Bandt clings to Melbourne seat as members internally clash on party direction
The Greens are blaming the loss of at least two lower house seats on inconsistent and confusing messaging during the campaign, and members are debating whether the party should double down on its emphasis on the war in Gaza.
The party's leader, Adam Bandt, looks set to maintain his position despite a 5.4 per cent swing to Labor in his seat, as the party reckons with the 'devastating' losses of firebrand Griffith MP Max Chandler-Mather and his Brisbane colleague Stephen Bates.
The Greens still hope to retain the Queensland seat of Ryan, held by Elizabeth Watson-Brown who is in a complex three-horse race with the Liberals and Labor.
Melbourne's progressive inner-north seat of Wills, where former state Greens leader Samantha Ratnam is attempting to unseat Labor's Peter Khalil, is still too close to call, disappointing party strategists who hoped an advantageous redistribution would hand them a seat they have been trying to win for over a decade.
One source told this masthead that the possibility of winning at least three to five extra Senate seats was proof the minor party just needs to better define itself and advocate more on climate, Israel-Palestine and housing.
'There was inconsistent and confused messaging from within the party and it stemmed from a disagreement between those who wanted a more moderate approach and those who wanted to be bolder,' they said.
'We need to be bolder, we need to be seen as an alternative.'
However, another source argued the opposite.
'[We got] sucked into the culture wars, and when you do that, you don't win – you have to help people at the local level. You saw it in Brisbane and Griffiths in 2022,' they said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
Israel-Iran: How Donald Trump decided to back Israel's attacks on Iran
The first act of 'Les Misérables' had just ended at the Kennedy Center Wednesday night when Sen. Lindsey Graham (Republican, South Carolina) pulled President Trump aside for a quick conversation about Iran. Graham applauded the Trump administration's handling of the nuclear issue without people getting killed. 'Yeah, we're trying,' Trump said about the sputtering negotiations with Tehran. 'But sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do,' he said. Graham took that remark to mean Trump was referring to the possibility of an Israeli strike on its longtime enemy. The encounter came midway through a week that would see Trump go from trying to head off an Israeli attack to backing its sudden campaign of air strikes targeting Iran's nuclear facilities and senior military and civilian leaders, an abrupt shift that underscored the fraying prospects for a deal. Trump said Friday that he had been aware of Israel's attack plans and argued that the punishing operation makes a nuclear deal even more likely, though Iran said they were pulling out of a sixth round of talks scheduled for Sunday. 'They should have made a deal and they still can make a deal while they have something left — they still can,' Trump told The Wall Street Journal. Trump had seemed far less optimistic earlier in the week. On Sunday, he summoned his national-security team to Camp David and told them during a discussion on the Middle East that he was increasingly pessimistic Tehran would agree to a deal, according to US officials. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were due to speak the next day, and the president said he would tell the Israeli leader to delay any attacks until special envoy Steve Witkoff's diplomatic effort had run its course, US officials recounted. In a letter to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in March, Trump had set a two-month time limit once talks got under way to reach a deal, a deadline that was due to expire this week. But Khamenei rejected a US proposal to allow Iran to temporarily continue uranium enrichment in the country if it agreed to eventually halt its domestic centrifuge operation. Always in the background was Netanyahu's push to launch strikes against Iran's nuclear sites, a threat that loomed ever larger. In a call Monday with Netanyahu, Trump said he wanted to see diplomacy with Tehran play out a little longer, according to US officials. But even Trump was losing faith in his strategy. Netanyahu raised his oft-expressed objection that Iran wouldn't make the deal Trump wanted and that Israel needed to keep preparing strikes, the officials added. Trump seemed to internalise the message. 'I'm getting more and more — less confident about it,' he said of the prospects for a nuclear deal with Iran in a New York Post interview published Wednesday. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that is a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago.' Netanyahu had been seeking to head off a US-led negotiation with Iran over its nuclear program for years, arguing that only the destruction of its vast enrichment centrifuges and other facilities could guarantee Tehran wasn't secretly developing a bomb. The Israeli leader rejoiced when Trump in his first term tore up the 2015 nuclear deal brokered by then President Barack Obama, and he recoiled when Trump pushed for a tougher agreement during his second term in office. US intelligence agencies concluded in January that Israel was considering strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The intelligence analysis concluded Israel would push Trump's new team to back the assault, viewing the incoming president as more likely to join an attack than former President Joe Biden. The Israelis, according to the assessment, believed the window for halting Tehran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon was closing. In a sign of mounting concern about an Israeli attack and Iranian response, the State Department on Wednesday ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel from the US Embassy in Baghdad and authorised the departure of non-essential personnel and family members from Bahrain and Kuwait. At the same time, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the voluntary departure of military dependants from across the Middle East. Army Gen. Erik Kurilla, the top US commander in the Middle East, cancelled a congressional testimony scheduled for the next day and returned to Central Command's headquarters in Tampa. As anxiety grew in the Middle East and Washington, Trump was enjoying the performance of his favourite musical at the Kennedy Center, joined by Graham and other supporters. When Trump and Netanyahu spoke again on Thursday, the Israeli leader told Trump that it was the last day of his 60-day timeline for Iran to make a deal. Israel could wait no longer, Netanyahu said, according to officials familiar with the call. Israel had to defend itself and enforce the deadline Trump himself had set. Trump responded that the US wouldn't stand in the way, according to administration officials, but emphasised that the US military wouldn't assist with any offensive operations. At the White House, Trump told reporters he wouldn't describe an attack as imminent, 'but it is something that could very well happen.' While the US and Iran were close to a deal, he claimed, Israeli strikes could 'blow it.' Israel launched its operation as Trump was at a picnic Thursday evening on the White House grounds for members of Congress. He later joined Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Hegseth, and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and other senior officials in the Situation Room to monitor events. Israel had acted unilaterally and the US played no role in the attack, Rubio said in a statement that acknowledged Israel notified Washington before the operation began. That was the only comment from the US as the attack unfolded. Bombs struck and damaged a key Iranian nuclear facility at Natanz, and senior military leaders including Major Gen. Hossein Salami, commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, were killed. In all, Iran claimed that Israel's first attack killed 78 people and injured around 320 more in multiple waves of Israeli strikes. Netanyahu pledged that the operation would last for as long as necessary. Trump, who began the week resistant to an assault on Iran, quickly embraced it as a successful campaign that could boost his diplomatic effort. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left,' he posted on social media Friday, 'and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' Wall Street Journal Read related topics: Donald TrumpIsrael The Wall Street Journal The conflict in the Middle East is exacerbating a schism between conservatives over foreign policy. The Wall Street Journal Tehran's bruising fight with Israel has left its military weakened and unable to respond in kind to Israeli attacks.
Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Bad policy': Former ACTU President Bill Kelty condemns Chalmers super, unrealised gains tax as rancour mounts within Labor ranks
Well-known figure of the Australian Labor movement Bill Kelty has unloaded on the Albanese government, revealing his distaste at the proposed super, unrealised gains tax whilst railing against the excessive levies imposed on small businesses. Labor's plan to double the tax rate from 15 to 30 per cent on super accounts over $3 million is set to dominate the political arena when parliament resumes in late July. The policy, which includes targeting unrealised capital gains has sparked widespread furore from industry magnates, former Treasury and RBA officials and senior economists who have railed against the unprecedented nature of the move. Experts have expressed fierce disapproval of Labor's insistence to target unrealised capital gains, of which are often fleeting and illusory and have stated the policy will undermine confidence in the superannuation industry. Mr Kelty, who served as the President of the Australian Council of Trade Unions from 1983 to 2000 lashed the move as 'bad policy' and said taxing gains that a person had not yet realised in their own accounts was flawed. 'I don't mind taxing people but not unrealised earnings,' Mr Kelty told The Australian. Mr Kelty, who was an influential force in legislating compulsory superannuation alongside former Labor Prime Minister Paul Keating said pursuing unrealised gains would establish a dangerous precedent and undermine the entire concept of super. 'I think taxing unrealised capital gains is bad policy. It distorts the effective tax. Changes your income flows, and if it was on superannuation generally, there would be a revolution about it. It would destroy super.' The ex-trade union boss also attacked Treasurer Jim Chalmers' argument that the changes would only impact 0.5 per cent of superannuants, and argued the policy itself was fundamentally errored in principle. 'If you want to tax rich people in this way, why wouldn't you actually reform the tax system?' Mr Kelty questioned. "This is a circuitous revolution against the rich, is it? It seems a strange thing to do. Bad policy is bad policy – for rich or poor.' Mr Kelty called on the government to instead turn its attention to reforming the mounting tax burden lumped on small businesses and said that operators faced an impossible system to navigate. 'You have got to keep records of this, records of that. You have got to go to your accountant to get depreciation scales for this and that. You have got to keep logbooks for your car. You have got to employ people to collect and maintain all your records. You have got to go to your accountant. You're making $100,000 a year, and $10,000 of that is to try and operate your tax system. Labor has also resisted repeated calls to index the $3 million threshold, with experts despairing that younger Australians would fall victim to the tax due to CPI and wage shifts over the coming decades. The contentious policy is expected to pass both houses of parliament unopposed, with the Greens set to join forces with Labor in the Senate.
The Advertiser
8 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Concerns over US AUKUS review dismissed by deputy PM
Doubts over Australia's submarine deal with the US have been hosed down by the deputy prime minister. Richard Marles again doused concerns about the future of the three-nation pact also involving the United Kingdom, as the Trump administration reviews AUKUS. The Pentagon is considering whether the agreement aligns with Donald Trump's "America First" agenda. Mr Marles on Saturday drew a parallel to Australia's own defence reviews that occur with changes in government, suggesting similar evaluations are a normal part of alliances. His comments follow the arrival of the USS America in Sydney on a goodwill visit on Saturday. "When we came to government, we did a review of our defence posture ... AUKUS was a key part of that, just as the British did when the new British Labor government came into power in July last year," Mr Marles told reporters in Geelong. "It is a very natural thing for an incoming government to engage in a review of this kind. It is actually exactly what we did. That's what the Trump administration are doing, we welcome it and we'll engage with it." Opposition Defence spokesman Angus Taylor, who was on the USS America as it made its way though the Sydney Heads, also stressed the critical nature of the US alliance. However he additionally emphasised the importance of adequate funding to support the objectives of the AUKUS. "We call on the government to make sure they engage with the United States to ensure AUKUS is successful into the future," Mr Taylor said. The AUKUS pact is aimed at countering China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. A key component of the pact is the provision for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, a capability deemed essential by the government for bolstering national security. Under the $368 billion submarine program, Australia is set to acquire at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class subs from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet is built for delivery from the 2040s. Australia has already demonstrated its commitment to the AUKUS partnership, paying almost $800 million to the US in February - the first of a number of payments - to help boost its submarine production. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese left Australia on Friday for the G7 summit in Canada but it is unclear if he will be able to secure a meeting with President Trump while there. Mr Albanese previously rebuffed calls from the US for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Doubts over Australia's submarine deal with the US have been hosed down by the deputy prime minister. Richard Marles again doused concerns about the future of the three-nation pact also involving the United Kingdom, as the Trump administration reviews AUKUS. The Pentagon is considering whether the agreement aligns with Donald Trump's "America First" agenda. Mr Marles on Saturday drew a parallel to Australia's own defence reviews that occur with changes in government, suggesting similar evaluations are a normal part of alliances. His comments follow the arrival of the USS America in Sydney on a goodwill visit on Saturday. "When we came to government, we did a review of our defence posture ... AUKUS was a key part of that, just as the British did when the new British Labor government came into power in July last year," Mr Marles told reporters in Geelong. "It is a very natural thing for an incoming government to engage in a review of this kind. It is actually exactly what we did. That's what the Trump administration are doing, we welcome it and we'll engage with it." Opposition Defence spokesman Angus Taylor, who was on the USS America as it made its way though the Sydney Heads, also stressed the critical nature of the US alliance. However he additionally emphasised the importance of adequate funding to support the objectives of the AUKUS. "We call on the government to make sure they engage with the United States to ensure AUKUS is successful into the future," Mr Taylor said. The AUKUS pact is aimed at countering China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. A key component of the pact is the provision for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, a capability deemed essential by the government for bolstering national security. Under the $368 billion submarine program, Australia is set to acquire at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class subs from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet is built for delivery from the 2040s. Australia has already demonstrated its commitment to the AUKUS partnership, paying almost $800 million to the US in February - the first of a number of payments - to help boost its submarine production. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese left Australia on Friday for the G7 summit in Canada but it is unclear if he will be able to secure a meeting with President Trump while there. Mr Albanese previously rebuffed calls from the US for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Doubts over Australia's submarine deal with the US have been hosed down by the deputy prime minister. Richard Marles again doused concerns about the future of the three-nation pact also involving the United Kingdom, as the Trump administration reviews AUKUS. The Pentagon is considering whether the agreement aligns with Donald Trump's "America First" agenda. Mr Marles on Saturday drew a parallel to Australia's own defence reviews that occur with changes in government, suggesting similar evaluations are a normal part of alliances. His comments follow the arrival of the USS America in Sydney on a goodwill visit on Saturday. "When we came to government, we did a review of our defence posture ... AUKUS was a key part of that, just as the British did when the new British Labor government came into power in July last year," Mr Marles told reporters in Geelong. "It is a very natural thing for an incoming government to engage in a review of this kind. It is actually exactly what we did. That's what the Trump administration are doing, we welcome it and we'll engage with it." Opposition Defence spokesman Angus Taylor, who was on the USS America as it made its way though the Sydney Heads, also stressed the critical nature of the US alliance. However he additionally emphasised the importance of adequate funding to support the objectives of the AUKUS. "We call on the government to make sure they engage with the United States to ensure AUKUS is successful into the future," Mr Taylor said. The AUKUS pact is aimed at countering China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. A key component of the pact is the provision for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, a capability deemed essential by the government for bolstering national security. Under the $368 billion submarine program, Australia is set to acquire at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class subs from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet is built for delivery from the 2040s. Australia has already demonstrated its commitment to the AUKUS partnership, paying almost $800 million to the US in February - the first of a number of payments - to help boost its submarine production. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese left Australia on Friday for the G7 summit in Canada but it is unclear if he will be able to secure a meeting with President Trump while there. Mr Albanese previously rebuffed calls from the US for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Doubts over Australia's submarine deal with the US have been hosed down by the deputy prime minister. Richard Marles again doused concerns about the future of the three-nation pact also involving the United Kingdom, as the Trump administration reviews AUKUS. The Pentagon is considering whether the agreement aligns with Donald Trump's "America First" agenda. Mr Marles on Saturday drew a parallel to Australia's own defence reviews that occur with changes in government, suggesting similar evaluations are a normal part of alliances. His comments follow the arrival of the USS America in Sydney on a goodwill visit on Saturday. "When we came to government, we did a review of our defence posture ... AUKUS was a key part of that, just as the British did when the new British Labor government came into power in July last year," Mr Marles told reporters in Geelong. "It is a very natural thing for an incoming government to engage in a review of this kind. It is actually exactly what we did. That's what the Trump administration are doing, we welcome it and we'll engage with it." Opposition Defence spokesman Angus Taylor, who was on the USS America as it made its way though the Sydney Heads, also stressed the critical nature of the US alliance. However he additionally emphasised the importance of adequate funding to support the objectives of the AUKUS. "We call on the government to make sure they engage with the United States to ensure AUKUS is successful into the future," Mr Taylor said. The AUKUS pact is aimed at countering China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. A key component of the pact is the provision for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, a capability deemed essential by the government for bolstering national security. Under the $368 billion submarine program, Australia is set to acquire at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class subs from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet is built for delivery from the 2040s. Australia has already demonstrated its commitment to the AUKUS partnership, paying almost $800 million to the US in February - the first of a number of payments - to help boost its submarine production. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese left Australia on Friday for the G7 summit in Canada but it is unclear if he will be able to secure a meeting with President Trump while there. Mr Albanese previously rebuffed calls from the US for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
