Trump's Trade War Is ‘Wake-up Call' for Europe, Lagarde Says
A full-scale global trade war would hurt the United States in particular and could re-energize Europe's push towards unity, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on Friday.
The US has imposed a raft of tariffs on friends and foes alike and threatened even more measures, prompting retaliation from most and raising concern that global growth could take a major hit.
"If we were to go to a real trade war, where trade would be dampened significantly, that would have severe consequences," Lagarde told BBC's HARDTalk program. "It would have severe consequences for growth around the world and for prices around the world, but particularly in the United States."
However, these tensions could also have the positive side effect of giving European unity another push, Lagarde argued.
"You know what it's doing at the moment? Stirring European energy. It's a big wake-up call for Europe. Maybe this is a European moment, yet again," she said.
The European Commission and Germany, the bloc's biggest economy, have already announced increased spending on defense and infrastructure, ending years of reluctance to spend, Lagarde argued.
This "collective waking up" also appears to include the UK, which left the European Union, as it's taking part in Europe's security effort, Lagarde argued.
Many of the EU's large scale efforts to deepen unity have been stalled for the better part of the last decade and former ECB chief Mario Draghi delivered a scathing report on the European project last year.
Leaders, however, have taken few if any steps to implement Draghi's reform proposals, even as the bloc is barely growing now and Germany suffered two straight years to economic contraction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
a day ago
- Saudi Gazette
Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog finds it in breach of obligations
TEHRAN — Iran has warned it will ramp up its nuclear activities after the United Nations nuclear watchdog's 35-member board of governors adopted a resolution Thursday declaring it in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. Tehran retaliated by announcing the launch of a new uranium enrichment center and the installation of advanced centrifuges – an escalatory move likely to complicate nuclear talks with the United States set to resume this weekend. Nations attending the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board meeting in Vienna voted on the resolution, with 19 in favor, 3 against and 11 abstentions, Reuters reported. The IAEA has previously accused Iran of non-cooperation but Thursday's move marks an official finding of non-compliance and raises the prospect of escalating the issue to the UN Security Council. The resolution was tabled by European countries and the US after a May 31 IAEA report found Iran to be non-compliant in its nuclear duties, including failing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country, and its stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran says the IAEA report was politicized. Uranium is a nuclear fuel that, when highly enriched, can be used to make a bomb. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful condemned the US, the United Kingdom, France and Germany for tabling the resolution and said it has 'no option but to respond.'A day ahead of the vote, a senior Iranian official told CNN that 'Iran intends to launch a series of retaliatory nuclear measures as soon as the resolution is adopted at the IAEA.''These measures include scaling back cooperation with the agency and imposing certain restrictions, activating advanced and new-generation centrifuges, and removing monitoring cameras from the Isfahan facility,' the official Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X last week: 'Mark my words, as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights.'In 2022, the IAEA censured Iran over uranium particles found at the undeclared sites. Iran also dismissed that motion as 'politicized,' and responded by removing surveillance cameras from key sites – depriving negotiators of up-to-date information on its enrichment IAEA board resolution comes as Tehran and Washington are in the midst of complicated negotiations over Iran's nuclear two nations will hold indirect talks in the Omani capital, Muscat, on Sunday for the sixth time, Oman's Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said on X Thursday. Despite multiple rounds of negotiations over a new nuclear deal, a major sticking point remains: Iran's insistence on its right to enrich has said he's grown less confident in being able to strike a deal with Iran, saying in a new interview that Tehran could be 'delaying' striking an agreement.'I'm getting more and more less confident about it. They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' Trump said in an interview with a New York Post podcast that was released on tensions have escalated significantly ahead of the next round of Wednesday night, the US State and Defense departments made efforts to arrange the departure of non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, according to US officials and sources familiar with the efforts. It's not clear what caused the change in posture, but a defense official said US Central Command is monitoring 'developing tension in the Middle East.'Trump said the personnel are being moved out 'because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens. But they have been or we've given notice to move out, and we'll see what happens.'On Thursday, the US embassy in Jerusalem also issued a security alert restricting US government staff and their families from traveling outside of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Be'er Sheva until further notice. — CNN
Saudi Gazette
a day ago
- Saudi Gazette
US reviewing Aukus submarine pact as part of 'America First' agenda
WASHINGTON — The US has launched a review of its multi-billion dollar submarine deal with the UK and Australia, saying the security pact must fit its "America First" agenda. Under the trilateral pact, believed to be aimed at countering China, Australia is to get its first nuclear-powered subs from the US, before the allies create a new fleet by sharing cutting-edge tech. Both Australia and the UK - which did its own review last year - have played down news of the US probe, saying it is natural for a new administration to reassess. The move comes as both Australia and the UK face pressure from the White House to lift military spending, demands heeded by Downing Street but largely resisted by Canberra. The Aukus agreement - worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn) - was signed in 2021, when all three countries involved had different leaders. A US defense official told the BBC the pact was being reviewed "as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda". "As [US Defence] Secretary [Pete] Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our servicemembers [and] that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defense," the defense official said. The US has been pushing allies to start spending at least 3% of GDP on defense as soon as possible. The UK has agreed to spend 2.5% of GDP on its defense by 2028, and 3% by the next parliament, while Australia has also said it will lift funding, but not to the 3.5% that the US wants. The review will be headed up by Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of Aukus, in a speech last year questioning why the US would give away "this crown jewel asset when we most need it". Defense Minister Richard Marles, speaking to local Australian media on Thursday morning local time, said he was optimistic the deal would continue. "I'm very confident this is going to happen," he told ABC Radio Melbourne. "You just need to look at the map to understand that Australia absolutely needs to have a long-range submarine capability." Some in Australia have been lobbying for the country to develop a more self-reliant defense strategy, but Marles said it was important to "stick to a plan" - a reference to the previous government's controversial cancellation of a submarine deal with France in favor of Aukus. An Australian government spokesperson told the BBC it was "natural" that the new administration would "examine" the agreement, adding the UK had also recently finished a review of the security pact between the long-standing allies. There is "clear and consistent" support for the deal across the "full political spectrum" in the US, they said, adding Australia looked forward to "continuing our close cooperation with the Trump Administration on this historic project". A UK defense spokesperson told the BBC it was "understandable" for a new administration to look at the deal, "just as the UK did last year". Aukus is a "landmark security and defense partnership with two of our closest allies", the spokesperson said, and "one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades, supporting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic". Jennifer Kavanagh, from American thinktank Defense Priorities, told the BBC that the US was "absolutely right to take another look at this deal" as its submarine capacities were already stretched. "The US cannot meet its own demand for these nuclear-powered submarines," she said. The other concern the US might have is whether Australia would use the submarines they buy in the way the US wants them to, she said, particularly if conflict erupts over Taiwan. Dr Kavanagh said the review might see the security pact shift its focus away from providing submarines to sharing other long-range weapons technology. However, if the US were to pull out of the deal, China would "celebrate" as they have long criticized the deal, Dr Kavanagh added. For Australia, the deal represents a major upgrade to its military capabilities. The country becomes just the second after the UK to receive Washington's elite nuclear propulsion technology. Such submarines will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet and Australia would also be able to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first time. It is a big deal for the US to share what is often called the "crown jewels" of its defence technology. But arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in a region they themselves aren't a part of. From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western Australia. Canberra will also buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US at a yet-to-be-determined date in the early 2030s - with options to purchase two more. After that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine model for the UK and Australian navies. This attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three countries. The security alliance has repeatedly drawn criticism from China, with the foreign ministry in Beijing saying it risked creating an arms race. — BBC
Saudi Gazette
a day ago
- Saudi Gazette
Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations
VIENNA — The global nuclear watchdog's board of governors has formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Nineteen of the 35 countries on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voted for the motion, which was submitted by the US, UK, France and Germany. It says Iran's "many failures" to provide the IAEA with full answers about its undeclared nuclear material and activities "constitute non-compliance". It also expresses concern about Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, which can be used to make reactor fuel but also nuclear weapons. Iran condemned the resolution as "political" and said it would open a new enrichment facility. It follows a report from the IAEA last week which criticized Iran's "general lack of cooperation" and said it had enough uranium enriched to 60% purity, near weapons grade, to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. Iran insists its nuclear activities are entirely peaceful and that it would never seek to develop or acquire nuclear a landmark 2015 deal with six world powers, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear activities and allow continuous and robust monitoring by the IAEA's inspectors in return for relief from crippling economic also committed to help the IAEA resolve outstanding questions about the declarations under its Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Safeguards US President Donald Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US 2019, Iran has increasingly breached restrictions of the existing nuclear deal in retaliation, particularly those relating to the production of enriched said three countries - Russia, China and Burkina Faso - voted against the resolution at the IAEA board's meeting in Vienna on Thursday. Eleven others abstained and two did not text, seen by the BBC, says the board "deeply regrets" that Iran has "failed to co-operate fully with the agency, as required by its Safeguards Agreement"."Iran's many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the agency with full and timely co-operation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran... constitutes non-compliance with its obligations," it a result, it says, the IAEA is "not able to verify that there has been no diversion of nuclear material required to be safeguarded". The "inability... to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful," it adds, "gives rise to questions that are within the competence of the United Nations Security Council".The issue could now be referred to the Security Council, which has the power to restore sanctions lifted under the 2015 Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) and the Iranian foreign ministry issued a joint statement condemning the "political action" by countries who voted in favour of the resolution and insisting that it was "without technical and legal basis".They announced that Iran would respond by setting up a new uranium enrichment facility at a "secure location" and by replacing first-generation centrifuges used to enrich uranium with sixth-generation ones at the underground Fordo facility."Other measures are also being planned," they resolution could further complicate talks between Tehran and Washington on a new nuclear agreement that Donald Trump hopes will see Iran end its enrichment program and prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon.A sixth round of talks is due to be held this Sunday in Oman. However, Trump said earlier this week that he was growing less confident of striking a also held a reportedly tense phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long argued for a military rather than diplomatic approach. Israel considers the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential comes amid mounting tensions in the Middle East, with the US advising non-essential staff at some of its embassies in the region to leave and reports saying that Israel is ready to launch strikes on Iranian nuclear defense minister has warned that it would respond to any attack by targeting all US military bases "within our reach". — BBC
