logo
Want to save and make more money? You might need to look inward. How to do it.

Want to save and make more money? You might need to look inward. How to do it.

USA Today20-05-2025

Want to save and make more money? You might need to look inward. How to do it.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
How to control your finances on a tight budget
Living on a tight financial budget? That doesn't mean you can't take control of your finances.
When Dr. Brad Klontz' maternal grandfather went to his bank one day, he discovered all of his money was gone.
His bank was one of the thousands of financial institutions that failed during the Great Depression. He was so traumatized that he never put a dollar in a bank again. His daughter carried some of that risk aversion into her life, investing only in certificates of deposit, or CDs, and she felt ashamed of being poor.
Growing up, Klontz internalized some of that shame and wanted to be wealthy. To get there, he decided that instead of being extremely cautious like his mother and grandfather, he'd go in the opposite direction.
Staring at his $100,000 in student loan debt in his 20s, he sold his truck and used the money to buy a $500 car and invest the rest in one asset class in the stock market.
Then the dot-com bubble burst and he watched that money fade away.
'I went from the most risk averse to the riskiest possible approach,'' Klontz, a certified financial planner and psychologist, said. "That's dysfunctional. It's not moderation.'
Klontz says that he was following a "money script," a term he coined for the unconscious beliefs, often rooted in childhood, that affect your financial behaviors as an adult.
'For many of us, it's like a script that was written by somebody else and you're just reading it,' Klontz said.
But just because financial habits are often first molded by things out of your control, it doesn't mean you can't change them. The first step to having a healthier relationship with money is understanding where you currently stand.
What's your money script?
Klontz's story is just one example of how people's attitudes toward money are passed down through generations and shaped by experiences or trauma.
He calls his personal experience a 'dysfunctional pendulum swing.' It's something you often see when alcoholism runs in a family, he said. If a parent is an alcoholic, their child will either also become one or never drink a drop of it in their life.
Helping people uncover their money scripts and rewrite them, Klontz said, has led to improved mental health. One study he conducted found people's savings rate increased 73% when they became more aware of their psychological relationship with money.
The four main money scripts are Money Avoidance, Money Focus, Money Status, and Money Vigilance. Klontz offers a free diagnostic test to help determine yours.
Some lead to better financial outcomes than others, but no matter your script, there are tips to help you build a healthier relationship with money.
More: What to prioritize when making a budget? Tips on creating and sticking to one
Money Avoidance
Those who are money avoidant tend to believe money is inherently bad or corrupting, according to Klontz' framework. Money avoidants might avoid thinking or talking about money, ignore financial statements, financially enable others, or overspend.
Jack Howard, head of financial wellness at Ally Financial, discusses 'money stories' — a concept similar to money scripts — in her financial education workshops.
She said she often sees parents hesitate to have conversations about finances with their children because their own parents avoided the subject.
'I'm hearing that in a lot of our classes. 'We didn't talk about money. It was taboo. It was seen as disrespectful,'' Howard said.
Klontz' advises the money avoidant to schedule periodic money check-ins, financially support people and causes they care about, and to identify a role model who uses wealth to do good, to strengthen their overall relationship with money.
Money Vigilance
Money vigilant individuals are cautious and concerned about their financial well-being. They save for the future, avoid unnecessary debt, and believe hard work pays off.
'The average American needs to get way more money vigilant,' Klontz said. 'That's just the bottom line.'
But identifying with this script can lead to missing out on experiences due to fear-based decision making. Klontz said as a financial adviser, he's seen wealthy people struggle to spend their money even in retirement because they are used to being so vigilant.
'People who are really high on money vigilance may end up with the highest net worth,' Klontz said. But 'Are they happy? Can they sleep at night? Are they so vigilant around money that they can't spend it?'
If that sounds like you, he advises you create a 'fun money' budget, check in with an adviser who will set your mind at ease, and set limits on how often you monitor your finances.
Money Focus
Money focused individuals often believe money is the key to happiness and a solution to life's problems but also that no amount of money is enough, according to Klontz' framework.
Klontz himself identifies with this script, but he also scores high in the money vigilance category. It's a duality he sees a lot in business professionals.
'The two go hand in hand,' he said. 'Why would you be so conscientious and concerned about it if you didn't want more of it?'
But unchecked money focus can actually lead to lower net worth and higher levels of debt, as people try to buy happiness and prioritize work over relationships, research shows.
Tips for the money focused include pausing before making a purchase to determine if you need it and realizing money can buy comfort but not connection. Giving both money and time to causes and people that matter to you can also help those who identify with this script.
Money Status
If you often tie your self-worth to your net worth, you may find the money status script familiar. Individuals who fall into this category may be a fan of outward displays of wealth and see them as a way to gain respect, according to Klontz' framework.
Klontz said he likely would've scored high in this category when he was younger. When he started making six figures for the first time, he bought himself a luxury watch and a gold bracelet for his mother, even though he still had a significant amount of student loan debt.
'I don't know why I did it. I mean I did it because I heard there's a whole club when you're making money now and it's about luxury watches,' Klontz said. 'It's a signal, you know? 'Hey, I've made it.''
Howard said as a mom to a Gen Z child, she sees the younger generations buying things to showcase and achieve status on social media. Those social networks' influencers and ads can also lead to more impulse buying, she said.
To avoid the most negative outcomes including overspending, compulsive gambling, and financial dependence on others, money status seekers should take a step back. Klontz advises them to pause before they purchase, schedule money check-ins, and take care of their overall health instead of only chasing financial goals.
Reach Rachel Barber at rbarber@usatoday.com and follow her on X @rachelbarber_

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15
Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri proposed a bill Tuesday that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, his latest move to frame himself as a new kind of pro-worker Republican. Hawley's legislation is not in any danger of actually becoming law — his fellow Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and have been blocking minimum wage increases for years. But the proposal aligns him with a core Democratic demand and further separates Hawley from the traditional anti-union, free-market wing of the GOP when it comes to labor policy. 'Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford anything,' Hawley told HuffPost. 'Right now, the federal minimum wage, if you index it for inflation, or relative to inflation, it's the lowest level since the 1940s.' The federal minimum is just $7.25 per hour and hasn't been raised in more than 15 years, by far the longest such stretch since it was created during the Great Depression. It prevails in the 21 states that currently don't mandate a higher one, many of them clustered in the South. Hawley's bill, co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, would raise the wage floor to $15, then tie it to an inflation index so that it goes up with the cost of living — a common feature in more progressive legislation. Such a hike would force increases in all but the mostly blue states where the wage floor has already been raised above that level. Hawley did not pretend that his proposal stands much chance of becoming law. 'I will try to move it. I mean, I'd love to get a vote on it,' he said. The proposal puts Hawley far ahead of other Republicans, but still behind Democrats on the issue. Most Democratic lawmakers are now pushing for a $17 minimum wage, arguing that $15 — the rallying cry of the Fight for $15 labor campaign, which began in the fast food industry in 2012 — has become inadequate as a living wage due to inflation. Although he supports a more aggressive raise, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) seemed pleased to see Hawley separate himself from other Republicans on the issue. 'I think every Democrat, last month, voted to raise the minimum wage to $17, and I'll look forward to working with Sen. Hawley,' Sanders told HuffPost on Tuesday, referencing an April vote on an amendment to a symbolic budget resolution. The amendment failed by a vote of 47 to 52 with every Republican except Hawley voting no. Hawley said that if the Republican Party wants to brand itself as the party of working people — which it does, according to statements from President Donald Trump and other leaders — then Republicans need to back policies that benefit the working class. 'This is what President Trump ran on. I mean, if we're going to be a working party, we have to do something for working people, and working people haven't gotten a raise in years,' Hawley said. Hawley is not the first Republican to back a minimum wage increase. Back in 2021, Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and then-Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) proposed a boost from $7.25 to $10. But the bill included an immigration measure that would have mandated nationwide use of e-Verify to crack down on undocumented workers, a poison pill for Democrats that isn't part of Hawley's legislation. Earlier this year, Hawley released a policy platform dubbed a 'Pro-Worker Framework.' It included some pro-labor reforms typically associated with Democrats, like putting limits on mandatory 'captive audience' meetings, in which employers pressure workers not to form unions. Then, in March, he joined Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) in proposing a bill that would speed up the process for workers to secure their first union contracts, the sort of legislation a typical Republican wouldn't go near. As with Vice-President J.D. Vance, Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. But when it comes to maybe moving legislation, lawmakers like Sanders like the idea of having a Republican to work with. 'It would be great if we could get some other Republicans,' the Vermont senator said. '$7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. We've got to raise it.'

Is your money safe in a bank during a recession?
Is your money safe in a bank during a recession?

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Is your money safe in a bank during a recession?

As scary as they can be, recessions are normal — and temporary. But that doesn't make them any less painful. With the possibility of a recession dominating headlines in recent months, it's no surprise if you're concerned about the security of your money. You may even wonder if your money is safe in a bank during a recession. Two pieces of good news may help calm your fears: First, according to JPMorgan Research, the likelihood of a recession has dropped from 60% to 40% in recent weeks. Second, even if a recession does happen, your money is safe in a bank. Continue reading to learn how banks protect your cash, what happens when they fail, and how you can keep your money safe during a recession. Banks are generally safe at any time, including during a recession. In 1933, following the Great Depression, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was created to promote consumer trust in banks. The FDIC protects insured bank deposits of up to $250,000 per customer, per insured bank, per ownership category, in case of bank failure. FDIC insurance doesn't apply to all account types; it only covers certain deposit accounts, such as savings accounts, checking accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit (CDs). Money invested in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other investments isn't covered. Bank failures are unlikely, but they do happen on occasion, and especially during a recession. While there has only been one bank failure in 2025, there were 157 in a single year following the Great Recession. But even when banks fail, FDIC insurance protects bank customers in one of two ways: The FDIC may open a new account for you at an insured bank with a balance equal to your insured balance at the failed bank. The FDIC may send you a check in the amount of your insured balance at the failed bank. According to the FDIC's website, it has historically paid customers within a few days of failed bank closures. And since the creation of the FDIC, no depositor has ever lost insured funds. Credit unions and banks are both safe during a recession, provided they're both federally insured. Like banks, credit unions offer insurance on deposits of up to $250,000. Though FDIC insurance doesn't apply to credit union deposits, credit unions are insured by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), which provides similar coverage. While banks and credit unions provide the same amount of financial protection during a recession, credit unions have characteristics that may make them feel safer. For example: Credit unions are member-owned. Unlike banks, credit unions are nonprofit organizations and don't have to cater to shareholders. This generally means they put members' needs first and offer highly personalized customer service, which can provide some peace of mind during financially unstable times. Credit unions tend to have fewer fees, more affordable loans, and higher savings rates. Because credit unions are nonprofit entities, they can pass profits on to members in the form of lower fees and higher savings rates. These extra savings can go a long way during a recession, when members may be looking to cut costs wherever they can. Credit unions take less risk compared to banks. Because banks operate for a profit, they're generally willing to take on more risk in the pursuit of bigger returns. For example, the majority of subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by banks, not credit unions. Credit unions, meanwhile, are more risk-averse, which can provide a sense of stability for their members. You can keep your money safe during a recession by keeping it in the right place. Here are some tips to make sure your cash is secure if and when a recession hits: Make sure you bank with insured institutions. FDIC or NCUA insurance protects your deposits as long as your bank or credit union is backed by one of these organizations. To confirm your bank is FDIC-insured, use the FDIC's BankFind Suite tool. To check a credit union's NCUA status, use the NCUA's Credit Union Locator tool. Get extra FDIC coverage. If you have a lot of money saved, $250,000 worth of insurance may not be enough. Luckily, some banks allow you to insure deposits beyond the standard $250,000 by using something called reciprocal deposits. This system spreads your money between multiple partner banks, each of which can insure up to the standard limit. Alternatively, you can insure funds beyond the $250,000 maximum simply by opening accounts at multiple banks. Build an emergency fund. An emergency fund is always important, but it's particularly crucial during a recession. Having cash on hand in a safe, high-interest account like a high-yield savings account gives you extra comfort and protection if an emergency does happen. Read more: Recession-proof your money: How to protect your savings, investments, mortgage, and more Yes, keeping your money in the bank during a recession is generally a good idea. You can also keep your money in a credit union. As long as your bank or credit union is insured by the FDIC or NCUA, your deposits will be safe up to federal limits. Both banks and credit unions are safe places to keep your money during a recession. Banks are insured by the FDIC, and credit unions are insured by the NCUA. Both types of financial institutions insure up to $250,000 per depositor, per account category. Both banks and credit unions are safer than keeping physical cash, which can get lost, stolen, or damaged. Generally, the government can't take money from your bank account in a crisis. However, it may be able to garnish wages and seize your tax refund if you owe outstanding debt, such as federal student loans.

A banana a day to keep the tariffs away? Howard Lutnick mocked during congressional hearing over plan to make more products in America
A banana a day to keep the tariffs away? Howard Lutnick mocked during congressional hearing over plan to make more products in America

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

A banana a day to keep the tariffs away? Howard Lutnick mocked during congressional hearing over plan to make more products in America

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was ridiculed in the House of Representatives over his proposed solution if Donald Trump's tariffs hit banana imports. Lutnick, one of the loudest cheerleaders for Trump's aggressive trade strategy, was testifying before the House Appropriations Committee when he found himself up against Pennsylvania Democratic Rep. Madeleine Dean. The congresswoman put it to Lutnick that the Trump administration lacked a fundamental understanding of how a trade deficit works, pointing out that the last time the United States had a trade surplus was during the Great Depression of the 1930s, a return to which is 'a direction none of us wants to go,' she said. Dean rebuked the secretary over the chaotic implementation of Trump's tariff policy after the president was forced to row back his imposition of steep levies on 100 countries on 'Liberation Day' (April 2) when they spooked the stock markets, forcing him to swiftly introduce a 90-day pause to allow for dealmaking. 'We are in the midst of negotiations with dozens of countries,' Lutnick raced to reassure her. 'We could sign deals but they're only going to get better as we negotiate them.' Dean then pivoted to her true subject, the cost of living, saying that residents of her suburban Philadelphia district were facing $2,000 a year increases to their grocery bills as a result of inflation, noting that Walmart, for one, had already raised the price of bananas by eight percent. 'Mr Trump promised to bring down the cost of goods, day one. And what he has done through his trade deficit fixation and his tariff chaos has nakedly increased the cost of goods,' she said. Brandishing a banana, Dean asked the secretary: 'What's the tariff on bananas? Americans, by the way, love bananas. We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas. What's the tariff on bananas?' 'The tariff on bananas would be representative of the countries that produce them,' Lutnick answered, estimating the rate at 10 percent when pushed. 'But the cost is on the American consumer now and on the businesses with the confusion now,' she hit back. 'Mr Secretary, I believe you know better. I believe you recognize that a trade deficit is not something to fear. I believe you know that predictability, stability is essential for businesses. I wish you would show that truth to this administration.' When Dean yielded her time, Lutnick asked for permission to respond to her and said: 'There's no uncertainty if you build in America and you produce your product in America. There will be no tariff.' 'We can't produce bananas in America,' she responded, incredulously. 'The concept of building in America and paying no tariffs is very, very clear,' said Lutnick. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' Dean repeated. 'Fighting for imports is not the same,' the secretary tried again. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' the representative repeated. While it is true that the United States cannot 'build' its own bananas and most are imported from Central American nations like Guatemala, Ecuador and Costa Rica, southern states like California, Florida, Arizona, Louisiana and Texas have the necessary climate to grow them but currently only do so in small quantities. Hawaii also grows bananas, as do the American territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands but, again, not currently on a scale sufficient to meet domestic demand.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store