logo
MG IM5 review: The closest rival yet to the Tesla Model 3

MG IM5 review: The closest rival yet to the Tesla Model 3

Independent28-07-2025
MG thought long and hard about how it should badge its new IM models. At one time, they were headed for their own premium brand alongside MG. But the decision was made to confuse everyone by calling them MG IMs, yet not put MG badges on them. It's bonkers!
And a shame as people will see the IM5 (and its SUV twin, the IM6), really like it and have no idea what it is due to the weird combination of dots and lines for a badge.
The IM5, in particular, is worthy of your attention. It's a spacious five door hatchback with proportions, pricing, range and tech specs that are very much in line with the Tesla Model 3.
Is it overall as good as the Tesla Model 3? No, not quite. But it gets much closer than any other rival, so if Tesla – for whatever reason – isn't your thing, one of MG's 115 dealers will be very happy to let you play in an IM model.
You'll have fun, too. It's good to drive, easily as spacious as a Model 3, but with even better build quality. The kit count is impressive, as is the tech – although the usability (and spelling) of the touchscreen operations needs to be updated. We're told it will be.
The IM5 will be an easy, efficient and enjoyable EV to live with – I like it very much.
How we test
I spent an entire morning driving the IM5 around the lanes, towns and motorways of Kent, Sussex and Surrey to get a good feel for the car and its tech. I assessed the self-driving, self-parking and even the car's ability to retrace its steps by reversing 100 metres. I also checked on rear seat comfort and boot space to give you a verdict you can trust.
Independent rating: 9/10
MG IM5 specs
Price range £39,450 to £48,495
Battery size 75 & 100kWh
Maximum claimed range 441 miles
Miles per kWh 3.8
Maximum charging rate 396kW
Battery, range, charging, performance and drive
Although there are two battery offerings, there's a clear sweet spot in the IM5 range – and it's the car I drove. The 100 Long Range, as the name suggests, uses a 100kWh battery to give it a Tesla-beating range of 441 miles. You'll pay a fiver more for the rear-drive IM5 Long Range than you will a Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive Long Range, but I can't believe an MG dealer wouldn't do something about that for you – you won't get a penny off the Tesla.
The entry-level car undercuts the entry-level Model 3 by £440 but doesn't go as far on a full charge. The 75 Standard Range IM5 has a maximum claimed range of 304 miles versus the Rear-Wheel Drive Model 3's 323 miles.
At the top of the IM5 range currently is a 100 Performance model, which gets all-wheel drive, the same 100kWh battery as the Long Range IM5, but all-wheel drive, a 0-62mph time of 3.2 seconds and a maximum claimed range of 357 miles – all for £48,495. A Model 3 performance is quicker (0-60mph in 2.9 seconds), but will only go 328 miles on a full charge and, crucially, costs a whopping £59,990.
Not that the Long Range IM5 I drove was sluggish, getting from 0-62mph in 4.9 seconds. But whatever IM5 you drive it'll feel quick with the usual swift acceleration when you need it.
Where MGs will outperform Teslas is on charging speeds with the 800-volt tech in the 100kWh cars enabling the IM5 to charge at a maximum of 396kW, meaning the typical 10 to 80 per cent charge would take just 17 minutes – if you can find a fast-enough charger.
The Standard Range car makes do with 400-volt tech so charges slower at a maximum of 153kW so the same 10 to 80 per cent charge will take 26 minutes.
As with many EVs, the heavy battery takes a toll on ride comfort and the IM5 rides quite firmly. It's not uncomfortable, though, and the low centre of gravity means the car corners confidently, although the steering doesn't feel especially meaty. There are various drive modes you can cycle through that beef up the steering and accelerator response or ease the throttle off for eco driving.
It's a shame the brakes didn't feel slightly sharper and linear in their response – they felt slightly dead and needed a bit more of a shove at the end of the brake travel.
What you'll really notice and enjoy, though, is the four-wheel steering, which not only gives the sizeable IM5 a smaller turning circle than an MG4 – making it really easy to manoeuvre around car parks (which I did extensively on my test route) – but also benefits at faster speeds with greater surety through corners.
One feature that's missing, though, is one-pedal driving, which many EV drivers love. There are only three levels of brake regen available – I'd like more. Hopefully one-pedal driving can be added before the cars go on sale in September.
Interior, practicality and boot space
Whichever model of IM5 you go for, you'll get the same feature-packed interior – and the same high quality. I'm obsessive about stitching lining up, and the stitching across the dashboard lined up perfectly with that on the doors, showing a real attention to detail when it comes to quality.
The materials inside all feel very plush, the design is attractive and there's plenty of space. Sitting in the back you get the full benefit of the full-length glass roof, comfy rear seats and good leg and head space, while in the front the seats are just as comfy and come with heating or cooling.
A tiny rear-view mirror hints at what's behind – the tiniest of rear windows. I'm surprised MG hasn't done a Polestar and just made do with a digital rear-view mirror and cameras. However, MG's approach is to have a display from a rear-facing camera on the infotainment screen that's activated by a single roll upwards of the right hand scroll wheel on the steering wheel. That's a neat solution, but I'd rather just have a bigger rear window. At least the side mirrors are a decent size, though.
Unlike the four-door Tesla Model 3, the IM5 comes with a rear hatch, making it much more practical. There's a reasonable if not enormous 457 litres of space, plus an additional 18 litres under the bonnet at the front.
The inside isn't exactly flush with cubbies – it would be nice to have a few more spaces to put things and slightly wider and deeper door bins.
Technology, stereo and infotainment
The MG IM5 is a tech tour-de-force with everything you expect and a few things you don't.
Here's one… If you've ever driven down a narrow country lane and met something coming at you from the other direction and have to reverse, it can be quite tricky. The IM5 will do it for you.
Somewhat spookily, the car logs precisely where it has driven over the past 100 metres and will reverse for that full distance going back precisely through its wheel tracks. I tried it and it reversed back through a curved road, through a car park, around a couple of corners and eventually stopped where it first started, 100 metres beforehand. Clever and surprisingly useful.
The self-parking system works brilliantly and very quickly – unlike many – while the car will also get closer to the curb for you if your own parking efforts aren't up to scratch.
On top of all that there's the usual adaptive cruise – which uses the paddles behind the steering wheel to adjust speed and distance to the car in front – plus the expected suite of driver safety and assistance systems.
As with many Model 3 rivals, you must use screens for everything, but in the IM5 there are two of them. One super-wide 26-inch display on top of the dash for driver info and infotainment, with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a 10-inch screen in the centre console for other controls including the clever parking tech, system set-up and climate control – although there was a slightly odd Ramdon setting for the air con that we hope is a spelling mistake that will be easily fixed.
MG made great play of the 20-speaker audio system with its Sky Speakers in the roof, but it really didn't live up to the promise. With my well-used test playlist, it lacked real punch from the bass and a lack of detail to the sound. I couldn't get the 'hello IM' (why not MG?) voice function to work, either, in spite of it being selected on the display.
Although the wireless mobile phone charger is ventilated to stop your smartphone overheating while charging, there's only one of them when many rivals allow you to charge up two phones at a time.
What I did like was how, when you indicate, you get a digital view from the mirrors displayed on the appropriate side of the 26-inch display, cleverly shoving my Apple CarPlay display over sideways rather than covering up the maps. And why it has taken car makers so long to be able to make the indicator clicks come out of the left or right speakers is beyond me – I like that in the IM5, too.
There's no sign yet of any low-rate finance offers, although first deliveries of the IM5 won't be until mid-September 2025. But the pricing is pretty much spot on against the Tesla Model 3: slightly cheaper on the Standard car, slightly more expensive on the Long Range one. The Performance IM5 does look like good value.
What I would expect, though, is for MG's 115 dealers selling the IM models to have a bit of leeway to give the IM5 a bit more of an advantage over Tesla Model 3s if you haggle. Tesla dealers won't give you a penny off.
My test showed impressive efficiency, meaning a range of well over 400 miles should be easily achievable, too.
MG IM5 rivals
Tesla Model 3
Mercedes CLA
Hyundai Ioniq 6
FAQs
How long does it take to charge?
The 100kWh IM5 uses 800-volt tech for charging up to 396kW, allowing a 10–80 per cent charge in just 17 minutes with a sufficiently fast charger. The Standard Range's 400-volt system charges at up to 153kW, taking 26 minutes for the same charge range.
How much does it cost - is it worth it?
Prices start at £39,450 for the Standard Range car going up to £48,495 for the Performance model. The sweet spot of the range is the £44,995 Long Range IM5, which costs a fiver more than the equivalent Tesla Model 3, but will go a bit further on a full charge.
Does MG replace batteries for free?
As with all EVs, the IM5's battery is covered for eight years and 100,000 miles, while MG offers a standard seven-year warranty on the rest of the car.
Why trust us
Our team of motoring experts have decades of experience driving, reviewing and reporting on the latest EV cars, and our verdicts are reached with every kind of driver in mind. We thoroughly test drive every car we recommend, so you can be sure our verdicts are honest, unbiased and authentic.
The verdict: MG IM5
Not everyone wants a Tesla, and there's now more choice than ever if you want a different sort of EV. I really enjoyed the MG IM5 – I love the tech, the quality of the car and the drive. There's loads of space inside, a decent range and fast charging. If only MG would just stick an MG badge on the front and back, that would make the car more appealing and easier to understand.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chevy Just Set An Insane EV Range Record—In A Big Truck
Chevy Just Set An Insane EV Range Record—In A Big Truck

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

Chevy Just Set An Insane EV Range Record—In A Big Truck

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. View post: Official: The Cadillac XT5 Is Sticking Around With a Mild-Hybrid Update for 2027 This 1967 Jaguar XKE Series 4.2 is a stunning example of British motoring history, beautifully preserved, period-correct, and ready to be enjoyed or shown. View post: Amazon Is Selling a 'Powerful' Greenworks Chainsaw for 43% Off, and Shoppers Say It's 'Game Changer' View post: Wayfair Is Selling a 'Very Sturdy' $350 Sterilite Storage Cabinet for Only $115, and It 'Keeps Things Organized' No hardware or software changes were required to set a new record It's been a record-breaking month for Chevrolet. Already, the company set a new record for American cars at the Nürburgring with the Corvette ZR1 and ZR1X. Its latest record won't be as exciting for gearheads, as it involves the longest range on a full charge for an EV, but it's another stellar technical achievement. 300 miles is generally accepted as the psychological mark of a useful EV range, but Lucid far surpassed this by hitting 749 miles in the Air sedan last month—a record at the time. Chevy has now crushed that figure, and even more impressively, it pulled off the feat with a heavy, full-size pickup, not an aerodynamic sedan. Over 1,000 Miles On A Full Charge Source: GM The record-breaking achievement came behind the wheel of a 2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Max Range Work Truck, which went 1,059.2 miles on a full charge, breaking Lucid's 749-mile record. This truck is rated by the EPA for a 493 mile range, so how was it able to more than double that figure? GM says the record attempt began with a casual conversation between GM engineers late last year. They started guessing what sort of range they could achieve if the pickup could be optimized for range and efficiency. Source: GM 'Getting this kind of range on a full charge doesn't happen by accident,' said Kurt Kelty, VP, battery, propulsion, and sustainability. 'It takes deep integration across battery chemistry, drive unit efficiency, software and vehicle engineering—and that's exactly what the team delivered. This achievement is a great example of how far our EV technology has come, and the kind of innovation we're building on every day at GM.' Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Real-World Test Sees Staggering Results Source: GM The GM team performed the record-breaking test on public roads in southeastern Michigan, close to GM's Milford Proving Ground. The team optimized every feasible aspect of the truck, but left the hardware and software as is. While it's technically possible for owners of the truck to put some of these optimizing measures in place, combining them all will be just about impossible in normal driving. These were the measures taken by the team: When conditions allowed, drivers averaged 20 to 25 mph, and hard braking was minimized No passengers were in the truck for most of the test Windshield wiper arms were set to the lowest possible position, reducing drag The highest acceptable tire pressure was used, resulting in lower rolling resistance The wheel alignment was optimized and the spare tire was removed The climate control wasn't used at all For smoother airflow, an accessory tonneau cover was added The test occurred in warmer summer conditions None of these measures are particularly groundbreaking, but the cumulative effect clearly made all the difference. The various engineers who drove the truck did so in one-hour shifts, allowing them to incorporate the project into their normal work schedules. Source: GM 'If we drove it downhill the whole time, sure, we'd get insane mileage,' said Jon Doremus, propulsion calibration engineering manager. 'But that's not what this was about. We wanted this to be real, on public roads.' The test suggests that by incorporating just a few of these measures, owners of this Chevy pickup should easily be able to squeeze over 500 miles of range from it, a commendable effort. The EPA rating of the Chevy is already better than all other rivals, including the Rivian R1T, Tesla Cybertruck, and Ford F-150 Lightning. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile

Rivian Reports $1.1B Q2 Loss But Holds 2025 Delivery Forecast
Rivian Reports $1.1B Q2 Loss But Holds 2025 Delivery Forecast

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

Rivian Reports $1.1B Q2 Loss But Holds 2025 Delivery Forecast

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Rivian's Q2 earnings are out, and while the EV startup posted another sizable loss — $1.1 billion — the company is standing by its full-year delivery guidance of 40,000 to 46,000 vehicles. That's despite continued cost pressures, weakening regulatory credit income, and delivery volumes that came in lighter than expected. Revenue for the quarter was $1.3 billion, up slightly year-over-year and just ahead of analyst estimates, but still well below what investors were hoping for. The company's adjusted loss per share landed at $0.80, missing expectations by $0.04. Production Down, Losses Up Rivian produced 5,979 vehicles and delivered 10,661 in Q2, both down significantly compared to last year. The company said the dip is tied to planned factory retooling ahead of the launch of its upcoming R2 SUV — a mid-size, sub-$50,000 model aimed squarely at volume growth from 2026 onward. That said, costs per vehicle remain steep. On average, Rivian spent $118,375 to build each EV last quarter, thanks to inflationary headwinds, rare earth material constraints, and reduced EV tax credit access. Regulatory credits, which once padded the balance sheet, are now expected to bring in just $160 million this year — nearly half the earlier forecast. Rivian's full-year EBITDA loss guidance has now widened to $2.0–$2.25 billion, from its previous $1.7–$1.9 billion range. Source: Rivian What's Next: R2, Repositioning, and Relevance Despite its financial drag, Rivian is focusing heavily on its upcoming R2 platform, with pilot builds already underway and capital expenditures projected at $1.8–$1.9 billion for the year. Positioned to compete in a broader, more price-sensitive segment, the R2 is intended to do what the brand's flagship R1T and R1S models have struggled with: reach beyond the enthusiast core and connect with everyday buyers. While updates to the 2025 R1T and R1S have refined the platform's feel and responsiveness, the vehicles still carry high price tags — and aren't resonating with all the right audiences. A recent S&P Global study found that Rivian continues to underperform with female buyers, a demographic that legacy brands like Ford and Toyota increasingly view as central to their EV strategy. Still, Rivian is doubling down on brand appeal. This summer, it brought back its most viral party trick: Tank Turn, the feature that lets the R1S or R1T rotate in place like an off-road hovercraft. First teased back in 2019, the quad-motor function never actually reached customers — but that's set to change, as Rivian looks to reignite attention in its existing lineup ahead of the R2 rollout. Takeaway It's another quarter of deep red ink for Rivian, but the message from CEO RJ Scaringe is steady: losses are expected, scale is coming, and R2 is the hinge point. Whether that's enough to calm Wall Street remains to be seen — but for now, the company isn't blinking. About the Author Max Taylor View Profile

Britain's 9 WORST selling cars revealed – including £80k Fast and Furious-inspired motor & ‘king of weird' retro classic
Britain's 9 WORST selling cars revealed – including £80k Fast and Furious-inspired motor & ‘king of weird' retro classic

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

Britain's 9 WORST selling cars revealed – including £80k Fast and Furious-inspired motor & ‘king of weird' retro classic

BRITAIN'S least popular cars in terms of sales have been revealed. One of the losers to make it to the list includes a super rare Fast and Furious-inspired MG. 9 Vauxhall Adam Rocks But first, let's kick things off with the Vauxhall Adam Rocks, which had the makings of a nippy little motor. However, after just three years, the car manufacturer revealed that they were taking it off the market. Launched for the UK market in early 2014, it used the standard Adam's platform but added a rugged flair. The car had 15 mm of raised ride height, plastic cladding, skid plates and a retractable fabric sunroof that folded in just seconds to give a semi‑convertible experience with SUV styling cues. Rocks models started from about £14,695 for the base 1.2-litre version, rising to around £16,695 for the turbo‑charged 1.0‑litre Ecotec unit with around 113 bhp. Mercedes R-Class 9 Mercedes pitched the R‑Class as a 'grand sports tourer'. It was spacious enough for up to seven occupants and packed with luxury touches. Engine options ranged from smooth petrol and diesel V6 units to rare V8s, including a short‑lived R 63 AMG with a 6.2 litre V8 producing over 500 hp—making it one of the fastest seven‑seat vehicles ever. Yet, despite these impressive details, the R‑Class struggled on the market. Its shapeshifting identity—neither true SUV nor comfortable minivan—left buyers uncertain. Fast and the Furious legends meet for the first time in franchise's history The model, priced from around £44,620, withdrew from the UK market in late 2013. MG XPower SV-R model 9 Inspired by the Fast and Furious films, the XPower SV-R can do 0-60mph in just five seconds, and has a 4.6 litre V8 325 bhp engine. Unveiled in the early 2000s, the SV‑R was built on the Qvale Mangusta platform, created by McLaren F1 designer Peter Stevens with aggressive styling, wide arches, prominent air intakes, and a carbon‑fibre and aluminium body. The asking price when new was approximately £82,000–£83,000 for the SV‑R variant. Unfortunately, that price proved a major obstacle: MG Rover couldn't sell more than a handful of units. Only 82 cars in total were built between 2003 and 2005 (including prototypes and standard SVs), with as few as nine SV‑R units reportedly sold to actual customers before the company collapsed in April 2005. Lotus Europa 9 The 2006 Lotus Europa S was a curious detour in Lotus's otherwise razor-focused lineup of lightweight sports cars. Introduced as a more refined, road-friendly alternative to the hardcore Elise, the Europa S was based on the same bonded aluminium chassis but featured a longer wheelbase, more comfortable cabin, and a turbocharged 2.0-litre GM-sourced engine producing around 200 bhp. However, it failed to impress as it lacked the practicality to compete with more luxurious rivals like the Porsche Cayman. Only around 458 Europa S models and just 48 Europa SEs were produced before the car was quietly discontinued in 2010. Renault Vel Satis 9 This French car lasted just three years in the UK, as sales topped just at 1,000. Ironically, the Vel Satis was designed as a concept car, but was not the most appealing of vehicles. It also came at a time when it was up against BMWs, Mercedes and the Ford Scorpio. The Vel Satis came available with five engine options, and had a squishy nature to it. However, it perhaps had too much weight to it, with the centre of gravity to high, and not the greatest to drive. But there were some positive aspects, such as being insanely comfortable on the interior, and having a well-appointed cabin that was spacious. Vauxhall Meriva 9 Slated for its bland styling, boring driving dynamics and underwhelming interior quality, the Vauxhall Meriva failed to impress. Despite clever features like rear-hinged FlexDoors and versatile seating system, the Meriva was often left at the bottom of the pile, as motorists leaned towards SUVs and crossovers. By 2017, Vauxhall quietly replaced it with the more SUV-like Crossland X, marking the end of the Meriva's run. It was given a 178bhp turbo engine in the Meriva OAP-mobile, and achieved 272 sales in four years. Chevrolet SSR 9 This is essentially a pickup truck with RWD and has no off-roading ability. Sales for the Chevvy SSR therefore did not go great, even despite its folding hard-top roof. It even had factory layoffs due to its lack of success. Chevrolet admitted defeat of the SSR in 2006, with just 9,000 sales. Aston Martin Virage 9 Only 426 Virages were made between 1988 and 1995, but this did not stop music icon Sir Elton John wanting the luxury car. He forked out £129,950 to get his hands on one, but sold it in 1997. Sitting between the DB9 and more hardcore DBS, it can be described as a GT two-door coupe with a Jekyll and Hyde personality. The Virage can go from long-distance cruiser at comfortable speeds well in excess of 150mph, to an out-and-out supercar. But Aston quietly canned the car 18 months after it launched. Renault Avantime 9 Sales of the Renault Avantime was very low, with only about 450 sold in the UK and 8,557 over the three years it was on the market. The company had originally projected sales of 1,500 per year in the UK. Though with its unique design and rarity, the Avantime could be a future classic. The car did gain a cult following later, but sales performance was still far below expectations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store