Doctor's plea to Irish Government to help get mobile children's hospital into Gaza
A BRITISH-AUSTRALIAN doctor who has recently spent time working in Gaza is appealing to the Irish government to help lead the charge to get mobile hospitals into the besieged territory.
Dr Mohammad Mustafa was invited to present to TDs, Senators, and their staff today in Leinster House by Independent Senator Lynn Ruane.
Dr Mo, as he is known, told Oireachtas members of the sheer horror he witnessed during his time working in Gaza.
The emergency medical doctor volunteered with the Palestinian Australian New Zealand Medical Association at al-Ahli Arab hospital, also known as the Baptist hospital.
He explained how this hospital was never supposed to be relied on as a main hospital, but now it is the epicentre of healthcare in Gaza City, catering to almost a million people.
'The emergency room is 15m long and about 5m wide…That would be a corridor that should fit eight beds but we would have to fit 150 people on the floor.'
The situation is so dire that while Dr Mo was working there, he was the only doctor with a thermometer.
Five days after he left Gaza, Israel
bombed the hospital
, destroying the emergency room.
'It was the only emergency department that was functioning in the whole of Gaza City. With their own bare hands, they managed to clear the rubble and have put a tent in its place.
'The healthcare system is going to turn into tents. And it's not hygienic, it's not sterile. The worry is that as more and more of the healthcare system gets eroded, that's all that will be left, and more and more people will die,' Dr Mo said.
Thirty-six of Gaza's 38 hospitals have been destroyed.
Since leaving Gaza, Dr Mo has been campaigning across the globe to get governments to back plans to get mobile hospitals into Gaza.
The mobile hospitals are refurbished solar-powered modular buildings with operating theatres, a pharmacy, a cafeteria and a kitchen. In particular, Dr Mo is campaigning to get a 100-bed children's hospital in as well as a maternity and neonatal hospital.
'Once this hospital gets driven into Gaza, it's assembled like a jigsaw puzzle and you have this semi-permanent structure that's air-conditioned, fully equipped with state-of-the-art medical equipment. With running sewage, running water, self-sufficient,' Dr Mo explained.
The aid project is being led by an organisation called Pious Projects and would operate in coordination with the UN, the World Health Organisation, UNICEF and the Gaza Health Cluster.
But what Dr Mo is pushing for is backing from governments internationally to help get the mobile hospitals' entry into Gaza. He said governmental support is needed to give the project legitimacy at a time when NGO [Non-governmental organisation] workers are being killed in Gaza.
'This is the way that we need to start thinking about doing healthcare, we need to start bringing hospitals into Gaza. We can't just bring in pocket ultrasounds with whichever doctors come in, and a stethoscope and a thermometer. We need to bring the whole hospital in,' he said.
'We've got the infrastructure in place in Jordan to do this. We have got the willingness of the Jordanian government to help with this. And we already have a maternity and neonatal hospital ready to go.
Advertisement
'And when we bring in these hospitals, we bring in a whole team of doctors, nurses. It's fully equipped.'
Dr Mo explained that he has travelled to Ireland to get as much support as possible.
'This needs to be a government-led initiative. It cannot be an NGO initiative.
'With NGOs, NGOs get bombed.
'NGOs don't have the leverage to break the siege, but governments do.
'Even the UN doesn't, because the UN has almost been outplayed and pushed aside by the US and Israel. And their legitimacy has been eroded away. This is a way we can get legitimacy back into the systems in Gaza,' he said.
Dr Mo said the project would be done with the support of UN agencies but that it needs the oversight from international governments who are willing to help run and oversee the security and logistics.
'We're not asking for funding because I understand that could be contentious, but what we are trying to do is take away all the variables. The maternity hospital is already in Jordan, ready to go in. We just need help to get it in.
'The next project that we have is a pediatric hospital, which will be a similar set up to this. And that's the hospital that we want all governments to get involved in.
'We already have the blueprint in place and we're at the end stages of securing funding.
'What we need right is the legitimacy, and the oversight, and the political leverage of governments to get involved.'
Healthcare workers
Speaking about his experience in Gaza, Dr Mo said the healthcare workers on the ground are exhausted.
'When I was there the last time, over half the workers had jaundice because they had hepatitis A from dirty drinking water.
'Most of these healthcare workers were living in tents because their homes had been destroyed, so they would leave their tents to come to work and do a full 24-hour shift.
'Sometimes, while some of these healthcare workers were working, their entire families were killed. They are working under the most stressful conditions.'
Dr Mo argued that healthcare workers in Gaza need more support.
'They have been carrying a load for the last two years that is unbearable.
'I was there for over a month and I was exhausted. I can only imagine what it is like to do that for two years, not having a warm bed to go home to, not knowing if your kids are going to be safe when you go to work, walking through demilitarised zones to get to work where you could be shot at, this is a way to help them as well.
'This is a way we can help those heroes in Gaza by giving them a hospital and allowing them to rest while we pick up some of the load.'
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Tánaiste Simon Harris have been contacted for comment.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
32 minutes ago
- The Journal
Ireland has third lowest childhood vaccine coverage among high-income nations
IRELAND HAS THE third lowest childhood vaccine coverage among high-income nations globally. It also has the sixth lowest coverage among the countries on the European continent and the second lowest among western European nations. And while there's been a stark 75% global decline since 1980 in the number of children who had never received a routine childhood vaccine, Ireland has the seventh highest number of so called 'zero-dose' children in Western Europe. In 2019 before the onset of the Covid pandemic, the 'zero-dose' count was 2,460 – this more than doubled to 4,942 in 2023. With childhood vaccination coverage of 91%, Ireland is below the 95% milestone needed for herd immunity and is someway off its 2030 target of 97.7%. The findings have been complied in an article in The Lancet on childhood vaccination coverage globally between 1980 and 2023. 'Scare mongering' Dr Illona Duffy, a GP based in Monaghan, said that while her practice is 'quite good' in terms of childhood vaccination rates, it isn't at 95%. The 95% figure is important because this is the threshold at which there is herd immunity against a number of contagious diseases. Duffy said that by not vaccinating your child, 'you're not only leaving your own child at risk, but others'. 'If we achieve high rates of vaccines we get herd immunity,' said Duffy. 'By having lots of people vaccinated, it keeps the amount of these disease in the community low, therefore it drops everybody's risk of getting them and protects everybody.' When asked why Ireland ranks so lowly in childhood vaccination coverage, Duffy pointed to three issues. The first is parents putting off vaccines because other things get in the way and eventually it drops off the radar. The second is vaccine refusals and the third issue is somewhat similar – vaccine refusal among parents of Eastern European origin in particular. A 2022 European Commission report said that 'steep declines in vaccines confidence are a worrying trend most notable in Eastern and Central Europe, the Baltics, and Netherlands'. It added that 'perceptions towards vaccines in general remain low' in these regions. Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ukraine, North Macedonia and Austria were the European nations to have lower childhood vaccine coverage than Ireland as of 2023. Misinformation Duffy said this vaccine refusal is the result of 'a lot of scare mongering around vaccines', much of which is based on widely debunked misinformation. For example, Duffy saif that when she asks vaccine hesitant parents about their concerns, 'most of them are getting it from blogs and they're still talking about concerns of the MMR vaccine causing autism'. 'There is no link between the MMR vaccine and autism,' said Duffy, 'yet that fallacy continues.' This myth can be traced back to a now-retracted Lancet article by Andrew Wakefield, a British conspiracy theorist who was then a research doctor, that was published in 1998. The Wakefield paper has been described as 'perhaps, the most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years' and multiple subsequent studies attempting to replicate Wakefield's findings were unable to find a link between vaccines and autism. However, Duffy told The Journal that public information campaigns refuting this 'remains poor' and warned that when something has 'become ingrained into certain people's belief, it's very hard to reverse that negative commentary'. She also pointed to an increase in vaccine refusal following the Covid pandemic and warned that a 'huge amount' of scepticism is coming from social media. 'I tell them, 'people who are happy with the vaccines and have no side effects don't put this up on social media, so you're not actually seeing real data and you're seeing a lot of scare mongering'.' Advertisement She also called for greater messaging towards women during pregnancy because 'uptakes of vaccines that are encouraged for pregnant women tend to be low'. Duffy also called on the HSE to study the cohorts who are not vaccinating and to carry out research on what their fears are in order to allay them. Individual Health Identifier Kingston Mills is a Professor of Experimental Immunology at Trinity College Dublin. He said part of the reason for the low vaccine rates is the lack of an integrated patient identifier number 'to keeps tabs on whatever a person gets in terms of medicines and vaccines'. 'If somebody moves from a GP practice or moves location, the records don't normally travel with them' said Mills. 'So we're relying on the parent to remember whether they have done something or not.' He said a patient identifier number with the records of vaccines taken would enable for the public to be issued with reminders to get vaccinated. 'It's much more haphazard here,' said Mills, 'where you're relying on PR campaigns or GP and school systems to make sure people get vaccinated.' And before he commented on The Lancet article, Mills said he wanted to stress that the measles vaccine is 'incredibly effective'. 'It's 99% effective so your chances of getting measles if you've had two doses of that vaccine are extremely low.' He noted that there was an epidemic of Measles in Europe last year. Some 127,350 measles cases were reported in the European Region in 2024 – double the number reported for 2023 and the highest number seen since 1997. Of the cases in Europe last year with a known vaccination status, 90% of children between the ages of one and four were unvaccinated. In 2023, 89.2% of junior infants had received their MMR vaccine which protects against measles, a considerable margin short of the 95% needed for herd immunity. 'If you're not vaccinated, your chances of getting measles are substantially higher than if you are vaccinated', Mills noted. He added that The Lancet article 'comes as no surprise'. 'I have no information that's got a scientific basis to tell you the reason behind it,' said Mills, 'other than it's possibly vaccine hesitancy.' He added: 'You don't need to be a scientist or medic to figure out that if parents don't take their children to get vaccinated, they're increasing the risk of their children getting measles.' 'Challenges' In a statement to The Journal , the HSE said it 'remains committed to reversing recent declines in vaccine uptake and ensuring every child has access to life-saving vaccines'. While the HSE said 'significant progress' has been made in childhood vaccination coverage in Ireland, it acknowledged that 'recent years have brought challenges, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic'. The HSE also pointed to the 2024-2027 Strategic Plan launched by its National Immunisation Office. The HSE said this plan 'sets out a clear roadmap to work with partners to achieve a 95% uptake of all routine childhood vaccines'. It also aims to reduce the number of children who have not received any routine childhood vaccines and to support healthcare professionals in identifying under-immunised children. The plan also sets out to improve the ability to monitor the uptake of childhood immunisations, and strengthen vaccine delivery in clinical and community settings, particularly in areas or communities where uptake is lowest. The HSE added that 'clear, empathetic communication with parents and caregivers is essential to building trust and confidence in vaccines'. The spokesperson said the HSE is working closely with stakeholders, such as GPs and schools, to 'expand access, maintain and build vaccine confidence, and deliver equitable immunisation services'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Blanket bans on smartphones are not the answer
Smartphones and social media are recurring features in the ongoing debates on declining mental health among young people. Earlier this month, the Irish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study reported nearly half of young people 'feel low' at least weekly . Invariably, any discussion on young people's mental health moves quickly to smartphones and social media, and the conclusion that the digital lives of young people are linked to a decline in their happiness. But we may be too quick to jump to conclusions on this. In truth, the evidence is limited. Links between the digital lives of children and adolescents and their mental wellbeing are often based on correlative data with few longitudinal or experimental studies. Studies don't always clearly separate how different types of smartphone or social media use affect young people, and they often don't distinguish between using a phone for learning versus mindlessly scrolling. There are likely positive and negative aspects to online activities, but sweeping conclusions and reactionary policies ignore this important nuance. A lot of the commentary around smartphone use in young people frames it as a post-pandemic problem, with increased screen time and online distractions seen as linked to lockdown-induced dependency. But this ignores digital educational policies established well before the pandemic, which encouraged the use of student-owned devices, particularly to support classroom learning. READ MORE Policy guidance laid important groundwork for the informal incorporation of smartphones into educational settings, particularly in schools where resources are tight and there isn't always access to 1:1 laptop or tablet schemes. Implementation often relied on devices students already owned – in most cases, this meant a smartphone. The increasing presence of smartphones in schools is less a byproduct of the pandemic and more a foreseeable consequence of earlier policy directions that were often reactive and technologically permissive. Media coverage of smartphone use in recent years has focused on, and often celebrated, more restrictive responses. Sweden, for example, has moved towards banning smartphones in primary classrooms, aligning with broader efforts to refocus on traditional forms of learning. Minister for Education Helen McEntee recently issued circulars requiring schools to implement a policy to restrict the use of, and access to, personal mobile phones by students for the duration of the school day at post primary level and a full ban at primary level. In 2024, the Australian government passed a new law which introduces a mandatory minimum age of 16 for accounts on some social media platforms. Controversially, parents cannot give their consent to under-16s to use these platforms, marking a new departure in terms of parents' rights. At a surface level, such actions offer clear, decisive action in the face of complex technological challenges, and resonate with public anxieties about youth wellbeing. But they're fraught with practical, human rights and ethical implications. Age verification systems can be circumvented and bans also risk pushing young users on to less-regulated platforms or creating generational disconnects in digital literacy. Blanket bans on smartphones, social media access and other digital activities overlook both the complexity of the issues and the realities of young people's lives. Restrictive policies and a one-size-fits-all approach may inadvertently exacerbate inequalities. Mobile devices and social media can serve as essential tools for safety, communication and family co-ordination, especially for older adolescents needing greater independence. Digital tools such as the language-learning app Duolingo, interactive Stem app Brilliant and online chess have opened up access to educational and enrichment opportunities that were once limited to wealthier families. These tools can give children from lower-income households a chance to learn languages, engage in advanced problem-solving, and develop critical-thinking skills. While regulatory efforts may form part of a broader digital policy toolkit, bans alone are a blunt instrument and probably ineffective. They do little to address the underlying needs that drive youth engagement with smartphones; the human desire for social connection, access to information and autonomy. So what can we do? A more effective response must be holistic: combining regulation with education, digital literacy and the co-creation of safe digital spaces that support both protection and participation. Collective action and voluntary agreements among parents of primary schoolchildren to delay children's access to smartphones can play an important role. The 'no smartphone' initiatives seen in parts of Ireland are a promising grassroots approach to addressing concerns around digital overexposure, cyberbullying and mental health. These agreements can help to reduce peer pressure and create a more uniform standard that benefits all children. Ideally, they should begin during primary school when habits and digital behaviours are still forming. Early implementation not only delays premature exposure to potentially harmful online environments, but also lays the groundwork for more responsible and mindful smartphone use in adolescence, supported by ongoing digital literacy education and parental involvement. Investment in education-based initiatives, such as the Webwise programme, can empower young people and their families to navigate the digital world safely. Safer Internet Day, which is held annually in more than 180 countries, presents a valuable opportunity to promote responsible online behaviour through schools and community engagement. Acceptable use policies, widely used across educational contexts, also present significant potential as instruments for guiding responsible smartphone and social media engagement among young people and advancing digital wellbeing. Of course we need to implement stronger regulations for the technology sector, including setting quality standards for children's content, controlling data extraction and algorithms and enforcing stricter privacy laws. But technology is part of contemporary life, and it is continuously evolving. Simply trying to ban it won't work. Policymakers must adopt a flexible approach that maximises its benefits while safeguarding young people from potential risks. Selina McCoy is professor in Sociology at the Economic and Social Research Institute and Ann Marcus-Quinn is associate professor in Technical Communication at the University of Limerick
The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
Doctor's plea to Irish Government to help get mobile children's hospital into Gaza
A BRITISH-AUSTRALIAN doctor who has recently spent time working in Gaza is appealing to the Irish government to help lead the charge to get mobile hospitals into the besieged territory. Dr Mohammad Mustafa was invited to present to TDs, Senators, and their staff today in Leinster House by Independent Senator Lynn Ruane. Dr Mo, as he is known, told Oireachtas members of the sheer horror he witnessed during his time working in Gaza. The emergency medical doctor volunteered with the Palestinian Australian New Zealand Medical Association at al-Ahli Arab hospital, also known as the Baptist hospital. He explained how this hospital was never supposed to be relied on as a main hospital, but now it is the epicentre of healthcare in Gaza City, catering to almost a million people. 'The emergency room is 15m long and about 5m wide…That would be a corridor that should fit eight beds but we would have to fit 150 people on the floor.' The situation is so dire that while Dr Mo was working there, he was the only doctor with a thermometer. Five days after he left Gaza, Israel bombed the hospital , destroying the emergency room. 'It was the only emergency department that was functioning in the whole of Gaza City. With their own bare hands, they managed to clear the rubble and have put a tent in its place. 'The healthcare system is going to turn into tents. And it's not hygienic, it's not sterile. The worry is that as more and more of the healthcare system gets eroded, that's all that will be left, and more and more people will die,' Dr Mo said. Thirty-six of Gaza's 38 hospitals have been destroyed. Since leaving Gaza, Dr Mo has been campaigning across the globe to get governments to back plans to get mobile hospitals into Gaza. The mobile hospitals are refurbished solar-powered modular buildings with operating theatres, a pharmacy, a cafeteria and a kitchen. In particular, Dr Mo is campaigning to get a 100-bed children's hospital in as well as a maternity and neonatal hospital. 'Once this hospital gets driven into Gaza, it's assembled like a jigsaw puzzle and you have this semi-permanent structure that's air-conditioned, fully equipped with state-of-the-art medical equipment. With running sewage, running water, self-sufficient,' Dr Mo explained. The aid project is being led by an organisation called Pious Projects and would operate in coordination with the UN, the World Health Organisation, UNICEF and the Gaza Health Cluster. But what Dr Mo is pushing for is backing from governments internationally to help get the mobile hospitals' entry into Gaza. He said governmental support is needed to give the project legitimacy at a time when NGO [Non-governmental organisation] workers are being killed in Gaza. 'This is the way that we need to start thinking about doing healthcare, we need to start bringing hospitals into Gaza. We can't just bring in pocket ultrasounds with whichever doctors come in, and a stethoscope and a thermometer. We need to bring the whole hospital in,' he said. 'We've got the infrastructure in place in Jordan to do this. We have got the willingness of the Jordanian government to help with this. And we already have a maternity and neonatal hospital ready to go. Advertisement 'And when we bring in these hospitals, we bring in a whole team of doctors, nurses. It's fully equipped.' Dr Mo explained that he has travelled to Ireland to get as much support as possible. 'This needs to be a government-led initiative. It cannot be an NGO initiative. 'With NGOs, NGOs get bombed. 'NGOs don't have the leverage to break the siege, but governments do. 'Even the UN doesn't, because the UN has almost been outplayed and pushed aside by the US and Israel. And their legitimacy has been eroded away. This is a way we can get legitimacy back into the systems in Gaza,' he said. Dr Mo said the project would be done with the support of UN agencies but that it needs the oversight from international governments who are willing to help run and oversee the security and logistics. 'We're not asking for funding because I understand that could be contentious, but what we are trying to do is take away all the variables. The maternity hospital is already in Jordan, ready to go in. We just need help to get it in. 'The next project that we have is a pediatric hospital, which will be a similar set up to this. And that's the hospital that we want all governments to get involved in. 'We already have the blueprint in place and we're at the end stages of securing funding. 'What we need right is the legitimacy, and the oversight, and the political leverage of governments to get involved.' Healthcare workers Speaking about his experience in Gaza, Dr Mo said the healthcare workers on the ground are exhausted. 'When I was there the last time, over half the workers had jaundice because they had hepatitis A from dirty drinking water. 'Most of these healthcare workers were living in tents because their homes had been destroyed, so they would leave their tents to come to work and do a full 24-hour shift. 'Sometimes, while some of these healthcare workers were working, their entire families were killed. They are working under the most stressful conditions.' Dr Mo argued that healthcare workers in Gaza need more support. 'They have been carrying a load for the last two years that is unbearable. 'I was there for over a month and I was exhausted. I can only imagine what it is like to do that for two years, not having a warm bed to go home to, not knowing if your kids are going to be safe when you go to work, walking through demilitarised zones to get to work where you could be shot at, this is a way to help them as well. 'This is a way we can help those heroes in Gaza by giving them a hospital and allowing them to rest while we pick up some of the load.' The Department of Foreign Affairs and Tánaiste Simon Harris have been contacted for comment. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
