&w=3840&q=100)
Bolivia votes amid 40-year high inflation and divided opposition candidates
A man carries electoral material outside a polling station, ahead of the general election scheduled for August 17, in El Alto, Bolivia. Reuters
Voters in Bolivia are gearing up for a general election on Sunday that has been overshadowed by inflation at a four-decade high and the absence of former leftist President Evo Morales, who is barred from running.
Leading the race are opposition conservative contenders Samuel Doria Medina, a business magnate, and Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga, a former president, but neither commands more than 30% support, opinion polls show, with around a quarter of Bolivians undecided.
The August race marks the first time in almost two decades that polling indicates Bolivia's incumbent Movement for Socialism, or MAS, could face defeat. Support for MAS-affiliated and other left-leaning candidates trails the opposition, totaling around 10%, according to the latest August Ipsos CEISMORI survey.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
If no presidential candidate wins more than 40% support with a 10 percentage point lead, the election will head to a runoff on October 19.
Morales, who co-founded MAS and governed the country from 2006 to 2019 under its banner, has been barred from running for another term as president.
Ballot stations open on Sunday at 8 a.m. local time (1200 GMT) and close at 4 p.m., with initial results expected after 9 p.m. Full official results are due within seven days. Voters will also elect all 26 senators and 130 deputies, and officials assume office on November 8.
With a crowded field and no dominant MAS party candidate, the election marks a 'crossroads moment' for Bolivia, said Southern Andes analyst Glaeldys Gonzalez Calanche of the International Crisis Group.
Bolivia's fragile economy is top-of-mind for voters. Price-rises have surged past other Latin American countries this year, and fuel and dollars have run scarce.
Annual inflation doubled to 23% in June, up from 12% in January, with some Bolivians turning to cryptocurrencies as a hedge.
Many Bolivians, especially those who work in the informal economy, were now struggling to make ends meet, said economist Roger Lopez.
'Prices of the basic food basket are going up fast,' said Lopez. 'Suddenly the math doesn't add up anymore.'
They may choose to punish MAS on Sunday, creating a window of opportunity for centrists, the right, or a leftist faction led by Senate President Andronico Rodriguez.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Every year the situation has got worse under this government,' said Silvia Morales, 30, from La Paz, who works in retail. A former MAS voter, she said this time she would cast her vote for the center-right.
Carlos Blanco Casas, 60, a teacher in La Paz, said he intended to vote for change. 'This election feels hopeful. We need a change of direction,' he said.
Quiroga has promised 'radical change' to reverse what he calls '20 lost years' under MAS rule. He supports deep public spending cuts and a shift away from alliances with Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua. Quiroga was president for a year in 2001-2002 after the then-leader resigned.
Doria Medina, meanwhile, offers a more moderate approach, pledging to stabilize the economy within 100 days.
On the left, the vote is split between the official MAS party candidate Eduardo del Castillo, who is backed by outgoing President Luis Arce, and Rodriguez, who has distanced himself from the party and is running on his own ticket.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Morales, 69, has called for a boycott of the election, but analysts said his influence is waning.
'There is widespread support for these elections,' said Calanche. 'Most Bolivians see them as key to leading the country towards economic recovery.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
Are European leaders travelling to the White House to prevent Trump from bullying Zelenskyy?
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is headed to Washington, DC, today (August 18), and he will be accompanied by European leaders, including Germany's Friedrich Merz, the UK's Keir Starmer, and France's Emmanuel Macron. The meeting at the White House comes after US President Donald Trump met Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska last Friday. But why is Zelenskyy going with an influential entourage? US President Donald Trump with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House in Washington, in February. Six months after that disastrous meeting, the Ukrainian leader will once again meet his US counterpart at the Oval Office on August 18. File image/Reuters In February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the White House only to be berated by his American hosts after which he was abruptly asked to leave the White House. The meeting, six months ago, has gone down in history as, perhaps, one of the most disgraceful episodes in modern-day diplomacy — a national leader was humiliated in front of the cameras in a grilling that the US president said afterwards would make good television. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Now, Zelenskyy is heading back to the White House today (August 18). However, he won't be alone, as an array of European prime ministers and presidents are joining him to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House to make sure that Ukraine's security interests are maintained after Trump-Putin's Alaska summit. More from Explainers Friendly summit with no ceasefire: Putin disarms Trump, neutralises sanctions threats at Alaska summit Who's going to accompany Zelenskyy? What's at stake? We have the answers for you. Why is Zelenskyy heading to Washington today? The meeting at the White House between Trump and Zelenskyy comes after the US president's Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 15. While the two leaders billed that meeting as historic, it failed to come up with any immediate solution to the war, which has now dragged on for three-and-a-half years. Zelenskyy first headed to Brussels over the weekend to meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, a top EU leader, and hold a video call with the other leaders to prepare for the meeting with Trump at the White House. 'It's very important that you are with us and that we speak to America together,' Zelenskyy said in Brussels, standing alongside von der Leyen. 'It's crucial that Europe is as united now as it was at the very beginning—as it was in 2022,' when Russia staged its large-scale invasion of Ukraine, Zelenskyy said. 'This unity really helps encourage real peace and it must stay strong.' Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen attend a joint press conference in Brussels, on Sunday. AFP Who's going with Zelenskyy to Washington? Following his meeting in Brussels, Zelenskyy will now head to Washington, DC. However, he won't be alone. Accompanying the Ukrainian leader will be UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who many consider to be the 'Trump whisperer'. There's also Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz and France's Emmanuel Macron as well as Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, will be a reminder of Europe's combined importance as an economic juggernaut, as The Guardian reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni will also attend the meeting as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb. Nato's Secretary General Mark Rutte will also be accompanying Zelenskyy to the Oval Office today. Retired French General Dominique Trinquand, a former head of France's military mission at the United Nations, told Sky News that the reason the European leaders were travelling with Zelenskyy is because they are 'very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Zelenskyy to the hilt.' 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he added. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer will accompany Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the White House on August 18. File image/Reuters What will all the leaders discuss at the White House today? The European leaders accompanying Zelenskyy to the White House today want to ensure that US President Trump has not pivoted too close to the Russian side, and does not try to strong-arm Zelenskyy into a deal. Even European diplomats, who chose to remain anonymous, told media outlets that the European leaders want to avoid a scene like the one that took place in February when Zelenskyy met with Trump in front of television cameras at the White House. At that meeting, Trump rebuked the Ukrainian president, saying 'you don't have the cards' in the war — essentially telling Ukraine to bend to Russia's demands. The US president did so again on Friday night, after Putin flew back to Russia, telling a Fox News interviewer that Ukraine was going to have to realise that Russia was a more 'powerful' country, and that power meant Zelenskyy was going to have to make concessions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even before Zelenskyy and his European allies made their way to the American capital, Trump indicated that the Ukrainian leader must agree to some of Russia's conditions for the war in Ukraine to end. 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and no going into Nato by Ukraine. Some things never change!!!' US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin hold a press conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska on August 15. File image/Reuters Earlier, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also rejected the notion that the Europeans were coming to protect Zelenskyy from a repeat of the February shouting match. 'They're not coming here to keep Zelenskyy from getting bullied,' Rubio told CBS. 'They are coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans,' he said, listing the many meetings the United States had engaged in before and after the Putin visit. 'We invited them to come.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is expected that the leaders will also sit down today to discuss territorial questions, including Russia's demand for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk. They are also expected to address security guarantees for Ukraine, which could be backed by US air power. The role of Nato and European allies in enforcing a settlement is likely to be discussed, alongside sanction pressures on Russia. The European leaders also want that Ukraine is at the table for all negotiations. In fact, on the issue of land and territory, EU's Ursula von der Leyen even said on Sunday, 'With regards to any territorial questions in Ukraine, our position is clear: international borders cannot be changed by force. 'These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table.' There also might be discussions on setting up a trilateral between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy in the near future. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What does Russia want? At the Alaska summit, Putin reportedly stated that Ukraine must surrender Donetsk and Luhansk in full, abandon its Nato aspirations and declare neutrality. He offered to freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. However, Zelenskyy has rejected any idea of handing over territory to Russia, saying that a ceasefire should be first instituted. According to Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Putin agreed to allow the US and the European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato,' he was quoted as telling CNN. He added that it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called them 'game-changing.' For the unaware, Article 5 of Nato states that an armed attack against one or more of the members shall be considered an attack against all members. What happens today is left to be seen, but as Kim Darroch, who was the UK ambassador to Washington in Trump's first term, told The Guardian: 'History will be kind to him (Trump) if he delivers a fair peace in Ukraine; less so if he presses for a capitulation.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian auto shares at 10-month high after media report on small car tax cut proposal
Indian auto stocks jumped 4% to their highest level in 10 months on Monday, after Reuters reported that the government has proposed lowering the goods and services tax on small cars as part of sweeping consumption tax cuts . Auto shares were the top sectoral gainers on the benchmark Nifty 50 , which rose 1.3%. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo The government has proposed lowering the goods and services tax on small petrol and diesel cars to 18% from 28%, Reuters reported citing a government source. India's finance ministry did not reply to an e-mail seeking comment. All 15 stocks on the auto index rose. Motorcycle maker Hero MotoCorp jumped 7%, followed by top carmaker Maruti Suzuki 's 6.6% rise. Live Events


Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India taxed, China spared: Marco Rubio defends US' double standards on Russian oil
Synopsis U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that global energy prices could rise if the U.S. imposes secondary sanctions on China for refining Russian oil, amid criticism over the U.S. placing a 25% tariff on India for similar purchases but sparing China. Reuters US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Monday that energy prices could rise if the United States imposes secondary sanctions on China for refining Russian oil. The statement follows growing questions over why the U.S. imposed an additional 25% tariff on India for purchasing Russian oil, while taking no similar action against an interview with Fox News, Rubio said, "If you put secondary sanctions on a country – let's say you were to go after the oil sales of Russian oil to China. Well, China just refines that oil. That oil is then sold into the global marketplace, and anyone who's buying that oil would be paying more for it or, if it doesn't exist, would have to find an alternative source for it." "So we have heard, when you talk about the Senate bill that was being proposed where there was a hundred percent tariffs on China and India, we did hear from a number of European countries – not in press releases but we heard from them – some concern about what that could mean."China remains the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India and sanctions debate is unfolding again in the wake of Trump's widely publicised meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. While the summit failed to produce a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine, Trump termed the discussions as productive, rating them a "10 out of 10." Earlier, the US president claimed that the tariffs imposed on India for purchasing oil from Russia have influenced Moscow's decision to seek a meeting with Washington, as the country was losing its 'second largest customer'.In an interview with Fox News on Thursday, Trump said, "I think everything has an impact," and claimed that when he told India that "we're going to charge you, because you're dealing with Russia and oil purchases", it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia".India last week said it has not halted oil purchases from Russia in response to the US President's tariff threat and continues to buy based solely on economic the steep tariffs are likely to hit the USD 40 billion of non-exempt exports that India does to the US, there has been chatter around stopping or curtailing oil imports from Russia. However, AS Sahney, Chairman of Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), the country's largest oil firm, has clarified that there is "no pause" on Russian oil imports, and India's intent to continue buying Russian oil remains unchanged. Responding to the US tariffs, the Ministry of External Affairs had said that the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable.