Ramaphosa slams opposition parties' criticism of economic reform
President Cyril Ramaphosa has slammed opposition parties who claim the economic reforms in the country represent a 'form of privatisation'.
Ramaphosa said South Africa is making steady progress on economic reform to combat an unreliable energy supply, inefficient rail and ports, high data costs and a visa system that has deterred investors and tourists.
Progress report
Last week Pretoria released a progress report on Operation Vulindlela, a government-wide initiative to accelerate progress on economic reform.
Established in the aftermath of Covid in October 2020, the joint initiative of the Presidency and National Treasury was formed with the aim of driving rapid and inclusive economic growth and job creation through structural reforms.
The first phase of Operation Vulindlela focused on tackling issues in five areas – energy, logistics, water, telecommunications and the visa system.
ALSO READ: 'Operation Vulindlela update provides detailed progress' – Presidency
'Baseless claims'
Writing in his weekly newsletter on Monday, he said South Africa has made progress despite criticism from opposition parties.
'The claims by some opposition parties that these reforms represent a form of privatisation are baseless and misguided. The measures we are taking are common sense reforms that will preserve public ownership of key infrastructure while introducing greater competition, dynamism and investment.
'A number of our peer countries introduced similar reforms, which have powered their economies to higher levels of growth,' Ramaphosa said.
Steady progress
Ramaphosa said the Operation Vulindlela report showed that the economic reform programme is making steady progress, opening the way to more rapid, inclusive and sustainable growth and job creation.
'We have made significant progress since then in clearing these obstacles with a clear view to enhance economic growth. The reduction in load shedding over the past year was supported by the reforms that we introduced to unlock private investment in electricity generation, while reforms in the telecommunications sector have brought down the cost of mobile data.
'We have reduced the turnaround times for approval processes for water use licences and energy projects, made great progress in clearing the visa application backlog, and expanding the eVisa scheme,' Ramaphosa said.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa defends police commission of inquiry
Next phase
Ramaphosa said the next phase of Operation Vulindlela, which was initiated in April this year, builds on 'these successes'.
'As part of Operation Vulindlela Phase II, we are also reforming the local government system to ensure that basic services such as water and electricity – which are essential for economic growth – are delivered efficiently and reliably.'
Ramaphosa said all of these reforms are 'designed to boost economic growth and create jobs for South Africans'.
ALSO READ: 'Ramaphosa will go down in history as one of the most useless presidents' – analyst
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Cartoon of the day: 22 July 2025
Who will get rid of the rats eating SA's state resources Corruption, greed, and political parasites are siphoning money and state resources meant to help the most vulnerable. A 2024 Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index ranked South Africa 82nd out of 180 countries for corruption, with 1 being the least corrupt and 180 the most. SA sits alongside Cuba, Hungary, and Tanzania on the ranking. Ivory Coast, Botswana and Namibia are all less corrupt, according to the index. 'The global trend of weakening justice systems is reducing accountability for public officials, which allows corruption to thrive. Both authoritarian and democratic leaders are undermining justice. This is increasing impunity for corruption and even encouraging it by eliminating consequences for criminals. 'Corrupt acts like bribery and abuse of power are also infiltrating many courts and other justice institutions across the globe. Where corruption is the norm, vulnerable people have restricted access to justice while the rich and powerful capture whole justice systems, at the expense of the common good,' it noted in a previous report. Rot in the police While widespread corruption has become increasingly normalised, and the rot has set in across most of government, the spotlight has fallen on the SA Police Service in recent weeks. President Cyril Ramaphosa has reportedly had a report on issues in the police on his desk for more than a year, but did not act on the crisis until KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi alleged that several high-profile officials, including Ramaphosa's own cabinet member Senzo Mchunu, were involved in political interference, corruption, and collusion with criminal syndicates. He has since announced a judicial commission of inquiry to look into the allegations.
IOL News
32 minutes ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa just doesn't cut it and Mayor Xaba is keeping our land from us
Alexander the Great shows just why Ukrainian heavyweight world boxing champion Oleksandr Usyk who retained his heavyweight title after beating UK challenger Daniel Dubois over the weekend is an example as to why the Ukrainian armed forces have given the Russian invaders a bloody nose and having held the front line for 3 years. Ukrainian fighters are as tough as teak and this streak comes through in Usyk who fights in the ring for every man and woman living in the trenches in Eastern Ukraine. When Russia invaded Ukraine 3 years ago Usyk left the boxing ring in Europe after a call from a relative, got on a plane, flew to Poland and drove across the border to Kyiv …. He was in the trenches inside a week ! This is what Ukrainians are made of and the reason they will never ever give up. The people of Ukraine have much to be proud of. Slava Ukraini! | Colin Bosman Newlands National dialogue an insult or distraction? On behalf of SAFI (the South African Friends of Israel) I must share how deeply dismayed we are by the shocking absence of evangelical representation on the panel of 'eminent persons' selected for President Ramaphosa's R700-million National Dialogue. While the president insists the dialogue is meant to be citizen-led and non-partisan, the deliberate exclusion of evangelical voices, such as those of Pastor Bert Pretorius, who represents over 19 900 churches and half of South Africa's Christian population, raises serious concerns about the inclusivity and legitimacy of the initiative. This glaring omission undermines the credibility of a process billed as a path toward national unity. Faith-based organisations have always been central to South Africa's moral and political awakening, from resisting Apartheid to fostering reconciliation. Ignoring their contribution today suggests this dialogue is less about unity and more about political optics – perhaps even a thinly veiled prelude to the ANC's local election campaign. South Africans have already spoken through the ballot box in 2024, giving rise to a Government of National Unity. What citizens demand now is implementation, not more rhetoric. With unemployment at 32.9%, basic services failing, and daily life growing more difficult, a taxpayer-funded talkshop feels like a distraction at best and an insult at worst. It's time to govern, not consult. | Daniel Jacobi Executive Director, South African Friends of Israel Ramaphosa fails to inspire confidence Cyril Ramaphosa hit the eject button long ago. The last time he inspired trust was in 2018, when he took a stroll on the Cape Town promenade, pretending to be a man of the people. Since then, he's revealed himself as possibly one of the most radical leaders in recent memory. A real captain stays with a sinking ship, but not Ramaphosa. He's doubled down on some of the most destructive, racist policies South Africa has seen. When crisis strikes, he doesn't calm the flames – he throws petrol on them. His silence on Malema's Kill the Boer chant, indifference toward farm murders, and fixation with Foreign Affairs in the GNU should've set off loud alarm bells. Add to that his ties with Police Minister Mchunu – exposed by the fearless General Mkwanazi – and the picture darkens. Economically, we are bleeding. Politically, we're in disarray. Drug trafficking, political assassinations, vanishing dockets, no arrests of senior politicians, and radical BEE laws – this country is in worse shape than under Zuma! Ramaphosa hasn't just inherited the baton of State Capture – he's running full tilt with it. We are leaderless, rudderless. The ship has hit the iceberg and Ramaphosa, with his well-connected cadres, has already fled in lifeboats, leaving the rest of us to drown. No matter h ow often the ANC is exposed – by Trump, the World Bank, Solidarity, Afriforum or Mkwanazi –Ramaphosa remains unfazed. Not even Marikana, Phala Phala or his White House embarrassment rattled him. He just giggles, throws in a joke, or speaks in that slow, hypnotic drone. But the public has had enough. No more commissions. No more empty promises. No more 'family meetings' or excuses for incompetence. We must now rally behind honest voices like General Mkwanazi. Ramaphosa's weaponisation of apartheid is nothing more than an exhausted ploy to maintain power. His repeated refrain – 'we are on a journey, and much still needs to be done' – has worn thin. The damage is done. It's time the people pushed back. | L Oosthuizen Durban They seized the day and now lead the way Raymond Ackerman's Pick n Pay was once a leading retailer. Now it's a poor second to Checkers. During Covid, Pick n Pay, Spar and Woolworths were in slumberland. Checkers saw the opportunity a lockdown presented and raced ahead with its online shopping. It was a hit with customers as many found it a convenient way of shopping. Nine out of 10 times, you see Checkers 60/60 motor cycles on the roads delivering groceries and food. You rarely see Pick n Pay, Spar or Woolworths delivery bikes. Checkers even brought celebrity chef Jamie Oliver to South Africa to promote its 60/60 delivery service. Then belatedly Pick n Pay got a rap artist who didn't make much of an impression. Pick n Pay cannot even get its advertising right. It's advertising pages are crowded with importantly, is the location of some of its shops. I know of three Pick n Pay shops which are sited in the wrong place. In Chatsworth the Pick n Pay shop is not in the busy mall but away from it, as cross the road. The dame with Malvern Pick n Pay which is now isolated from the new stylish Malvern Park Shopping Centre. Customers are drawn to the new mall where Checkers is the anchor Kloof the Field's Hill Pick n Pay has suffered the same fate. Customers find Village Mall with its clothing shops, Spar, Post Office, banks, Clicks and several fast food outlets more convenient .Checkers is way ahead of the pack and left its stragglers far behind. | Thyagaraj Markandan Kloof You, Mr Mayor, are keeping land from us Dear ANC Mayor Cyril Xaba In your Metro Newspaper of June 27-July 10, 2025, you said: 'The Proactive Land Release Strategy, approved by Council in 2021, was to give effect to Section (5) of our Constitution, obligating the Council to take reasonable legislative and other means, to foster conditions to enable citizens to gain access to land on an equitable basis.' Really Mayor Xaba? Twenty-seven years for the ANC-led eThekwini Municipality to wake up to the Constitution? Going against AA and EE, the ANC retained Wim van Heerden as Director of Real Estate Department for three years, then placed another White, Keith Matthias, to run and ruin the Council's Real Estate Department for over 25 years. Was the ANC expecting these White Apartheid architects of the former NP-run Durban City Council, to undo Apartheid and return our lands? Really! This strategy was to punish Indians who didn't vote ANC and prevent us from getting claimed land back! What destruction and division did your ANC cause in 31 years with and without the help of the EFF and Minority Front, Patrick Pillay, Roy Moodley (MOSA) , Visvin Reddy etc, in coalition? Yet the Constitution instructs you to rectify historic imbalance of land ownership and distribution, but you do the opposite of restitution. The goal was to create an environment for everyone to have equal access to land for housing, agriculture, business etc. You have failed Indians badly. Racism – anti-Indian, anti–restitution of claimed lands; is this what the ANC stands for? Our claimed lands were overun by your illegal, land-invading, bussed voters. Your ANC sold our Indian claimed lands illegally to Moreland Properties, and Rivers Church, among others. Are you waiting for us to die or get fed up and walk away? When the ANC in eEthekwini Municipality employs/imports a youth from Gauteng, Thaphelo Mmsunyane, as Director of Real Estate and ignores the others in Durban with degrees and much more experience, skin and cadre over merit, then we are sinking. He has no experience of Apartheid, so refuses to meet with us and undo it, much like his predecessors, Van Heerden and Mathias. What a shame that your ANC co-run eThekwini Municipality has taken the place of the New National Party and supporters of your own Group Areas Action & Apartheid by keeping Indians in Chatsworth, Phoenix, Verulam and out of Durban North, Glen Anil, Riverside, Greyville, Cato Manor, the Bluff, Newlands etc where they were removed from. | Robin Naidoo Chairman ILCA (Indian Land Claimants Association), Phoenix DAILY NEWS
The Citizen
32 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Why mass deportation is failing SA's immigration system
Deportations are draining resources without solving immigration challenges. It's time to rethink our approach. Suspects in custody at the China Plaza Mall this month at Umbilo in Durban. It is reported that some companies hire illegal immigrants instead of local workers. Picture: Gallo Images Minister Leon Schreiber's budget speech in the National Assembly recently was rich in energy, statistics and digital reform promises. Yet, it was preceded by two quieter signals: a sobering portfolio committee report on budgetary pressures and Schreiber's own estimate, in February, that the department would have to 'make do with what it has'. Schreiber invoked the logic of compound interest to illustrate how smart, sustained action can yield exponential returns. However, if deportations are the investment and deterrence the return, then the department appears to be compounding inefficiencies, not public value. In a year marked by an unprecedented surge in deportation numbers, the question is not whether home affairs is working harder – as it clearly is – the question is whether it's working smarter. Does investing in mass deportations still make budgetary and policy sense, even to those who support the politically charged, somewhat frustrated, optics and xenophobic populism of groups like Operation Dudula, ostensibly in the name of preserving scarce public resources for South Africans? Home affairs allocated R897 million to its immigration affairs programme in the 2024-25 financial year. A significant portion of this is dedicated to enforcement: detentions, deportations and border management. ALSO READ: Reports of SA man arrested in US as eSwatini welcomes immigrants deported from US Lindela Repatriation Centre alone costs R6 million per month, or R70 million per year, and this is just to detain individuals prior to deportation. Schreiber reported that the department 'deported over 46 000 illegal immigrants, the highest number in five years and more than countries like France and Germany combined'. This dramatic operational scale should give rise to serious questions about sustainability. In its official reply to the parliamentary committee, the department confirmed that deportation-related expenditure for the full 2024-25 fiscal year was reported at R73 million. Against this expenditure, the reality remains that the estimated number of undocumented or fraudulently documented foreigners is not just highly vague, but often miscalculated and politically weaponised. Estimates range from a conservative one million, to higher estimates of over three million, and inflated figures up to six million. ALSO READ: Greece freezes asylum claims over migrant 'invasion' from Libya Whichever figure one accepts, deporting 69 000 people per year means addressing only a fraction of that population annually. This risks remaining an endless loop of ineffective, reactive policy that burns public funds without shifting the underlying dynamic. What if we were to imagine a different approach? One grounded not in fear and reaction, but in revenue, data integrity and constitutional accountability. What if we dared to imagine a two-year amnesty programme: undocumented migrants, or those holding fraudulent documents, coming forward voluntarily to undergo background and biometric checks, and for a temporary determined period of time to be granted an exemption against the payment of a nominal fee – for instance, a processing fee of R1 500 per person. Such fee to be payable to the department over and above the service fees otherwise applicable if the programme were to be administered via VFS Global, as was done with the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit process, plus a biometric fee. If even half of the cautiously estimated one million undocumented migrants applied, the department would raise R750 million in direct revenue. ALSO READ: Bus driver arrested after transporting nearly 80 undocumented Zimbabweans Full uptake could easily generate R1.5 billion over two years, more than enough to self-fund the programme, build biometric records, clear long-standing backlogs and allocate human resources more efficiently across departments. The programme could break even or even yield a surplus, particularly if digitised infrastructure is used. While deportations drain resources and create logistical bottlenecks, an amnesty has the potential to generate revenue, improve compliance and restore trust. An amnesty-driven regularisation effort would enable the state to capture biometric and identity data on hundreds of thousands of individuals currently operating outside the legal system. This foundational layer of information is essential to any system of immigration governance based on integrity, accountability and national security. Second, such a programme would help identify and isolate fraud syndicates through forensic vetting processes. ALSO READ: Politicians dangle immigration control as election bait Third, it would give the department institutional breathing room to focus on sustainable, digitised, rule-based migration governance. It would also free up public resources. An amnesty would signal a fundamental shift: that immigration control in South Africa is not just about keeping people out, but about governing the presence of those already here in a rational, rule-based way. This is not a plea for porous borders. It is a call for budgetary logic and long-term strategy. Deportation has its place, especially where criminality or risk is involved. But when used as a blanket policy response to a decades-old systemic failure, it becomes expensive and futile.
