Are Murder Rates Plummeting Under Donald Trump? What We Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Homicide rates in the United States have dropped by an average of 20 percent since 2024, with record-low numbers of murders being recorded across the country, according to a crime data analyst.
Co-Founder of AH Datalytics, Jeff Asher, found that as of early May 2025, murders have fallen by 31.6 percent in Baltimore, 34.5 percent in St. Louis, 36.8 percent in Cleveland, 63 percent in Denver, 30.6 percent in New Orleans, 26.8 percent in New York, and 23.7 percent in Chicago.
The White House is taking credit for this fall. However, this reduction in homicides is part of a larger trend. In June 2024, homicide rates were down nearly 20 percent from 2023, and in 2023, homicide rates dropped by 13 percent from 2022.
Asher told Newsweek: "I think that it would be hard to give credit towards administration action, given that it really just a continuation of trends [and continuing on] momentum from things that were happening before."
It's still not clear how much it'll hold up for the rest of the year, but the drop in murder so far in 2025 is remarkable. Murder is down in 25 of the 30 cities that reported the most murders nationally in 2023.
[image or embed] — Jeff Asher (@jeffasher.bsky.social) May 6, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Why It Matters
Homicide rates skyrocketed during the pandemic, and are now falling to lower than pre-pandemic levels, signaling a positive move away from the lingering impacts of COVID-19 on American society.
What To Know
In 2020, during President Donald Trump's first term, the U.S. saw the fastest spike in murders in recorded history, with cities seeing an average rise in homicides of 30 percent, per the Brookings Institution.
More than 24,000 Americans died by homicide in the U.S. in 2020. These numbers remained high in 2021 and 2022.
Data analysis by the Brookings Institution found that homicide spikes occurred alongside spikes in unemployment in low-income areas, pointing to how a significant rise in people out of work could lead to higher crime rates.
Since then, homicide rates have been falling year on year. If rates continue to fall this year, then 2025 could see the lowest murder rate ever recorded in the U.S. As of mid-2025, the lowest recorded murder rate was in 2014.
In a post to Bluesky, Asher said: "It's still not clear how much it'll hold up for the rest of the year, but the drop in murder so far in 2025 is remarkable."
Asher told Newsweek that federal funding of community resources and construction can lead to a reduction in crime rates. In general, he is skeptical of the impact that any federal government can have on murder rates.
He added that, given the newness of the Trump administration to office, it is difficult to determine what impact it may have had on current homicide rates.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva
What People Are Saying
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Signal: "American families were promised their communities would be safer and President Trump swiftly delivered by vocally being tough on crime, unequivocally backing law enforcement, and standing firm on violent criminals being held to the fullest extent of the law."
Jeff Asher told Newsweek: "I think it's generally beyond the scope of any piece of legislation or any piece of federal action that tends to be a major driver [in homicide rates]."
What Happens Next
If homicide rates continue to fall, 2025 could see the lowest murder rate in recorded history.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's EU Allies Send Him New Ukraine Plea Ahead of Putin Summit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European Union (EU) leaders issued a fresh joint appeal to U.S. President Donald Trump on Ukraine, imploring him ahead of his crunch summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15. Kyiv and its European allies fear Trump will consent to the concession of Ukrainian territory Moscow has seized during its invasion, which they say will reward Russia for its unlawful aggression and signal that it could take similar action elsewhere. Twenty-six EU leaders—Hungary being the only member state that did not want to co-sign—said in the statement Tuesday that they welcomed Trump's efforts to end Russia's invasion and seek "a just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine". But they warned: "A just and lasting peace that brings stability and security must respect international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and that international borders must not be changed by force. "The people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. "Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine has wider implications for European and international security. We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.
Business Insider
11 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump May Allow Nvidia (NVDA) to Sell Scaled-Down Blackwell Chips to China
President Donald Trump said on Monday that he might allow Nvidia (NVDA) to sell a scaled-down version of its most advanced AI chip, the Blackwell, to China. Indeed, he told reporters that he would consider approving the sale if the chip's performance was reduced by about 30% to 50%, describing it as a 'somewhat enhanced — in a negative way — Blackwell' processor. Trump's comments came as he confirmed a separate deal that allows Nvidia to sell its less-powerful H20 AI chip to China if the company pays 15% of the revenue from those sales to the U.S. government. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) will also pay the same percentage on revenue from its MI308 chip. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The H20 revenue-sharing deal and the possibility of a similar arrangement for the Blackwell are examples of Trump's strategy to secure financial benefits for the U.S. in exchange for lower trade restrictions. However, experts warn that these kinds of agreements could set a precedent for all American companies selling to China and might weaken the national security argument behind the current export controls. Indeed, it is worth noting that U.S. restrictions currently classify the Blackwell chip as too powerful to be sold in China. As a result, Nvidia and AMD have both seen their China sales drop sharply due to these rules. And while the Trump administration has started issuing permits for some shipments, the approved chips are older models that are no more advanced than those already made in China, thereby limiting their appeal. However, a newer but less powerful Blackwell could help Nvidia win back customers in China if approved. Unsurprisingly, though, Nvidia has said it is working on a new chip for the Chinese market and will look to receive export approval. What Is a Good Price for NVDA? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on NVDA stock based on 35 Buys, three Holds, and one Sell assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average NVDA price target of $187.57 per share implies 3% upside potential.
Boston Globe
33 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
How public health — not handcuffs — can heal Mass. and Cass
I am deeply familiar with the challenges at Mass. and Cass and do not dismiss their severity. I am a lifelong Bostonian who experienced street homelessness and substance-use disorder. As an adolescent, I spent time in juvenile detention because of my substance use, and I was court-ordered into involuntary treatment for nearly a year. As an adult, I began working in the substance-use field, serving as policy director for the City of Boston's Office of Recovery Services for five years. Advertisement In the years since I left my city role, I have been Advertisement Many South End residents — along with This shift is mirrored nationally. President Trump recently signed an executive order, Some local leaders have been eerily silent about how much federal interference they would support at Mass. and Cass. When More criminalization will not improve Mass. and Cass, however. We cannot simply lock complicated social issues away. America has a long history of political decisions creating harmful and inhumane policies. Before the 1960s, involuntary commitment was the only way Americans dealt with mental health and substance-use disorders. The threshold for Advertisement People were most often institutionalized by police. By the 1930s, police officers were responsible for Public opinion started to turn against involuntary commitment in the 1950s. Americans rightly considered it to be cruel and ineffective. Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson both facilitated changes to involuntary commitment through landmark civil rights and health care legislation. In 1967, California's Ronald Reagan was the These days, an incarcerated person is 40 to 129 times as likely as the general public Advertisement Growing economic inequality, soaring housing costs, and dwindling living-wage jobs have led to Americans must prioritize public health policies that have caused a Boston should replicate the Boston has a much lower rate of unsheltered people compared to the national average, but there is more work to do. The city should expand congregate housing options that allow residents to cohabitate with a partner or pet; Victory Programs' Advertisement If locking people up for using drugs or being unhoused were effective, it would have worked by now. Americans can only address homelessness and problematic drug use by following public health data and investing accordingly. A Band-Aid is not enough to treat a bullet wound. If we spend less time and money criminalizing poor people and more on proven public health measures, we'd all be healthier and safer.
