logo
The U.S. and China are copying each other, giving rise to memes and mockery

The U.S. and China are copying each other, giving rise to memes and mockery

NBC News09-04-2025
President Donald Trump wants to bring back American manufacturing in ways that would reshape the United States economy to look more like China's. The campaign, which has led to a rapidly escalating trade war with China, has given ample social media fodder to Chinese and American observers alike.
Announcing a series of sweeping tariffs in a move dubbed 'Liberation Day,' Trump said last week that this will lead factories to move production back to American shores, boosting the U.S. economy after 'foreign leaders have stolen our jobs, foreign cheaters have ransacked our factories, and foreign scavengers have torn apart our once beautiful American dream.'
In a Truth Social post Wednesday, Trump announced that he is raising tariffs on goods imported from China to 125%, up from the 104% that took effect the same day, due to 'the lack of respect that China has shown to the World's Markets.'
Meme-makers and Chinese government officials have in recent days begun pointing out the irony of Trump's tariff-driven manufacturing pivot through AI-generated satire and political cartoons that have percolated online, with many American users boosting the jokes.
One video poking fun at the Trump administration's attempted pivot to American manufacturing has accumulated millions of views on X since a user posted it on TikTok earlier this week. The clip, seemingly generated with artificial intelligence, showed workers sewing garments and assembling mobile devices in a factory, followed by a screen touting: 'Make America Great Again.'
Others reshared an old political cartoon depicting Trump, with nearly everything in the drawing, including the president's suit and the American flag he's raising, labeled as being 'Made in China' — all except for Trump's own gaseous product, which is labeled as 'Made in USA.'
Official Chinese accounts have also gotten in on the fun. Last weekend, Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, posted a meme appearing to mock Trump for imposing tariffs on several largely barren Antarctic islands inhabited by penguins rather than people.
Some have been subtler with their critiques. On Monday, the Chinese Embassy reposted a clip of a 1987 speech given by President Ronald Reagan, whose economic agenda hugely influenced mainstream Republican economics today. In it, Reagan staunchly defends free trade.
'You see, at first when someone says, 'Let's impose tariffs on foreign imports,' it looks like they're doing a patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes, for a short while, it works. But only for a short time,' Reagan says in the clip, before launching into a list of consequences.
Trump's calls to embrace domestic manufacturing come as China has pushed to make its economy look more like that of the U.S. Aiming to reduce its economic reliance on exports, China has been struggling to encourage domestic consumption, expanding subsidies for home appliances such as microwaves and rice cookers, as well as smartphones and other electronic devices.
By contrast, Trump's vision for the United States, whose high consumption of Chinese-manufactured goods has helped propel China's economic rise, involves industrial revival for everything from aluminum refining to shipbuilding.
At least in the short term, both the U.S. and Chinese goals are 'pipe dreams,' said Ian Johnson, formerly a senior fellow for China studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
'China has been trying for decades to promote consumption or to get people to consume more, but for a variety of reasons Chinese people aren't willing to do that,' Johnson said in a phone interview Tuesday, citing the lack of social safety net that drives high levels of personal savings.
'The government hasn't changed structural issues that hold back consumption,' Johnson said. 'So until they do that, that's not going to work.'
On the U.S. side, Johnson said, 'it's difficult because the government is trying to turn back the clock and I don't think that's fully possible, no matter how high the tariffs are.'
'You're never going to bring back, for example, shoe manufacturing, or things like that, or textile manufacturing to the United States, because it's still going to be too expensive, even if you put 100% tariffs," he said.
Some American manufacturing jobs, Johnson said, 'are just gone forever and are not going to come back. And in the case of China, their goal is more reasonable, but it would require huge changes in how the economy and society are structured.'
Trump has alluded to his vision of American industrial revival in justifying mounting tariffs on Chinese goods, starting with 20% in additional tariffs he imposed in February and March, citing China's role in the international flow of fentanyl precursors.
Last week, he announced a baseline 10% tariff on imports from all countries, with higher tariffs for dozens of specific trading partners — particularly China. On Wednesday, he announced that he will pause higher tariffs for 90 days on some trading partners that have not retaliated, although the 10% baseline tariff will remain in place for all countries.
On Tuesday, before Trump announced the new 125% tariff, China vowed to 'resolutely take countermeasures to safeguard its own interests.'
'The U.S. threat to escalate tariffs on China is a mistake upon a mistake, further exposing the coercive nature of the U.S.,' the Commerce Ministry said in a statement. 'If the U.S. insists in its own way, China will fight to the end.'
In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday, Trump said China 'wants to make a deal, badly, but they don't know how to get it started.'
'We are waiting for their call. It will happen!' he wrote.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not confirm whether any negotiations with the U.S. were underway.
'It seems to me that the actions of the U.S. do not reflect a genuine willingness to engage in serious dialogue,' ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said at a regular briefing in Beijing. 'If the U.S. truly wants to talk, it should demonstrate an attitude of equality, mutual respect and reciprocity.'
The Trump administration says that menial jobs would be automated in revived U.S. factories, and that Americans working in them would be doing higher-level tasks.
'Our high-school-educated Americans — the core to our workforce — is going to have the greatest resurgence of jobs in the history of America to work on these high-tech factories, which are all coming to America,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday on CBS News' 'Face the Nation.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taiwan's 2026 defence budget to exceed 3% of GDP as US presses spending increase
Taiwan's 2026 defence budget to exceed 3% of GDP as US presses spending increase

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Taiwan's 2026 defence budget to exceed 3% of GDP as US presses spending increase

TAIPEI, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Taiwan's defence spending next year will exceed 3% of gross domestic product to demonstrate to the world the government's determination to fulfil its shared responsibility for security, Premier Cho Jung-tai said on Thursday. The move comes as China, which views democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory, has ramped up military and political pressure over the past five years to assert its claims, which Taipei strongly rejects. But Taiwan also faces calls from Washington to spend more on its own defence, mirroring pressure from the United States on Europe. This month, President Lai Ching-te said he wanted to boost defence spending to more than 3% of GDP next year. Cho told reporters 2026 defence spending would reach T$949.5 billion ($31.27 billion). At 3.32% of GDP, the figure crosses a threshold of 3% for the first time since 2009, government figures showed. "This is another concrete demonstration to the world and to our people of our determination and ability to safeguard national sovereignty and security, maintain stability and security in the Indo-Pacific region, and fulfill our shared responsibilities to the world," Cho said. Taiwan was following the "NATO model" to include spending on the coast guard and veterans in total defence expenditure, he added. Taiwan was including spending for the coast guard in its total defence budget for the first time, two senior officials briefed on the matter separately told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. "They are standing on the frontline," said one, referring to the coast guard, which figures in regular stand-offs with China's coast guard and would, in time of war, be pressed into the navy's effort to defend Taiwan. Taiwan's government has made military modernisation a key policy platform and has repeatedly pledged to spend more on its defences given the rising threat from China, including developing made-in-Taiwan submarines. China's air force flies almost daily missions into the skies near Taiwan, and holds periodic war games, the last in April. China is also rapidly modernising its armed forces, with new aircraft carriers, stealth fighter jets and missiles. In March China unveiled a rise of 7.2% in this year's defence spending, to 1.78 trillion yuan ($248.17 billion), outpacing its 2025 economic growth target of about 5%. ($1=30.3650 Taiwan dollars) ($1=7.1724 Chinese yuan)

Ukraine shows Scotland why independence cannot wait
Ukraine shows Scotland why independence cannot wait

The National

time24 minutes ago

  • The National

Ukraine shows Scotland why independence cannot wait

Even the most cursory glance at the letters or comments sections show they are replete with righteous indignation whenever a perceived slight towards Scotland is detected. Such comments also serve as confirmation – were it needed – that as Scots, we often take exception to others speaking on our behalf, not least when their prime motivation is self-serving and to Scotland's detriment. Any sovereign nation is entitled to have its own voice, make its own decisions, instead of others doing it for them, which brings me to Ukraine and the recent flurry of diplomacy surrounding Russia's war on the country. READ MORE: Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp: 'Independence first, everything later' is doomed to fail Writing in The National yesterday, my colleague Mark Brown characterised this ongoing diplomacy as little more than 'inter-imperialist rivalries' and the war in Ukraine as being one not of 'liberation' but 'a proxy war between Russia and the nominal West'. On one level I would agree and in this column have often acknowledged that fear of Nato expansionism was undoubtedly a contributing factor behind Russia's land grab and invasion. But whatever really lay behind Russia's motivation, an illegal invasion of a neighbouring sovereign state, which it undeniably was, and Ukraine's subsequent fight to retain its independence free from Kremlin control is both understandable and justified. It's important never to lose sight of this. For as this war has dragged on, the concerns, desires and wishes of Ukrainians themselves seem to have been increasingly overlooked or outright ignored. The war Ukrainians are waging to repel the Russian invasion is not only about the freedom of a people to choose their place in Europe, but as they see it, it's also about defending democracy itself. And speaking of Ukraine's democratic credentials, you need look no further than the recent surge of civic mobilisation that made Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy think again and reverse his decision, restoring the independence of the two bodies responsible for combating corruption. The very fact that these public protests were possible while the country was under martial law and were responded to positively by those in power, speaks volumes about the health of Ukraine's democratic vibrancy. Can you imagine anything comparable happening on the streets of Moscow or St Petersburg on Vladimir Putin's watch? READ MORE: Could Scotland challenge hotels housing asylum seekers? A legal expert explains Watching Ukraine's fate and its people's desire for freedom once again resting on the whims of the Trump administration has been an unedifying spectacle to say the least. Donald Trump and his special envoy sidekick the credulous Steve Witkoff are to diplomacy what a sputtering candle is to a supernova. As was evident in Anchorage and then a few days later at the White House, optics matter more to Trump than substance. The simple inescapable fact is that Trump will never be able to process the fundamental reality that most Ukrainians and other neighbouring countries in the region have long recognised. In short, Ukraine like Georgia and others in the region want to be secure, sovereign and independent, while Russia wants to subjugate and control their destiny. Recognising this, let alone putting in train a diplomatic strategy to assist Ukraine in achieving such aims, is frankly beyond Trump and Witkoff's abilities. Speaking to Ukrainians from here or whenever I visit the country, time and again I hear them say the last thing they need right now is Trump's flip-flopping approach. Just as it's evident in Trump's on-off tariffs and trade relations, so it's the same when it comes to diplomacy over Ukraine, resulting in more chaos and volatility rather than solid moves towards peace and stability. Ukrainians are also acutely aware that Trump's tendency is to reflect the views of the last person he has spoken to or to be more precise, who has flattered him. In Anchorage it was Putin, in Washington it was the Europeans. This is the diplomatic tightrope that Zelenskyy has to walk. Those that opine from afar that Zelenskyy should cede territory for peace need to try putting themselves in his position or indeed that of his fellow citizens. READ MORE: Scottish Labour MSP Colin Smyth issues statement after 'indecent images' arrest To those outside it might seem like small price to pay for ending a war that has lasted three and half years and killed tens of thousands of Ukrainians. But the future of the country's borders and the security implications that come with them is more than the kind of run of the mill real-estate deal that is Trump and Witkoff's raison d'être. Anyway, it is not within Zelenskyy's 'gift' to hand over under Ukraine's territory as any changes would have to be settled inside the country by a referendum, according to Article 73 of the country's constitution. The question can only be put to a referendum by popular initiative if the signatures of three million eligible Ukrainian voters are gathered from at least two thirds of the country's regions. This is not to say that it will never happen as part of any diplomatic process and were Ukraine offered strong and reliable security guarantees, it could become easier for Zelenskyy's government to consider such concessions on territory. While a recent Gallup poll suggested that 69% of Ukrainians favoured a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible, the same polls also unequivocally showed that most Ukrainians are not prepared to formally concede territory in exchange for peace. In other words, it's unlikely that Zelenskyy would accept the loss of any territory putting in jeopardy – as such a move would – Ukraine's future security and his own political survival. These past few days as the international diplomatic band wagon has rolled on, there has been a lot of form but very little by way of content produced so far. If there are grounds for cautious optimism then it should certainly not come at the expense of what Ukrainian themselves want by way of an outcome. This is paramount. They after all are the ones that were invaded, have seen their people bombed, murdered, raped, tortured and abducted by Russian forces. Like any independent, sovereign nation, they must continue to have their own voice heard. They must be a central part of decision making that ultimately affects them most. Above all, they should not be steamrollered by others making such decisions on their behalf purely out of self-interest. To put this in some kind of context for those of us here, would you really expect anything different were Scotland to find itself in such a challenging position?

UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks
UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks

Glasgow Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks

Admiral Sir Tony Radakin met senior US defence officials alongside other European military chiefs in Washington DC on Wednesday to discuss military options to secure peace in Ukraine. He later attended a virtual meeting of Nato's military committee, described by its chairman Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone as 'candid'. On Tuesday evening, Admiral Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, had dined with his US counterpart General Dan Caine. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, travelled to Washington for talks with US military leaders (Andrew Matthews/PA) The meetings come amid renewed planning for a 'coalition of the willing', led by the UK and France, that would guarantee Kyiv's security in the event of a ceasefire. Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron co-chaired a meeting of the coalition, in which members of the group also discussed the possibility of further sanctions on Russia. Western security guarantees, strongly resisted by Moscow, are one of the central issues for any peace deal for Ukraine, which fears Russia could otherwise use a ceasefire to regroup and launch a renewed invasion. So far, only the UK and France have indicated they could commit troops to a peacekeeping force in Ukraine. In an interview on Tuesday Donald Trump ruled out an American ground contribution but suggested the US could be willing to provide some form of air support. Sir Keir Starmer joined European leaders in a show of support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as he met Donald Trump at the White House (Aaron Schwartz/PA) His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, had earlier suggested the US could offer Ukraine a mutual defence agreement similar to Nato's Article 5, without Kyiv formally joining the alliance. Renewed talks among the 'coalition of the willing' follow last week's summit between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska as the US president continued to push for an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. Those talks appeared to result in little progress towards a deal, but sparked concern among some in Europe that Mr Trump could seek to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into accepting a deal without sufficient security guarantees. On Monday, Sir Keir and Mr Macron joined other European leaders in travelling to Washington in a show of support for Mr Zelensky during a meeting with Mr Trump. Meanwhile, the UK and Russia traded sanctions as London sought to increase the pressure on Moscow to end its invasion. Europe minister Stephen Doughty unveiled sanctions on a series of organisations linked to Kyrgyzstan's financial services sector, saying they had been involved in Kremlin attempts to 'soften the blow of our sanctions by laundering transactions through dodgy crypto networks'. Russia in turn sanctioned 21 individuals, including former Labour MP Denis MacShane, several journalists, and the Government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store