
Spotlighting Venture's Rising Stars: The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Each year we call upon a panel of investors previously named to the Brink List to use their experience and networks to help make the final determinations. Nina Achadjian of Index Ventures, Logan Bartlett of Redpoint Ventures and Sonya Huang of Sequoia served as our panelists this year and provided insights and knowledge that resulted in an exciting list of VCs.
As always, we are excited to present the list of up-and-coming VCs who are building tomorrow's tech giants.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Leigh Marie Braswell
Leigh Marie Braswell
Partner, Kleiner Perkins
Key Deals: Neon, Nooks, Persona, Windsurf
Leigh Marie Braswell is emblematic of a new breed of venture investors – one who bridges deep technical expertise with investment acuity. After receiving degrees in math and computer science at MIT, she was an early engineer at Scale AI, where she became the company's first product manager. There, she built and later led product development for computer vision annotation products.
She began her investing career at Founders Fund and subsequently joined Kleiner Perkins in 2024. At Kleiner, she focuses on partnering with the next generation of infrastructure and machine learning application founders.
Her first investment at Kleiner was in Windsurf, a deep learning acceleration platform designed to simplify and accelerate complex artificial intelligence workloads. She met the founders, Varun and Douglas, because they were all ex-competitive mathletes at MIT. The founders had previously started Exafunction, a GPU virtualization startup – and she partnered with them as Windsurf evolved. The company is now rumored to be a $3 billion acquisition target.
Other key deals include Nooks, which automated pipeline generation by using large language models and audio AI; Neon, a next-gen cloud database company; and Persona, which focuses on identity verification.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Konstantine Buhler
Konstantine Buhler
Partner, Sequoia Capital
Key Deals: Citadel Securities, Kumo, Roblox, Verkada, XBOW
Konstantine Buhler has quickly become a thought leader on the evolution of artificial intelligence. With three degrees from Stanford, including a Masters in Computer Science specializing in AI, he brings deep technical knowledge and a passion about the practical applications of machine learning to work with his founders.
He built a diverse resume before diving into venture: CTO at Italia Innovation Company, product manager at RelateIQ (acquired by Salesforce and now SalesforceIQ), and time at McKinsey. He joined Sequoia Capital in 2019 after roles at Pritzker Group and on the investment team at Meritech Capital Partners.
He has led many of Sequoia's early-stage AI investments, including XBOW, Rox, Dust, Enter, and Xaira, a new generation of companies tackling cybersecurity, productivity, and infrastructure callenges. He sourced and co-led Sequoia's $1 billion investment into Citadel Securities in 2021.
Beyond his role at Sequoia, he is a personal seed investor in companies including OpenSea and Viz.ai. He co-created the Forbes AI 50 list in 2018 and plays a leading role in AI Ascent, Sequoia's annual gathering of AI leaders aimed at advancing the industry.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Ambar Bhattacharyya
Ambar Bhattacharyya
Managing Partner, Maverick VenturesKey Deals: Hims & Hers, MosaicML, Collective Medical Technology, Cityblock Health, Nourish
Ambar's journey is a testament to the power of domain expertise paired with bold investing. Before joining Maverick Ventures, he was an operator at MinuteClinic, the trailblazing healthcare startup ultimately acquired by CVS Health.
After spending time at Bain Capital Ventures and Bessemer Venture Partners, he went on to lead Maverick's first or second checks into many category-defining healthcare innovators, often at the seed or Series A stage.
At Hims & Hers, Bhattacharyya served on the board from Series A through IPO, with the company reaching a peak market cap of about $15 billion. He led the spin-out of Cityblock Health from Alphabet and led Maverick's Series A investment in MosaicML seven months before it was acquired by Databricks for $1.2 billion in June 2023. Almost all his notable wins were initiated at the seed or Series A stages, and he served in board roles in nearly all of those investments.
Other key investments include gene editing companies Caribou Biosciences and Homology Medicines as well as healthcare tech companies Collective Medical Technologies and Devoted Health. His colleagues note that his combination of deep healthcare domain expertise, disciplined strategy and keen foresight sets him apart.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Miles Clements
Miles Clements
Partner, Accel
Key Deals: Cursor, Laravel, Linear, Remote
Miles Clements joined Accel in 2009 as the firm's first associate and has since become a driving force behind Accel's growth strategy, helping to lead that fund. His portfolio proves that he is willing to hunt for and back the best founders regardless of geography, with companies in Bucharest, Little Rock, San Francisco and beyond.
He invests across AI, cloud and enterprise software, and has led the firm's investments in several breakout companies including Linear, Cursor, and Laravel, where Accel's $57 million Series A investment is fueling the company's expansion into fully-managed cloud infrastructure products while maintaining a strong open-source ethos.
Earlier in his career at Accel, he worked on landmark investments in Atlassian, UiPath, and Lynda.com, which was acquired by LinkedIn. Beyond investing, Clements oversees Accel's Ignite program, bringing together CROs and revenue leaders from across the tech ecosystem.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Sofia Dolfe
Sofia Dolfe
Partner, Index Ventures
Key deals: Atlar, Cradle, Dream Games, Printify
Sofia Dolfe is a Partner at Index Ventures. She invests in a wide range of sectors, from gaming and financial services to healthcare, and is particularly interested in how AI accelerates innovation across these sectors.
She began her investing career at Index Ventures in London, where she sourced and led investments in high-growth companies Cradle and Atlar. She was instrumental in closing the firm's investment in Dream Games and worked closely with the company's founder to the recent investment from PE firm CVC that valued the company at around $5 billion. At Printify, she represented Index on the board and facilitated the company's merger with Printful.
Prior to joining Index in 2018, she was an investor at EQT Ventures in Stockholm and a consultant with EY-Parthenon in London and Paris. She currently works in Index's San Francisco office, bringing her global perspective to the team.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Jacob Effron
Jacob Effron
Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures
Key Deals: Abridge, Legora, Garner, Scribe, AcuityMD
Jacob Effron is a Partner at Redpoint Ventures, where his portfolio includes AI, enterprise software and healthcare, including several category-defining companies. He's known for building trusted relationships with founders and for being a deep thinker - something Abridge CEO Shiv Rao credits as an unfair advantage to the company.
At Abridge, he co-led the $150 million Series C in February 2024 alongside Lightspeed at a $850 million post-money valuation. Just a year later the company raised a round valuing it at $2.75 billion. In addition to Abridge, he's led or co-led investments in Scribe, AcuityMD, Legora and Poolside. He works closely on Scribe, an AI-based platform that helps document and scale work processes that saw a $245 million post-money value after its February 2024 Series B financing.
He hosts two of Redpoint's podcasts: Unsupervised Learning, where he's interviewed top leaders like Marc Benioff of Salesforce, Thomas Dohmke of GitHub, and Aravind Srinivas of Perplexity; and Vital Signs, a healthcare-focused show featuring experts like Mandy Cohen of the CDC and Sarah London of Centene.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Ramtin Naimi
Ramtin Naimi
Managing Partner, Abstract
Key deals: Krea, Verse Medical, WorkOS
Ramtin Naimi's story begins with an early entrepreneurial spark. At just 13, he began trading tech stocks, ultimately choosing to forgo college in order to pursue entrepreneurship and investing full-time. After launching a hedge fund, he transitioned into private market investing, making early bets on companies like Rippling and Solana.
In 2016, at age 25, he founded Abstract to further focus on seed and early-stage investing. Since then, he has led the seed rounds for a number of exciting companies. Krea is a creative collaboration and content generation platform that subsequently closed a $47 million Series B in April 2025. He also backed healthcare tech company Verse Medical, which provides software for in-home healthcare. That company most recently raised a $42 million Series B round in April 2024.
Other early high-conviction bets include Neon, Hebbia, Polymarket, Replit, Partiful, and Clay.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Sarah Wang
Sarah Wang
General Partner, Andreessen Horowitz
Key deals: Character.ai, Cursor, Hex, Wiz, World Labs
In her role on the growth investing team at Andreessen Horowitz, Sarah Wang focuses on AI and enterprise technology investments. Her academic path is as impressive as her professional one: a John Harvard Scholar and graduate in economics from Harvard and an MBA from Stanford. Her early career included stints at Morgan Stanley and the Boston Consulting Group, before she dove into venture capital at DCM Ventures and Radicle Impact. She then joined TA Associates to invest in founders at growth-stage companies.
Since joining a16z, she has worked with some of the most exciting names in the industry, including collaborative data analytics company Hex, where she is a board member and led the Series B. She led the initial round of funding at Character.ai and played a key role in helping the team navigate a pivotal deal with Google that has positioned the company as a leader in conversational AI.
She led the Series B at Cursor, co-led the Series B at World Labs and led the Series B for data analytics workspace Hex. She also co-led Wiz's $1 billion Series E financing in May 2024, resulting in a post-money value of $12 billion – a bet that paid when Google announced its intent to acquire the company for $32 billion acquisition in March 2025.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Liz Wessel
Liz Wessel
Partner, First Round Capital
Key deals: David AI, Gumloop, M7, Reducto
Liz Wessel loves working with companies that are reimagining old-school industries or that exist as a result of new or breakthrough technologies.
As the cofounder and CEO of WayUp, she spent several years building a platform for early-career talent, ultimately leading the company through a successful acquisition in 2021. She took that founder experience to Y Combinator as a Visiting Group Partner, where she coached more than 100 early-stage companies.
Since joining First Round in late 2023, she's led seed rounds in a string of high-potential companies that are already seeing sales traction and valuation increases. She was the lead seed investor in nurse-matching platform M7 in July 2024 and led the seed round in Reducto in March 2024. That company went on to secure a $25 million Series A from Benchmark earlier this year, with founders crediting her hands-on support and strategic insight as pivotal.
She is also an active angel investor, having backed another 40+ startups at their earliest stages, including Ramp, ScaleAI, Ro, Artera and others.
The 2025 Forbes Midas Brink List
Suzanne Xie
Suzanne Xie
Partner, Neo
Key deals: Aethero, Bluesky, dub, Nucleus Genomics, Tutor Intelligence
Suzanne Xie's journey from serial entrepreneur to early-stage investor is resulting in the rise of some of tech's most ambitious startups. Before joining Neo as its first investment partner in 2023, she built and scaled multiple companies. She founded Weardrobe (acquired by Like.com), kids app Hullabalu and Lightwell, an early no-code platform for mobile apps that was acquired by Twitter in 2019. At Twitter she became director of product and later led Stripe's B2B and finance software businesses, launching Stripe Invoicing.
As a founder, she participated in Y Combinator, Techstars and Facebook's first accelerator program, giving her perspective on the venture experience from a founder's point of view.
As an investor, she works to back visionary founders early. She led the first institutional seed round for decentralized social platform Bluesky, which was spun out of Twitter, and led the pre-seed financing for Aethero while working closely with the company as it participated in Neo's accelerator. And she started working with Nucleus Genomics, whose genetic testing and analysis platform enables understanding of genetic predispositions, before its $14 million Series A round was closed in January 2025.
The Midas Brink List isn't just about who's winning today – it's about who's building tomorrow. With these investors at the table, the odds look very good indeed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
High costs and thin margins threatening AI coding startups
In February, AI coding startup Windsurf was in talks to raise a big new round at a $2.85 billion valuation led by Kleiner Perkins, at double the valuation it hit six months earlier, sources told TechCrunch at the time. That deal didn't happen, according to a source familiar with the matter. Instead, news broke in April that the startup planned to sell itself to OpenAI for roughly the same valuation: $3 billion. While that deal famously fell apart, one bigger question remains: If the startup was growing that fast and attracting VC interest, why would it sell at all? Insiders tell TechCrunch that for all the popularity and hype around AI coding assistants, they can actually be massively money-losing businesses. Vibe coders generally, and Windsurf in particular, can have such expensive structures that their gross margins are 'very negative,' one person close to Windsurf told TechCrunch. Meaning it cost more to run the product than the startup could charge for it. This is due to the high costs of using large language models (LLMs), the person explained. AI coding assistants are particularly pressured to always offer the most recent, most advanced, and most expensive LLMs because model makers are particularly fine-tuning their latest models for improvements in coding and related tasks like debugging. This is a challenge compounded by fierce competition in the vibe-coding and code-assist market. Rivals include companies that already have huge customer bases like Anysphere's Cursor and GitHub Copilot. The most straightforward path to improving margins in this business involves the startups building their own models, thereby eliminating costs of paying suppliers like Anthropic and OpenAI. 'It's a very expensive business to run if you're not going to be in the model game,' said the person. But that idea comes with its own risks. Windsurf's co-founder and CEO, Varun Mohan, ultimately decided against the company building its own model — an expensive undertaking, the person said. In addition, model makers are already competing directly. Anthropic offers Claude Code and OpenAI offers Codex, for instance. Selling the business was a strategic move to lock in a high return before it could be undermined by the very companies that supplied its AI, including OpenAI and Anthropic, which were also entering the AI coding market. Multiple people believe that the same pressure on margins Windsurf faced could be impacting Anysphere, the maker of Cursor, as well as vibe coders like Lovable, Replit, and others. 'Margins on all of the 'code gen' products are either neutral or negative. They're absolutely abysmal,' said Nicholas Charriere, founder of Mocha, a vibe-coding startup and back-end hosting solution serving small and medium businesses (SMBs). He added that he believes the variable costs for all the startups in the sector are very close, likely within 10% to 15% of one another. Unlike Windsurf, Anysphere has been growing so fast that it intends to remain an independent company, having already turned down acquisition offers, including, reports say, from OpenAI. And Anysphere announced in January that it is attempting to build its own model, which could give it more control over its expenses. In July, the startup hired two leaders from Anthropic's Claude Code team, the Information reported, but two weeks later, these employees returned to work at Anthropic. In addition to building a model, Anysphere could expect the cost of LLMs to decrease over time. 'That's what everyone's banking on,' said Erik Nordlander, a general partner at Google Ventures. 'The inference cost today, that's the most expensive it's ever going to be.' It's not entirely clear how true that is. Rather than falling as expected, the cost of some of the latest AI models has risen, as they use more time and computational resources to handle complicated, multistep tasks. When that will change remains to be seen. On Thursday, for instance, OpenAI introduced a new flagship model, GPT-5, with fees that are significantly less than its competitor, Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.1. And Anysphere immediately offered this model as a choice for Cursor users. Anysphere has also recently changed its pricing structure to pass along the increased costs of running Anthropic's latest Claude model, particularly to its most active users. The move caught some of Cursor customers by surprise, since they didn't expect additional charges on top of its $20-per-month Pro plan. Anysphere CEO Michael Truell later apologized for unclear communication about the pricing change in a blog post. This is the rock and the hard place. Although Cursor is one of the most popular AI applications, having reached $500 million in ARR in June, the company's user base may not be so loyal to the product if another company develops a tool that is superior to Cursor, investors say. Anysphere didn't respond to a request for comment. Given the competitive landscape and the costs, Windsurf's decision to get out may prove to be understandable. After the OpenAI deal fell through, the founders and key employees left to join Google in a deal that led to a $2.4 billion payout to key shareholders. The remaining business then sold itself to Cognition. While many, including prominent VCs, criticized Mohan for leaving approximately 200 employees without roles at Google, a source familiar with the deal insisted the acquisition actually maximized the outcomes for all employees. Beyond Cursor, other AI coding tools are also among the fastest growing startups of the LLM generation, like Replit, Lovable, and Bolt, and all of them rely on model makers as well. Additionally, if this extremely popular business sector, already generating hundreds of millions in revenue or more a year, has difficulty building on top of model makers, what might it mean for other, more nascent industries? Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten


TechCrunch
6 hours ago
- TechCrunch
The high costs and thin margins threatening AI coding startups
In February, AI coding startup Windsurf was in talks to raise a big new round at a $2.85 billion valuation led by Kleiner Perkins, at double the valuation it hit six months earlier, sources told TechCrunch at the time. That deal didn't happen, according to a source familiar with the matter. Instead, news broke in April that the startup planned to sell itself to OpenAI for roughly the same valuation: $3 billion. While that deal famously fell apart, one bigger question remains: if the startup was growing that fast and attracting VC interest, why would it sell at all? Insiders tell TechCrunch that for all the popularity and hype around AI coding assistants they can actually be massively money-losing businesses. Vibe coders generally, and Windsurf in particular, can have such expensive structures that their gross margins are 'very negative,' one person familiar close to Windsurf told TechCrunch. Meaning it cost more to run the product than the startup could charge for it. This is due to the high costs of using large language models, the person explained. AI coding assistants are particularly pressured to always offer the most recent, most advanced, and most expensive LLMs because model makers are particularly fine-tuning their latest models for improvements in coding and related tasks like debugging. This is a challenge compounded by fierce competition in the vibe coding and code-assist market. Rivals include companies that already have huge customer bases like Anysphere Cursor and GitHub CoPilot. The most straightforward path to improving margins in this business involves the startups building their own models, thereby eliminating costs of paying suppliers like Anthropic and OpenAI. 'It's a very expensive business to run if you're not going to be in the model game,' said the person. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW But that idea comes with its own risks. Windsurf's co-founder and CEO, Varun Mohan ultimately decided against building its own model — an expensive undertaking, the person said. In addition, model makers are already competing directly. Anthropic offers Claude Code and OpenAI offers Codex, for instance. Selling the business was a strategic move to lock in a high return before it could be undermined by the very companies that supplied its AI, including OpenAI and Anthropic, which were also entering the AI coding market. Multiple people believe that the same pressure on margins Windsurf faced could be impacting Anysphere, the maker of Cursor, as well as vibe coders like Lovable, Replit and others. 'Margins on all of the 'code gen' products are either neutral or negative. They're absolutely abysmal,' said Nicholas Charriere, founder of Mocha, a vibe coding startup and backend hosting solution serving small and medium businesses (SMBs). He added that he believes the variable costs for all the startups in the sector are very close, likely within 10% to 15% of one another. Unlike Windsurf, Anysphere has been growing so fast that it intends to remain an independent company, having already turned down acquisition offers, including, reports say, from OpenAI. And Anysphere announced in January that it is attempting to build its own model, which could give it more control over its expenses. In July, the startup hired two leaders from Anthropic's Claude Code team, the Information reported, but two weeks later, these employees returned to work at Anthropic. In addition to building a model, Anysphere could expect the cost of LLMs to decrease over time. 'That's what everyone's banking on,' said Eric Nordlander, a general partner at Google Ventures. 'The inference cost today, that's the most expensive it's ever going to be.' It's not entirely clear how true that is. Rather than falling as expected, the cost of some of the latest AI models has risen, as they use more time and computational resources to handle complicated, multi-step tasks. When that will change remains to be seen. On Thursday, for instance, OpenAI introduced a new flagship model GPT-5 with fees that are significantly less than its competitor, Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.1. And Anysphere immediately offered this model as a choice for Cursor users. Anysphere has also recently changed its pricing structure to pass along the increased costs of running Anthropic's latest Claude model, particularly to its most active users. The move caught some of Cursor customers by surprise, since they didn't expect additional charges on top of its $20-per-month Pro plan. Anysphere CEO Michael Truell later apologized for unclear communication about the pricing change in a blog post. This is the rock and the hard place. Although Cursor is one of the most popular AI applications, having reached $500 million in ARR in June, the company's user base may not be so loyal to the product if another company develops a tool that is superior to Cursor, investors say. Anysphere didn't respond to a request for comment. Given the competitive landscape and the costs, Windsurf's decision to get out may prove to be understandable. After the OpenAI deal fell through, the founders and key employees left to join Google in a deal that led to a $2.4 billion payout to key shareholders. The remaining business then sold itself to Cognition. While many, including prominent VCs, criticized Mohan for leaving approximately 200 employees without roles at Google, a source familiar with the deal insisted the acquisition actually maximized the outcomes for all employees. Beyond Cursor, other AI coding tools are also among the fastest growing startups of the LLM generation like Replit, Lovable, Bolt and all of them rely on model makers, as well. Additionally, if this extremely popular business sector, already generating hundreds of millions in revenue or more a year, has difficulty building on top of model makers, what might it mean for other, more nascent industries?


Axios
10 hours ago
- Axios
ChatGPT unlocks its next level with OpenAI's major GPT-5 update
OpenAI's long-awaited GPT-5 — a major update to the technology underlying ChatGPT — is a faster, more-capable large language model that CEO Sam Altman said gives users instant access to a PhD-level expert on any subject. Why it matters: The Thursday release of GPT-5 brings together traditional and "reasoning" models and ups the ante in the race toward so-called artificial general intelligence (AGI). Driving the news: OpenAI is making the new model available Thursday for free and paid users, with enterprise and educational customers getting access starting next week. GPT-5 will have fewer hallucinations and be better at coding and health-related tasks, among other improvements, the company said. Yes, but: Free ChatGPT users will have a limited capacity for GPT-5 use. Once they hit their limit, they'll be switched to a smaller GPT-5 mini model. Paying subscribers will be able to use GPT-5 as their default model, while Pro users will have unlimited GPT-5 queries and access to GPT-Pro, which uses additional computing capacity. Zoom in: OpenAI said GPT-5 sets new highs on a range of benchmarks and cited praise from a variety of companies that had early access, including Windsurf, Vercel, Notion and Manus. Altman told a press briefing that the new model not only excels at coding but at taking software projects from idea to usable code in a single step. "This idea of software on demand will be a defining part of the new GPT-5 era," he said. Zoom out: Altman said that GPT-5 shows signs of broad intelligence but lacks the ability to learn and improve on its own — a capacity that, he added, is likely a key component of AGI. After you use GPT-5, Altman said, going back to an earlier model is like reverting to a lower-resolution display after you've grown used to an iPhone's Retina display. Between the lines: Users will also be able to customize GPT-5's personality as part of a feature in "research preview." The four initial options are "Cynic," "Robot," "Listener" and "Nerd." The new model displays less sycophantic behavior than its predecessors, OpenAI said in a blog post. "Overall, GPT‑5 is less effusively agreeable, uses fewer unnecessary emojis, and is more subtle and thoughtful in follow‑ups compared to GPT-4o. It should feel less like 'talking to AI' and more like chatting with a helpful friend with PhD‑level intelligence." Threat level: As it did with its recently released ChatGPT Agent, OpenAI is proceeding as if GPT-5 ranks "high" on its risk scale for biological threat capability and has added additional safeguards. What we're watching: GPT-5 was originally expected much earlier this year, and its delays led some critics to argue that OpenAI's scaling-up strategy was yielding diminishing returns.