logo
What is EU's hand luggage ban and how will it affect Brits?

What is EU's hand luggage ban and how will it affect Brits?

Here's what we know about the possible change and how it could affect those travelling to Europe from the UK.
What does EU hand luggage fee ban mean for Brits?
Travel agency Trip.com has shared insights from James Spalding, UK Head of Aviation, on how this change could affect customers.
Hand luggage policies are different for each airline (Image: Getty) Hand luggage policies are different depending on the airline you fly with meaning those who don't travel often need to brush up on the rules before going away.
James Spalding said: 'If the EU introduces a standard size and removes fees for small cabin bags, it could bring greater consistency across the board. That means fewer unexpected charges and a simpler way to compare fares between airlines.
'That said, it's unlikely airlines will absorb the cost entirely. It may be built into the base fare instead. While that could mean slightly higher upfront prices, many travellers will welcome the added transparency - knowing exactly what's included in the ticket from the outset.'
The BBC added: 'Under the new rule, travellers would be allowed to bring one cabin bag measuring up to 100cm on board their flight, as well as an under-the-seat personal item with a maximum size of 40x30x15cm at no additional cost.
'The proposed law still requires approval from 55% of EU member states, but if adopted following negotiations starting in July 2025, the new rules would extend to all flights within the EU, as well as routes to and from the EU.'
Your rights if your flight is cancelled or delayed
How will the EU hand luggage fee ban affect prices?
James explained: 'Over recent years, many European carriers have introduced fares without hand luggage to offer more flexibility and competitive entry-level pricing.
'If that option is removed, airlines may explore other ways to offer choice — for example, by introducing or expanding 'priority' options for early boarding or guaranteed cabin space.
'Cabin storage is always limited, especially on full flights. We already see some airlines asking passengers to check bags at the gate when overhead lockers are full.
'If more passengers bring similar-sized bags onboard under a single rule, it could lead to more operational changes and a bigger focus on how baggage is managed at boarding.'
Do I need travel insurance?
How can you get a good deal if prices go up?
If prices rise, James says 'comparison is key.'
Using platforms like Trip.com will mean travellers can compare prices and 'see what's included in their fare - from cabin bags and checked luggage to seat selection.'
Use search filters so you can select your preferences when booking your holiday so you can 'avoid unexpected costs at checkout' and find the flights and holiday deals that suit you.
Will UK airlines ban hand luggage fees?
Since the UK operates outside the EU now, you might be wondering how this hand luggage fee change could affect you and your holiday.
James said: 'That's an interesting one. If the UK doesn't adopt the same rule, there could be a bit of a mismatch - especially on flights between the UK and the EU - with different policies for the outbound and return legs. That might cause some confusion for passengers and create complexity for airlines.
Your passport is your most important travel document - it's worth taking your time to get right!
Before submitting your application check:
- your photo meets all requirements
- all personal details are correct
- supporting documents are ready
- payment details are accurate pic.twitter.com/mkzLHN5ZpY — His Majesty's Passport Office (@HM_Passport) June 16, 2025
'To simplify things, some carriers may choose to align their policies across both EU and UK routes, even if it's not a formal requirement. We'll have to wait and see how the industry responds.'
What are the hand luggage sizes for Ryanair, Jet2, easyJet and more?
Each airline has different allowances for hand luggage, here's what we know.
Ryanair's website says: "All our fares include one small personal bag which can be brought on board, such as a handbag or laptop bag (40x20x25cm), which must fit under the seat in front of you."
easyJet says passengers can bring one small cabin bag:
Maximum size 45 x 36 x 20cm (including any handles and wheels)
Includes items like a small trolley case, handbag, rucksack and laptop bag, but please check dimensions
Needs to fit under the seat in front of you
Maximum weight 15kg. You need to be able to lift and carry the bag yourself
Recommended reading:
Jet2 says: "You can bring one piece of hand luggage onboard free of charge, as long as it weighs no more than 10kg and is no larger than 56cm x 45cm x 25cm, including any wheels and handles."
Here's what you're allowed to bring on board when flying with British Airways:
1 cabin bag, max. 23kg (51lbs), up to 56×45×25cm (22 x 18 x 10in)
1 handbag or laptop bag, max. 23kg (51lbs), up to 40×30×15cm (16 x 12 x 6in)
Wizz Air allows two types of bags to be brought onboard, according to its website rules:
Free carry-on bag
Trolley bag (for WIZZ Priority holders)
It allows everyone one small carry-on bag, which should be placed under the seat, maximum size: 40 x 30 x 20 cm, 10kg.
Exceeding these dimensions will result in additional fees being charged.
Passengers have the choice to upgrade their hand luggage allowance at an extra cost.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EasyJet and Ryanair cancel hundreds of flights as chaos affects 300,000 flyers
EasyJet and Ryanair cancel hundreds of flights as chaos affects 300,000 flyers

Daily Mirror

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

EasyJet and Ryanair cancel hundreds of flights as chaos affects 300,000 flyers

EasyJet and Ryanair are among the airlines having to cancel flights due to disruption caused amidst strikes by French Air Traffic Controllers with 1,500 flights estimated to be affected EasyJet and Ryanair are amongst the airlines that were forced to cancel hundreds of flights due to strike action by French Air Traffic Controllers this week. Ryanair's CEO Michael O'Leary said that the airline had been forced to cancel over 400 flights due to the disruption, affecting over 70,000 passengers. Meanwhile easyJet had to cancel 274 flights across the two days. ‌ It's estimated that around 1,500 flights in total were cancelled or disrupted by the industrial action, with a quarter of flights at Paris Orly and Paris Charles de Gaulle reported to have been cancelled. ‌ The industrial action on Thursday 3 July and Friday 4 July is believed to have impacted around 300,000 passengers, with routes to airports including Paris, Lyon and Marseille all affected. The French Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC) asked for a reduction in airport capacity across the country, meaning airlines were left with no choice but to cancel flights. The UNSA-ICNA union - the second largest union for air traffic controllers in France - is calling for increased staffing levels and a pay rise. The third-largest ATC union, USAC-CGT, also issued a strike notice for Thursday 3 July. The move came on the eve of the school summer holidays in France. Unfortunately, passengers affected by air traffic control strikes may not be able to get all of their money back, as airlines may be able to claim 'extraordinary circumstances' ie that were out of their control, and therefore you may not be entitled to a full refund. READ MORE: Brits heading to Spain, France and Greece this summer issued '24-hour warning' According to the experts at MoneySuperMarket, you would only be eligible for extra compensation if you are made aware of strikes less than 14 days before the flight. However, that doesn't mean you'll be left fully out of pocket, as travel insurance may be able to cover you depending on when you booked your ticket. ‌ Kara Gammell, who works for the comparison site, explains: "As long as the airline strikes were announced after you booked your trip and your travel insurance, you may be able to claim through your insurer. Always check the terms and conditions of a policy before you buy it as not all travel insurance providers offer cover for airline strikes. "If your policy includes travel disruption cover though, then it might be possible to claim for disruption or losses incurred as a result of your trip being delayed or cancelled. This may include alternative accommodation, or expenses incurred such as travel, food and drink, and can even stretch to covering the full cost of your holiday should you end up not being able to go. "However, it is worth noting that not all policies cover this as standard and cover levels, conditions and exclusions can vary between providers, making it important to check with your insurer as your first port of call."

'I've been to 30 countries - one Scottish city doesn't have much to offer tourists'
'I've been to 30 countries - one Scottish city doesn't have much to offer tourists'

Daily Record

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

'I've been to 30 countries - one Scottish city doesn't have much to offer tourists'

A travel blogger who has visited 30 European countries has shared the places that disappointed her the most - including a surprising city in the UK Choosing the perfect vacation destination can be challenging. With options from serene beach resorts in Greece to vibrant city getaways in Rome, travellers have many choices. An experienced traveller who has visited over 30 countries could offer valuable insights to streamline your list. Tour guide Megan Arz has spent years living in Europe and has firm opinions about certain popular cities she'd prefer not to revisit. ‌ Get ready, her reviews are a little harsh on one popular UK hotspot - although others seem to love the place. ‌ 1. Frankfurt, Germany Taking to TikTok last year, she began her list with a 'semi-obvious' city that is 'so easy to punch down'. "That is Frankfurt, my neighbouring city here in Germany," she said, according to the Express. "Frankfurt does lack a lot of character, especially when you compare it to other cities in Germany and smaller towns. It's a banking centre and you can feel that. It's the centre of the European Central Bank and it just doesn't have that kind of warm and cosy feeling about it." Aside from this, Megan also mentioned the scarcity of good local beer and the prevalence of bankers, or 'financial bros'. She continued: "It just leads to the sense of like 'eh' - it's not that cool." 2. Pisa, Italy You might be surprised to learn that a well-known Italian destination was next on her list. Although she visited it quite a while ago, she criticised its 'cheap souvenirs, ' saying it's more suitable for a 'day trip' than a place to spend an entire week. ‌ In the 2024 video, Megan went on: "Can't wait for some super defensive Italians in my comments here, but Italy made the list this time around with Pisa. Now, admittedly, I only went to Pisa once and it was quite a while ago, but I don't remember there being anything to do in the town besides see the Leaning Tower of Pisa. "And that whole area around there is so mobbed with like cheap souvenirs and people trying to sell you things and pickpockets, and it just didn't have a very nice feeling about it." 3. Kiruna, Sweden Coming in third was Kiruna — a place you might not be familiar with. It is situated in northern Sweden, and Megan described the city as being in 'the middle of nowhere', with a population of just over 20,000. ‌ "You go there to hunt for Northern Lights, and you can visit the original ice hotel here," she continued. "But honestly, other than that, it's a mining town that's going through a major transition. "[...] But it's an odd place and definitely one of the most forgettable places that I've visited, sorry Kiruna!" 4. Prague, Czech Republic ‌ Unexpectedly, Prague also made her list, ranking fourth. Megan blamed her dislike on overtourism, numerous stag parties, and a feeling that all worth seeing could be done in one trip. "Prague in the Czech Republic [...] it's a city that has a lot of bachelor [and] bachelorette parties and it's suffering a bit from overtourism, which leads to this feeling of just like, 'What's going on here?'," she said. "I've only visited once, and while I would consider going back, I would only consider going back if I had a local perspective and someone who could show me other parts of it [...] I was there for five days before, and I kind of felt like I saw what I needed to see." ‌ 5. Inverness, Scotland Patriots, beware. The final highlight was a surprisingly unexpected city in the UK. While Megan appreciated her experiences there, she mainly saw it as a 'launching pad' for reaching other destinations. She said: "The last European city that I probably wouldn't visit again is Inverness in Scotland. I absolutely love Scotland and while I did have a good time in Inverness, it's quite a small city and doesn't have that much to offer from a tourist perspective. "It's a great jumping-off point for seeing the Highlands or visiting Speyside, but honestly after a couple of days there, I feel like I saw everything I needed to see and probably wouldn't come back for a return visit." ‌ Others on TikTok have loved Inverness, however. kalanighosthunter went to visit the Victorian Market there and was blown away with the food he found. He praised 'really tasty' fries with peppers on them. He also ate some Korean pulled beef dish that he said had 'so much flavour' that he said you could eat the meat on its own and it would still be delicious. And in the comments, others also raved about eating spots in the city - recommending a variety of spots he could visit. ‌ As expected, the reviews overall from Megan generated a surge of interest on TikTok, where many viewers shared their opinions about each location. One person wrote: "I super agree with you on Pisa! I was staying there for a day and I got soooo bored after seeing the leaning tower and main attractions and even that wasn't as impressive tbh." Another added: "Just got back from Inverness and I agree! It's a great place to base yourself to see the Highlands, but the city itself just isn't great." Despite this, others entirely disagreed with Megan's perspective, with one viewer writing: "I feel like putting smaller cities, Inverness and Pisa, in the same list as capital cities and big metropoles is a bit unfair." Someone else also said: "Inverness was our jumping off point to go explore the whole Isle of Skye! We stayed for three days but spent one full day exploring Skye and probably would've spent one more day there if we could've!"

ScotWind: Mingyang Smart Energy wind power project creates double-edged dilemma over security
ScotWind: Mingyang Smart Energy wind power project creates double-edged dilemma over security

Scotsman

time24 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

ScotWind: Mingyang Smart Energy wind power project creates double-edged dilemma over security

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... When the West of Orkney Wind Farm received planning permission from the Scottish Government last month, it was a rare bright spot for a sector that's been bruised by global economic headwinds and domestic regulatory uncertainty for over a year. The decision marks a key step forward in the project's plan for 125 wind turbines to be fixed to the seabed about 30 kilometres west of the Orkney mainland, allowing the generation of enough electricity to power two million homes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It also makes West of Orkney the first of 20 wind farms – collectively known as ScotWind – to be given such consent since Crown Estate Scotland awarded options to develop seabed acreage in the North Sea in 2022. The granting of onshore consent is a significant planning milestone for the Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm project. Yet while the decision will be welcomed by the project's backers – TotalEnergies of France, Renewables Infrastructure Development Group of the UK, and Corio Generation, part of Australia's Macquarie – the mood among most of the other ScotWind developers is anxious. That's because, a thousand miles away in London, consent of a different kind is pending that has greater consequences for the future of ScotWind. Westminster has for months been grappling with whether to allow a Chinese wind turbine manufacturer, Mingyang Smart Energy, to build a wind turbine blade factory in the Inverness area. The deliberations have widened to whether the Chinese company's kit should be used in the UK's offshore wind supply chain at all. The case in favour is economically compelling. Mingyang, like many businesses in China's green tech juggernaut, produces turbines more cheaply than its European rivals. Mingyang's factory would also create hundreds of green jobs in the North-east of Scotland. Small wonder that Holyrood has earmarked £30 million for the project. The investment from Mingyang would be around £120m, attractive for Labour as it tries to attract foreign investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The case against boils down to two issues: perceived security threats to the UK's critical national energy infrastructure and supply chain dependency. An aerial view shows wind turbine blades stored on the quayside ready for shipping at the Siemens Gamesa blade factory in Hull. Picture: Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images Concerns have been raised by MPs including Andrew Bowie, Nick Timothy, Christine Jardine and Harriet Cross that because the operational software embedded in a turbine remains in the control of the manufacturer after installation, the risk exists that a wind farm using Chinese turbines could be switched off, causing damage to downstream transmission and grid. Cyber espionage is another worry. Germany has already raised a red flag. A paper commissioned from the German Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies by the country's defence ministry this year said that the Waterkant wind farm off the German coast should not go ahead on the grounds of public safety, citing planned use of Chinese wind turbines. For anyone who still thinks this is far-fetched, it's worth reading two recently published government policy documents that lay out the stark geopolitical reality of our times. China is assessed in the Strategic Defence Review as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge', while the National Security Strategy says: 'Economic coercion will become more common as other states weaponise trade or use export controls and supply chain dependencies to gain advantage." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dependency stems from the fact that more than 60 per cent of ScotWind's wind farms are designed to be floating units in deep waters, unlike the fixed bottom technology used by West of Orkney. Mingyang specialises in floating turbines. The only other manufacturers in the game, Vestas and Siemens-Gamesa, are too financially constrained to develop floating turbines at scale any time soon. They are also busy fulfilling existing orders for fixed-bottom projects. This means that, without Mingyang, much of ScotWind is less likely to materialise, jeopardising the UK's overall offshore wind targets. The government now finds itself on the horns of a geopolitical dilemma. Sir Keir Starmer, on whose desk the Mingyang decision likely now sits, must now navigate between the White House's antipathy towards wind power – expressed yesterday in the gutting of Biden-era tax credits for wind and solar in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' – and China's desire to expand its wind power champions in Europe. Tension flared last month when China's embassy in London slammed as 'groundless' any 'so-called security concerns' over the use of Chinese wind equipment in the UK's energy infrastructure. This came after a report that Washington had warned London about national security risks associated with allowing Mingyang to build a plant in the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The dilemma is complicated by the fact that another Scottish offshore wind project, Green Volt, backed by Eni of Italy and Tokyo Electric Power Company, reportedly intends to use Mingyang turbines. It was the only successful bidder from Scotland at the last government auction that allocates offtake prices, meaning it is well advanced. Allowing Mingyang in with technical and legal safeguards would be one option. Another would be to incentivise Vestas and Siemens-Gamesa to ramp up floating wind turbine technology, providing more flexibility to developers. I understand one measure under consideration is sweetening the terms of the next auction to make it more viable to incorporate Siemens-Gamesa turbines in project plans. Germany might also look at channelling some of the up to €1 trillion recently approved as part of relaxing the 'debt brake' to upgrade its military and infrastructure for its own offshore wind champion, Siemens-Gamesa.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store