Elon Musk now goes by ‘Gorklon Rust' on X: Here's what it could mean
Elon Musk - the world's richest man - has once again changed his name on X (the social media platform he owns, formerly known as Twitter). The new name on the billionaire's profile spells 'gorklon rust', leading to speculation about its meaning.
The new username is the third one used by Musk in the last six months after "Kekius Maximus" in December 2024 and "Harry Bolz" in February this year.
While the billionaire didn't give details on why he changed his name again or what it means, one possible reason could be the induction of a lightweight version of Grok to power the X recommendation algorithm.
The first part of the name, "Gorklon Rust", seems to be inspired by xAI's chatbot Grok, while the 'klon' could hint at 'clone', making the whole term mean "Grok clone". Meanwhile, the 'rust' part of the phrase could be hinting towards the Rust programming language that xAI uses in its tech stack.
There's also a meme coin linked to the name Gork on the Solana blockchain, suggesting this could also be a ploy by the billionaire to boost the cryptocurrency's visibility.
Recently, Musk also tagged the handle 'Gork' in one of his posts, which is different from the official handle of the Grok chatbot. The new handle has been around since at least early 2025 and seems to be a more humorous spin on Grok—offering irreverent replies and engaging in banter.
Meanwhile, the word Grok itself is inspired by Musk's fascination with the science fiction book The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. In a product announcement earlier this year, Musk explained that Grok means to fully and profoundly understand something. So far, there have been three generations of foundation models powering Grok, and Musk has announced xAI's plans to launch the new Grok 3.5 model this week.
First Published: 5 May 2025, 12:18 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why Trump Appears To Have Won Billionaire Battle Royale With Elon Musk
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. A controversial bill has strained the relationship between Trump and Musk. Trump has warned Musk of serious consequences if he supports Democrats, which could impact Musk's businesses and brand reputation. A "Big Beautiful Bill" drove a wedge between US President Donald Trump and his former adviser Elon Musk, turning the bros to, well, almost foes. The blistering end of the raging bromance largely played out live on their social media profiles. The friendship had clear benefits for both men. Trump gained the financial backing of the world's wealthiest man. Musk gained not only unparalleled access to the US president but also a role leading the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). While Musk appears to have cooled the spat somewhat, deleting some of his more critical posts, Trump doesn't seem in the mood to let it all go. And, as the situation stands right now, it does seem that Trump has the upper hand. Trump has warned Musk of "very serious consequences" if he backs Democrats at the mid-term elections in 2026. He didn't stop at that. He also said that he has "no desire" to repair his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX boss. Has Trump Gained The Upper Hand? The break-up can have big consequences for Musk's business empire. His companies were promised $3 billion in government contracts from 17 federal agencies in 2023. And now, Musk, out of the White House and seemingly Trump's good books, faces the possibility of taking a financial hit if the US President follows through on his threat. Not just this, Trump's disappointment in him may translate into a regulatory crackdown for Musk. Eleven agencies were investigating or suing Musk companies before Trump took office, as per a report by The New York Times. The feud also comes as an opportunity for the tech mogul's rivals. Bill Gates visited the White House on Friday to ask for the undoing of some of the Musk-driven cuts to foreign aid, the Red Letter reported. It would not be the first when Trump would discard a powerful figure. However, Musk has more power than most and the capability to strike back. But what may hold him back is his public reputation and brands that are already tarnished due to the fallout. Break-Up After White House Farewell The public fight came days after Musk departed his role as the face of DOGE in a White House ceremony, where Trump thanked him for his service. However, as per reports, underneath the surface of civility, tension was brewing over the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB). Musk had earlier claimed that DOGE would save the government $2 trillion. To achieve the goal, he cut government programmes and employees at a remarkable rate in the early months of the Trump administration. The USAID programme, the Department of Education and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau took the biggest hits. As the cuts picked up pace, so did the Musk-linked controversy. Critics questioned the apparent power wielded by the unelected billionaire. Musk's ties to the far right were also in the spotlight after he appeared to perform two "Roman salutes", which many observers believed to be a Nazi salute. His apparent rampage through the government did not last long. As Trump's executive appointees assumed control of their departments, Musk and DOGE experienced increasing resistance. After a series of fractious cabinet meetings, Trump reduced the power of DOGE in March, reported The Conversation. The negative publicity has also damaged the Tesla brand, leading to a drop in sales around the world and a fall in Tesla's share price. When he announced on May 1 that he would be leaving DOGE, he claimed the department had saved the government $180 billion in spending - a number well short of his original target. While for Trump, his treatment of Trump appears to be a smart move, for Musk, it came as a harsh lesson in politics.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Pump.Fun's $1 Billion Token Sale Raises Liquidity Concerns for Memecoin Universe
(Bloomberg) -- decision to raise $1 billion is sparking concern that a token sale by the most popular platform for creating memecoins risks siphoning demand away from the hundreds of coins issued daily through the website. The platform, which is based on the Solana blockchain, is still in the early stages of the token offering, according to a person familiar with the plans who asked not to be named discussing private company information, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday. Alon Cohen, co-founder of didn't respond to requests for comment. While details of the sale are not clear, the offering would rank among the largest ever in crypto. The last major token sale was the January debut of the Trump memecoin, which instantly generated billions of dollars in trading volume within a few days. The broader memecoin sector saw a drop in trading when the Trump token was launched, as speculators sold other crypto assets to buy President Donald Trump's official token. 'could be a drain on liquidity,' said Ryan Watkins, co-founder of crypto investment fund Syncracy Capital. 'The raise will take place over the course of a month. And I think during that month, any asset in the Solana ecosystem is vulnerable to being sold to fund that purchase.' which has been compared to the edgy 4chan social media network, allows users to quickly create, promote and sell memecoins, a type of token that has no intended utility but is often associated with jokes, memes and celebrities. The platform has been one of the biggest drivers of the explosive growth in memecoins and the attendant burst in activity on the Solana blockchain in the past year. Retail and professional investors alike have poured billions of dollars into the sector, and their quests for quick profits are seen as generating a lucrative stream of fees for founders. Other market participants also questioned the relatively high valuation of based on the token sale, which is set to be at a $4 billion fully diluted valuation, or FDV. The measure equals the current price times the total number of tokens expected to ever be in circulation. 'I would consider investing at $50 million FDV,' said Christine Fang, managing partner at Hong Kong-based crypto hedge fund PSE Trading. 'Not sure if the $4 billion valuation is justified, especially with the lack of liquidity overall in altcoins.' But with few details about the token sale, others said it's too early to make a conclusion. 'People are overly bearish on this, specifically because they don't know the details,' said Mert Mumtaz, co-founder and chief executive officer of Solana infrastructure project Helius. 'Pump is the main name behind memes today,' Mumtaz added. 'So if they raise a bunch of extra money from investors instead of users, I don't see why they wouldn't invest this money to grow the market beyond what exists today. I mean, their entire business relies on this.' More stories like this are available on
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bolivia struggles with poor internet connectivity. Why did it still say no to Elon Musk's Starlink?
Web pages load at a crawling pace. Video streams glitch and freeze. Outside Bolivia's biggest cities, the nearest internet signal is sometimes hours away over treacherous mountain roads. So when Elon Musk's Starlink offered Bolivia fast, affordable internet beamed from space, many expected the Andean nation of 12 million to celebrate. Instead, Bolivia said no thanks. Starlink, the satellite internet service from Musk's private space company, SpaceX, has made remarkable strides in South America, spreading to almost every country and bringing high-speed internet to the region's most far-flung corners, even reaching isolated Indigenous people living deep in the Amazon rainforest. But Starlink's advance has been stymied by Bolivia, which refused to give it an operating license last year, with experts and officials citing worries over its unchecked dominance everywhere it has set up shop, instead choosing to rely on the country's own aging Chinese-made satellite. The decision to reject Starlink has puzzled and angered people in Bolivia, where internet speeds are the slowest in South America and hundreds of thousands remain offline. Without an internet connection, people often struggle to get an education and lack access to jobs and fast help during natural disasters. But in keeping Starlink out, Bolivia has joined other nations that have begun to raise alarm about SpaceX and the political influence Musk can exert through his control of a telecommunications network used by governments, militaries and people across the world. Starlink, which did not respond to requests for comment, has also faced roadblocks in the Caribbean, Europe and South Africa. Musk claims that 'there is no substitute for Starlink' and uses X, the social media platform he also owns, to promote his right-wing politics. And he has been vocal about the power he wields. 'Countries have realized that they cannot just rely on one party,' said Antoine Grenier, the global head of space at Analysys Mason, a consultancy based in England. Just over half of Bolivian homes have broadband internet, compared with 87% in Brazil and 94% in Chile. More than 90% of Bolivians use cellphones to go online, but in rural areas where cell signals can be spotty, many have no way to connect to the internet. 'People sometimes have to get up on a tree or a rock to get the signal,' said Patricia Llanos, a university professor and geographer who often leads teams of field researchers in Bolivia's Amazon region. 'It's a big problem for us.' Elsewhere in the world, Starlink has helped bring the internet to many places. In only a few years, SpaceX has launched more than 7,300 small satellites into space, connecting more than 5 million people across 125 countries. But despite its success elsewhere, Starlink is viewed with suspicion by Bolivia's government. The worry, according to Bolivian authorities and experts, is that Starlink could usher in unfair competition and undermine the country's sovereignty by handing over too much control to a powerful foreign company, which may try to use its influence to sway Bolivian regulations in its favor. Starlink 'has technological superiority' over Bolivia's own internet services, said Iván Zambrana, the director of Bolivia's space agency, which owns the nation's Chinese-made satellite and has been operating it since its launch in 2013. But regulators must set rules to ensure that Starlink contributes to Bolivia's economy and 'competes on equal terms' without undercutting local internet providers, he added. 'Any company that comes to do business in the country is going to get a piece of the pie — a pie that right now belongs to those of us here,' Zambrana said in an interview. Starlink's service has become a hit in much of South America largely because it can be difficult and costly to bring traditional internet infrastructure to remote areas. In villages that can be reached only by boat or over dirt roads, compact Starlink kits offer a cheaper, more practical way to get homes, schools and hospitals online. In Brazil, its biggest market in Latin America, Starlink has grown to more than 250,000 subscribers since arriving in 2022, according to the company's figures. But Brazil has started looking for alternatives, fearing an overreliance on Starlink. Last year, after Musk's X defied orders by the country's Supreme Court to take down right-wing social media posts peddling misinformation, Brazil struck a deal with SpaceSail, a Chinese rival currently developing its own satellite internet system. In Bolivia, Zambrana played down the country's need for Starlink, insisting that the Chinese satellite it uses is reliable and provides internet coverage across the country. 'There's no place where these services aren't provided,' he said. But experts say that, in reality, the aging satellite is no match for Starlink. Its signal is slow and patchy, and installing antennas and satellite dishes in rural areas is expensive and difficult. Now, the Bolivian-run satellite is nearing the end of its life span, with expectations that it could run out of fuel and go offline as early as 2028. Bolivia is still evaluating how to replace the satellite, but it has held early talks with China's SpaceSail about possibly using the satellite network it is building, said Hugo Siles, Bolivia's ambassador to China. 'We have been working with China because we feel that there is an absolute accommodation in terms of Bolivian regulations and a respect for sovereignty,' Siles said in an interview. SpaceSail, which did not respond to a request for comment, plans to launch 648 low-orbiting satellites this year and as many as 15,000 by 2030, according to figures posted by the Shanghai municipal government, which owns SpaceSail. 'If anyone is going to be able to compete with Starlink in the near future, it will be them,' said Gregory Falco, an assistant professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Cornell University. For now, pressure to connect Bolivians is growing, with lawmakers reconsidering if the country should allow Starlink to operate in the country. Starlink appears optimistic about its chances. On its map of service locations, it lists Bolivia as one country where its satellite internet will become available in 2025. This would be welcome news for Adrián Valencia, 45, a schoolteacher in Quetena Chico, a town of 1,000 residents in Bolivia's southern region. Valencia, who runs the town's only high school, serving some 200 students, said the town's poor internet connection means that he has to drive six hours to the closest city to upload educational videos that he records for his students. 'The internet is terrible,' he said. That undermines his students' education and digital literacy. 'Not having internet access,' he added, 'is like not being able to read.' Some local hotels have even smuggled Starlink routers across the border from neighboring Chile. Even though the signal reaches sections of Bolivia's border, Starlink typically cuts off the internet after a few months. As Llanos, the geographer, prepared a workshop recently in a remote forest region seven hours from La Paz, she, too, hoped to turn to Starlink, asking colleagues to bring her a router. They could not get one in time, though, so the 80 participants used walkie-talkies to communicate during their training. 'Even though we have a satellite in space,' said Llanos, referring to the Chinese spacecraft, 'we still don't have a way to connect.'
