
At least 12 injured after unknown powder found at German DHL centre
Several mail centre employees reportedly came into contact with an unknown white powder through a suspicious package, local media reported.
The mail centre staff later complained of feeling ill shortly after the package was discovered, including suffering from rashes.
The substance was found on the outside of the parcel and allegedly caused irritation. At least eight people were hospitalised after touching the powder.
However, a spokesperson for the regional police said this number could increase.
This discovery prompted a response from several emergency departments including police, firefighters and hazardous materials specialists. Around 100 emergency personnel were deployed.
A local fire department set up a decontamination site at the scene and the distribution centre was evacuated.
The police spokesperson told local media that a so-called decontamination shower had been taken to the warehouse.
Such a device can be used to wash off potentially hazardous substances. According to reports, 35 people have already used the shower.
Dangerous goods specialists are examining the package, but for now, it is unclear what it contains.
Meanwhile, the public has been asked to avoid the area until firefighters give the all-clear.
Proposals to allow charging air passengers for carry-on cabin baggage were green-lit by EU transport ministers on Thursday as part of wider reforms of EU air passenger rights, despite resistance from Germany, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain.
As Euronews reported, the proposal would create a new free hand luggage item, one that can be slipped under the seat, leaving other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges.
The agreed proposals would mean airlines must reroute passengers at the earliest opportunity, including through other carriers or transport modes when appropriate.
If rerouting isn't offered within three hours, passengers may book their own travel and claim up to 400% of the original ticket cost in reimbursement.
Delays of over four hours on short and intra-EU flights (under 3,500 km) will trigger €300 in compensation.
Long-haul flights (over 3,500 km) will warrant €500 after six hours of delay.
Airlines would no longer be permitted to invoke "extraordinary circumstances" unless they prove all reasonable measures were taken to avoid disruption. Airlines would also be explicitly required to provide food, drinks, and accommodation during delays. If they fail to do so, passengers may arrange these themselves and claim costs back.
To bolster enforcement, the rules impose stricter information requirements. Airlines must clearly inform passengers of their rights at booking and during complaints handling.
New timelines are foreseen: passengers would have up to six months to submit a claim, and airlines must respond within 14 days.
'The position finally adopted today answers to an urgent call by air passengers and airlines for up-to-date, clearer and more straightforward rules. The revised rules will bring over 30 new rights to the air passengers, applicable from the moment when they buy a ticket, until they arrive at their destination, and in some cases even beyond. It is a historical milestone as an agreement couldn't have been reached in the last 12 years,' Dariusz Klimczak, Minister of Infrastructure of Poland, whose country holds the presidency of the Council, told reporters.
European consumer organisation BEUC criticised the position adopted by member states, saying it 'substantially decreases several key rights'. 'Although the deal improved some rights on paper, giving consumers improved access to information in case of disruption, care and assistance, it represents a substantial rollback of other key rights. Take compensation for instance. The new eligibility thresholds will deprive the majority of passengers from their compensation rights as most delays are between two and four hours,' Agustín Reyna, BEUC's director general, said after the vote.
'Consumer groups have already pointed out that airlines should stop charging passengers for their hand luggage by lodging a complaint with the consumer protection authorities and the European Commission last May. Such practices are contrary to EU rules and EU top court case law which states that hand luggage is an essential aspect of passengers' carriage. On the contrary, the text adopted by the Council legitimises charging for reasonably sized hand luggage,' the director added. The next legislative steps
Now it is the turn of the European Parliament to adopt its position on the file. If it does so, the text will enter interinstitutional negotiations with member states, the Parliament and the Commission to find a common position on the new rules.
BEUC lamented the fact that the revision is being conducted through an expedited procedure that gives shorter deadlines in the Parliament, which will only need to approve the proposal by an absolute majority.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
Retiring abroad? This country is most popular among pensioners
What country is the top choice for people looking to start a new life abroad? With 53% of preferences as a destination for a move abroad, Italy ranked first. This is according to an international poll of nearly 70,000 people in over 40 countries, including the US, Israel, Canada, the UK, Brazil, and Argentina. Spain is the second choice with 22%, followed by Portugal (18%), France (15%), Greece (9%), the UK (3%) and Malta (3%), real estate agency reports. Who wants to move, and how much are buyers likely to spend? People interested in moving abroad are generally over 56 years old (81%), and more than one-third (38%) are aged over 66. Most people interested are looking to buy their new house across borders within a year (37%). Most of the respondents looking to move to another country (78%) are either married or in a relationship. The budget differs slightly depending on the nationality. Germans, Portuguese, Swedes, Brits and Dutch, for example, are keen to spend between €100,000 and €250,000, while the French and Spaniards tend to keep spending below the €100,000 mark. tells Euronews that the number of people not willing to exceed €100,000 is growing. A life change rather than an economic investment The dealmaker? For most, it's a great view, but not for the French, who tend to prefer a garden over a nice panorama. Properties with balconies are also in high demand. Over one-third (34.5%) of respondents are looking to reside abroad for at least six months per year. Most of them (46%) are planning to purchase specifically for retirement, while 30% want a life change and 16% a base for the holidays. Only 6.3% of respondents looking to purchase a home abroad see it as an investment. The required property size usually ranges between 60 and 80 square meters. Slow life or bureaucratic nightmare? Why people choose (or turn down) Italy When it comes to the top destination, Italy, most people are drawn in by its slow life as well as natural and cultural beauty, says Italy-based However, the country's excessive bureaucracy and high taxation, as well as its lacklustre economic conditions, do turn people off. In terms of regions, Tuscany remains the dream for most people interested in Italian properties (17%), followed by Sicily (10%), Lombardy, particularly near Lake Como (9%), Liguria (8%) and Puglia (8%). The ranking is almost exclusively made up of southern towns, with a few exceptions. Ostuni is in the top spot, followed by Santa Maria del Cedro, Caltagirone, Noto, Carovigno, Todi, Nizza Monferrato, Scalea, Casciana Terme Lari and San Vito dei Normanni. Most potential buyers come from the United States (31%), followed by Germany (11%), the United Kingdom (9%), Canada (6.5%), the Netherlands (6%), Sweden (5%) and Australia (4%). Notably, 38% want to move away from their country due to the political situation. This percentage was significantly higher (52.5%) among American citizens.


Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
From blue flags to ecolabels, how green are your beach holidays?
Summer 2025 is set to be one of the hottest on record in Europe, and millions will once again head for the coast. The Mediterranean is one of the world's favourite destinations, attracting one third of global tourists. However, its ecosystems are under growing pressure from the same sector that fuels its economy. In 2023 alone, the EU recorded 1.1 billion tourist nights, with Italy and Spain leading the way. It is easy to see why. European coasts offer more than just sea breeze. According to the European Union's 2024 bathing water assessment, more than 85% of Europe's bathing waters were rated 'excellent', with Cyprus, Bulgaria, and Greece topping the charts. But while the activities that draw people to the coast depend on clean and intact environments, tourists often leave places more polluted than they found them. A 2024 study published in the international journal Nature says that tourism's carbon emissions have grown at twice the rate of the global economy, and now account for 8.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Coastal tourists leave a trace of pollution behind 'In some hotspots, around 75% of annual waste is generated during the summer season', says Chloé Martin, Sustainable Tourism Programme Manager at Plan Bleu, the French activity centre of the Mediterranean Action Plan of the United Nations Environment Programme. From the skies to the seafloor, every tourist leaves a mark on the environment. Martin points out that air travel, accommodation, and plastic waste are the main ecological concerns associated with coastal tourism. As tourism adapts to climate change, how can travellers make more sustainable choices? Climate change is projected to have a profound impact on beach tourism and challenge the industry's resilience, according to the EU Blue Economy Report 2025. Rising seas, hotter summers, and more frequent extreme weather events are reshaping the physical environment, ecosystems, and amenities that underpin coastal tourism. This can damage the reputation of many destinations, which is why sustainability and adaptability to climate change are now crucial for many seaside travel companies today. But as the promotion of ecolabels and sustainability certifications increases, how can travellers tell what is truly green and what is simply greenwashing? According to the European Commission, 53% of green claims in the EU are vague or misleading. 'They are used so much that people stop believing them,' warns Patricia Puig, a specialist in marine conservation and founder of Oceanogami, a Spanish consultancy company focused on ocean responsibility. Martin recommends that travellers check whether the issuing body is a private company or an independent public body, and whether the requirements are clear and publicly available, based on international standards that undergo regular verification. What to look out for on whale or dolphin watching tours? When booking a wildlife-watching tour, it is key to research beforehand. 'If you look at the promotional pictures of the company and you see a tourist touching an animal, that's not responsible', warns Puig. When anchoring a boat, a responsible company would prefer to stabilise the vessel by attaching it to a buoy where possible, rather than always anchoring in the sand, explains Puig, to prevent damaging the seabed. It is also advisable to keep a distance from the animals. How to snorkel and dive responsibly? 'We are guests in the marine environment', says Puig, reminding travellers that touching marine animals or plants can spread diseases and disrupt ecosystems. Even seemingly harmless actions, like removing pieces of coral as souvenirs, can cause lasting damage and should never be encouraged, especially by companies claiming to be sustainable. To enjoy these activities consciously, Puig recommends choosing certified operators that work with marine biologists and offer tours to small groups, thereby reducing environmental pressure. She also suggests using reef-safe sunscreen. And jet skiing? Jet skis disturb wildlife with noise and emissions. Some countries, such as Greece and Italy, are already limiting or banning the use of motorised watercraft in coastal areas to protect both wildlife and coastal communities. 'Underwater noise is very impactful for any organism, including invertebrates, corals, and fish', Puig told Euronews. Slowing down can significantly reduce harm to wildlife. Do you want to be sure that your sea holidays are really eco-friendly? Watch the video to find out more.


Local France
a day ago
- Local France
What's going on with France's Lumpy Skin Disease outbreak?
One month after it was first detected in France, there are now 51 recorded cases of the highly contagious cattle virus Dermatose nodulaire contagieuse (known as Lumpy Skin Disease or LSD in English) in the French Alps. As of July 31st, 24 farms in Savoie have been affected and 27 in neighbouring Haute-Savoie, both départements in the French Alps. Lumpy Skin Disease poses no risk to humans, who cannot contract it, but it is highly infectious among cattle. The virus is spread by biting flies and - as the name implies - causes lumpy skin defects on infected cattle. Advertisement In most farms only a single case has been detected, but because the virus is so infectious, culls have been carried out among the herds where a case was discovered. So far around 1,000 cows have been culled. Farmers must then observe a 45-day quarantine before they can reintroduce cattle onto their farm. The government is also carrying out a mass vaccination programme in Savoie and Haute Savoie, with around 100,000 cattle already vaccinated against Lumpy Skin Disease, and another 200,000 still waiting. For the moment, vaccination drives are only taking place in the two affected départements. The government has also, at this stage, ruled out a more widespread cull of cattle in the Alps. Farms that are affected have put quarantine measures in place, so if you are hiking or cycling in the Alps you may come across paths that are closed for health reasons. A stage of the Tour de France was re-routed because the original route was due to go very close to affected areas and local farmers were worried that the influx of fans and vehicles would break the quarantine. Sign in the French Alps, referring to the Lumpy Skin Disease outbreak and culls, reads 'To the farmers who had to sacrifice their herds, we support you'. Photo: Anne-Christine Poujalat/AFP Lumpy Skin Disease cannot be transmitted to humans so there are no restrictions on the consumption of milk, cheese or meat from the affected areas. However supplies of some artisan cheeses may be affected by the culling of herds in the Alps. The UK has banned the import of French cheeses made with unpasteurised milk because of the Lumpy Skin Disease outbreak (and also the import of Italian unpasteurised cheeses, since cases of the virus have also been reported in Italy). Advertisement Although the cheese is not harmful to humans, the UK's agriculture ministry Defra says the measure is to protect British cattle, who could theoretically contract the virus through eating French cheese. This affects all French cheeses that are made with unpasteurised milk, not only those from the infection zones, and includes some of the most famous cheeses such as Roquefort and Tomme. The cheeses can still be safely consumed in France, or the rest of the EU.