
House passes rescission package to claw back $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid, NPR, PBS
In a 214 to 212 vote, all but four House Republicans voted in favor of the measure, with all Democrats opposing. The package now heads to the Senate.
President Trump put pressure on Republicans to vote in favor of the bill ahead of the vote, calling it a "no brainer."
"Every single Republican in Congress should vote, 'YES,'" he wrote on Truth Social.
The package would cancel $9.4 billion appropriated by Congress, looking to make permanent some of the Department of Government Efficiency's spending cuts. Its primary focus is slashing foreign aid, from peacekeeping efforts to refugee assistance and climate projects, but it would also essentially cut off federal funding for NPR and PBS.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, touted the request to cancel what he called "wasteful spending" in recent days, calling it a "manifestation of the DOGE effort," adding that it would "ensure greater accountability in government going forward."
"This is a long time overdue," Johnson said. "Today's passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step towards a more responsible and transparent government that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first."
The cuts in the rescissions package
The rescissions package includes $1.1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to NPR and PBS. The White House has targeted the entities, claiming they have "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'" PBS received $325 million in CPB funding this year.
Johnson said of NPR and PBS that funding them is an outmoded idea because "we're in a different era now."
"There is no reason for any media organization to be singled out to receive federal funds," Johnson said. "Especially those who appear to have so little regard for the truth."
The package would cut $8.3 billion for the United States Agency for International Development, or USAID, among other international assistance programs, after the foreign aid agency became an early target of the administration. Johnson said the resolution would make cuts in what he called the "USAID abuses area."
Johnson said DOGE "went after USAID first for their review, their audits," because USAID "opposed the loudest of this accountability measure," claiming they "put the scrutiny targets on their own backs."
But some of the cuts have sparked objections among Republican lawmakers, like cuts to a program aimed at combatting HIV and AIDS globally. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, was started by former President George W. Bush, and has been credited for saving millions of lives around the world. Rep. Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, told The New York Times he would oppose the rescissions package because of these cuts, though he seemed to warm to the package this week, telling reporters he feels "better" about the cuts to the program after the House GOP conference met Tuesday. Bacon ultimately voted in favor of the measure Thursday.
Other Republicans, like Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, have voiced concerns as well.
"PEPFAR cuts make no sense to me whatsoever, given the extraordinary record of PEPFAR in saving lives," Collins told reporters last week, while pointing to several other global health care programs targeted in the rescissions package. "So, I have a lot of concerns."
But Republican leaders in Congress were bullish about the path forward.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, said Tuesday that "our members are ready to go lock in some of those DOGE cuts," adding that "this is a start — it's a good start, it's an important first step and we're going to take it on Thursday."
Johnson said the vote on the package "is an important signal — House Republicans are serious about getting our fiscal house in order, and we'll do that."
The rescissions process
Congress can cancel funds that the federal government has not yet spent but has previously appropriated under the rescissions process. Each year, Congress approves funding to keep the federal government running before the funds are disbursed to government agencies and programs. The president can temporarily defer funds or withhold them altogether — but only with Congress' approval.
The White House's official transmission of the rescission package on June 3 started the clock on a process that gives Congress 45 days to act. Rescissions requests first go before relevant committees for consideration, before moving to the full House and Senate for votes. In the Senate, rescission bills are not subject to the 60-vote threshold needed to advance most legislation in the upper chamber and only require a simple majority.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters Thursday that Collins, the top Republican appropriator in the Senate, would receive the package in the upper chamber. He said the Senate is prioritizing the massive budget bill that's key to enacting Mr. Trump's agenda, pushing work on the rescissions package likely into July.
and contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising
Another day, another confused Trump voter! On today's edition, we've got a MAGA supporter who supposedly understands tariffs but can't imagine why costs are rising. In a social media screenshot posted to r/LeopardsAteMyFace, this person wrote, "Trump i voted for him,now that being said I understand the tarrifs,but what good are they doing to help us? Everything is going up i thought one reason to elect him as president was for things to be cheaper I haven't seen it,Everything is going up i know the government is making more money but its us I'm worried PLEASE!" The Trump voter seemingly edited the post with an update, writing, "OK I understand now just last time he was in office it seemed like right a way fuel was cheaper. Thanks all of you!" Related: Economists widely agree that Donald Trump's tariffs will likely result in rising costs, with many companies such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble already confirming the reasons behind their recent price hikes. Sooo I'm not sure if this Trump supporter really does understand now! Naturally, people had a lot to say in the comments: "Here let me explain using cookies: You voted for a fascist because you thought he would give other people's cookies to you, but now he's taking your cookies and telling you to go fuck yourself. Hope this helps." —u/Apple-Dust Related: "These fools will never get that tariffs are just a type of tax." —u/Gadshill "It's a sales tax with extra steps." —u/GoodDog_GoodBook123 "Why is water wet? Trump said water was dry, but every time I take a shower, I get wet? Is this something the transgender Democrats are doing? Can we arrest them? Is this from the Deep State?" —u/rwblue4u "Any Trumper who tells you they 'get' or 'understand' tariffs is lying." —u/Glenn-Sturgis Related: "This reads like a satirical cartoon. 'I understand exactly how an extra tax works, but why am I suddenly paying more?? And I could've sworn prices were cheaper last time he was in power and was working with Obama's economy… explain please??'" —u/Revolutionary-Ad5695 "The bizarre disconnect we're all going to continue to see from Trump voters on the tariffs issue is so frustrating. These bozos believed that foreign governments pay our tariffs because Trump told them this. They argued with Kamala Harris supporters at the time, despite the fact that this is Econ 101. They never believe they have ANY responsibility at all. They don't believe they're expected to research the issues, learn anything new, or verify any of the information they're being given, before they adopt it as their new mantra." "The biggest frustration is the fact that they're being continually misled and never, ever learn from it. There'll be a new lie tomorrow to cover up yesterday's lie, and they'll regurgitate it perfectly, without ever feeling any embarrassment or personal responsibility." —u/Longstroke_Machine "'Last time he was in office seemed like right away fuel was cheaper.' There was a pandemic, everything was closed, and demand for fuel cratered. I'm not sure why they all have amnesia about that part while remembering the cheap gas. They sure made enough noise about it at the time." —u/WintersChild79 Related: "'I understand now.' Lord knows what Rumpelstiltskin gold was spun on that thread with those geniuses." —u/ThatsRobToYou And finally, "Yeah. We tried to explain this beforehand, but he didn't understand since he only speaks Republican." —u/Jocelyn-1973 What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Note: Some responses have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walmart stock falls after earnings miss forecasts as US sales, 2025 outlook rise
Walmart (WMT) stock fell more than 2% early Thursday after the company reported second quarter earnings shy of expectations while US sales growth topped forecasts with the big box retailer's low-price strategy drawing consumers as tariff-related uncertainty pushed them to more carefully scrutinize their household budgets. In the second quarter, total US same-store sales grew 4.6%. That's more than the 4.2% Wall Street predicted, per Bloomberg consensus estimates. Its wholesale subscription business, Sam's Club, saw the same metric grow 5.9%, the Street had forecast a 5.3% increase. The company now expects net sales in its fiscal 2026 to increase between 3.75%-4.75%, up from a prior range of 3%-4% growth that the company reiterated in the prior quarter. Walmart stock came under pressure after the results showed the company reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.68, below the $0.74 the Street had forecast. Revenue came in at $177.40 billion, better than the $176.05 billion Wall Street expected. Adjusted earnings per share are expected to come in between $0.58-$0.60 in the current quarter. "The top-line momentum we have in our business comes from how we're innovating and executing. Connecting with our customers and members through digital experiences is helping to drive our business, and the way we're deploying AI will make these experiences even better," CEO Doug McMillon said in the release. Walmart called out strength in its grocery and health & wellness categories driving its US sales growth. The company it saw share gains "across income brackets led by upper-income households" in its US stores. By category, the company saw grocery sales rise by mid-single digits in the US stores while health & wellness categories saw sales rise by a mid-teens percentage. Investors will look for further insights around tariffs on the call after the company said it would have to raise prices earlier this year. In the quarter, Walmart said "like for like" inflation was 1.1% in its US stores. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances Walmart CEO Doug McMillon told analysts in May, "We aren't able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins." He added that tariffs had already led to price increases in April and May. At the time, McMillon said the "reset of costs" would continue throughout the year, adding that for an imported item, "You pay the tariff at the time it comes through customs ... even if the tariff rate comes down later, the cost has been elevated." Robert Ohmes of Bank of America estimated Walmart imports roughly 15% of its US sales from China. Around 60% of the US sales are groceries, which are largely tariff-exempt if they're produced domestically or in Mexico and Canada. Brooke DiPalma is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @BrookeDiPalma or email her at bdipalma@ Click here for all of the latest retail stock news and events to better inform your investing strategy
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Redistricting Map Clears Legislature, Heads To Abbott
The Texas House approved a new congressional map that could give Republicans five additional U.S. House seats, shifting the balance from 25 Republicans and 12 Democrats to 30 Republicans and 7 Democrats. The vote followed the end of a two-week Democratic walkout that had stalled the redistricting process during a special legislative session. As previously reported by The Dallas Express, Democrats have used quorum-breaking walkouts in past sessions to block legislation, including during high-profile battles over voting and redistricting. The tactic carries significant political stakes. It temporarily halts lawmaking but often sets the stage for partisan standoffs when lawmakers eventually return. Democrats argued the plan diminishes minority voting strength and pledged to challenge it in court. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' State Rep. Todd Hunter, who authored the map, said during floor debate. Republican leaders at both state and national levels pushed for quick action. President Donald Trump urged lawmakers to act, posting a message that read 'ASAP!' Gov. Greg Abbott also called on legislators to advance the proposal during the special session. Democrats returned to Austin after their failed walkout strategy. Their return restored the quorum needed for the House to conduct business. That move cleared the way for Republicans to move forward with the redistricting plan, which passed along a strict 88-52 party line after nearly eight hours of debate and a procedural standoff. House Democratic Caucus Chair Chris Turner said his party will fight the plan in court. 'In a democracy, people choose their representatives. This bill flips that on its head and lets politicians in Washington, D.C., choose their voters,' Turner said. The plan concentrates Democratic voters in urban districts while expanding Republican representation in previously competitive areas, according to critics. Under the new map, no Republican incumbents would see their districts become more competitive. Hunter defended the effort by citing court precedent. He noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. With both chambers now approving the map, it heads to Gov. Greg Abbott, who is expected to sign it into law. If enacted, Texas's congressional delegation could shift from 25 Republicans and 12 Democrats to a projected 30 Republicans and 7 Democrats.