Tesla Battles Nine Major Legal Action That Could Dent Musk's EV Empire
From Autopilot crash verdicts to right-to-repair fights, here's why Tesla's lawyers are burning rubber.
Tesla's not just racing Porsche on Nürburgring leaderboards — it's in a different kind of endurance test. The company is defending itself on multiple legal tracks at once, with billions of dollars, regulatory approval, and investor confidence all at stake.
From the $329 million Autopilot verdict in Florida to the class-action punches over its Robotaxi debut, here's Tesla's legal jeopardy scoreboard. And this is not exhaustive!
The Legal Docket
Case / Issue
Summary
Scale / Status
Autopilot fatal crash verdict
Florida jury orders $329M penalty after a 2019 crash on Autopilot.
Historic first verdict tying Tesla to a third-party death.
Robotaxi shareholder suit
Investors claim safety misstatements inflated stock before Austin launch.
Filed Aug 2025. Potential class-wide damages.
California DMV false-marketing case
DMV says 'Autopilot' label misled buyers; wants 30-day sales ban in CA.
Hearing finished July 2025; ruling pending.
DOJ criminal probe
Federal inquiry into fraud over self-driving statements.
Active; no public findings yet.
Phantom-braking & other consumer suits
Class actions over sudden braking, range claims, warranties.
Multiple cases alive in federal courts.
Workplace bias & harassment
Racial harassment and retaliation claims from staff and ex-HR pros.
Ongoing litigation; some large settlements reduced on retrial.
Right-to-repair antitrust actions
Owners say Tesla locks out independent repairs and parts.
Two claims advancing under CA law.
Whistleblower solar-fire claims
Alleged retaliation for reporting defective solar products.
SEC probe continues.
Odometer manipulation lawsuit
Plaintiffs say Tesla inflated odometer readings to void warranties early.
Class action in California; could affect over 1M vehicles
Why It Matters to the Car World
The Autopilot crash verdict is more than a legal loss—it's the first time a jury has said Tesla shares blame for a death tied to its driver-assist tech. If you're a fan of steering feel, suspension compliance, or road feedback, think about this: every Autopilot failure is also a reminder of what gets lost when software makes decisions instead of the driver's hands and seat-of-the-pants instinct.
The Robotaxi lawsuit strikes at Tesla's hype machine. For enthusiasts, the appeal of a Tesla has always been the combination of instant torque, low center of gravity, and that clean cabin feel. If investors win on claims that autonomy was oversold, the company might shift resources away from chassis refinement and long-trip comfort to pay for settlements.
The Bigger Picture
Competitors like Porsche and Mercedes are pushing adaptive driver-assist systems, but they've avoided Tesla's courtroom exposure by framing them as aids, not chauffeurs. Tesla's choice to market 'Full Self-Driving' as near-human has put it in the crosshairs.
A California sales ban, even for a month, would hit Tesla where it's most entrenched. And right-to-repair lawsuits? They speak directly to gearheads who like tinkering—Tesla's lockouts run counter to the American garage culture.
Bottom Line
Tesla's legal troubles aren't background noise—they're part of the main act now. The company is still quick off the line in EV performance, but the track ahead is lined with subpoenas, regulatory hurdles, and shareholder fury. If you care about the cars themselves, watch these cases. They'll shape not just the brand's balance sheet, but how much control you have over the car in your driveway.
Tesla Battles Nine Major Legal Action That Could Dent Musk's EV Empire first appeared on Autoblog on Aug 17, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Aug 17, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
25 minutes ago
- Business Insider
NIO Stock Soars 10% as Newly Launched ES8 SUV Takes Aim at TSLA
Chinese EV maker Nio Inc. (NIO) has introduced its all-new ES8 SUV, a spacious three-row model now available for pre-order in China. Following the news, NIO stock jumped 10% on Thursday, as investors reacted positively to the company's latest push in the premium EV market. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Nio's ES8 SUV is seen as a direct response to Tesla's (TSLA) recently launched Model Y L in China. TSLA's vehicle saw a strong start, gaining attention for its spacious design and strong performance. Nio's ES8 Gets Bigger and More Affordable The ES8 is Nio's largest battery-electric SUV to date, available in six- and seven-seat versions. It features a 520-kW dual-motor system and advanced autonomous driving supported by three LiDAR sensors and a 4D imaging radar. Importantly, the price starts at about $58,000. This makes it about 25% cheaper than its predecessor and brings it closer in price to Tesla's Model Y. The pricing move is a key part of Nio's strategy to gain market share in the highly competitive Chinese EV market. To attract early orders, NIO has rolled out promotional incentives, including pre-order discounts and benefits for existing NIO owners who repurchase. NIO Rolls Out Back-to-Back New Models The ES8 launch follows Nio's July rollout of the ONVO L90, a mid-size SUV under its new family-focused brand. The L90 is priced under $37,000, and it targets everyday buyers looking for value and comfort. Just 10 days after launch, Nio delivered over 4,000 units, and it is expected to pass 10,000 deliveries in August. This strong demand is helping Nio bounce back in China's competitive EV market. Is Nio a Buy, Sell, or Hold? Overall, Wall Street has a Hold consensus rating on NIO stock, based on three Buys, seven Holds, and one Sell assigned in the last three months. The average NIO stock price target of $4.67 implies 15.55% downside risk from current levels.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Federal regulators probe Tesla over not properly reporting crashes involving Autopilot and Full Self-Driving
Tesla is once again in the crosshairs of federal regulators. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced Wednesday that it is investigating allegations that Tesla is not correctly reporting crashes involving its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems. In the probe notice, the NHTSA said that car companies are required to report crashes involving autonomous or advanced driver assistance systems within five days of being notified of them. The regulator alleged that Tesla submitted reports months after the incident, sometimes in batches or on a rolling basis. "Preliminary engagement between [Office of Defects Investigation] and Tesla on the issue indicates that the timing of the reports was due to an issue with Tesla's data collection, which, according to Tesla, has now been fixed," according to the NHTSA's notice. "NHTSA is opening this Audit Query, a standard process for reviewing compliance with legal requirements, to evaluate the cause of the potential delays in reporting, the scope of any such delays, and the mitigations that Tesla has developed to address them." The NHTSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Dan O'Dowd, founder of The Dawn Project, a tech safety advocacy group, pointed out to Business Insider that according to Tesla's crash-counting methodology listed on its website, the company only counts crashes involving airbag deployments and if Autopilot was engaged within five seconds before the crash. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2022, the NHTSA said it was investigating Tesla's Model 3 and Model Y vehicles over an alleged phenomenon known as " phantom braking," which is when the vehicle suddenly slams on the brakes for no reason, often at high speeds. In 2020, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on what was then Twitter that phantom braking would be fixed in a coming software update, but he has not commented further since then. On August 1, a Florida judge ordered Tesla to pay $242 million in damages after finding the EV partly to blame for a 2019 crash that killed a 22-year-old woman and seriously injured her boyfriend. The driver was using Autopilot and had briefly looked away when the crash took place. Musk said on X that the company would appeal the decision. Another lawsuit brought by California's Department of Motor Vehicles alleges that Tesla's use of language in advertising Autopilot and FSD has misled consumers into thinking the vehicles are more autonomous than they really are. The case could see Tesla's right to sell in California suspended for at least 30 days. Attorney Matthew Benedetto, a member of Tesla's legal team, denied the allegations and told an administrative judge last month that the company informed customers that they "cannot fully rely" on FSD or Autopilot.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Tesla's (TSLA) Autopilot in Hot Seat as NHTSA Probes Crash Reporting Delays
Tesla (TSLA) is under fresh regulatory scrutiny. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched a probe into the EV giant's delayed reporting of crashes involving its Autopilot and full self-driving (FSD) systems. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Under federal rules, automakers must report crashes involving advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) within five days of learning about them. Tesla, which typically receives crash data within minutes via automated alerts, has reportedly submitted incident reports months after the actual events. NHTSA cited numerous cases where Tesla failed to meet the required timeline, raising concerns about transparency and compliance. The 'audit query' will determine the reasons for these reporting delays, confirm whether the provided information is complete and accurate, and whether Tesla has taken any corrective actions. Importantly, Tesla attributed the delays to a data collection error, claiming the issue has since been resolved. Ongoing Scrutiny of Tesla's Autonomous Technology This latest investigation adds to a series of ongoing probes by the safety agency into Tesla's technology. Since October, NHTSA has been looking into crashes involving Tesla's FSD system in low-visibility conditions. That probe covers 2.4 million vehicles and follows four reported crashes, one of which was fatal in 2023. Further, NHTSA is investigating 2.6 million Tesla vehicles in a separate case, started in January. This probe looks into crashes tied to a feature that allows remote vehicle movement. These probes come at a critical time for the company, which recently launched a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, and plans to roll out autonomous features to millions of vehicles via software updates. Thus, the outcome of this investigation could impact Tesla's ambitious push into autonomous driving. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? Turning to Wall Street, TSLA stock has a Hold consensus rating based on 14 Buys, 15 Holds, and eight Sells assigned in the last three months. At $307.23, the average Tesla price target implies a 4.34% upside potential. The stock has declined 2% over the past six months.
