logo
Report outlines dozens of policy ideas to address Maine's housing crisis

Report outlines dozens of policy ideas to address Maine's housing crisis

Yahoo29-01-2025

Jan. 29—Recent reports on the state's housing crisis have carried some eye-popping numbers: The state needs to build 84,000 homes by 2030. Washington County needs to increase the annual number of building permits by 1,200%. The median home sale price last year was over $390,000.
For years, state housing officials and advocates have argued that the only way to shrink those numbers is simply to build more. When the need is so great, the task can seem overwhelming. But a new state-sponsored report, presented this week to the Legislature's Committee on Economic Housing and Development, issued specific recommendations for how to do just that — 83 pages of them.
And it could set the stage for the upcoming Legislative session.
Two years ago, the state released its report that Maine is short about 84,000 homes and that the total housing stock — not just the number of new homes being built — needs to increase by about 11% in by 2030 to alleviate the existing housing crisis and make room for all the people needed to bolster the declining workforce.
Then, in September, officials broke down the needs at the county level and established housing "goals" that found that statewide, annual housing production needs to just about double.
The September report included a long list of suggestions — including infrastructure improvements, increased state and federal funding for affordable housing development and simplified building and land-use regulations at the state and municipal level — but did not require any changes or direct money to any particular solutions.
This week's report drills deeper into those suggestions, offering a more granular look at the ways the state can incentivize development, data collection and workforce development. It also lays out which options are the most and least cost-effective and labor-intensive.
Most of the 40-plus changes outlined would require legislative action, so the report is partly intended to serve as a roadmap for Maine's lawmakers as they draft and consider new housing bills.
"If we know our needs and we know our goals, the next question is, how do we get from where we are now to where we need to be by 2030?" said Greg Payne, the state's senior housing advisor. "What state-level policy levers exist that we can pull to create more homes more quickly, and at a more sustainable cost?"
View this document on Scribd
The reports come at the behest of the Legislature as part of LD 2003, a law passed in 2022 that, among other changes, requires municipalities to allow up to four units on any property zoned for single-family residential use.
The landmark law was "a step forward," according to the report, but significant challenges remain.
"Delays in development approvals, high impact fees, uncertain infrastructure costs, and resistance to increased density continue to make it difficult to deliver homes that are affordable for most Mainers," HR&A Advisors wrote.
HR&A, a consulting firm, provided research for the first report and authored the most recent.
Some recommendations included:
— Increasing the pace and volume of housing development reviews and appeals
— Reforming state and local building codes to reduce development costs
— Establishing a mixed-used income housing fund
— Preserving mobile homes and exploring modular and 3D-printed housing
— Finding state-owned properties that could be sold for housing development
— Increased subsidies for affordable rental and homeownership programs
Few of the recommendations are revolutionary, but if adopted, a handful could prove to be unpopular among municipalities, many of which have pushed back against implementing the zoning changes required by LD 2003.
For example, all three reports have emphasized the need for accurate and comprehensive data collection. Currently, housing production data is tracked by the U.S. Census Bureau, which compiles data voluntarily submitted by municipalities. One suggestion follows the lead of states like Connecticut and Oregon, and would require that municipalities regularly submit data on housing production and demolition. It would need to be a mandate, so municipalities couldn't opt out, the report said.
The report also suggested that towns and cities that "contribute to housing goals" should be prioritized for state funding.
"Participating municipalities would gain prioritized access to discretionary funding, such as school renovation and infrastructure funding, by meeting or exceeding housing production targets and adopting priority zoning and land use policies," the report said. Municipalities could be scored based on their adoption of a range of policies including reducing minimum lot sizes to 0.5 acres in designated growth areas and requiring multifamily housing provisions in local comprehensive plans, among other options.
HR&A floated the idea of a housing appeals process to "limit delays and unlawful denials of housing proposals."
The state would need to determine the criteria for a project to be eligible for appeal. Some states, like Connecticut, limit eligible projects to those that include affordable housing. There could also be criteria to exempt municipalities from the appeals process.
A housing appeals process was included in earlier versions of LD 2003, but was scrapped in the scaled-back version of the bill that passed. The appeal process was opposed by the Maine Municipal Association, which argued that allowing developers take municipalities to court for denying projects undermines local housing control.
The report also emphasized the need to support the private sector, particularly by bolstering the construction trades workforce.
According to the Maine Department of Labor, the state is short between 2,000 to 4,000 workers in the construction and adjacent industries, including transportation and material workers, construction laborers, electricians, equipment operators and building inspectors.
HR&A recommended providing long-term funding for apprenticeship programs, attracting nontraditional workers, streamlining licensing for the trades and accelerating employer-financed workforce housing projects.
These recommendations wouldn't be the first steps the state has taken to alleviate the housing shortage — Maine has invested over $310 million in doing just that, according to Payne, the senior housing advisor.
"These historic investments, along with key zoning and land use reforms, have supported vulnerable residents and our workforce while creating the largest pipeline of affordable housing development in MaineHousing's history," he said in a statement. "But as reports like this show, there's more Maine could do to address this critical need."
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nevada GOP governor vetoes voter ID bill that he pushed for in a deal with Democrats

time2 hours ago

Nevada GOP governor vetoes voter ID bill that he pushed for in a deal with Democrats

LAS VEGAS -- Nevada Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo unexpectedly vetoed a bill on Thursday that would have required voters in the swing state to show a photo ID at the polls — a conservative priority across the country and something that has long been on the governor's legislative wish list. The move brings a dramatic end to one of the legislative session's most surprising outcomes: A bipartisan deal that combined the requirement for voter identification with a Democratic-backed measure to add more drop boxes for mail ballots that Lombardo had initially vetoed. The bill came together in the final days of the session and passed mere minutes before the Democratic-controlled Legislature adjourned just after midnight on June 3. Lombardo had been expected to sign it. In his veto message, Lombardo said he 'wholeheartedly' supports voter ID laws but that he felt the bill fell short on addressing his concerns about ballots cast by mail, because such ballots could still be accepted 'solely on the basis of a signature match" under the bill. Because it 'would apply voter ID requirements unequally between in-person and mail ballot voters and fails to sufficiently guarantee ballot security, I cannot support it,' he said. The voter ID requirements in the bill mirrored a ballot initiative known as Question 7 that Nevada voters overwhelmingly approved last November. But voters would have to pass it again in 2026 to amend the state constitution. The requirement would then be in place by 2028. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, the Democrat who brokered the deal with Lombardo, said when he introduced the legislation that voters seemed poised to give the final approval, and that enacting a voter ID law would have given the state a head start on ensuring a smooth rollout before the next presidential election. In a scathing statement, Yeager called the governor's decision a 'breach of trust," saying that he believes Lombardo gave in to pressure around him to veto the bill, designated Assembly Bill 499. 'Lombardo was for AB499 before he was against it, encouraging all legislative Republicans to support it, which they did,' Yeager said. Voting rights groups condemned the legislation, saying it would have made it harder for some people to vote, including low-income or unhoused voters, people with disabilities and older voters. Let Nevadans Vote, which describes itself as a nonpartisan coalition, said Thursday in a statement that the governor's veto only temporarily stops what it called 'the misguided and ill-conceived implementation of voter ID in Nevada.' 'Come 2026, Question 7 will still be on the ballot," the group said while describing voter ID requirements as 'strict regimes' that 'decide who gets to exercise their constitutional right to vote and who cannot.' Polls have shown that most Americans support voter ID laws, and that has been consistent over the years and across party lines. A 2024 Gallup poll found 84% of Americans were in favor of requirements for a photo ID at voting places, consistent with Gallup findings from 2022 and 2016. That includes about two-thirds of Democrats, according to the 2024 survey. Voters are either required or requested to show ID when voting in person in 36 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Not all states require photo ID, though. Some accept documents such as a bank statement, and some allow voters without ID to vote after signing an affidavit. A few states allow poll workers to vouch for voters without an ID. Lombardo on Thursday also vetoed a bill that would have allowed the swing state's nonpartisan voters to cast ballots in Republican or Democratic primary races. The bill sought to include the more than 855,000 voters registered as nonpartisans — the state's largest voting bloc — in the process of nominating major-party candidates for congressional races and statewide offices. A ballot initiative to open up primaries for all registered voters was rejected by voters last November. The sweeping measure, which also attempted to implement ranked choice voting, faced intense opposition from party leaders on both sides who said it was too broad and confusing.

Program that kept 200 people off the streets headed for the scrap heap
Program that kept 200 people off the streets headed for the scrap heap

Boston Globe

time3 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Program that kept 200 people off the streets headed for the scrap heap

And while an 'We're really scrambling here,' said Ken Bates, CEO of Open Sky, a community services organization serving Central Massachusetts. 'We have a governor who has talked extensively about supporting people in reentry and getting people housed. And we've found a model for doing just that. We can't understand why she isn't funding this.' Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But Governor Maura Healey isn't alone in turning her back on the program. She was aided and abetted by the Legislature. Advertisement Community Compass at Open Sky began as a pilot program. But isn't the point of pilot programs to find out what works and then replicate it — not consign it to oblivion? It was allowed to draw not just from men and women recently released from state or county correctional facilities but also anyone who had ever been incarcerated — a population that, Bates said, numbers well into the thousands in Worcester County. Advertisement Its totally voluntary nature and the wrap-around services it offered — nutrition (including a food pantry), employment assistance, education, and health care referrals (including mental health and substance use treatment) — attracted more than 1,400 people to its door, who logged more than 14,000 visits during that less than two-year span. It drew its staff from those with 'learned experience,' including the formerly incarcerated who are all too familiar with what it takes to find housing when your last residence had 'MCI' as part of its address or find a job without a proper shirt or jacket in your closet. The program was not without friends in the Legislature, like Senator Jamie Eldridge of Acton and Representative Mary Keefe of Worcester, who were both unsuccessful in their attempts to win an amendment to the state budget for the $1.5 million it would take to keep the center open for another year. Now keep in mind the Massachusetts Senate added 540 local earmarks to its budget during debate this year, according to the But the formerly incarcerated don't have much of a lobby on Beacon Hill. And this year the governor's budget allocated This is going to be a tough budgetary year all around — with Washington providing the great unknown and unknowable at the moment. But when it comes to the 'frills' that lawmakers like to pass out to local causes like so many bonbons (what, Advertisement Lost in that shuffle are worthy programs like Community Compass at Open Sky, which deserves a second lease on life from the governor who once supported it and lawmakers who have managed to find money for far less critical causes. Rachelle G. Cohen is a Globe opinion writer. She can be reached at

Cuomo and Mamdani trade fire in the final New York City mayoral debate
Cuomo and Mamdani trade fire in the final New York City mayoral debate

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Cuomo and Mamdani trade fire in the final New York City mayoral debate

NEW YORK — New York's former governor, who carries heavy baggage, and his surprise top rival — a 33-year-old democratic socialist with few accomplishments — faced a flood of attacks during the second and final New York City mayoral debate Thursday night, a faceoff that captured the tumultuous end of what had been a stagnant campaign. Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani traded barbs and faced attacks from lower-polling opponents during the two-hour debate, as one rival — city Comptroller Brad Lander — made a final push to break into what polls show is a two-person race. Lander delivered withering criticisms of Cuomo over the scandals that drove him out of office four years ago — his handling of nursing home policy during Covid and sexual harassment allegations from female staffers. 'Everyone here knows you sexually harassed women, that you created a toxic work environment,' Lander said as a stone-faced Cuomo stood next to him. 'Those are just bold-faced lies,' the former governor shot back. It was one of several pitched exchanges as five candidates aimed to improve their standings and the two frontrunners desperately sought to weaken the other just two days before early voting begins in the June 24 Democratic primary. Surging in recent polls but generally still in second place, Mamdani was subject to the frontrunner treatment as his opponents knocked his paltry record in the state Legislature, far-left views and criticism of Israel. 'Experience matters and I think inexperience is dangerous in this case,' Cuomo said. 'Mr. Mamdani has a staff of five people. You're now going to run a staff of 300,000 employees.' Mamdani, in turn, sought to portray the 67-year-old Cuomo as part of a political establishment many voters have grown tired of. 'I've never had to resign in disgrace,' Mamdani said, referring to Cuomo's 2021 resignation from the scandals encapsulated in state attorney general reports. He denies all wrongdoing. 'I've never cut Medicaid. I've never stolen money from the MTA. I've never hounded the 13 women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment.' Cuomo, Mamdani, Lander, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, former city Comptroller Scott Stringer, state Sen. Zellnor Myrie and businessperson Whitney Tillson — squared off in the debate, sponsored by NY1, WNYC and THE CITY. In a shift from last week's debate, some of the candidates opted not to aim their fire at Cuomo when given the chance to ask another candidate a question of their choosing. The differences between the leading men could hardly be more stark. Cuomo would be the oldest mayor elected in modern history and is running on his lengthy record; Mamdani is hoping to bypass concerns about his inexperience by inspiring Democrats looking for a change from the status quo. Cuomo has pledged to tackle subway crime and bring his aggressive leadership brand — which critics call bullying — to City Hall. Mamdani wants to fund free bus services and create government-run grocery stores by increasing taxes on wealthy New Yorkers. His priorities will need approval from state officials in Albany, and Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has already said she opposes tax hikes. Similar to the first debate, Cuomo was often on the defensive, particularly as he traded heated exchanges with Lander. Lander, who has struggled in the race, had one of his best days yet Thursday: After getting the backing of a panel convened by the New York Times in lieu of a traditional newspaper endorsement, he found his footing on the debate stage. He trained his attacks on Cuomo again and again, including on the former governor's management of the MTA and COVID. An investigation by state Attorney General Letitia James' office determined Cuomo sexually harassed 11 women; the then-governor resigned weeks after a report detailed the findings of the probe. Cuomo — who initially apologized to some of the women — has since insisted he's done nothing wrong and said Thursday night the findings were 'all political.' The city comptroller even laid a trap of sorts. He directed Cuomo's attention to the audience where Peter Arbeeny, whose father was one of thousands of nursing home deaths during the pandemic, was waiting. Arbeeny blames Cuomo for directing nursing homes to admit COVID patients. 'Andrew, this is Peter Arbeeny,' Lander said. 'Will you finally apologize to Peter and other grieving New Yorkers? Or will you just keep gaslighting them?' Cuomo responded he was 'very sorry' that Arbeeny's father died, but insisted the state was following federal guidelines when his administration required nursing homes to receive Covid-positive patients. The ex-governor is making his comeback bid by leaning heavily on his record — including his televised Covid briefings that turned him into a national star. But he is now reportedly under investigation for lying to Congress after he initially told a House subcommittee that he did not review or edit a state Department of Health report on nursing home deaths. He said in subsequent testimony he did not 'recall' seeing it. In last week's debate, Cuomo declined to say if he edited or saw the report before its release. In an interview with PIX 11 this week, he acknowledged he reviewed it and if he had read it, he likely made edits. He's denied lying to Congress. Lander and the others used sledgehammers to go after the former governor's record — and the sexual harassment allegations that pushed him from office — and scalpels to spotlight other missteps, including his mispronunciation of Mamdani's name. While Cuomo was expected to attack Mamdani's resume, surprising pokes came from Lander — who not-so-subtly suggested Mamdani's social media savvy would not translate into managing a government of roughly 330,000 people. Adams, a reserved legislative leader, questioned the state assemblymember's qualifications. Adams, who ran through a list of her governmental accomplishments and would be the first Black woman to lead City Hall, let a hammer drop: 'In a recent New York Times article, you said you were the most qualified person to lead the city. Given what I've laid out, do you think you're more qualified than me to lead the city?' Mamdani responded — sheepishly — that all the candidates likely believe they're the most qualified. 'The objective is to beat Andrew Cuomo. Let's keep that clear. He is not fit to be mayor,' Adams told reporters after the debate. 'My question to the assemblymember was basically just to get my experience out there on the table so everybody can hear it.' Just as telling: the attacks that didn't happen. At one point in the two-hour ordeal, Adams jabbed Cuomo for his description of New York as a city so dangerous residents are scared to leave their houses at night. 'I don't know how long you've been out of it, Mr. Cuomo, but it's been a while,' she said. 'So I just want to make sure that we are clear here tonight, old slogans and scare tactics aren't going to make anybody in New York City safer, okay?' The former governor — whose coalition is highly dependent on leading with the same Black voters Adams represents in the Council — notably did not offer a rejoinder. Cuomo was hit with fresh criticism, meanwhile, when he referred to 'illegal immigrants' when sparring with Lander over contracted workers cleaning the city subways. Tilson, a little-known hedge fund executive, repeatedly knocked Mamdani's criticism of Israel — a touchstone issue for a city with the world's second-largest Jewish population. 'He has a double standard, because if you search his Twitter feed — 15,000 tweets — Sudan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia don't appear,' Tilson said. 'Yet the word 'Israel' appears more 50 times, the word 'genocide' appears more than 26 times, so that tells you where his heart is.' Mamdani called the criticism 'a smear' and said attacks on him are part of a 'dehumanization' in the city. Since last week's forum, Cuomo has won politically disparate endorsements from people he has feuded with — centrist former Mayor Michael Bloomberg and primary foe Jessica Ramos, an acerbic left-flank critic. Ramos did not qualify for Thursday's debate. But two recent polls show Mamdani — who has the recent endorsement of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — gaining ground. Hundreds of supporters of the campaigns lined the street outside John Jay College of Criminal Justice in Manhattan to cheer the candidates as they entered the building. Mamdani's crowd included a brass band, dubbed Horns for Zohran. When Cuomo arrived in his black Dodge Charger muscle car, union workers cheered as Mamdani's musicians played 'The Imperial March' from Star Wars — Darth Vader's theme. The clash of candidates earned attention online, including from former Mayor Bill de Blasio, who gleefully live-tweeted along with the attacks on his political foe Cuomo. 'Wow, @andrewcuomo is REALLY scared of @ZohranKMamdani! He's not even faking it…' de Blasio wrote. 'And Andrew is REALLY disrespecting all the New Yorkers who support Zohran.' Top Cuomo adviser Melissa DeRosa said his debate commentary was 'a sad fall from grace for the former mayor.' She listened to the other candidates speak with reporters in the spin room after the debate. Cuomo was the only candidate who declined to appear. Asked after the debate if he would accept an endorsement from de Blasio, Mamdani answered in the affirmative, labeling de Blasio ' the architect of universal pre-K, which is one of the most effective examples of what city government can do to alleviate an affordability crisis.' Emily Ngo, Joe Anuta and Michael Gartland contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store