason Gagnon, a Calvert spokesperson.
HERE TO HELP — Amador County Sheriff Gary Redman says he would work with ICE in certain situations, the Sacramento Bee reports.
He said he would not round up people for the federal agency, but would consider calling authorities if someone was being released from jail.
'I just feel it's my duty as sheriff,' he said.
BE MY GUEST — Sen. Alex Padilla hopes to send a message next week with his choice of guest to President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress. California's senior senator will be joined by Frank Lima, a longtime LA fire captain and union leader.
'As President Trump outlines his priorities for our country, we want to make clear that Los Angeles County cannot be forgotten,' Padilla said in a statement. 'The community faces a long road to recovery and we need a fully staffed and supported firefighting workforce and federal support without conditions.'
AROUND THE STATE
— A San Jose school district will close three elementary schools amid its $23 million budget shortfall. (San Jose Mercury News)
— The Fresno Police Department says it arrested two men for impersonating ICE officers and harassing customers in local businesses. (GV Wire)
— Mattie Scott is San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie's choice to replace Max Carter-Oberstone as police commissioner. (San Francisco Chronicle)
— compiled by Nicole Norman
PLAYBOOKERS
SPOTTED: FARMER MIKE — McGuire is awful proud of his roots with the Future Farmers of America. ICYMI: He busted out his FFA pride — and dance moves — when a gaggle of high schoolers with the group visited the Capitol this week.
'You can take the dude out of FFA, but you can't take the FFA out of the dude,' McGuire posted on X, along with a video of him doing a traditional FFA dance.
PEOPLE MOVES — Arie Dana is joining the Republican Jewish Coalition as deputy director of government affairs/director of executive branch relations. He most recently was chief of staff for Rep. Michelle Steel (R-Calif.).
— Chris Masami Myers has been promoted to director of governmental relations at the California School Employees Association. He was previously assistant director of governmental relations.
— Anastasia Baskerville and Ashley Hong have joined the law firm White Brenner LLP in its government affairs practice.
BIRTHDAYS — Cara Hewitt at Amazon … Adam Sieff …
BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Thursday): Noah Emmerich ... Eleanor Antin
WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans, be so for real. This embarrassing government is what you wanted?
Republicans, be so for real. This embarrassing government is what you wanted?

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Republicans, be so for real. This embarrassing government is what you wanted?

Republicans, be so for real. This embarrassing government is what you wanted? | Opinion Is this really what Republicans still want? Are they so scared of trans people having rights or undocumented immigrants receiving due process they chose a government that won't stand up to tyranny? Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Anyone could have predicted that President Donald Trump's second term was going to be an absolute disaster. I doubt even Republicans realized it would be this bad. Amid Trump's feud with Elon Musk, our tanking economy and our dysfunctional Congress, it seems that the next three and a half years are going to be rough on the country. I have to imagine that some Republican voters have buyer's remorse but would never admit it. I also realize that, for many Republican voters, a chaotic government is better than one that's run by a Democrat. They would rather watch our country become an international laughingstock than vote for someone who would run a stable, albeit more liberal, government. They would rather have millions lose health care than have a Democrats in power. I'll be the first to admit that Kamala Harris wasn't a perfect presidential candidate, but she was competent. She was energetic. She could ensure the country stayed on its course and continued to be a place where people felt secure. We could have had that. And Republicans in Congress would have done their job. Instead, we have this. So, this far into Trump's chaotic reign, I have to ask. Is this really what Republicans wanted? President Donald Trump vs. Elon Musk. Really? In case you missed it, Trump and Musk have gone from inseparable to enemies in a matter of hours. Musk, who was previously charged with leading the Department of Government Efficiency, has gone on X (previously Twitter) to allege that Trump was included in the Jeffrey Epstein files and whine that the Republicans would have lost the election without him. Trump, in response, has threatened to cancel all of Musk's contracts with the federal government. It's almost entertaining, in the way high school drama is entertaining. If only the entire country weren't on the verge of suffering because of it. Opinion: Musk erupts, claims Trump is in the Epstein files. Who could've seen this coming? If Harris had been elected, I doubt she would have made a narcissistic man-child one of her closest advisers in the first place – not just because Musk endorsed Trump, but because he was and continues to be a liability. She wouldn't have created DOGE and then allowed it to be a threat to Americans. Republicans, however, were unwilling to acknowledge the baggage that came with having Musk on their side. Now we have the president of the United States embroiled in a childish social media battle with the world's richest man. Think about how stupid that makes the country look. Is this what Republicans wanted? Is that what they still want? Surely they knew that the Trump-Musk partnership, like many of Trump's alliances, was going to implode. They are so scared of progressivism that they would rather have pettiness and vindictiveness in the White House. The American economy is not doing well. You wanted this? Trump, ever the businessman, has decided that making everything more expensive is what will make our country great again. His tariffs are expected to cost the average family $4,000 this year, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. I thought Republicans were the party of the working class. I thought they were supposed to care about grocery prices and the cost of living. But with the insanity of Trump's tariffs, a cooling job market and tax cuts that protect the wealthy, it seems like nothing is actually getting better for the average American. Our economy actually shrank. Opinion: Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me. Again, Republicans, you really wanted this? You were so scared of a government that was slightly more liberal that you would let everything get more expensive for working families? What were you afraid of – taxing billionaires? Helping first-time homebuyers? Harris' 'opportunity economy'? It seems like none of you thought this through. Or, worse, you did. The Republican Congress is a joke Another element of Trumpism is the fact that Republicans in Congress seem to be fine with the way he is completely dismantling the United States government. They don't care that his One Big Beautiful Bill Act is going to add to the deficit, so long as it's a Republican putting us further into debt. Some of them, like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, failed to even read the bill before voting for it. Their lack of interest is so substantial that she just admitted it openly. Opinion: Why can't Democrats take advantage of all this obvious Republican failure? If Harris had been elected, there would be no need for Congress to monitor her every move (even if they're failing to do that with Trump). Instead, we may have seen a legislature that, while divided, was able to function. We would have had checks and balances and likely significantly fewer executive orders, none of which would have tried to rewrite the U.S. Constitution. Once again – is this really what Republicans still want? Are they so scared of the possibility of trans people having rights or undocumented immigrants receiving due process that they would choose a government that won't stand up to tyranny? Would they really elect a tyrant in the first place? They did, so I suppose they must be OK with all of it. I can't get over the fact that Republicans willingly chose chaos over stability. They would rather say they won than have a functioning government or a stable economy. They would rather see our country suffer than admit that Trump is a raging lunatic. That isn't patriotism – it's partisanship. They would rather give Musk billions in federal contracts than help Americans in any way. This is what nearly half the country chose for the rest of us. And it doesn't seem like anyone is embarrassed about it. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno

Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold
Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold

President Donald Trump's suggestion that he may let Russia and Ukraine keep fighting has left US lawmakers in an awkward spot over their plan to force a ceasefire with 'bone-crushing' sanctions against Moscow. The Senate bill has more than 80 co-sponsors, an all-but-unheard-of level of bipartisan support. Yet although that kind of veto-proof backing is enough for the Senate to press ahead without White House backing, supporters show no sign they're ready to challenge the president.

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

time3 hours ago

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store