UBS Backs Costco to Outperform Regardless of Economic Conditions
Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) is one of the best stocks for a retirement stock portfolio.
UBS advises staying invested in Costco, noting the company's strong performance early in the year and its potential to keep outperforming the broader market regardless of economic conditions.
A customer in a warehouse aisles, browsing the wide range of branded and private-label products.
Analyst Michael Lasser emphasized the importance of Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST)'s dedicated membership base, which he believes will keep supporting sales growth. He also praised O'Reilly's expansion into both urban and rural locations, pointing out that this strategy improves the company's ability to make quick deliveries.
Lasser made the following comment:
'These retailers also should see an accelerated upswing as the backdrop improves. This is because they tend to benefit from periods of disruption and come out stronger on the other side of it. Plus, each of these retailers has unique drivers that can help them succeed in various macro backdrops, driving sustainable sales growth and market share gains.'
Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) has surged by nearly 9% since the start of 2025, outperforming the market, which has only returned nearly 2% during this period.
While we acknowledge the potential of COST as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: and
Disclosure. None.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway expects housing market price changes soon
Homebuyers have faced a turbulent housing market over the past few years. Rising home prices and elevated mortgage rates have forced many Americans to reconsider or postpone homeownership until conditions become more affordable. In 2020 and 2021, home prices skyrocketed as moving patterns shifted from cities and homebuyers began to take advantage of record-low mortgage rates below 3%. After the initial Covid-era housing boom, surging inflation in 2022 exacerbated housing prices that were already on the rise. Don't miss the move: SIGN UP for TheStreet's FREE daily newsletter As mortgage rates inch back toward 7%, homebuyers have tempered their expectations for a strong 2025 housing market rebound, but rising home inventory may be enough to lure them back to the market. Though the outlook for the second half of the year is uncertain, many experts believe that homebuyers will have more options and negotiating power as listings take longer to sell. Berkshire Hathaway Home Services believes there may be a shift in the housing market, offering advice for how buyers and sellers can navigate prices in the midst of continued market swings. Image source: Shutterstock Years of rising mortgage rates have created a housing market stalemate where sellers became hesitant to list their homes, creating a supply shortage and increasing competition among homebuyers. Many first-time homebuyers have been collateral damage, forced to delay or rethink homeownership entirely. Eventually, buyer demand has weakened enough to the point that housing inventory reached a surplus of over 500,000 homes, the highest level since 2013. Now, housing conditions have completely shifted, creating a buyer's market for the first time in years. For sellers to keep their listings competitive, Berkshire Hathaway Home Services suggests they may need to implement price reductions. More on homebuying: The White House will take surprising approach to curb mortgage ratesHousing expert reveals surprising ways to reduce your mortgage rateDave Ramsey predicts major mortgage rate changes are coming soonWarren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sounds the alarm on the 2025 housing market The blog recommends that sellers examine home prices in their area and look at home sales trends over the past few months. "Accept the current market. Ask for an updated comparative market analysis with detailed sales trends over the last three months. Are home sales slowing or accelerating? Are home prices rising or falling? Price your home slightly under the trends." found that home listings spent an average of 51 days on the market in May, up from 45 days in May 2024 but on par for the pre-Covid housing market. However, the number of unsold homes is up 21% from last year, marking a considerable change in sales trends. In March, which is typically the onset of renewed buyer demand during the spring housing market, 23% of home listings received a price reduction. Now, as housing inventory rises, sellers are losing the upper hand and may need to lower their pricing expectations. Related: Fannie Mae predicts major mortgage rate changes are coming soon The Berkshire Hathaway Home Services blog wrote that, "A price reduction should send the right message to the marketplace - that your home is well worth its asking price." It also suggests that sellers may need to put in more effort to draw in buyers and close sales. "Pay for professional staging and photography to showcase your home to better advantage online. Highlight the charms and special features of your home as well as the neighborhood." While this may not be the shift sellers were hoping for, a more favorable environment for buyers may be enough to motivate housing activity and undo the current gridlock. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the Fed and ECB are no longer on the same page
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday is widely expected to hold interest rates steady for the fourth meeting in a row, while the European Central Bank just lowered its rates for the eighth time in a year. The divide has caught the attention of President Trump, who has seized on the gap as he pushes the Fed to lower rates by a full percentage point. He did so again last week as he called central bank chairman Jerome Powell a "numbskull" who has refused to ease policy despite Europe dropping its rates "10 times." "We've done none," Trump added. "Nobody understands.' The two central banks in the US and Europe have diverged as their respective economies move in different directions, impacted not just by tariffs from the Trump administration but other domestic factors. Earlier this month the ECB cut its benchmark interest rate to 2% from 2.25%, the lowest level since early 2023, leaving borrowing costs now more than 2 percentage points lower in Europe than the US. It also signaled it is nearing the end of its rate-cutting cycle. The Fed last cut rates in December 2024, reaching a target range of 4.25%-4.5%, and has yet to cut rates during Trump's second term in office. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments 'The president is going to keep getting more and more upset about it,' said Wilmington Trust chief economist Luke Tilley. Perhaps the major difference is how the two central banks are viewing inflation. Policymakers in the US hiked their inflation forecasts in the spring as they worried about the ultimate impact of Trump's tariffs on prices — even though the higher expected prices haven't arrived yet. The Fed will offer new forecasts this coming week. In Europe, by contrast, the ECB has been cutting its inflation forecasts and now expects inflation to fall to its target of 2% this year before falling further to 1.6% next year. 'The European Union is cutting because inflation is low and there's a threat to growth," Tilley said. "I say the Fed either should be or will be cutting because inflation is low and there's a threat to growth, but they're holding on a little bit here.' Jeffrey Roach, chief economist for LPL Financial, said the Fed is more likely to remain in 'wait-and-see' mode than the ECB because US consumers are on stronger footing than their European counterparts, giving the Fed the luxury of time before US policymakers have to act. "Relatively stronger consumer demand means US inflation is running a bit hotter than the Euro area," said Roach. "As growth prospects look weaker in the Euro area, the ECB is becoming more dovish as they respond to economic pressures in Europe." ECB president Christine Lagarde has warned that trade tensions could lead to greater volatility and risk aversion in financial markets, which could weigh on demand in Europe and would also act to lower inflation. Most exports to the US face a 10% tariff, and levies could rise to 50% if the European Union and the US don't reach a deal by the White House's July 9 deadline. A fragmentation of global supply chains could also raise inflation by pushing up import prices and adding to capacity constraints in the domestic economy, Lagarde added. Unlike the US, Europe's central bank does not have a dual mandate. The ECB only targets inflation, while the Fed has to maintain both stable prices and maximum employment. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and many of his colleagues this year have repeatedly urged caution and patience on rates, saying they expect Trump's tariffs to push inflation higher and drag down growth, putting the Fed in a challenging spot. But a divide is emerging within the Fed about whether to hold rates steady for some time or get more comfortable about cuts later this year as officials try to determine whether any inflation coming from Trump's tariffs will prove to be longer-lasting. Some policymakers are arguing for "looking through" the impact of the duties as temporary, a stance that would leave the door open for cuts. Many on the rate-setting committee, however, believe there is a risk that inflation from tariffs could become more persistent. 'If we had a good Fed chairman, you would lower rates,' Trump told reporters earlier this week. 'And you know what? If inflation happened in a year from now or two years, let them raise rates.' The president stressed that the US has a lot of debt coming due and lower rates would mean lower interest expense for the US. 'If this guy would lower rates, we get a lower interest rate. It's unbelievable,' said Trump. 'And he's worried about inflation.' The World Bank warned this week that heightened trade tensions and policy uncertainty are expected to drive global growth down to 2.3 percent this year, nearly half a percentage point lower than the rate that had been expected at the start of the year and the slowest pace since 2008 outside of outright global recessions. The international body said turmoil has resulted in growth forecasts being cut in nearly 70% of all economies — across all regions and income groups. However, a global recession is not expected. Dustin Reid, chief strategist for fixed income at Mackenzie Investments, which has $150 billion in assets under management, said he thinks "the ECB may need to go a bit lower" with its rates. "Tariffs are going to be quite challenging for the European Union,' said Reid. On the Fed side, Reid thinks September is in play for a Fed rate cut. 'I do think the labor market data in the US is cracking a bit,' said Reid, adding that he 'would not be surprised" if Powell this coming week keeps "a little bit of an open door [to] at least keep July in play.' Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump OKs Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel with security guarantees
President Donald Trump's Friday executive order inches Nippon Steel one step closer to a planned investment in U.S. Steel, with the caveat that the Japanese company must follow a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. The terms of the national security agreement weren't detailed in the order, but U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement lays out that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. Former President Joe Biden cited national security concerns in December when he denied the deal before leaving office. During their respective campaigns, Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris both said they planned to block the acquisition of U.S. Steel. However, in February, Trump began to try to undo Biden's actions, saying Nippon would drop its $14.1 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel to make an 'investment, rather than a purchase,' according to Post-Tribune archives. The companies thanked the Trump Administration for supporting the partnership. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come,' the statement said. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' Gary Mayor Eddie Melton, who has been supportive of the deal from the beginning, called the investment 'a pivotal moment for Gary and steelworkers across Northwest Indiana.' 'This development brings hope to steelmaking communities around the country,' Melton said in an emailed statement. 'As the child of a steelworker, I understand firsthand what this means for families who depend on good-paying union jobs. 'This historic partnership with one of our nation's oldest allies delivers exactly what the American steel industry needs — $11 billion in new investments that will ensure the longevity of our facilities, drive environmental sustainability in the process, and protect careers for the next generation of steelworkers.' Melton said he's hopeful that as the details of this partnership emerge, they will provide even greater assurance to workers and their families. United Steelworkers leadership has remained skeptical of a potentiall deal between the two steel companies for months, and last week, the USW filed an information request about the partnership, saying in a statement that union leadership 'have seen nothing credible' about the deal, 'including whether it meaningfully differs from Nippon's initial proposal to acquire U.S. Steel and make it a wholly owned subsidiary.' 'Neither Nippon nor the White House has provided any details on where, exactly, proposed investments will be directed or what kind of accountability or oversight there will be to ensure Nippon makes good on its promises,' said a USW letter to its members. 'We also have seen nothing suggesting that Nippon has backed away from its demand that it would be permitted to pull out of promised investments if we exercise our legal rights during negotiations fighting for a fair contract.' Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. In August, it was announced that Nippon Steel would invest $300 million into Gary Works. A Nippon executive later said the company would invest $1 billion into the local facility. The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, according to Trump's statement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States by the closing date of the transaction. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. Trump has promised that U.S. Steel will keep its headquarters in Pittsburgh, but the companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment, then he said that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.'
