Hegseth orders the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk scrubbed from Navy ship
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a highly rare move that will strip the ship of the moniker of a slain gay rights activist who served as a sailor during the Korean War.
US officials say Navy Secretary John Phelan put together a small team to rename the replenishment oiler and that a new name is expected this month.
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the next name had not yet been chosen.
Advertisement
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk.
AP
The change was laid out in an internal memo that officials said defended the action as a move to align with President Donald Trump and Hegseth's objectives to 're-establish the warrior culture.'
It marks the latest move by Hegseth and the wider Trump administration to purge all programs, policies, books and social media mentions of references to diversity, equity and inclusion. And it comes during Pride Month — the same timing as the Pentagon's campaign to force transgender troops out of the US military.
Advertisement
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement that Hegseth is 'committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.'
Phelan's office did not respond to a request for comment on the decision, which was first reported by Military.com.
The USNS Harvey Milk was named in 2016 by then-Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who said at the time that the John Lewis-class of oilers would be named after leaders who fought for civil and human rights.
Milk, who was portrayed by Sean Penn in an Oscar-winning 2008 movie, served for four years in the Navy before he was forced out for being gay.
Advertisement
He later became one of the first openly gay candidates elected to public office.
Milk served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and had sponsored a bill banning discrimination based on sexual orientation in public accommodations, housing and employment. It passed, and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone signed it into law.
Milk was a gay rights activist who also served as a sailor during the Korean War.
DVIDS/AFP via Getty Images
On Nov. 27, 1978, Milk and Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, a disgruntled former city supervisor who cast the sole vote against Milk's bill.
Advertisement
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat representing San Francisco, said in a statement Tuesday that 'this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos.
'Instead, it is a surrender of a fundamental American value: to honor the legacy of those who worked to build a better country.'
California Gov. Gavin Newsom also slammed the move, saying Milk was a Korean War combat veteran whose commander called him 'outstanding.'
'Stripping his name from a Navy ship won't erase his legacy as an American icon, but it does reveal Trump's contempt for the very values our veterans fight to protect,' the Democrat wrote on X.
The ship was christened in 2021, and during the ceremony, then-Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro said he wanted to be at the event 'not just to amend the wrongs of the past, but to give inspiration to all of our LGBTQ community leaders who served in the Navy, in uniform today and in the civilian workforce as well, too, and to tell them that we're committed to them in the future.'
The ship is operated by Military Sealift Command, with a crew of about 125 civilian mariners.
The Navy says it conducted its first resupply mission at sea in fall 2024, while operating in the Virginia Capes.
Advertisement
It continued to resupply Navy ships at sea off the East Coast until it began scheduled maintenance at Alabama Shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, earlier this year.
While the renaming is rare, the Biden administration also changed the names of two Navy ships in 2023 as part of the effort to remove Confederate names from U.S. military installations.
The USS Chancellorsville — named for the Civil War battle — was renamed the USS Robert Smalls after a sailor and former enslaved person.
And the USNS Maury, an oceanographic survey ship originally named after a Confederate sailor, was renamed the USNS Marie Tharp after a geologist and oceanographic cartographer who created the first scientific maps of the Atlantic Ocean floor.
Maritime lore hints as to why renaming ships is so unusual, suggesting that changing a name is bad luck and tempts retribution from the sea gods.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries
Donald Trump's travel ban, a purportedly security-focused measure largely targeting African nations and Muslim-majority countries, underscores his administration's ignorant and potentially destructive approach to a continent with growing global influence. In announcing the ban, Trump said it's meant to ensure the U.S. only allows people to enter who 'do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' Whereas the Biden administration took steps to ingratiate itself with African leaders and slough off some of the American paternalism that has driven some African nations closer to Russia and China in recent years, Trump's administration seems to have doubled down on an outmoded strategy of exploitation, conspiratorial brow-beating and ostracism. In just the first few months of Trump's second term, his administration has pressured African nations to permit Elon Musk's Starlink internet service to operate within their borders and has sought to use war-torn nations in Africa — including a country known for its human rights abuses — as landing spots for people booted from the U.S. as part of Trump's mass deportation plan. The president also personally turned the Oval Office into a screening room for bigoted conspiracy theories when he invited the president of South Africa to the White House and then bombarded him with false allegations of 'white genocide' being committed in his country. Needless to say, this hasn't helped the U.S. build on its rapport with African nations. And fundamentally, what that could mean for the U.S. is that a continent full of countries that American officials have pinpointed as crucial partners in our geopolitical strategies related to security and commerce could drift further toward our adversaries. That's certainly the vibe given off by the African Union Commission and its dozens of member states, which denounced Trump's travel ban and warned about its potential impacts. 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades. Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation,' the commission said in a statement, adding: 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.' University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers identified one clear way that Trump's travel ban could harm the American economy. 'One obvious economic implication of the latest travel ban is that genuinely international conferences will no longer be held in the U.S.,' he wrote on X. And that may just be the tip of the iceberg. It's also true that the materials used to make batteries in everything from cutting-edge cars to phones and computers most often come from African mines. Which is to say: Trump's cold shoulder toward African nations could have dire consequences for America's future, particularly with regard to the economy and U.S. national security. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Plan To Turn Ex-RAF E-3 AWACS Into E-6B ‘Doomsday' Jet Trainer Abandoned By Navy
The U.S. Navy has quietly awarded Northrop Grumman a contract to strip useful parts from an ex-Royal Air Force (RAF) E-3D Sentry airborne early warning and control aircraft before disposing of it. The service first acquired the plane in 2021 for conversion into a dedicated training platform for the crews of its E-6B Mercury jets, which are often referred to as 'doomsday planes' given their role as airborne command posts that relay launch orders for America's nuclear arsenal. 'Naval Air Systems Command (NAVIAR) Patuxent River, MD, issued a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) and Labor Hour (LH) Delivery Order to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation [NGSC] … under Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) N0001920G0005, on an other than full and open basis for the for part harvesting and disposal of the TE-6B aircraft, Bureau Number (BuNo) 170508 (formerly an E-3D Aircraft),' according to a notice posted online on May 27. The contract, valued at just under $3 million, was formally awarded on May 14. As of March 2024, the Navy had already received $16.376 million in funding to acquire and convert the ex-RAF E-3D to the TE-6B standard. 'NGSC is the only vendor that owns, controls, and has access to the aircraft maintenance manuals and proprietary engineering data previously independently funded and developed by NGSC establishing the current configuration of the TE-6B,' an accompanying official justification for the sole-source deal adds. 'Accurate and current technical data is required to part harvest the preponderance of components and dispose of the aircraft.' How far along the TE-6B had gotten in the conversion process is unknown. In 2022, NAVAIR announced that the work had begun, and that 'the outer mold line will be modified to resemble an E-6 and the aerial refueling probe and radar dome will be removed.' It's not clear what other alterations may have been planned, but the E-6B is notably configured to refuel in mid-air using the boom method rather than a probe-and-drogue like the E-3D. The Mercury jets also have a completely revised cockpit architecture that leverages elements taken from Boeing's 737 and 777 airliners. It is also unclear why the Navy is moving to dispose of the aircraft now and what might happen to it in the end. Prior Navy budget documents do not mention any plans to halt work on the former RAF E-3D as of March 2024, but do mention 'increased air certification requirements due to removal of the dome.' The Navy did not request any additional funding for the conversion work in its proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2025. TWZ has reached out to NAVAIR and Northrop Grumman for more information. The Navy currently has 16 E-6Bs in service. Those aircraft are upgraded E-6As, which first began entering service in 1989. Today, the Mercury fleet supports two critical nuclear deterrence mission sets: a Navy one called 'Take Charge And Move Out' (TACAMO) and an Air Force one referred to simply as the Airborne Command Post (ABNCP), but better known by the nickname Looking Glass. Today, TACAMO involves the relaying of orders to Navy Ohio class nuclear ballistic missile submarines, even if they are submerged, with the help of a five-mile-long antenna. The Looking Glass mission set is very roughly similar to TACAMO, but for Air Force nuclear-capable bombers and silo-based Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles. The E-6Bs, which are Navy-owned but fly with crews that also include Air Force personnel, also have the ability to initiate Minuteman III launches while in flight. The RAF first began flying E-3Ds in 1991, eventually acquiring a fleet of seven of the aircraft, but had persistent difficulties in maintaining them. By December 2020, only three of the jets, locally designated as Sentry AEW1s, were still serviceable. In addition to the U.S. Navy, the Chilean Air Force also acquired three of the British E-3Ds after their retirement and began flying them operationally in 2022. The E-6B, as well as all variants of the E-3 Sentry, are derived from the Boeing 707 airliner, which is now long out of production. The original E-6As were the last 707-based aircraft to roll out of Boeing's factory in Renton, Washington, in the 1980s. The E-3D variant of the Sentry, specifically, and the Mercury also both feature more modern fuel-efficient high-bypass CFM56 engines. The U.S. Air Force currently flies E-3s powered by older, out-of-production TF33 engines. The service is moving to retire those aircraft and replace them with a mix of E-7 Wedgetail jets based on the Boeing 737 Next Generation (737NG) line and space-based assets. The E-7 is also set to succeed the E-3 in RAF service. The Air Force also operates a variety of C-135-series aircraft that are based on the 707's immediate predecessor, which are also steadily aging. This includes multiple intelligence-gathering RC-135 types for which there are dedicated TC-135 trainers. When it comes to the TE-6B, 'training flights expose [E-6B] mission aircraft to significant wear-and-tear and impact their readiness and availability,' Navy Capt. Adam Scott, then head of the Airborne Strategic Command, Control and Communications Program Office (PMA-271) within NAVAIR, had said back in 2021. 'This is a great chance to work with the United Kingdom and bring a much-needed aircraft to the fleet.' Scott left that post in March ahead of his retirement from the Navy. 'Since the E-6's inception over three decades ago, the Navy has looked for ways to train pilots and keep them up to date on the airframe. Those options have included leasing several different commercial aircraft as well as using the mission-capable aircraft,' the Navy had also said in 2021. 'For the past several years, the program has been looking for a dedicated trainer and found one when the Royal Air Force decided to retire their fleet of E-3Ds.' 'The [TE-6B] aircraft will help reduce an estimated 600 flight hours and 2,400 landings/cycles per year from the E-6 mission aircraft.' In April, aviation services provider AAR announced that KALS LLC, a joint venture it had formed together KIRA Aviation Services, had received an E-6B pilot contract, but did not say what platform or platforms might be used for that purpose. Whether the Navy is now pursuing additional in-flight training options to fill any resulting gap left by the disposal of the TE-6B, provided in-house or by contractors, is unknown. The service does have simulators and other virtual training systems to support the E-6B fleet, but this in no way eliminates the need for live in-flight training. Routine training is essential for maintaining crew proficiency for any aircraft, but those requirements are especially pronounced for the E-6B fleet given its critical mission sets. At the same time, ensuring the availability of those jets for actual operational taskings is similarly vital. For years now already, the Mercury fleet has become increasingly more difficult to operate and sustain just because of the age of the aircraft. 'The E-6B fleet met or exceeded its annual mission capable goals for 5 of the 9 fiscal years from fiscal years 2011 through 2019 and its mission capable rate decreased during this time period,' according to a report the Government Accountability Office, a Congressional watchdog, published in 2020. 'Program officials cited three reasons for not meeting the mission capable goals: parts obsolescence, aging aircraft, and increased maintenance needs.' 'Officials stated that increasing the lifespan of the aircraft has created more requirements on maintenance personnel, and total maintenance hours have increased by 9 percent since 2010,' that report, which came less than a year before the Navy's purchase of the former RAF E-3D, added. The move now to dispose of the TE-6B does come as the Navy is working to acquire a C-130J-based aircraft to succeed the E-6B, at least when it comes to the TACAMO mission. The service does not appear to have put out a formal timeline for when the new E-130J might enter operational service, but has previously said it is looking to order three of the aircraft in Fiscal Year 2027 and six more in Fiscal Year 2028. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation is currently the prime contractor for the E-130J program. Questions remain about whether the E-130J will eventually take on the Looking Glass mission set. Other aircraft, like the Air Force's forthcoming Boeing 747-based E-4C Survivable Airborne Operations Center (SAOC) jets, might also take on that role in the future. When the last E-6B actually gets retired remains to be seen, as well. In the meantime, Mercury crews will still need to meet their routine flight training requirements, now without the help of the TE-6B aircraft. Contact the author: joe@
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It
Nearly universal support on Capitol Hill for the "big, beautiful bill" is a powerful reminder that Republicans love to run for office on a platform of cutting spending and then immediately betray that promise once they actually have the power to fulfill it. President Donald Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and most of the Republican caucus are working tirelessly to pass a budget that would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit. Virtually the only political figures remaining consistent in their opposition to increased spending are Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.), and Elon Musk, who is currently venting his frustration with Trump on X. Suffice it to say, genuine attempts to cut federal spending are unusual. One bright spot, however, is Trump's move to cut funding to publicly subsidized media: National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Libertarians and conservatives have long wondered why the government is in the business of subsidizing news or children's programming, especially when that programming evinces a pro-liberal bias, as was obviously the case with NPR and its president, Katherine Maher. PBS may be marginally more defensible on its own merits, but in the year 2025, it is simply not the case that the channel is meeting some need that the market fails to provide for. YouTube is brimming with high-quality, free (i.e. advertiser-supported) educational content for kids. If Big Bird is a better product, let him stand on his two legs—people will pay to watch him. Defenders of continued taxpayer support for PBS deploy all sorts of counterarguments. But one new development merits a response. A trio of researchers—Christopher Ali, Hilde Van den Bulck, and Jonathan Kropko—published their study, "An island of trust: public broadcasting in the United States," in which they argue that PBS is an atypically trusted source of information, and thus deserves continued public support. In a writeup of their paper, published by Nieman Lab—Harvard University's investigative journalism foundation—the researchers argue that "Americans trust PBS because it's publicly funded, not in spite of it." "Very little seems to unite Americans these days," the authors write. "Trust in government and public institutions is precipitously low. PBS bucks this trend. It is an 'island of trust' in an ocean of what some call 'post-trust' and others call 'post-truth.' It can be the focal point for a renewed spirit of American public discussions, a commitment to journalism, and a platform to recultivate trust." One issue: The study measured trust in PBS, not among all Americans, but among viewers of PBS. That was the sample: survey respondents who themselves watch PBS. This is hardly a surprising finding—and is not whatsoever grounds for public funding. Regular viewers of Fox News, for instance, place very high levels of trust in Fox News. Does that mean all Americans do? Does it mean that Fox News should receive public funding? One doubts that the researchers would agree with such an argument. In any case, they did not respond to a request for comment. For more on Trump's efforts to defund NPR and PBS, read Reason's Jesse Walker. I am joined by Amber Duke to discuss Elon Musk's understandable outrage over Nazi-salute double standards, the attack on Jewish demonstrators in Colorado, Joy Behar's brilliant campaign advice, Stephen Miller clashing with CNN, and Joe Rogan vs. Bono on the U.S. Agency for International Development. I'm waiting to get my Nintendo Switch 2 until I have more free time on my schedule. Right now, I am playing the Mega Man X Legacy collection, which includes the first four games. I've loved these games since I was a kid, though I had forgotten how steep the difficulty curve is. X-1 is pretty easy overall, but I don't understand how you could possibly find all the hidden power-ups in 2 and 3 without help. I've beaten them before, and I still don't remember where to find everything. The post If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It appeared first on
