National Development Plan allocates almost €4bn for defence and justice capital spends
The total allocation for the Department of Defence between 2026-2030 compares to €697m in the five years 2021 to 2025 — an increase of 144%, excluding inflation.
The total spend on the Department of Justice in 2026-2030 compares to €1.35bn in 2021 to 2025 — a rise of 61%, not factoring in inflation.
The expansion of the Department of Justice to incorporate migration explains, in part, the extra capital allocation. In addition, cybersecurity and the National Cyber Security Centre have just been transferred to it.
The National Development Review Plan 2025, published on Tuesday, outlines annual allocations across the security departments:
Defence — €300m in 2026, rising to €340m in both 2027 and 2028, and increasing to €360m in both 2029 and 2030;
Justice — €390m in 2026, rising to €430m in 2027, €440m in 2028, €455m in 2029, and €465m in 2030.
There was no detail of department allocations in the 49-page NDP review, compared to the 184-page NDP 2021-2030 document.
Levels of investment
The Government has committed to implement the second of three levels of investment (LOA2) set out by the Commission on the Defence Forces in February 2022, centred on increasing the annual defence budget from €1.1bn in 2022 to €1.5bn in 2028, based on 2022 prices.
The NDP capital spends are also based on the Defence Equipment Development Plan 2020-2024 and the Defence Capital Infrastructure Development Plan 2022-2027.
Major capital projects include three C295 surveillance aircrafts (third due in September), a refit of 80 Mowag armoured personnel carriers, a primary radar system (due in 2028), four modern helicopters (the commission recommended eight), and an expansion of the naval fleet to nine ships by early in the next decade.
The Defence Equipment Plan 2020 also mentions plans to acquire an 'air combat interceptor', but it is not clear where that plan went. It is not part of LOA2, although LOA3 does recommend a squadron of fighter jets capable of interception.
Overcrowding crisis
It is not yet clear what the breakdown is under the justice budget and how much will go to prison expansion and refurbishment, given the escalating overcrowding crisis in the Irish Prison Service. The programme for government commits to 1,500 new spaces by 2030.
Justice minister Jim O'Callaghan recently secured Cabinet agreement to accelerate the delivery of 960 of the additional spaces in Castlerea, Midlands, Wheatfield, and Mountjoy Prisons.
He said that, 'subject to the necessary funding' in the NDP, this should speed up delivery by 12 to 18 months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
40 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Sinn Féin call for review of Government refugee accommodation plans
Sinn Féin has called for a review of the Government's policy of paying people to allow Ukrainian refugees to use their spare rooms or properties, saying the scheme is unfair on other people, and is potentially disrupting the wider rental market. The party's Justice, Home Affairs and Migration spokesperson Matt Carthy called for the policy to be examined, before rejecting claims he and his party are using the issue to "dog whistle" to anti-immigrant groups. According to figures obtained by Sinn Féin, the number of properties receiving a payment under the Government accommodation recognition payment scheme rose by 17% between January and July of this year. This, a party statement said, is "deeply unfair" to other people who are renting as the supports are not means-tested, and are distorting the wider rental market. Asked about the claims by journalists today, Mr Carthy said the "evidence appears to be bearing out" the Sinn Féin concerns, but did not provide specific examples of how this is the case. He said the scheme is giving landlords "a tax free payment" of hundreds of euro a month to cover costs, as well as "top up payments", which he said are "unregulated". 'Wide open for landlords' While saying the initial objective of the policy, namely to help Ukrainians fleeing war, was "laudable", Mr Carthy said subsequent changes by Government have left the scheme "wide open for landlords" and others to use the scheme, saying that 21,000 properties owned by less than 17,000 people are the subject of payments. Mr Carthy said "now is the time to carry out a review", but said when asked if the call is a "dog whistle" to anti-immigrant groups: "This is about setting out very clearly that what is going on is fair." The Sinn Féin TD said his party "wouldn't want to see at the end of this a cliff edge where people housed under this scheme all of a sudden become homeless, no one's suggesting that". However, he added that "nothing" causes "social anxiety or division more than if people see one set of people being treated differently than another set in housing need".
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
I will ‘definitely not' run for presidency, says Taoiseach Micheal Martin as he discusses National Development Plan
TAOISEACH Michael Martin has said he will "definitely not" run for Irish presidency this year. Speaking to Morning Ireland Advertisement 2 Minister Peter Burke has been calling to cut VAT rate for the hospitality sector Credit: � 2025 PA Media, All Rights Reserved Mr Martin said he was elected to "lead And an Asked if he would consider putting his name forward, Advertisement Read more in News "I have that obligation to the public. No disrespect to the presidency, but I gave commitments to the people that I will serve for the next five years and that's what I'm going to." There are a lot of names floating in association with Fianna Fiall in He added: "Party will consider that over the next number of weeks." Mr Martin also discussed the revised version of NDP which was announced yesterday with a total investment of €275.4 billion. Advertisement Most read in Irish News Latest It adds more than €40 billion for housing and water services, €22.3 billion for It also cited €2 billion to be delivered to Tetchy scenes in Dail as Micheal Martin accused of calling Mary Lou McDonald liar in Irish Mr Martin has explained that the money allocated to the NDP investments in the public sector comes from the government's projections of surpluses over the next number of years. He continued: "There is the additionality of €14 billion from the receipts from Advertisement "Now allocations have come from, it would be specifically dedicated to the metro which is clearly a climate infrastructural piece, because obviously the more people we can get on public transport the better in terms of climate. "I can't see KEY PRIORITIES The Government also promised to cut the VAT rate for the hospitality sector in the Mr Martin added: "Nothing yet is finalised in terms of the budget. Advertisement "We will be prioritising disability and we will be prioritising child poverty. "We will be targeting our measures and social protection to those most." Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke has been calling to cut VAT rate for the hospitality sector. The Minister said the cut is a "jobs measure to sustain employment" in the sector. Advertisement Speaking on RTE's "At this point in time, over 200,000 people are employed in it. It's a €9 billion sector. And it's so important to try and keep that sector sustainable. 'VIABILITY MEASURE' "This is a jobs measure to sustain the employment in that sector, which is critically important to me as Minister for "It is a viability measure, they are under significant pressure." Advertisement Mr Burke added: "We've had a lot of additionality from government, part of it over the last three years, in terms of regulatory requirements in the trajectory to a living wage and sick pay in so many areas that have put significant pressure on the sector and have reduced their margins. "We've pushed 90,000 jobs into the economy over the last 12 months. "And considering when we're at or about full employment, to put 90,000 extra households with additional income into them with more jobs is very significant." 2 Michael Martin has said he will 'definitely not' run for Irish presidency this year Credit: Collins Photos Advertisement
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
Debunked: Proposed building plans in Tallaght suburb are not for an IPAS centre
SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS viewed tens of thousands of times have falsely claimed that planning has been lodged for an asylum seeker centre in a Tallaght suburb — and that local TD Paul Murphy is objecting to it on that basis. Neither claim is accurate. The Department of Justice told The Journal that the site is not intended to be used by the International Protection Accommodation Services (IPAS). Nor is there any mention of such a use in the planning application lodged with South Dublin County Council. Instead, the planning application is for a housing development. Murphy, who represents the Dublin South-West constituency, lodged an observation with the council over the planning permission for the development in Kingswood. He cited possible technical problems with the plans, and raised concerns that they are vague and could be interpreted to show a 'co-living arrangement'. Murphy's previous objections to co-living developments are public record. IPAS Centre The incorrect claim that the building will be used as an IPAS centre was popularised in a video posted online. One version of the footage has been viewed more than 83,800 times since being posted to X on 16 July. 'This is going to be turned into a dwelling for 16 people,' a man in the video says, as he shows what appears to be a derelict house in a Tallaght suburb. 'We know what that means. Everyone knows what that means.' He goes on to say 'Paul Murphy [is] contesting this to be turned into an IPAS centre', before castigating Murphy for not supporting anti-immigrant protests. Other X posts which claim that Murphy is objecting to an IPAS centre have been viewed more than 150,000 times. However, this claim is untrue. The building shown in the video is based in Kingswood, Dublin 24, as confirmed by planning applications , as well as Google Street View images of the house. In a video posted to his BlueSky social media account on July 18, Murphy described the false claims and his actual involvement in the planning process. 'They're inventing an IPAS centre to be mad about,' he says. 'There's no proposal for it to be an IPAS centre. We're not opposing it being an IPAS centre.' Responding to inquiries from The Journal, the Department of Justice said it had 'not received an offer of international protection accommodation at this location and is not considering it for use'. The plans for the property online make no reference to a change of use of the building or indicate that it is being converted into accommodation for International Protection applicants. Instead, the application seeks permission to remove a 'redundant antenna' and build a large extension on the building. Paul Murphy did submit an observation to the application, co-signed with councillor Jess Spear, who, like Murphy, is a member of the political party People Before Profit – Solidarity. Advertisement However, this planning observation contained no reference to an IPAS centre being built. Planning objections Other social media posts focused on Murphy's stance towards the planning application, but made different claims, namely that he was objecting to the construction of housing in his area. These claims have been viewed tens of thousands of times on X, and a post entitled 'Paul Murphy TD objecting to residential development in his neighborhood' posted on 21 July attracted more than 550 comments on Reddit's Ireland forum. These claims have an element of truth, though are misleading without context. Murphy had posted letters in the local area about the planning application which said 'we are concerned that the intention is to circumvent the ban on co-living arrangements'. The letter also said: 'We desperately need more housing, and to bring vacant houses back into use.' His submitted observation on the planning application made the same arguments. Co-living housing is specifically designed for many people to live in while sharing common areas, such as kitchens and living rooms — not unlike some student accommodation. However, co-living developments for the general population are controversial and have been de facto banned since 2020 . Micheál Martin had described co-living arrangements as being at risk of becoming 'glorified tenement living'. So while it's fair to say that Murphy raised an issue with new housing in his observation on the planning application, this was only on the grounds that it could be a co-living development. It remains is unclear if the application is for a co-living space at all. Drawings submitted as part of the application show two 'proposed' large buildings, each with kitchens, dining areas, and multiple bedrooms: nine in total. A screenshot of the site plans that, taken at face value, appear to propose two large new buildings. However, these buildings are so large that they would not both fit on the physical site. This discrepancy is noted on Murphy's observation. 'The plans submitted are mislabeled,' Murphy and Spear wrote. 'The 'floor plans' show two sets of drawings labelled 'proposed ground floor' and 'proposed first floor'. We can only assume that this is a mistake. Nonetheless, it is causing confusion and concern that the owner intends to build a home with 9+ bedrooms, 3 kitchens, and so on.' The layout may be suitable for small co-living space, but it could also just be a very large home. 'It seems, to be honest, to be a mistake in the planning application,' Murphy said in his Bluesky video. 'But still, there are strange things in terms of proposals for 16 places at two different dining tables and this type of thing.' 'I suspect the council will go back looking for more information, because it should be used as accommodation for people. It should be a house, or a house and a granny flat.' Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
