Liberal Senator Anne Ruston suggests Chris Bowen should 'have been fired years ago' in scathing takedown of Energy Minister
Liberal Senator Anne Ruston has issued a scathing assessment of Labor's policies under Chris Bowen, declaring the Energy Minister "would have been fired years ago" if he had been working for a private business.
Following its emphatic victory in the May federal election, Labor has doubled down on its controversial renewables-led push to achieve net zero emissions.
Speaking at the National Press Club on Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese suggested his party's victory demonstrated a clear mandate for the plan, despite ongoing community concerns surrounding several high profile projects.
Mr Bowen, too, has doubled down on the push, insisting renewables remain the "cleanest and cheapest" way to power the national grid.
However, Senator Ruston was quick to push back against the claims, accusing both men of "completely destroying the very thing that underpins our economy".
"The Prime Minister just seems to be completely blind to any other solution, whatever that might be, so that Australians can have a reliable and affordable power," she told Sky News following Mr Albanese's address.
"All he seems to caring about is his pursuit of this ideological sort of renewable energy future that he's proving not to be deliverable.
"The government constantly is providing subsidies and handouts and the like of taxpayers' money to fix up a problem that is of their own making.
"Our power bills were supposed to have gone down by this year. Clearly, the complete opposite's happened with increases of over $1,000."
Senator Ruston then singled out Mr Bowen for particular criticism, as she questioned why Labor continued to stand by what she described as a "failed policy pursuit".
"If Chris Bowen was an executive in any sensible company around Australia he would have been fired years ago and yet he still stays in this job completely destroying the very thing that underpins our economy and that's affordable and reliable energy," she said.
The Senator's takedown of the government's energy plans comes as the Coalition continues to struggle internally over its own stance on net zero.
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce and Senator Matt Canavan have been amongst a handful of high-profile members pushing for the opposition to scrap their commitment to the emissions reduction target.
However, others within the Liberal Party have warned the Coalition risks losing even more support in urban areas if it abandons the pledge, with Labor and Teal independents both positioning themselves as strong on the environment.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has said the Coalition would review its stance on the issue and Senator Ruston was similarly coy when she addressed the party's stance.
"We're taking a very considered approach to making sure that the Coalition's energy policy going to the next election is one that will deliver reliable and affordable power, at the same time as making sure emissions reduction is part of the mix," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
an hour ago
- Canberra Times
Stricter IVF regulation on cards as clinic boss quits
"That sort of rapid growth in that industry, particularly a highly commercialised sector, means that there are potential risks or concerns about best practice in the absence of really comprehensive regulation with appropriate oversight and enforcement. "The issue is not just the quality of the regulation, it's also about the consistency and ensuring that the same standards apply to all Australians."
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it
The Australian national security establishment's worst nightmare has arrived. The Trump administration is putting AUKUS to a review. A review many fear will put the $368 billion submarine deal to the sword. Led by Elbridge Colby, defence undersecretary and noted AUKUS sceptic, the Pentagon's review will assess whether the deal meets the president's 'America First' agenda. It was always very unlikely that any presidential administration would be willing to hand over some of the crown jewels of the US Navy's fleet to Australia, which is what the first part of the deal involved – the United States giving Australia control of some Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines. We don't know much about the details of the deal, but we do know that the US always had a get out clause there. It's up to the president to decide whether to hand them over, and really, why would they? Now, it's possible the Trump administration will tank the whole thing. And we can safely assume that won't mean handing back the $800 million Australia has already invested, no strings attached, in the US shipbuilding industry in the vain hope that would accelerate production rates. AUKUS was always a disastrous deal for Australia. We were never likely to get any submarines, and all the deal does is tie us ever closer to an increasingly volatile and aggressive America. AUKUS would not have made Australia safer. It would have made us more vulnerable and compromised our ability to make independent decisions about our own security. Trump has given us an opportunity to get out. We should take it. Australians already knew that Trump is not to be trusted. Polling by The Australia Institute done back in March found that more Australians considered the US president a bigger threat to global peace than the leaders of the world's two most powerful authoritarian states in Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Almost half (49 per cent) said they felt less secure since the election of Trump.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it
The Australian national security establishment's worst nightmare has arrived. The Trump administration is putting AUKUS to a review. A review many fear will put the $368 billion submarine deal to the sword. Led by Elbridge Colby, defence undersecretary and noted AUKUS sceptic, the Pentagon's review will assess whether the deal meets the president's 'America First' agenda. It was always very unlikely that any presidential administration would be willing to hand over some of the crown jewels of the US Navy's fleet to Australia, which is what the first part of the deal involved – the United States giving Australia control of some Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines. We don't know much about the details of the deal, but we do know that the US always had a get out clause there. It's up to the president to decide whether to hand them over, and really, why would they? Now, it's possible the Trump administration will tank the whole thing. And we can safely assume that won't mean handing back the $800 million Australia has already invested, no strings attached, in the US shipbuilding industry in the vain hope that would accelerate production rates. AUKUS was always a disastrous deal for Australia. We were never likely to get any submarines, and all the deal does is tie us ever closer to an increasingly volatile and aggressive America. AUKUS would not have made Australia safer. It would have made us more vulnerable and compromised our ability to make independent decisions about our own security. Trump has given us an opportunity to get out. We should take it. Australians already knew that Trump is not to be trusted. Polling by The Australia Institute done back in March found that more Australians considered the US president a bigger threat to global peace than the leaders of the world's two most powerful authoritarian states in Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Almost half (49 per cent) said they felt less secure since the election of Trump.
